Strain-based assessment of liquefaction and seismic settlement of saturated sand

References

• Carraro, J. A. H., Bandini, P., & Salgado, R. (2003). Liquefaction resistance of clean and nonplastic silty sands based on cone penetration resistance. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 129(11), 965–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, B., Wood, C., & Hazirbaba, K. (2012). Frozen and unfrozen shear wave velocity seismic site classification of fairbanks. Alaska. Journal of Cold Regions Engineering, ASCE, 26(3), 118–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darendeli, M. B., & Stokoe, K. H. (2001). Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves (Geotechnical Engineering Report GD01-1). The University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Dobry, R. (1985). Liquefaction of soils during earthquake (Report No. CETS-EE-001). Washington, DC: National Research Council (NRC), Committee on Earthquake Engineering
   Google Scholar
• Dobry, R., Ladd, R. S., Yokel, F. Y., Chung, R. M., & Powell, D. (1982). Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method. National Bureau of Standards Building Science Series, 138, 150.
   Google Scholar
• Hazirbaba, K. (2005). Pore pressure generation characteristics of sands and silty sands a strain approach (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of Texas at Austin, p. 232.
   Google Scholar
• Hazirbaba, K., & Omarow, M. (2015). Post-cyclic loading settlement of saturated clean sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 77, 337–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazirbaba, K., & Omarow, M. (2018). Excess pore pressure generation and post-cyclic loading settlement of geofiber-reinforced sand. Gradevinar, 70(2018) 1, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, K. (1977). Simple method of analysis for liquefaction of sand deposits during earthquakes. Soils and Foundations, 17(3), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, T., Arakawa, T., & Tokida, K. (1984). Simplified procedures for assesing soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 3(1), 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, R. S. (1978). Preparing test specimens using undercompcation. Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, 1(1), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Law, K. T., Cao, Y. L., & He, G. N. (1990). Energy approach for assessing seismic liquefaction potential. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27(3), 320–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. L., & Albaisa, A. (1974). Earthquake induced settlements in saturated sands. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 100(GT4), 387–406.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, J. J., Ballagh, R. H., Orense, R. P., & van Ballegooy, S. (2015). CPT-based analysis of liquefaction and re-liquefaction following the Canterbury earthquake sequence. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 79, 304–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, B. W., Green, R. A., Cubrinovski, M., & Bradley, B. A. (2014). Evaluation of the liquefaction potential index for assessing liquefaction potential in Christchurch, New Zealand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140, 04014032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. K., & Campanella, R. G. (1985). Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 111(3), 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1971). Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 97(SM9), 1249–1273.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J. I., Golesorkhi, R., & Seed, H. B. (1988). Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils (Report No. EERC-88/15). Berkley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Dutta, U., Xu, G., Hazirbaba, K., & Marx, E. (2011). Numerical analysis of permafrost effects on the seismic site response. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier, 31(3), 282-290.
   Google Scholar