Feasibility study for the introduction of synchromodal freight transportation concept

References

• Ambra, T., Caris, A., & Macharis, C. (2016). A decision support system for synchromodal transport. ORBEL30 Conference, Louvain-la-Neuve.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, H.-S., & Ha, M.-S. (2014). The moderating effects of internal orientation and market orientation on the relationships between commitment and transportation service: An approach to international freight forwarders. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 30, 121–153.10.1016/j.ajsl.2014.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Bask, A. H. (2001). Relationships among TPL providers and members of supply chains–a strategic perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 16, 470–486.10.1108/EUM0000000006021
   Google Scholar
• Behdani, B., Fan, Y., Wiegmans, B., & Zuidwijk, R. (2014). Multimodal schedule design for synchromodal freight transport systems. Retrieved from SSRN 2438851.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, A., Kumar, S. A., Tiwari, M., & Talluri, S. (2014). An intermodal freight transport system for optimal supply chain logistics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 38, 73–84.10.1016/j.trc.2013.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol Raap, W. (2016). The design of a common data model for generic synchromodal cargo-tracking in logistics using web scraping and big & open data (pp. 9–111). Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Bontekoning, Y., & Priemus, H. (2004). Breakthrough innovations in intermodal freight transport. Transportation Planning and Technology, 27, 335–345.10.1080/0308106042000273031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R., & Schellinck, T. (2015). Measuring port effectiveness: What really determines cargo interests’ evaluations of port service delivery? Maritime Policy & Management, 42, 699–711.10.1080/03088839.2015.1077282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buiel, E., Visschedijk, G., Lebesque, L., Lucassen, I., Riessen, B. V., Rijn, A. V., & te Brake, G. (2015, July 18–25). Synchro mania-design and evaluation of a serious game creating a mind shift in transport planning (pp. 1–12). Paper presented at the 46th International Simulation and Gaming Association Conference, ISAGA 2015, Kyoto.
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, C., & Rockart, J. (1981). A primer on critical success factors. Cambridge, MA: Center for Information Systems Research, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Caesar, W. K., Riese, J., & Seitz, T. (2007). Betting on biofuels. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Caralli, R. A., Stevens, J. F., Willke, B. J., & Wilson, W. R. (2004). The critical success factor method: Establishing a foundation for enterprise security management ( DTIC Document). Pittsburgh: Camegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Cariou, P., & Wolff, F.-C. (2011). Ship-owners’ decisions to outsource vessel management. Transport Reviews, 31, 709–724.10.1080/01441647.2011.587907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crainic, T. G., & Laporte, G. (1997). Planning models for freight transportation. European Journal of Operational Research, 97, 409–438.10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00298-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, D. R. (1961). Management information crisis. Harvard Business Review, 39, 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Borger, B., & De Bruyne, D. (2011). Port activities, hinterland congestion, and optimal government policies the role of vertical integration in logistic operations. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 45, 247–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W., & Pallis, A. A. (2006). Analysis of the benefits of intra-port competition. International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti, 33, 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooms, M., van der Lugt, L., & de Langen, P. W. (2013). International strategies of port authorities: The case of the Port of Rotterdam authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 148–157.10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Fera, M., Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, A., Macchiaroli, R., & Miranda, S. (2017). The role of uncertainty in supply chains under dynamic modeling. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 8, 119–140.10.5267/j.ijiec.2016.6.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franc, P., & Van der Horst, M. (2010). Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 557–566.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransoo, J. (2011). The pioneer of synchromodality. Fast forward, 52, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ghana Ministry of Transport. (2016). MoT agencies information. Retrieved December 10, 2016, from http://www.mot.gov.gh/5/agencies
   Google Scholar
• Ghana Ports and Harbour Authority. (2005). Port overview. Tema: GPHA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghana Ports and Harbour Authority. (2007). Port news. Accra: Public Affairs Department, GPHA.
   Google Scholar
• Ghana Ports and Harbour Authority. (2016a). Port performance - Takoradi port. Retrieved December 24, 2016, from http://www.ghanaports.gov.gh/publications.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ghana Ports and Harbour Authority. (2016b). Tema port performance 2003–2015. Retrieved December 24, 2016, from http://www.ghanaports.gov.gh/Files/TEMAPORTPERFORMANCE2003-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Halldórsson, Á., Kovács, G., Sanchez-Rodrigues, V., Potter, A., & Naim, M. M. (2010). The impact of logistics uncertainty on sustainable transport operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40, 61–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, P. (2012). Synchromodality (cited in Lucassen, I., & Dogger, T. (2012a). Synchromodality pilot study. Identification of bottlenecks and possibilities for a network between Rotterdam, Moerdijk and Tilburg. Rotterdam: TNO).
   Google Scholar
• Hayut, Y. (1980). Inland container terminal—function and rationale. Maritime Policy and Management, 7, 283–289.10.1080/03088838000000042
   Google Scholar
• Heejung, Y. (2015). Participation of Private Investors in Container Terminal Operation: Influence of Global Terminal Operators. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31, 363–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, W. (2014). Control tower architecture for multi-and synchromodal logistics with real time data. ILS 2014, Breda.
   Google Scholar
• Holfeld, D., & Simroth, A. (2016). Risk analysis for a synchro-modal supply chain combined with smart steaming concepts. Ercim News, (105), 28–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannegiesser, M., & Günther, H.-O. (2014). Sustainable development of global supply chains—part 1: Sustainability optimization framework. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 26, 24–47.10.1007/s10696-013-9176-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapetanis, G. N., Psaraftis, H. N., & Spyrou, D. (2016). A simple synchro – modal decision support tool for the piraeus container terminal. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2860–2869.10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.403
   Google Scholar
• Kontovas, C. A., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2016). Transportation emissions: Some basics green transportation logistics (pp. 41–79). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, G., Spens, K., & Roso, V. (2008). Factors influencing implementation of a dry port. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38, 782–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Negenborn, R. R., & De Schutter, B. (2016). Distributed model predictive control for cooperative synchromodal freight transport. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucassen, I., & Dogger, T. (2012a). Synchromodality pilot study. Identification of bottlenecks and possibilities for a network between Rotterdam, Moerdijk and Tilburg. Rotterdam: TNO.
   Google Scholar
• Lucassen, I., & Dogger, T. (2012b). Synchromodality pilot study. Identification of bottlenecks and possibilities for a network between Rotterdam, Moerdijk and Tilburg ( Technical report). Rotterdam: TNO.
   Google Scholar
• Mes, M. R., & Iacob, M.-E. (2016). Synchromodal transport planning at a logistics service provider logistics and supply chain innovation (pp. 23–36). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Murillo, J. L. (2016). Development of a Comprehensive Pricing Approach for the Introduction of Synchromodal Transportation Services. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Naim, M. M., Potter, A. T., Mason, R. J., & Bateman, N. (2006). The role of transport flexibility in logistics provision. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 17, 297–311.10.1108/09574090610717491
   Google Scholar
• Oonk, M. (2014). Smart logistics corridors and the benefits of intelligent transport systems. Paper presented at the Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Pfoser, S., Treiblmaier, H., & Schauer, O. (2016). Critical success factors of synchromodality: Results from a case study and literature review. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 1463–1471.10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.220
   Google Scholar
• Pleszko, J. (2012). Multi-variant configurations of supply chains in the context of synchromodal transport. LogForum, 8, 287–295.
   Google Scholar
• Pomponi, F., Fratocchi, L., & Rossi Tafuri, S. (2015). Trust development and horizontal collaboration in logistics: A theory based evolutionary framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20, 83–97.10.1108/SCM-02-2014-0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponweiser, W., Putz, L.-M., Prandtstetter, M., Lenz, G., Pfoser, S., & Haller, A. (2016). An introduction to synchromodal networks in Austria (Research Forum). Wels: The Austrian University of Applied Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Putz, L.-M., Haider, C., Haller, A., & Schauer, O. (2015). Identifying key enablers for synchromodal transport chains in Central Europe. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the WCTRS SIGA2 2015 Conference “The Port and Maritime Sector: Key Developments and Challenges”, Antwerpen.
   Google Scholar
• Raap, W. B., Iacob, M.-E., van Sinderen, M., & Piest, S. (2016). An architecture and common data model for open data-based cargo-tracking in synchromodal logistics. Paper presented at the OTM Confederated International Conferences “On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems”.
   Google Scholar
• Riessen, B. V., Negenborn, R. R., Dekker, R., & Lodewijks, G. (2015). Service network design for an intermodal container network with flexible transit times and the possibility of using subcontracted transport. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7, 457–478.10.1504/IJSTL.2015.069683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, A. E. P., & Mes, M. R. (2016). Pre- and end-haulage operations in a multi-depot and multi-resource synchromodal network. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, A. P., & Mes, M. (2016). Service and transfer selection for freights in a synchromodal network. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rockart, J. F. (1978). Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, 57, 81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J.-P., & Notteboom, T. (2009). The terminalization of supply chains: Reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy & Management, 36, 165–183.10.1080/03088830902861086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohács, J., & Simongati, G. (2007). The role of inland waterway navigation in a sustainable transport system. Transport, 22, 148–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, S. (2012). Challenges for co-modality in a collaborative environment. Bedfordshire: Cranfield University.
   Google Scholar
• Savy, M. (2016). Logistics as a political issue. Transport Reviews, 36, 413–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management–a delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 455–466.10.1002/bse.v17:8
   Google Scholar
• Seuring, S., Sarkis, J., Müller, M., & Rao, P. (2008). Sustainability and supply chain management–an introduction to the special issue. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, K.-C., Lu, C.-S., & Li, S. (2010). A taxonomy of green supply chain management capability among electronics-related manufacturing firms in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1218–1226.10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P. M. (2014). Developing a service oriented IT platform for synchromodal transportation. Paper presented at the OTM Confederated International Conferences “On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems”.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P. M., & van Sinderen, M. (2015). Interoperability challenges for context aware logistics services-the case of synchromodal logistics. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Sislian, L., Jaegler, A., & Cariou, P. (2016). A literature review on port sustainability and ocean’s carrier network problem. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavasszy, L. A., Behdani, B., & Konings, R. (2015). Intermodality and synchromodality. Retrieved from SSRN 2592888.
   Google Scholar
• Tongzon, J. L. (2009). Port choice and freight forwarders. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45, 186–195.10.1016/j.tre.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsertou, A., Amditis, A., Latsa, E., Kanellopoulos, I., & Kotras, M. (2016). Dynamic and synchromodal container consolidation: The cloud computing enabler. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2805–2813.10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.345
   Google Scholar
• Tzannatos, E., Tselentis, B., & Corres, A. (2016). An inland waterway freight service in comparison to land-based alternatives in South-Eastern Europe: Energy efficiency and air quality performance. Transport, 31, 119–126.10.3846/16484142.2016.1129647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2008). Development Report 2008 (pp. 31–40). New York, NY: Author
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, R., & De Langen, P. W. (2015). Towards an ‘inland terminal centred’value proposition. Maritime Policy & Management, 42, 499–515.10.1080/03088839.2014.928955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, R., De Langen, P. W., & Rúa Costa, C. R. (2012). The role of port authorities in new intermodal service development; the case of Barcelona Port Authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5, 78–84.10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Van der Burg, M. (2012). Synchromodal transport for the horticulture industry. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Riessen, B., Negenborn, R. R., & Dekker, R. (2015b). The cargo fare class mix problem-revenue management in synchromodal container transportation. Berlin: Researchgate.
   Google Scholar
• Van Riessen, B., Negenborn, R. R., & Dekker, R. (2015b). Synchromodal container transportation: An overview of current topics and research opportunities. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computational Logistics. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Verweij, K. (2011). Synchronic modalities–critical success factors. In P. J. Van Sterre (Ed.), Logistics yearbook edition (pp. 75–88). Rotterdam: Feico Houweling.
   Google Scholar
• Vinke, P. (2016). Dynamic consolidation decisions in a synchromodal environment: Improving the synchromodal control tower. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Cao, C., Jia, B., & Zang, G. (2015). Model and algorithm for container allocation problem with random freight demands in synchromodal transportation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. & Pei, A. (2016a). Synchromodal versus intermodal freight transport: The case of rotterdam hinterland container transport. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. & Pel, A. (2016b). Synchromodal hinterland freight transport: Model study for the port of Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography, 52, 1–10.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar