A Pugh Matrix based product development model for increased small design team efficiency

References

• Akao, Y. (1990). Quality function deployment. Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akao, Y. (2004). Quality function deployment: Integrating customer requirements into product design. Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Asimow, M. (1962). Introduction to design. Prentice-Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Burge, S. (2009). The systems engineering toolbox. Retrieved from https://www.burgehugheswalsh.co.uk/uploaded/1/documents/pugh-matrix-v1.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cash, P., Elias, E., Dekoninck, E., & Culley, S. (2012). Methodological insights from a rigorous small scale design experiment. Design Studies, 33(2), 208–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausing, D. (1994). Total quality development: A Step-by-Step guide to world class concurrent engineering. ASME Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons LTD.
   Google Scholar
• De Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: A textbook of creativity. Ward Lock Educational.
   Google Scholar
• De Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats. Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
   Google Scholar
• French, M. (1971). Engineering design: The conceptual state. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• French, M. (1985). Conceptual design for engineers. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, D. D., Herder, P. M., Wijnia, Y., Subrahmanian, E., Katsikopoulos, K., & Clausing, D. P. (2007). An evaluation of the Pugh controlled convergence method. In ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 193–203), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v11i4.854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, W. J. J. (1969). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. Collier-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grenier, B. (1990). Product evaluation. In M. Oakley (Ed.), Design management: A handbook of issues and methods (pp. 335–344). Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, D. (2018). Qualitative frequency distributions and histograms. Retrieved from https://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/dgurney/Math241/StatTopics/HistGen.htm
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G. Q. (Ed.). (1996). Design for X: Concurrent engineering imperatives. Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kitsios, F. (2000). Product design and development. Technical University of Crete, Department of Production Engineering & Management.
   Google Scholar
• López-Mesa, B. (2003). Selection and use of engineering design methods using creative problem solving principles [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M., & Poon, J. (1996). Modelling design exploration as co-evolution. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, 11(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.1996.tb00323.x
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, E. R., Slocum, A. H., & Otto, K. N. (1993). Hierarchical decision making in machine design. MIT Precision Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Modransky, R., Jakabova, S., & Olah, A. (2020). Innovation management and barriers–creating space for innovation and organizational change. Emerging Science Journal, 4(5), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2020-01236
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R. (2009). The fundamentals of product design. AVA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mullur, A., Mattson, C. A., & Messac, A. (2003). Pitfalls of the typical construction of decision matrices for concept selection. In 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Paper No. AIAA 2003-0466, Reno, NV, (pp. 466–478)
   Google Scholar
• Nagamachi, M. (1995). Kansei engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00052-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oflaz, A. (2012). Kütahya çini sanatına yön veren tasarımcı ve ustalar ile Kütahya’daki çini sanatının gelişiminin değerlendirilmesi [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Dumlupinar University.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1984). Engineering design: A systematic approach (1st ed.). Design Council and Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, F. Y. (2016). The circle of innovation. Journal of Innovation Management, 4(3), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_004.003_0004
   Google Scholar
• Prince, G. M. (1970). The practice of creativity: A manual for dynamic group problem solving. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, S. (1991). Total design – Integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, S., Clausing, D., & Andrade, R. (1996). Creating innovative products using total design. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenburg, N. F. M., & Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: Fundamentals and methods. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, D. G., & Sieberg, K. K. (2004). Are partwise comparisons reliable. Research in Engineering Design, 15(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-003-0046-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salonen, M., & Perttula, M. (2005). Utilization of concept selection methods: A survey of Finnish industry. In ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Long Beach, CA (pp. 527–535). New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schütte, S. (2002). Designing feelings into products – Integrating Kansei engineering methodology in product development [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Quality and Human-Systems Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1995). Problem forming, problem finding and problem solving in design. In A. Collen & W. W. Gasparski (Eds.), Design & systems: General applications of methodology (pp. 245–257). Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sohlenius, G. (1992). Concurrent engineering. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 41(2), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63251-X
   Google Scholar
• Takai, S., & Ishii, K. (2004). Modifying Pugh’s design concept evaluation methods. In ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, UT (pp. 415–424). New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Taşer, A. (2004). Tam zamanlı üretim sisteminin porselen, çini ve seramik sektöründe uygulanabilirliği ve Kütahya ilindeki işletmelerde bir uygulama [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Dumlupinar University.
   Google Scholar
• Toubia, O., & Flores, L. (2007). Adaptive idea screening using consumers. Marketing Science, 26(3), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, G. (2010). The mechanical design process (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (1995). Product design and development. McCraw-Hill. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, W. (1991). Evocation and elaboration of solutions: Different types of problem solving actions. In Proceedings of 3rd COGNITIVA symposium on at the crossroads of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and neuroscience, Madrid, Spain (pp. 161–168). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar