2,844
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Economic losses due to earthquake - induced structural damages in RC SMRF structures

& | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1296529 | Received 02 Nov 2016, Accepted 14 Feb 2017, Published online: 01 Mar 2017

References

  • ACI-318. (2008). Building code requirements for structural concrete, Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
  • Ahmad, N., Ali, Q., Crowley, H., & Pinho, R. (2014). Earthquake loss estimation of residential buildings in Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 73, 1889–1955.10.1007/s11069-014-1174-8
  • Ahmad, N., Rashid, M., & Waqas, A. (2016). Quasi-static cyclic tests on special moment resisting beams (Technical Report). Peshawar: Earthquake Engineering Center, UET Peshawar.
  • Ali, S. M., Khan, A. N., Rahman, S., & Reinhorn, A. M. (2011). A survey of damages to bridges in Pakistan after the major earthquake of 8 October 2005. Earthquake Spectra, 27, 947–970.
  • Avouac, J., Ayoub, F., Leprince, S., Konca, O., & Helmberger, D. V. (2006). The 2005 Mw 7.6 Kashmir earthquake: Sub–pixel correlation of ASTER images and seismic waveforms analysis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 249, 514–528.10.1016/j.epsl.2006.06.025
  • BCP-07. (2007). Building code of Pakistan – seismic provisions. Islamabad: Ministry of Housing & Works.
  • Bearman, C. F. (2012). Post-earthquake assessment of reinforced concrete frames (M.S. Thesis). Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Bilham, R. (2004). Earthquakes in India and in the Himalaya: Tectonic, geodesy, and history. Annals of Geophysics, 47, 839–858.
  • Bossio, A., Fabbrocino, F., Lignola, G. P., Prota, A., & Manfredi, G. (2015). Simplified model for strengthening design of beam–column internal joints in reinforced concrete frames. Polymers, 7, 1732–1754.10.3390/polym7091479
  • Bothara, J. K., & Hicyilmas, K. M. O. (2008). General observations of building behavior during the 8th October 2005 Pakistan earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 41, 209–233.
  • Chang-Richards, A., Vargo, J., & Seville, E. (2013). Organizational resilience to natural disasters: New Zealand’s Experience. China Policy Review, 10, 117–119.
  • EC-8. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. CEN, Brussels.
  • FEMA P-58. (2012). Next-generation methodology for seismic performance assessment of buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  • Formisano, A., Di Feo, P., Grippa, M. R., & Florio, G. (2010). L’Aquila earthquake: A survey in the historical centre of Castelvecchio Subequo. In COST ACTION C26: Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events - Proceedings of the Final Conference (pp. 371–376). Prague.
  • Formisano, A., & Mazzolani, F. M. (2015). On the selection by MCDM methods of the optimal system for seismic retrofitting and vertical addition of existing buildings. Computers and Structures, 159, 1–13.10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.06.016
  • Guin, J., & Saxena, V. (2002). Extreme losses from natural disasters – earthquakes, tropical cyclone and extratropical cyclones (Technical Report). Boston, MA: Air WorldWide.
  • Hamburger, R. O., & Moehle, J. P. (2000). State of performance based-engineering in the united state. Proceedings of the second US-Japan workshop on performance-based design methodology for reinforced concrete building structures, Sapporo.
  • Haselton, C. B., Whittaker, A. S., Baker, J. W., Bray, J., & Grant, D. N. (2012). Selecting and scaling earthquake ground motions for performance response history analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa.
  • Indirli, M., Kouris, L. A. S., Formisano, A., Borg, R. P., & Mazzolani, F. M. (2013). Seismic damage assessment of unreinforced masonry structures after the Abruzzo 2009 earthquake: The case study of the historical centers of l'aquila and castelvecchio subequo. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 7, 536–578.10.1080/15583058.2011.654050
  • Kam, W. Y., Pampanin, S., Dhakal, R. P., Gavin, H., & Roeder, C. W. (2010). Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the September 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquakes. Bulletin of New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering, 43, 340–350.
  • Kam, W. Y., Pampanin, S., & Elwood, K. (2011). Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch (Lyttelton) earthquake. Bulletin of New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering, 43, 239–278.
  • Kircher, C. A., Nassar, A. A., Kustu, O., & Holmes, W. T. (1997). Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation. Earthquake Spectra, 13 663–682.10.1193/1.1585974
  • Lukkunaprasit, P., & Sittipunt, C. (2003). Ductility enhancement of moderately confined concrete tied columns with hook-clips. ACI Structural Journal, 100, 422–429.
  • Mahin, S. (2016). Resilience by design: A structural engineering perspective. Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago.
  • Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114, 1804–1826.
  • Moehle, J. P., & Deierlein, G. G. (2004). A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Paper No. 679.
  • Nanto, D. K., Cooper, W. H., Donnelly, J. M., & Johnson, R. (2011). Japan’s 2011 earthquake and tsunami: economic effects and implications for the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service Report for Congress.
  • Naseer, A., Khan, A., Hussain, Z., & Ali, Q. (2010). Observed seismic behavior of buildings in Northern Pakistan during the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 26, 425–449.10.1193/1.3383119
  • NZS-3101. (2006). Concrete structures standard. Wellington, NZ: Standards New Zealand.
  • Pampanin, S. (2009). Alternative performance-based retrofit strategies and solutions for existing rc buildings. In A. Ilki, F. Karadogan, P. Pala, & E. Yuksel (Eds.), Seismic risk assessment and retrofitting, geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering10 (pp. 267–295). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-90-481-2681-1
  • Pampanin, S. (2012). Reality-check and renewed challenges in earthquake engineering: Implementing low-damage systems-from theory to practice. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 45, 267–295.
  • Pinho, R. (2007). Nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures subjected to seismic action. In A. Pecker (Ed.), Advanced earthquake engineering analysis (pp. 66–89). Udine: CISM Udine.
  • Rashid, M. (2016). Earthquake induced damages in modern reinforced concrete special moment resisting frames: Repair-ability and cost implications (MSc Thesis). Department of Civil Engineering, UET Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
  • Rossetto, T., & Peiris, N. (2009). Observations of damage due to the Kashmir earthquake of October 8, 2005 and study of current seismic provisions for buildings in Pakistan. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 7, 681–699.10.1007/s10518-009-9118-5
  • SeismoSoft. (2015). SeismoSoft – earthquake engineering software solutions. Pavia.
  • UBC. (1997). Uniform building code – 97. International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA.
  • Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 491–514.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
  • Westenenk, B., de la Llera, J. C., Jünemann, R., Hube, M. A., Besa, J. J., Lüders, C., … Jordán, R. (2013). Analysis and interpretation of the seismic response of RC buildings in Concepción during the February 27, 2010, Chile earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11, 69–91.10.1007/s10518-012-9404-5