Work breakdown structure application for man-hours calculation in hull construction shipbuilding in Malaysia

References

• Abu Husain, M. K., Mohd Zaki, N. I., & Najafian, G. (2017). Prediction of offshore structural response extreme values by three different approaches of efficient time simulation technique. Ships and Offshore Structures, 12(2), 290–25. doi:10.1080/17445302.2016.1139258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, F. (1992). Spon’s fabrication norms for offshore structures: a handbook for the oil, gas & petrochemical industries. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Booz, A. & Hamilton Earned Value Management Tutorial Module 2: Work Breakdown Structure, Office of Science, Tools & Resources for Project Management, science.energy.gov. (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Brandić, V., & Kolić, D. (2018). PWBS best practice analysis of two shipyards. Pomorski zbornik ISSN 0554-6397 Stručni članak (Professional paper)(2), 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1993). Classification and regression trees. New York: New Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, -C.-C., & Chang, P.-L. (2001). Modeling and analysis of labor cost estimation for shipbuilding: The case of China shipbuilding corporation. Journal of Ship Production, 17(2), 92–96.
   Google Scholar
• DoD. (2011). Work breakdown structures for defense materiel items. Washington: DoD.
   Google Scholar
• Gordo, J., & Leal, M. (2018). A tool for analysis of costs on the manufacturing of the hull. Maritime transportation and harvesting of sea resources (pp. 743–748). Lisbon: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gullander, P., Davidsson, A., Dencker, K., Fasth, Å., Fässberg, T., Harlin, U., & Stahre, J. (2011). Towards a production complexity model that supports operation, re-balancing and man-hour planning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th Swedish Production Symposium (SPS), Lund, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, M., Lee, S.-K., Kim, B., Cho, S., Lee, D., & Lee, D. (2015). A study on the man-hour prediction system for shipbuilding. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(6), 1267–1279. doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0858-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, A. S., Jameel, M., Jumaat, M. Z., Shirazi, S., & Salman, F. A. (2012). Review of offshore energy in Malaysia and floating Spar platform for sustainable exploration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 6268–6284. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Jost, A. C., Perkins, T. K., Fleming, Q. W., Koppelman, J. M., Lipke, W., & Kimmerly, P. (2006). CrossTalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 19(6). Retrieved from http://medicallibrary.org/
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M. J., & Snyder, B. F. (2012). Reviewing rig construction cost factors, Center for Energy Studies, Louisiana State University https://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/print/volume-72/issue-7/rig- report/reviewing-rig-construction-cost-factors.html
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, P. C., & Christensen, W. L. (1999). Development and implementation of modern work breakdown structures in naval construction: A case study. Journal of Ship Production, 15(3), 136–145.
   Google Scholar
• Kolić, D., Brandić, V., Jaki, D., & Novak, L. (2018). Gantt chart analysis to improve shipbuilding panel line assembly. Paper presented at the SOME 2018, the 6th Annual International SOME Symposium (Ship Operations, Management and Economics), Athens, Greece, 20-21 March 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kolić, D., Sladić, S., & Storch, R. L. (2017). Lean IHOP transformation of shipyard erection block construction. Paper presented at the SNAME Maritime Convention 2017, Houston, Texas, 24-28 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Leal, M., & Gordo, J. M. (2017). Hull’s manufacturing cost structure. Brodogradnja: Teorija I Praksa Brodogradnje I Pomorske Tehnike, 68(3), 1–24. doi:10.21278/brod
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B., & Jiang, Z.-H. (2005). The man-hour estimation models & its comparison of interim products assembly for shipbuilding. International Journal of Operations Research, 2(1), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, O., Holm, H., Trostmann, E., & Conrad, F. (1993). Cybernetic modelling and control in integrated production systems-a project overview. In The 8th IPS Research Seminar, 22–24 March 1994, Fuglsø, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Mat Soom, E., Abu Husain, M. K., Mohd Zaki, N. I., Azman, N. U., & Najafian, G. (2016). Reliability-based design and assessment for lifetime extension of ageing offshore structures. OMAE: Proceeding of the ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, June 19–24, Busan, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Mat Soom, E., Abu Husain, M. K., Mohd Zaki, N. I., Mohd Nor, M., . N., . K., Ayob, M. S., & Najafian, G. (2015). Global ultimate strength assessment (GUSA) for lifetime extension of ageing offshore structures. The Twenty-Fifth International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, June 21–26, Kona, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, Y., Zeng, Z., Feng, D., & Tu, Y. (2015). A method for man hour optimisation and workforce allocation problem with discrete and non-numerical constraints in large-scale one-of-a-kind production. International Journal of Production Research, 54(3), 864–877. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1088972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd Zaki, N. I., Abu Husain, M. K., & Najafian, G. (2018). Extreme structural responses by nonlinear system identification for fixed offshore platforms. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13(sup1), 251–263. doi:10.1080/17445302.2018.1443377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhlas, N. A., Mohd Zaki, N. I., Abu Husain, M. K., & Najafian, G. (2018). Efficient derivation of extreme offshore structural response exposed to random wave loads. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13(7), 719–733. doi:10.1080/17445302.2018.1452474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, J.-H., Lee, J. H., & Woo, J. H. (2015). Construction of standardised data structure for simulation of mid-term scheduling of shipbuilding process. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 29(4), 424–437. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2015.1066031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okayama, Y. & Chirillo, L. D. & Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation & United States. Maritime Administration. Office of Advanced Ship Development & Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (U.S.). Ship Production Committee. (1980). Product work breakdown structure. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Maritime Administration in cooperation with Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A., & Gordo, J. (2018). Model to forecast times and costs of cutting, assembling and welding stages of construction of ship blocks. Paper presented at the Progress in Maritime Technology and Engineering: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Maritime Technology and Engineering (MARTECH 2018), May 7–9, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, M. (2015). Ship work breakdown structures through different ship lifecycle stages. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Applications in Shipbuilding 2015, Bremen, Germany
   Google Scholar
• Performance Forum (2017). Offshore structure benchmark for costing. Retrieved from https://www.performance-forum.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Potty, N. S., & Akram, M. K. B. M. (2009). Structural integrity management for fixed offshore platforms in Malaysia. Platform, 7(2), 8–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, W. A. Z. W. A., Zaki, N. I. M., & Husain, M. K. A. (2019). A review of work breakdown structure and man-hours estimation method used in shipbuilding production. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 10(1), 1141–1158.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, K. H. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide); fifth edition. Project Management Journal, 44(3), e1–e1. doi:10.1002/pmj.21345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. (2002). Forging a real-time link between initial ship design and estimated costs. ICCAS, 2002, 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. M. (2004). A practical approach for ship construction cost estimating. COMPIT’04, Siguenza, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. M., McNatt, T. R., & Hazen, G. (2002). The project 21 smart product model: A new paradigm for ship design, cost estimation, and production planning. Journal of Ship Production, 18(2), 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Salenm, M. (1997). Multiple linear regression analysis for work measurement of indirect labor. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 18(5), 314–319.
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki, Y. (2003). Application of factory simulation to the shipyard. Paper presented at the COMPIT, Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki, Y., Miura, M., Takano, G., Fujita, K., Fujiwara, N., Iida, A., & Sagou, A. (2001). Research on total cost evaluation system for shipyard. 7th International Symposium. Japan Welding Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki, Y., & Sonda, M. (2002). A study on 3-D digital mockup systems for shipbuilding. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, (192), 707–712. doi:10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.2002.707
   Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., Patel, N. R., & Bruce, P. C. (2011). Data mining for business intelligence: Concepts, techniques, and applications in Microsoft Office Excel with XLMiner. NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbule, J. C., Dougherty, J. J., Deschamps, L., Ewing, R., Greenwell, C. R., & Lamb, T. (2000). Product-oriented design and construction (PODAC) Cost module: An update. Journal of Ship Production, 16(1), 60–68.
   Google Scholar