1,558
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
COMPUTER SCIENCE

MS-TR: A Morphologically enriched sentiment Treebank and recursive deep models for compositional semantics in Turkish

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1893621 | Received 21 Nov 2020, Accepted 29 Jan 2021, Published online: 26 Apr 2021

References

  • Akın, A. A., & Akın, M. D. (2007). Zemberek, an open source nlp framework for Turkic languages. Structure, 10, 1–27.
  • Aksan, Y., Aksan, M., Koltuksuz, A., Sezer, T., Mersinli, Ü., Demirhan, U. U., Yilmazer, H., Kurtoglu, Ö., Atasoy, G., Ö Z, S., & Yildiz, I., “Construction of the Turkish national corpus (TNC),” in Proceedings of the 8th international conference on language resources and evaluation, Istanbul, Turkey LREC 2012, 2012
  • Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F., “SentiWordNet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining,” in Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10). Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA), May 2010.
  • Baly, R., Hajj, H., Habash, N., Shaban, K. B., & El-Hajj, W. (2017). A sentiment treebank and morphologically enriched recursive deep models for effective sentiment analysis in Arabic. ACM, Trans. Asian Low-Resource Lang. Inf. Process. https://doi.org/10.1145/3086576
  • Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2005). Inflectional synthesis of the verb. In The World Atlas of language structures. (pp. 94–97). Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online
  • Bilgin, O., Cetinoglu, Ö. C., & Oflazer, K. (2004). Building a Wordnet for Turkish. Romanian Journal of Information Science and Technology
  • C. Aytekin, “An Opinion Mining Task in Turkish Language: A Model for Assigning Opinions in Turkish Blogs to the Polarities ,” Journal. Mass Commun., vol. 3, pp. 179–198, 2013
  • Cambria, E., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A., “SenticNet 2: A semantic and affective resource for opinion mining and sentiment analysis,” in Proceedings of the 25th international Florida artificial intelligence research society conference, FLAIRS-25, 2012, pp. 202–207.
  • Cambria, E., Olsher, D., & Rajagopal, D., “SenticNet 3: A common and common-sense knowledge base for cognition- driven sentiment analysis,” Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 1515–1521, 2014.
  • Cotterell, R., Schütze, H., & Eisner, J., “Morphological smoothing and extrapolation of word embeddings,” in 54th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2016 - long papers, Berlin, Germany, 2016.
  • Dehkharghani, R., Saygin, Y., Yanikoglu, B., & Oflazer, K. (2016). SentiTurkNet: A Turkish polarity lexicon for sentiment analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation, 501, 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-015-9307-6
  • Dehkharghani, R., Yanikoglu, B., Saygin, Y., & Oflazer, K.. (2017). Sentiment analysis in Turkish at different granularity levels. Natural Language Engineering, 23(4), 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324916000309
  • Demirtas, E., & Pechenizkiy, M., “Cross-lingual polarity detection with machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining, WISDOM2013 - held in conjunction with SIGKDD, Chicago, USA, 2013.
  • Dong, L., Wei, F., Tan, C., Tang, D., Zhou, M., & Xu, K., “Adaptive recursive neural network for target-dependent Twitter sentiment classification,” in 52nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2014 - proceedings of the conference, vol. 2. Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2014, pp. 49–54. [Online]. Available: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P14-2009
  • Erogul, U., “Sentiment analysis in Turkish,” Middle East Technical University, MSc Thesis, Computer Engineering, 2009.
  • Gezici, G., & Yanıkoglu, B. (2018). Sentiment analysis in Turkish. In K. Oflazer & M. Saraclar (Eds.), Turkish natural language processing (pp. 255–271). Springer Publishing.
  • Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Gupta, P., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T., “Learning word vectors for 157 languages,” in LREC 2018- 11th international conference on language resources and evaluation, Miyazaki, Japan, 2019.
  • Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., & Comrie, B. (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press.
  • Iyyer, M., Enns, P., Boyd-Graber, J., & Resnik, P., “Political ideology detection using recursive neural networks,” in 52nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2014 - proceedings of the conference, Baltimore, Maryland 2014.
  • Kaya, M., Fidan, G., & Toroslu, I. H., “Sentiment analysis of Turkish political news,” Proceedings - 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence, Macau, China, WI 2012, pp. 174–180, 2012.
  • Liu, S., Yang, N., Li, M., & Zhou, M., “A recursive recurrent neural network for statistical machine translation,” in 52nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2014 - proceedings of the conference, 2014.
  • Manning, C., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S., & McClosky, D. (2015). The Stanford coreNLP natural language processing toolkit.
  • Miller, G. A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, K. J. (1990). Introduction to WordNet: an on-line lexical database . International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/3.4.235
  • Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., & Jurafsky, D., “Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data,” in Proceedings of the joint conference of the 47th annual meeting of the ACL and the 4th international joint conference on natural language processing of the AFNLP. Suntec, Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics, August. 2009, pp. 1003–1011. [Online]. Available: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P09-1113
  • Coban, Ö. C., Özyer, B., & Özyer, G. T., “Sentiment analysis for Turkish Twitter feeds,” in 2015 23nd signal process. commun. appl. conf., Malatya, Turkey, May 2015, pp. 2388–2391.
  • Oflazer, K. (2014). Turkish and its challenges for language processing. Language Resources and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-014-9267-2
  • Ozyildirim, B. M., & Coban, O. (2018). An empirical study of the extreme learning machine for Twitter sentiment analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 3(6), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.18201/ijisae.2018644774
  • Pang, B., & Lee, L., “Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales,” in ACL-05-43rd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, proceedings of the conference, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2005.
  • Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends{ in Information Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011
  • Park, J. H., Xu, P., & Fung, P., “PlusEmo2Vec at SemEval-2018 Task 1: Exploiting emotion knowledge from emoji and #hashtags,” in Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on semantic evaluation (SemEval-2018), Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018, pp. 264–272.
  • Read, J., “Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification,” in Proceedings of the ACL student research workshop, ser. ACLstudent ‘05. USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005, p. 43–48.
  • Socher, R., Huval, B., Manning, C. D., & Ng, A. Y., “Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces,” in EMNLP-CoNLL 2012-2012 joint conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and computational natural language learning, proceedings of the conference, Jeju Island, Korea, 2012, pp. 1201–1211.
  • Socher, R., Manning, C. D., & Ng, A. Y., “Learning continuous phrase representations and syntactic parsing with recursive neural networks,” Proceedings of the NIPS-2010 deep learning and unsupervised feature learning workshop, 2010.
  • Socher, R., Pennington, J., Huang, E. H., Ng, A. Y., & Manning, C. D., “Semi-supervised recursive autoencoders for predicting sentiment distributions,” in EMNLP 2011 - conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, proceedings of the conference, no. ii, 2011, pp. 151–161.
  • Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J. Y., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C., “Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank,” in EMNLP 2013-2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, proceedings of the conference, 2013, pp. 1631–1642.
  • Suttles, J., & Ide, N. (2013). Distant supervision for emotion classification with discrete binary values. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (pp. 121–136). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., & Paltoglou, G. (2012). Sentiment strength detection for the social web. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol, 63(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21662
  • Turk, U., Atmaca, F., Ozates¸, S. B., Koksal, A., Ozturk, B., Gungor, T., & Ozgur, A., “Turkish treebanking: Unifying and constructing efforts,” in LAW 2019-13th linguistic annotation workshop, proceedings of the workshop, 2019.
  • Türkmenoglu, C., & Tantug, A. C., “Sentiment analysis in Turkish media,” in ICML 2014, international conf. mach. learn. WISDOM’14, workshop issues sentim. discov. opin. mining, June 25th, Beijing, 2014.
  • Vural, A. G., Cambazoglu, B. B., Senkul, P., & Tokgoz, Z. O., “A framework for sentiment analysis in Turkish: application to polarity detection of movie reviews in Turkish,” in Computer and information sciences III: 27th international symposium on computer and information sciences, E. Gelenbe & R. Lent, Eds. London: Springer London, 2013, pp. 437–445.
  • Yıldırım, E., Etin, F. S. C., Eryigit, G., & Temel, T. (2014). The impact of NLP on Turkish sentiment analysis. TBV Journal of Computer Science and Engineering.
  • Zeybek, S., “MS-TR: A Morphologically enriched Turkish sentiment Treebank,” vol. 1, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/nz7vm5rchd/1