A novel group decision-making method by P-robust fuzzy DEA credibility constraint for welding process selection

References

• Balasubramanian, V., VArahamoorthy, R., Ramachandran, C., & Muralidharan, C. (2009). Selection of welding process for hardfacing on carbon steels based on quantitative and qualitative factors. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 40, 887–30. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1406-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bęczkowski, R., Gucwa, M., Wróbel, J., & Kulawik, A. (2016). The impact of the bead width on the properties of the anti-abrasion surfacing weld. 13th International conference of numerical analysis and applied mathematics Rhodes, Greece, 23–29 September. AIP Conference Proceedings (pp. 480095). AIP Publishing LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Capraz, O., Meran, C., Wörner, W., & Gungor, A. (2015). Using AHP and TOPSIS to evaluate welding processes for manufacturing plain carbon stainless steel storage tank. Archives of Materials Science, 158, 158.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V. M., & Chakraborty, S. (2011). Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Materials & Design, 32, 851–860. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury, N., Bandyopadhyay, A., & Rudrapati, R. (2014). Design optimization of process parameters for TIG welding based on Taguchi method. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 2, 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Darwish, S., Tamimi, A. L., & Al-Habdan, S. (1997). A knowledge base for metal welding process selection. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 37, 1007–1023. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(96)00073-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. R. (1993). Hardfacing, weld cladding, and dissimilar metal joining. ASM International, ASM Handbook., 6, 789–829.
   Google Scholar
• Du, J., Cook, W. D., Liang, L., & Zhu, J. (2014). Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 235, 206–214. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Whittaker, G. (2007). Network DEA. In Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis (pp. 209–240). Springer, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Fasanghari, M., Amalnick, M. S., Anvari, R. T., & Razmi, J. (2015). A novel credibility-based group decision making method for Enterprise Architecture scenario analysis using data envelopment analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 32, 347–368. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.03.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., Moradi, M., & Kangi, F. (2013). A fuzzy group electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities. Safety Science, 51, 414–426. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarian, M., & Vahdat, S. E. (2012). A fuzzy multi-attribute approach to select the welding process at high pressure vessel manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 14, 250–256. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2011.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Jahan, A., Ismail, M., Sapuan, S., & Mustapha, F. (2010). Material screening and choosing methods–a review. Materials & Design, 31, 696–705. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M. Y., Sapuan, S., & Bahraminasab, M. (2011). A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Materials & Design, 32, 1215–1221. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayant, A., & Dhillon, M. (2015). Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to select welding process in high pressure vessel manufacturing environment. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10, 586–595.
   Google Scholar
• Kao, C., & Liu, S.-T. (2009). Stochastic data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of Taiwan commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 312–322. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karande, P., & CHAKRABORTY, S. (2012). Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Materials & Design, 37, 317–324. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Kim, C. (2014). Benchmarking of service quality with data envelopment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 3761–3768. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Liu, B. (2006). A sufficient and necessary condition for credibility measures. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 14, 527–535. doi:10.1142/S0218488506004175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B. (2004). Uncertainty theory: An introduction to its axiomatic foundations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B., & Liu, B. (2009). Theory and practice of uncertain programming,239. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., & Lu, W.-M. (2016). Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 58, 33–45. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W.-M., & Lin, B. J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41, 3–15. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohtia, R., Donthu, N., & Yaveroglu, I. (2007). Evaluating the efficiency of Internet banner advertisements. Journal of Business Research, 60, 365–370. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løken, E. (2007). Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 1584–1595. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masudin, I., & Saputro, T. E. (2016) Evaluation of B2C website based on the usability factors by using fuzzy AHP & hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. 2nd International Manufacturing Engineering Conference and The 5th Asia Pacific Conference on Manufacturing Systems. University of Malaysia. Pahang, Malaysia, 14 November. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (pp. 012091). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J., Mittal, V. K., & Gupta, P. (2017). Role of thermal spray coatings on wear, erosion and corrosion behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 20, 445г452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mela, K., Tiainen, T., & Heinisuo, M. (2012). Comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods for building design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26, 716–726. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, M., & Liu, Y. (2007) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis with credibility constraints. Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. Haikui, China, 24–27 August (FSKD 2007) (pp. 149–153). IEEE. doi:10.1016/S0065-2776(07)95005-1
   Google Scholar
• Mirhedayatian, S. M., Vahdat, S. E., Jelodar, M. J., & Saen, R. F. (2013). Welding process selection for repairing nodular cast iron engine block by integrated fuzzy data envelopment analysis and TOPSIS approaches. Materials & Design, 43, 272–282. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi-Nasab, S. H., & Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. (2017). A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems. Materials & Design, 121, 237–253. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S. (2016). A comparative analysis of the DEA-CCR model and the VIKOR method. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 18 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2003). Comparing DEA and MCDM method. In Multi-Objective Programming and Goal Programming (227–232). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, A.-H., & Xiao, X.-M. (2013). Material selection using PROMETHEE combined with analytic network process under hybrid environment. Materials & Design, 47, 643–652. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R. (2006). Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process. Computers & Operations Research, 33, 1289–1307. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R. V. (2006). A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 431, 248–255. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2006.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravisankar, V., Balasubramanian, V., & Muralidharan, C. (2006). Selection of welding process to fabricate butt joints of high strength aluminium alloys using analytic hierarchic process. Materials & Design, 27, 373–380. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saputro, T. E., Masudin, I., & Daneshvar Rouyendegh, B. (2015). A literature review on MHE selection problem: Levels, contexts, and approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 5139–5152. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1005254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis, J. (2000). A comparative analysis of DEA as a discrete alternative multiple criteria decision tool. European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 543–557. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00099-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986, 73–105. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1551-2371
   Google Scholar
• Shabani, A., Saen, R. F., & Torabipour, S. M. R. (2012). A new benchmarking approach in cold chain. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36, 212–224. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.05.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, L. V., & Daskin, M. S. (2006). Stochastic p-robust location problems. IIE Transactions, 38, 971–985. doi:10.1080/07408170500469113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y. D. P., & Porto, R. L. L. (2005). Data envelopment analysis of reservoir system performance. Computers & Operations Research, 32, 3209–3226. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., Gollnick, V., Li, Y., & Stumpf, E. (2014). Intelligent multicriteria decision support system for systems design. Journal of Aircraft, 51, 216–225. doi:10.2514/1.C032296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 243–252. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Zhao, Z., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. (2013). Energy efficiency and production technology heterogeneity in China: A meta-frontier DEA approach. Economic Modelling, 35, 283–289. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani, M., & Payam, A. F. (2015). A comparative study on material selection of microelectromechanical systems electrostatic actuators using Ashby, VIKOR and TOPSIS. Materials & Design (1980–2015), 65, 328–334. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, L., Authurs, D., Wright, S., & Santarossa, L. (2014a). Fracture and wear in shredder hammer tungsten carbide tips in the sugar cane shredding process. In Recent advances in structural integrity analysis (pp. 57–61). UK: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, L., Authurs, D., Wright, S., & Santarossa, L. (2014b). Fracture and wear in shredder hammer tungsten carbide tips in the sugar cane shredding process. UK: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K.-L. (2008). A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar