256
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Computer Science

Exploring the influencing factors of blockchain technology adoption in national quality infrastructure: a Dual-Stage structural equation model and artificial neural network approach using TAM-TOE framework

ORCID Icon, , &
Article: 2369220 | Received 14 Mar 2024, Accepted 25 May 2024, Published online: 26 Jun 2024

References

  • Abdou, D., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2020). The use of the UTAUT model in the adoption of E-learning technologies: An empirical study in France based banks. Journal of Global Information Management, 28(4), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.2020100103
  • Abu Afifa, M. M., Vo Van, H., & Le Hoang Van, T. (2022). Blockchain adoption in accounting by an extended UTAUT model: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2021-0434
  • Abu-Akel, S. A., & Ibrahim, M. (2023). The effect of relative advantage, top management support and IT infrastructure on E-Filing adoption. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(6), 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16060295
  • Albrecht, S., Strüker, J., Reichert, S., Neumann, D., Schmid, J., & Fridgen, G. (2018). Dynamics of Blockchain implementation-A case study from the energy sector. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50334
  • Albshaier, L., Almarri, S., & Hafizur Rahman, M. M. (2024). A review of Blockchain’s role in E-Commerce transactions: Open challenges, and future research directions. Computers, 13(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13010027
  • Alkhateeb, F. M., Khanfar, N. M., & Loudon, D. (2009). Physicians’ adoption of pharmaceutical E-Detailing: Application of Rogers’ innovation-diffusion model. Services Marketing Quarterly, 31(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332960903408575
  • Al-Kubaisy, Z. M., & Al-Somali, S. A. (2023). Factors influencing blockchain technologies adoption in supply chain management and logistic sectors: Cultural compatibility of blockchain solutions as moderator. Systems, 11(12), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120574
  • Almuraqab, N. A. S., Jasimuddin, S. M., & Mansoor, W. (2021). An Empirical Study of Perception of the End-User on the Acceptance of Smart Government Service in the UAE. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.20211101.oa11
  • Al-Rawy, M., & Elci, A. (2019). A design for blockchain-based digital voting system. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02351-5
  • Al-Saqaf, W., & Seidler, N. (2017). Blockchain technology for social impact: Opportunities and challenges ahead. Journal of Cyber Policy, 2(3), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2017.1400084
  • Al-Saqaf, W., & Seidler, N. (2020). The factors effecing E-Filing adoption among Jordanian Firms: The moderating role of trust. PalArch s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 17–31.
  • Attaran, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (2019). Applications of blockchain technology in business challenges and opportunities. Springery.
  • Awa, H. O., Ojiabo, O. U., & Emecheta, B. C. (2015). Integrating TAM, TPB and TOE frameworks and expanding their characteristic constructs for e-commerce adoption by SMEs. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, 6(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2014-0012
  • Bach, M. P., Zoroja, J., & Čeljo, A. (2022). An extension of the technology acceptance model for business intelligence systems: Project management maturity perspective. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm050201
  • Behnke, K., & Janssen, M. F. W. H. A. (2019). Boundary conditions for traceability in food supply chains using blockchain technology. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.025
  • Beshah, B., Gidey, E., & Leta, A. (2017). National cost of quality in Ethiopian import–export. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 28(1-2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1050177
  • Cermeño, J. S. (2016). Blockchain in financial services: Regulatory landscape and future challenges for its commercial application. BBVA Research.
  • Chittipaka, V., Kumar, S., Sivarajah, U., Bowden, J. L. H., & Baral, M. M. (2023). Blockchain Technology for Supply Chains operating in emerging markets: An empirical examination of technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework. Annals of Operations Research, 327(1), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04801-5
  • Chivu, R. G., Popa, I. C., Orzan, M. C., Marinescu, C., Florescu, M. S., & Orzan, A. O. (2022). The role of blockchain technologies in the sustainable development of students’ learning process. Sustainability, 14(3), 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031406
  • Choudhury, O., Fairoza, N., Sylla, I., & Das, A. (2019). A blockchain framework for managing and monitoring data in multi-site clinical trials. ArXiv, abs/1902.03975.
  • Clohessy, T., & Acton, T. (2019). Investigating the influence of organizational factors on blockchain adoption: An innovation theory perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1457–1491. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0365
  • Dang Quan, T., Wei-Han Tan, G., Aw, E. C. X., Cham, T. H., Basu, S., & Ooi, K. B. (2024). Can you resist the virtual temptations? Unveiling impulsive buying in metaverse retail. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 2024, 911. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2023-0911
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefuness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Deng, L., Yang, M., & Marcoulides, K. M. (2018). Structural equation modeling with many variables: A systematic review of issues and developments. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(APR), 580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00580
  • Díaz, R. M., Valdés Figueroa, L., & Pérez, G. (2021). Blockchain implementation opportunities and challenges in the Latin American and Caribbean logistics sector. FAL Bulletin, No. 387. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Santiago, Chile.
  • Dutta, P., Choi, T. M., Somani, S., & Butala, R. (2020). Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities. Transportation Research. Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 142, 102067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067
  • Dziugaite, G. K., Ben-David, S., & Roy, D. M. (2020). Enforcing Interpretability and its Statistical Impacts: Trade-offs between Accuracy and Interpretability. pp. 1–12. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.13764
  • Elareshi, M., Habes, M., Youssef, E., Salloum, S. A., Alfaisal, R., & Ziani, A. (2022). SEM-ANN-based approach to understanding students’ academic-performance adoption of YouTube for learning during Covid. Heliyon, 8(4), e09236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09236
  • Eom, N., Wen, S. B., & Ashill, H. J. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
  • Esfahbodi, A., Pang, G., & Peng, L. (2022). Determinants of consumers’ adoption intention for blockchain technology in E-commerce. Journal of Digital Economy, 1(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2022.11.001
  • Esposito V., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of partial least squares. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
  • Foo, P.-Y., Lee, V.-H., Tan, G. W.-H., & Ooi, K.-B. (2018). A gateway to realising sustainability performance via green supply chain management practices: A PLS–ANN approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 107, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.013
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  • Gillis, A. S. (2023). Deep Learning. TechTarget. Retrieved October 21, 2023, from https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/deep-learning-deep-neural-network.
  • Grewal, D., Motyka, S., & Levy, M. (2018). The evolution and future of retailing and retailing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 40(1), 85–93.
  • Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Janssen, M., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2019). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and user acceptance of blockchain technology for digital transactions–insights from user-generated content on Twitter. Enterprise information system, 13(6), 771–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2019.1599446
  • Guan, W., Ding, W., Zhang, B., & Verny, J. (2023). The role of supply chain alignment in coping with resource dependency in blockchain adoption: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 36(2), 605–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-11-2021-0491
  • Hair, R., Black, J. F., Babin, W. C., Anderson, B. J., & Tatham, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson.
  • Hair, M., Hult, J. F., Ringle, G. T. M., & Sarstedt, C. M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
  • Hair, J., Jr, Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  • Haneem, F., Kama, N., Taskin, N., Pauleen, D., & Abu Bakar, N. A. (2019). Determinants of master data management adoption by local government organizations: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.007
  • Hardgrave, B. C., Davis, F. D., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2003). Investigating determinants of software developers’ intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045751
  • Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
  • Hervey, A. (2023). Blockchain is A new model that makes the existing model obsolete. Retrieved October 25, 2023, from medium.com. Blockchain is A new model that makes the existing model obsolete.
  • Hew, J.-J., Leong, L.-Y., Tan, G. W.-H., Lee, V.-H., & Ooi, K.-B. (2018). Mobile social tourism shopping: A dual-stage analysis of a multi-mediation model. Tour Manag, 66, 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.005
  • Hew, T.-S., & Syed Abdul Kadir, S. L. (2016). Predicting instructional effectiveness of cloud-based virtual learning environment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(8), 1557–1584. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2015-0475
  • Huang, T. L., & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2
  • Huang, G., & Ren, Y. (2020). Linking technological functions of fitness mobile apps with continuance usage among Chinese users: Moderating role of exercise self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.013
  • Kabra, N., Bhattacharya, P., Tanwar, S., & Tyagi, S. (2020). MudraChain : Blockchain-based framework for automated cheque clearance in financial institutions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 102, 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.08.035
  • Kapoor, K. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Examining the role of three sets of innovation attributes for determining adoption of the interbank mobile payment service. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(5), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9484-7
  • Karjaluoto, H., & Vaccaro, V. L. (2009). B2B green marketing and innovation theory for competitive advantage. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 11(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287260911002477
  • Kim, A. (2023). How blockchain is providing sustainable coffee. Ledger insight. Retrieved February 15, 2023, from https://www.ledgerinsights.com/how-blockchain-is-providing-sustainable-coffee/.
  • Kim, K. S. (2022). Methodology of non-probability sampling in survey research. American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research, 15(6), 616–618. https://doi.org/10.34297/AJBSR.2022.15.002166
  • Knauer, F., & Mann, A. (2020). What is in it for me? Identifying drivers of blockchain acceptance among german consumers. The Journal of the British Blockchain Association, 3(1), 1–16. Jan https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-3-1-(1)2020
  • Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral Collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302
  • Koh, L., Dolgui, A., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Blockchain in transport and logistics–paradigms and transitions. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2054–2062. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1736428
  • Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107831
  • Kulkarni, M., & Patil, K. (2020). Block chain technology adoption using TOE framework. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(02), 1109–1117.
  • Kumar Bhardwaj, A., Garg, A., & Gajpal, Y. (2021). Determinants of blockchain technology adoption in supply chains by Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in India. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5537395
  • Latif, K. F., Sajjad, A., Bashir, R., Shaukat, M. B., Khan, M. B., & Sahibzada, U. F. (2020). Revisiting the relationship between corporate social responsibility and organizational performance: The mediating role of team outcomes. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1630–1641. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1911
  • Lee, V.-H., Hew, J.-J., Leong, L.-Y., Tan, G. W.-H., & Ooi, K.-B. (2020). Wearable payment: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 157, 113477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113477
  • Lee, S. G., Trimi, S., & Kim, C. (2013). The impact of cultural differences on technology adoption. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.003
  • Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Ooi, K.-B., Lee, V.-H., & Hew, J.-J. (2019). A hybrid SEM-neural network analysis of social media addiction. Expert Systems with Applications, 133, 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.024
  • Leong, L. Y., Hew, T. S., Ooi, K. B., & Wei, J. (2020). Predicting mobile wallet resistance: A two-staged structural equation modeling-artificial neural network approach. International Journal of Information Management, 51(vember), 102047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102047
  • Leong, L.-Y., Jaafar, N. I., & Ainin, S. (2018). The effects of Facebook browsing and usage intensity on impulse purchase in f-commerce. Comput Human Behav, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.033
  • Li, J., Ma, Q., Chan, A. H., & Man, S. S. (2019). Health monitoring through wearable technologies for older adults: Smart wearables acceptance model. Applied Ergonomics, 75, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.10.006
  • Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Marinković, V., & Kalinić, Z. (2017). A SEM-neural network approach for predicting antecedents of m-commerce acceptance. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.008
  • Lin, J. S. C., & Chang, H. C. (2011). The role of technology readiness in self-service technology acceptance. Managing Service Quality, 21(4), 424–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111146289
  • Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020). Explainable AI: A review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy, 23(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23010018
  • Mahdavifar, S., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2019). Application of deep learning to cybersecurity: A survey. Neurocomputing, 347, 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.02.056
  • Malik, S., Chadhar, M., Vatanasakdakul, S., & Chetty, M. (2021). Factors affecting the organizational adoption of blockchain technology: Extending the technology–organization– environment (TOE) framework in the Australian context. Sustainability, 13(16), 9404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169404
  • Manoj, T., Makkithaya, K., & Narendra, V. G. (2022). A Blockchain based decentralized identifiers for entity authentication in electronic health records. Cogent Engineering, 9(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2035134
  • Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., Rana, O. F., & Ranjan, R. (2022). Blockchain adoption: A study of cognitive factors underpinning decision making. Comput Human Behav, 131(October 2021), 107207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107207
  • Marsal-Llacuna, M.-L. (2018). Future living framework: Is blockchain the next enabling network? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 128, 226–234.
  • Miličević, K., Omrčen, L., Kohler, M., & Lukić, I. (2022). Trust model concept for IoT Blockchain applications as part of the digital transformation of metrology. Sensors, 22(13), 4708. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134708
  • Minoli, D., & Minoli, D. (2019). Positioning of blockchain mechanisms in IoT-powered Smart Home Systems : A gateway-based approach. Internet of Things, 10, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100147
  • Montecchi, M., Plangger, K., & Etter, M. May (2019). It’s real, trust me! Establishing supply chain provenance using blockchain. Business Horizons, 62(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.01.008
  • Na, S., Heo, S., Han, S., Shin, Y., & Roh, Y. (2022). Acceptance Model of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based technologies in construction firms: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Combination with the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) Framework. Buildings, 12(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020090
  • Nakamoto, S. (2018). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. bitcoin.org. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf%0A.
  • Namahoot, K. S., & Rattanawiboonsom, V. (2022). Integration of TAM Model of consumers’ intention to adopt cryptocurrency platform in Thailand: The mediating role of attitude and perceived risk. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 98. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9642998
  • Nasongkhla, J., & Shieh, C. J. (2023). Using technology acceptance model to discuss factors in university employees’ behavior intention to apply social media. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(2), e202317. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13019
  • Nguyen, L. T., Duc, D. T. V., Dang, T. Q., & Nguyen, D. P. (2023). Metaverse banking service: Are we ready to adopt? A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023, 371. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6617371
  • Nguyen, T. H., Le, X. C., & Vu, T. H. L. (2022). An Extended Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework for online retailing utilization in digital transformation: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Open Innovation, 8(4), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040200
  • Nokhbeh Zaeem, R., & Barber, K. S. (2020). How much identity management with blockchain would have saved us? A longitudinal study of identity Theft. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61146-0_13
  • Nordman, E. R., & Tolstoy, D. (2016). The impact of opportunity connectedness on innovation in SMEs’ foreign-market relationships. Technovation, 57–58, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.04.001
  • Nuryyev, G., Wang, Y.-P., Achyldurdyyeva, J., Jaw, B.-S., Yeh, Y.-S., Lin, H.-T., & Wu, L.-F. (2020). Blockchain technology adoption behavior and sustainability of the business in tourism and hospitality SMEs: An empirical study. Sustainability, 12(3), 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031256
  • Oke, A., Walumbwa, F., Yan, T., Idiagbon-Oke, M., & A. Ojode, L. (2014). Linking economic status with technology adoption in three emerging economies of Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2012-0013
  • Ooi, K.-B., & Tan, G. W.-H. (2016). Mobile technology acceptance model: An investigation using mobile users to explore smartphone credit card. Expert Systems with Applications, 59, 33–46. Oct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.015
  • Oparaji, U., Sheu, R.-J., Bankhead, M., Austin, J., & Patelli, E. (2017). Robust artificial neural network for reliability and sensitivity analyses of complex non-linear systems. Neural Networks, 96, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2017.09.003
  • Orji, I. J., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Huang, S., & Vazquez-Brust, D. (2020). Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev, 141, 102025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102025
  • Park, E. (2020). User acceptance of smart wearable devices: An expectation-confirmation model approach. Telematics and Informatics, 47, 101318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101318
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Pranav, S., Singh, K., Nandi, R., & Kumar, S. (2019). Managing smart home appliances with proof of authority and blockchain (vol. 2). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22482-0
  • Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega, 27(4), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0483(98)00071-1
  • Priyanath, H. M. S., Rvspk, R., & Rgn, M. (2020). Methods and rule-of-thumbs in the determination of minimum sample size when appling structural equation modelling: A review. Journal of Social Science Research, 15, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v15i.8670
  • Puklavec, B., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2018). Understanding the determinants of business intelligence system adoption stages an empirical study of SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(1), 236–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0170
  • Queiroz, M. M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. H. (2020). Blockchain and supply chain management integration: A systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Management, 25(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0143
  • Rehman, I. H., Ahmad, A., Akhter, F., & Aljarallah, A. (2022). A dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis to explore consumer adoption of smart wearable healthcare devices. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.294123
  • Ringle, J.-M., Christian, M., & Wende., S. (2022). SmartPLS Release: 4. SmartPLS GmbH, Oststeinbek, Germany. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
  • Runde, D. F. (2017). Quality Infrastructure: Ensuring sustainable economic growth. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). (January 2017), 1–6. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep23247%0A.
  • Salahshour Rad, M., Nilashi, M., & Mohamed Dahlan, H. (2018). Information technology adoption: A review of the literature and classification. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(2), 361–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z
  • Schmidthuber, L., Maresch, D., & Ginner, M. (2020). Disruptive technologies and abundance in the service sector – Toward a refined technology acceptance model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.017
  • Sciarelli, M., Prisco, A., Gheith, M. H., & Muto, V. (2022). Factors affecting the adoption of blockchain technology in innovative Italian companies: An extended TAM approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(3), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2021-0054
  • Shi, P., & Yan, B. (2016). Factors affecting RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry: Empirical evidence from China. Springerplus, 5(1), 2029. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3708-x
  • Shrestha, A. K., & Vassileva, J. (2019). User acceptance of Usable Blockchain-based research data sharing system: An extended TAM Based Study. 2019 First IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA), 203–208.
  • Sohaib, O., Hussain, W., Asif, M., Ahmad, M., & Mazzara, M. (2020). A PLS-SEM Neural network approach for understanding cryptocurrency adoption. IEEE Access, 8, 13138–13150. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2960083
  • Soomro, B. A., Shah, N., & Abdelwahed, N. A. A. (2022). Intention to adopt cryptocurrency: A robust contribution of trust and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 40(2), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-10-2021-0204
  • Sternad Zabukovšek, S., Kalinic, Z., Bobek, S., & Tominc, P. (2019). SEM–ANN based research of factors’ impact on extended use of ERP systems. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 27(3), 703–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0592-1
  • Sun, Z., Xu, Q., & Liu, J. (2023). Dynamic supervision of counterfeit products based on blockchain technology: A differential game on goodwill accumulation. PLoS One, 18(10), e0293346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293346
  • Taherdoost, H. (2022). A critical review of blockchain acceptance models – Blockchain Technology adoption frameworks and applications. Computers, 11, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11020024
  • Taherdoost, H. (2023). Blockchain and machine learning: A critical review on security. Information, 14(5), 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14050295
  • Talukder, M. S., Sorwar, G., Bao, Y., Ahmed, J. U., & Palash, M. A. S. (2020). Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 150, 119793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119793
  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  • The World Bank Ethiopia. (2016). The World Bank Ethiopia: National Quality Infrastructure Development Project (P160279).
  • Tilahun, M., Berhan, E., & Tesfaye, G. (2023). Determinants of consumers’ purchase intention on digital business model platform: Evidence from Ethiopia using partial least square structural equation model (PLS-SEM) technique. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00323-x
  • Tsai, W., Deng, E., Ding, X., & Li, J. (2018). Application of Blockchain to trade clearing. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), pp. 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C.2018.00039
  • Ullah, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., & Alblehai, F. M. (2021). Blockchain technology adoption in smart learning environments. Sustainability, 13(4), 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041801
  • Uluskan, M. (2023). Structural equation modelling – Artificial neural network based hybrid approach for assessing quality of university cafeteria services. The TQM Journal, 35(4), 1048–1071. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2022-0001
  • Vionis, P., & Kotsilieris, T. (2023). The potential of blockchain technology and smart contracts in the energy sector: A review. Applied Sciences, 14(1), 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010253
  • Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, M. M. (2022). Industry 4.0 and the supply chain digitalisation: A blockchain diffusion perspective. Production Planning and Control, 33(2-3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1810756
  • Wang, X., Liu, L., Liu, J., & Huang, X. (2022). Understanding the Determinants of Blockchain Technology Adoption in the Construction Industry. Buildings, 12(10), 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101709
  • Wong, L. W., Leong, L. Y., Hew, J. J., Tan, G. W. H., & Ooi, K. B. (2020). Time to seize the digital evolution: Adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 52(March), 101997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.005
  • Wong, L. W., Tan, G. W. H., Lee, V. H., Ooi, K. B., & Sohal, A. (2020). Unearthing the determinants of Blockchain adoption in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2100–2123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1730463
  • Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
  • Wu, F., Mahajan, V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2003). An analysis of E-Business adoption and its impact on business performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303255379
  • Yadav, V. S., Singh, A. R., Raut, R. D., & Govindarajan, U. H. (2020). Blockchain technology adoption barriers in the Indian agricultural supply chain: An integrated approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104877
  • Yeoh, W., Lee, A. S. H., Ng, C., Popovic, A., & Han, Y. (2023). Examining the acceptance of blockchain by real estate buyers and sellers. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(3), 1121–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10411-8
  • Zhang, J., Tan, R., Su, C., & Si, W. (2020). Design and application of a personal credit information sharing platform based on consortium blockchain. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 55(2019), 102659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102659