Phased array probe for the inspection of large steel forgings

References

• American Society of Mechanical Engineers and Committee on Nondestructive Examination. (2017, issue 29). ASME Section V, Article 23 (Ultrasonic Standards). https://www.asme.org/codes-standards/publications-information/standards-certification-update/issue-29-fall-2017
   Google Scholar
• ASTM A714-99(2009)e1, Standard Specification for High-Strength Low-Alloy Welded and Seamless Steel Pipe (Withdrawn 2014), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1520/a0714-99r09e01.
   Google Scholar
• Braconnier, D., & Murakami, T. (2013). Thick part inspection using volume focusing and large aperture phased arrays. 18th WCNDT. September. https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt2008/papers/627.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Calmon, P., Lhémery, A., Lecœur-taı̈bi, I., Raillon, R., & Paradis, L. (1998, April). Models for the computation of ultrasonic fields and their interaction with defects in realistic NDT configurations. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 180(3), 271–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00299-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calmon, P., Mahaut, S., Chatillon, S., & Raillon, R. (2006, December). CIVA: An expertise platform for simulation and processing NDT data. Ultrasonics, 44(Supplement), e975–e979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chassignole, B., Duwig, V., Ploix, M.-A., Guy, P., & El Guerjouma, R. (2009, December). Modelling the attenuation in the ATHENA finite elements code for the ultrasonic testing of austenitic stainless steel welds. Ultrasonics, 49(8), 653–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2009.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheeke, J. D. N. (2012). Fundamentals and applications of ultrasonic waves. CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Darmon, M., Leymarie, N., Chatillon, S., & Mahaut, S. (2009). Modelling of scattering of ultrasounds by flaws for NDT. In A. Leger & M. Deschamps (Eds.), Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Non Homogeneous Media (Vol. 128, pp. 61–71). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Darmon, M., Dorval, V., Kamta Djakou, A., Fradkin, L., & Chatillon, S. (2016, January). A system model for ultrasonic NDT based on the Physical Theory of Diffraction (PTD). Ultrasonics, 64, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2015.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roumilly Loïc, and al. (2012, march). Introduction à la technique ultrasonore multiéléments. Techniques de l'ingénieur Analyses de surface et de matériaux, ref. article : p3790. https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/base-documentaire/mesures-analyses-th1/analyses-de-surface-et-de-materiaux-42383210/introduction-a-la-technique-ultrasonore-multielements-p3790/
   Google Scholar
• Dupont-Marillia, F., Jahazi, M., Lafreniere, S. & Belanger, P. Influence of Local Mechanical Parameters on Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Large Forged Steel Ingots. J Nondestruct Eval 38, 73 (2019)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, B., Painchaud-April, G., Le Duff, A., & Bélanger, P. (2021, January). Towards an alternative to time of flight diffraction using instantaneous phase coherence imaging for characterization of crack-like defects. Sensors, 21(3), 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Generazio, E. R., & Harris, C. E. (1999, July). The role of modelling and simulation in the development of advanced non-destructive evaluation systems. The Aeronautical Journal, 103(1025), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000064691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, X.E. & Cameron, N.B. & King, Martin. (2002). Current applications and future trends in phased array technology. Insight: Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 44, 673–678. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bindt/insight#Supp
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B., & Wilcox, P. (2004). The post-processing of ultrasonic array data using the total focusing method. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 46(11), 677–680. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.46.11.677.52285
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B. W., & Wilcox, P. D. (2005, December). Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit–receive array data for non-destructive evaluation. NDT & E International, 38(8), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkoori, S. R., Rahman, M.-U., Chinta, P. K., Ktreutzbruck, M., Rethmeier, M., & Prager, J. (2013, February). Ultrasonic field profile evaluation in acoustically inhomogeneous anisotropic materials using 2D ray tracing model: Numerical and experimental comparison. Ultrasonics, 53(2), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2012.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Jeune, L., Robert, S., Lopez Villaverde, E., & Prada, C. (2016, January). Plane wave imaging for ultrasonic non-destructive testing: Generalization to multimodal imaging. Ultrasonics, 64, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2015.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, R., Russell, J., & Cawley, P. (2012, July). Ultrasonic phased array inspection using full matrix capture. Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 54(7), 380–385. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2012.54.7.380
   Google Scholar
• Matrone, G., Savoia, A. S., Caliano, G., & Magenes, G. (2015, April). The delay multiply and sum beamforming algorithm in ultrasound b-mode medical imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 34(4), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2371235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanekar, P., Kumar, A., & Jayakumar, T. (2015a, April). Characterization of planar flaws by synthetic focusing of sound beam using linear arrays. Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, Volume 3, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csndt.2015.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Nanekar, P., Kumar, A., & Jayakumar, T. (2015b, April). SAFT-assisted sound beam focusing using phased arrays (PA-SAFT) for non-destructive evaluation. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 30(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2014.1002837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Diligent, S. Chatillon, M. Darmon, A. Lhémery, and S. Mahaut, „Results of the 2004 UT Modeling Benchmark Obtained with the CIVA Software Developed at the CEA“AIP Conference Proceedings, 760(1843), 2005 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1916894
   Google Scholar
• Olympus, N. (2004). Introduction to phased array ultrasonic technology applications. D Tech Guideline”, Olympus NDT, p111. https://www.olympus-ims.com/fr/books/pa/pa-intro/
   Google Scholar
• Poidevin, C., Roumilly, L., Cattiaux, G., Sollier, T., & Aux Roses, F. (2008). Simulation de la réponse ultrasonore de défauts réalistes dans CIVA. Actes Du Congrès COFREND, Toulouse, NDT.net :2009–01, Accessed: Jun. 22, 2015. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/21747318.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. A., “Dynamic control of aperture width using ddf phased array instrumentation,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, Portland, Oregon (USA), 2007, vol. 894, pp. 767–774, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2718047.
   Google Scholar
• Standard practice for ultrasonic examination of austenitic steel forgings, ASTM A745. (2015) https://doi.org/10.1520/A0745_A0745M-15.
   Google Scholar
• Sumana,, & Kumar, A. (2020, December). Phased array ultrasonic imaging using angle beam virtual source full matrix capture-total focusing method. NDT & E International. Volume 116, Issue 102324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, M., Weston, M., Dutton, B., Charlton, P., & Donne, K. (2012, October). Real-time full matrix capture for ultrasonic non-destructive testing with acceleration of post-processing through graphic hardware. NDT & E International, 51, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villaverde, E. L., Robert, S., & Prada, C. (2017, September). ultrasonic imaging in highly attenuating materials with hadamard codes and the decomposition of the time reversal operator. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 64(9), 1336–1344. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2690499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar