Design and stepwise user evaluation of an ergonomic 2 DOF arthroscopic cutter

References

• Buchel, D., Marvik, R., Hallabrin, B., & Matern, U. (2010). Ergonomics of disposable handles for minimally invasive surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 24(5), 992–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daams, B. J. (1994). Human force exertion in user-product interaction. Delft: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, R. H. M., & van Veelen, M. A. (2001). Assessment of ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 10(3), 175–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G. S., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Standard development of NASA-TLX Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human mental workload. Amsterdam, NL: North Holland Press. (Reprinted from: NOT IN FILE).
   Google Scholar
• Hedge, A. (1998). Design of hand-operated devices. In N. Stanton (Ed.), Human factors in consumer products (Vol. 1, pp. 203–222). London: Taylor & Francis. (Reprinted from: IN FILE).
   Google Scholar
• Horeman, T., Aguirre, M., Kerkhoffs, G. M. M. J., Dankelman, J., & Tuijthof, G. M. J. (2015). The SATA, a simple, stiff, and rigid steering mechanism. Journal of Medical Devices, 9(3), 030933.
   Google Scholar
• Horeman, T., Schilder, F., Aguirre, M., Kerkhoffs, G. M. M. J., & Tuijthof, G. J. M. (2015). Design and preliminary evaluation of a stiff steerable cutter for arthroscopic procedures. Journal of Medical Devices, 9(4), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Matern, U. (2001). Principles of ergonomic instrument handles. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 10(3), 169–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, T. Y., Herder, J. L., & Tuijthof, G. J. M. (2011). Steerable mechanical joint for high load transmission in minimally invasive instruments. Journal of Medical Devices, 5(3), 034503.
   Google Scholar
• Patkin, M. (2001). A checklist for handle design. Retrieved from http://mpatkin.org/ergonomics/handle_checklist.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sancibrian, R., Gutierrez-Diez, M. C., Torre-Ferrero, C., Benito-Gonzalez, M. A., Redondo-Figuero, C., & Manuel-Palazuelos, J. C. (2014). Design and evaluation of a new ergonomic handle for instruments in minimally invasive surgery. Journal of Surgical Research, 188(1), 88–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Carreras, L., Hagen, M., Gassert, R., & Bleuler, H. (2012). Survey on surgical instrument handle design: Ergonomics and acceptance. Surgical Innovation, 19(1), 50–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, L., Dahlman, S., Wikström, L., Kilbom, Åsa, & Kadefors, R. (1993). A cube model for the classification of work with hand tools and the formulation of functional requirements. Applied Ergonomics, 24(3), 212–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, A. R. H. D. A. (2002). Manual controls. In A. R. H. D. A. Tilley (Ed.), The measure of man and woman: Human factors in design (Revised Edition, pp. 6). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. (Reprinted from: IN FILE).
   Google Scholar
• Tuijthof, G. J. M., Engelen, S. J. M. P., Herder, J. L., Goossens, R. H. M., Snijders, C. J., & Dijk, C. N. (2003). Ergonomic handle for an arthroscopic cutter. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 12(1–2), 82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuijthof, G. J., Frühwirt, C., & Kment, C. (2013). Influence of tool geometry on drilling performance of cortical and trabecular bone. Medical Engineering & Physics, 35(8), 1165–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuijthof, G. J. M., Pontesilli, M., van der Zwaag, H., Jonges, R., van de Geer, S. G. V., Maas, M., & Blankevoort, L. (2012). A novel foot plate to assess 3D range of motion of the hindfoot. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(1), 41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuijthof, G. J., van Dijk, C. N., Herder, J. L., & Pistecky, P. V. (2005). Clinically-driven approach to improve arthroscopic techniques. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 13(1), 48–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuijthof, G. J., Visser, P., Sierevelt, I. N., Van Dijk, C. N., & Kerkhoffs, G. M. (2011). Does perception of usefulness of arthroscopic simulators differ with levels of experience? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 469(6), 1701–1708. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1797-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Veelen, M. A., Goossens, R. H. M., Jakimowicz, J. J., Snijders, C. J., Jacobs, J. J., & Meije, D. W. (2001). New ergonomic guidelines for laparoscopic instruments. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 10(3), 163–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Veelen, M. A., Meijer, D. W., Goossens, R. H., & Snijders, C. J. (2001). New ergonomic design criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forceps. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 11(1), 17–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorhorst, F. (1998). Affording action, implementing perception-action coupling for endoscopy (PhD). Delft University of Technology. Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:0014bf57-85e4-40f3-a13b-efb5118decb5/datastream/OBJ/download
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D., Birt, J. A., Snyder, M., & Duncanson, J. P. (1996). Anthropometry and biomechanics. In D. Wagner, J. A. Birt, M. Snyder, & J. P. Duncanson (Eds.), Human factors design guide (p. 45). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service. (Reprinted from: IN FILE).
   Google Scholar