Effective ecodesign implementation in power electronics: a method based on functional blocks

References

• A New Circular Economy Action Plan For a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. (2020). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, T., Mandil, G., Naveaux, É., & Zwolinski, P. (2016). Lifespan extension for environmental benefits: A new concept of products with several distinct usage phases. Procedia CIRP, 47, 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.079
   Google Scholar
• Blessing, L. T. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a design research methodology. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1
   Google Scholar
• Borres, B. A., Lorenz Ardiente, I., Satur, J. R., Valiente, F., & Martinez, J. (2019 Design optimization of a two-phase interleaved transition mode boost converter for power factor correction [Paper presentation]. 2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM48295.2019.9072711
   Google Scholar
• Bovea, M. D., & Pérez-Belis, V. (2012). A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracquene, E., Peeters, J. R., Burez, J., De Schepper, K., Duflou, J. R., & Dewulf, W. (2019). Repairability evaluation for energy related products. Procedia CIRP, 80, 536–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.069
   Google Scholar
• Brambila-Macias, S. A., & Sakao, T. (2021). Effective ecodesign implementation with the support of a lifecycle engineer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangal, S., Faludi, J., & Balkenende, R. (2022). Design aspects in repairability scoring systems: comparing their objectivity and completeness. Sustainability, 14(14), 8634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas Lima, G., Rahmani, B., Rio, M., Lembeye, Y., & Crebier, J.-C. (2021). Eco-dimensioning approach for planar transformer in a dual active bridge (DAB) application. Eng, 2(4), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng2040035
   Google Scholar
• Debusschere, V., Ben Ahmed, H., & Multon, B. (2007). Eco-design of electromagnetic energy converters: The case of the electrical transformer. In IEEE IEMDC 2007 (pp. 1599–1604). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00676233
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, A., Schöggl, J.-P., Reyes, T., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2021). Sustainable product development in a circular economy: Implications for products, actors, decision-making support and lifecycle information management. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2009). of 21 October 2009 Establishing a Framework for the Setting of Ecodesign Requirements for Energy-Related Products (Text with EEA Relevance), CONSIL, EP, 285 OJ L http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/125/oj/eng
   Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Environment. (2022). Proposal for ecodesign for sustainable products regulation. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/proposal-ecodesign-sustainable-products-regulation_en
   Google Scholar
• Falck, J., Felgemacher, C., Rojko, A., Liserre, M., & Zacharias, P. (2018). Reliability of power electronic systems: An industry perspective. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 12(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2018.2825481
   Google Scholar
• Fang, L., Lefranc, P., & Rio, M. (2023). Barriers for eco-designing circular Power Electronics Converters. Procedia CIRP, 116, 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.049
   Google Scholar
• Fang, L., Romano, T. T., Alix, T., Crebier, J.-C., Lefranc, P., Rio, M., & Zwolinski, P. (2023, March 22). Eco-design implementation in power electronics: A literature review. In International Symposium on Advances Technologies in Electrical Systems (SATES 23). https://hal.science/hal-04074109
   Google Scholar
• Flipsen, B., Huisken, M., Opsomer, T., & Depypere, M. (2019). Smartphone reparability scoring: PLATE 2019. PLATE 2019
   Google Scholar
• Forti, V., Baldé, C. P., Kuehr, R., & Bel, G. (2020). The global e-waste monitor 2020, 120.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, J., & Perry, S. (2008). SysML for systems engineering (1. publ). Institution of Engineering and Technology. London.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 62430. (2019). IEC 62430:2019. ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/79064.html
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14040. (2006). ISO 14040:2006. ISO. https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/fr/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/03/74/37456.html
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14044:2006. (2006). ISO. https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/fr/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/03/84/38498.html
   Google Scholar
• Jaouen, C., Multon, B., & Barruel, F. (2011). Design optimization methodology for power converters based on global energy requirement criteria. Application to a DC-DC flyback structure. In Proceedings of the 2011 14th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (pp. 1––10).
   Google Scholar
• Javier Hurtado Albir, F., & Antonio Carrasco Hernández, J. (2011). Environmental aspects of manufacturing and disposal of power electronics equipment. EPE Journal, 21(3), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09398368.2011.11463798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, G. (2002). Success factors for integration of ecodesign in product development: A review of state of the art. Environmental Management and Health, 13(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/09566160210417868
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, A., Le Bocq, A., Nazarkina, L., & Hauschild, M. (2008). Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.11.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampen, D., & Burger, M. (2016). Drive system loss reduction by allpole sine filters. PCIM Europe 2016; International Exhibition and Conference for Power Electronics, Intelligent Motion, Renewable Energy and Energy Management (pp. 1–4).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-W., Noh, Y.-S., Joo, D., Hwang, D. Y., Kim, J.-H., & Choi, J.-H. (2021). Development of high efficiency and power density converter using SiC MOSFET for xEV [Paper presentation]. 2021 24th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS) (pp. 2132–2137). https://doi.org/10.23919/ICEMS52562.2021.9634326
   Google Scholar
• Middendorf, A., Benecke, S., Nissen, N. F., Wittler, O., & Lang, K.-D. (2015). Establishing ecoreliability of electronic devices in manufacturing environments. Procedia CIRP, 26, 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.063
   Google Scholar
• Millet, D. (2003). Environmental integration in design. Paris: Hermes Science publications.
   Google Scholar
• Multon, B., Ben Hamed, H., Debusshere, V., Aubry, J., Jaouen, C., & Barruel, F. (2012a). Expériences de recherche en éco-conception dans le domaine du génie électrique. European Journal of Electrical Engineering, 15(5), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.3166/ejee.15.433-449
   Google Scholar
• Multon, B., Ben Hamed, H., Debusshere, V., Aubry, J., Jaouen, C., & Barruel, F. (2012b). Research experiences in ecodesign in the field of Electrical Engineering. European Journal of Electrical Engineering, 15(5), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.3166/ejee.15.433-449
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering Design. K. Wallace (Ed.). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3581-4
   Google Scholar
• PEP Ecopassport. (2021). PEP Ecopassport. http://www.pep-ecopassport.org/
   Google Scholar
• PEP ecopassport®. (2021). Product category rules for electrical, electronic and HVAC-R products, PEP ecopassport® PROGRAM.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, L., Carney Almroth, B. M., Collins, C. D., Cornell, S., de Wit, C. A., Diamond, M. L., Fantke, P., Hassellöv, M., MacLeod, M., Ryberg, M. W., Søgaard Jørgensen, P., Villarrubia-Gómez, P., Wang, Z., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2022). Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(3), 1510–1521. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirson, T., Delhaye, T. P., Pip, A. G., Le Brun, G., Raskin, J.-P., & Bol, D. (2023). The environmental footprint of IC production: Review, analysis, and lessons from historical trends. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 36(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2022.3228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, R., Botez, G., Mihai, C., & Stoia, D. (2017 A comparative study of transformers losses with eco-design requirements [Paper presentation]. 2017 International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM) & 2017 Intl Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines and Power Electronics (ACEMP) (pp. 25–30). https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM.2017.7974942
   Google Scholar
• Popović-Gerber, J., Ferreira, J. A., & Wyk, J. D. v (2011). Quantifying the value of power electronics in sustainable electrical energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 26(12), 3534–3544. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2011.2166088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popović-Gerber, J., Oliver, J. A., Cordero, N., Harder, T., Cobos, J. A., Hayes, M., O'Mathuna, S. C., & Prem, E. (2012). Power electronics enabling efficient energy usage: Energy savings potential and technological challenges. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(5), 2338–2353. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2011.2171195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potting, J., Hekkert, M. P., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain. Planbureau Voor de Leefomgeving, PBL publication number: 2544, 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmani, B., Lembeye, Y., Rio, M., & Crebier, J.-C. (2021). Analysis of passive power components reuse. PCIM Europe Digital Days (International Exhibition and Conference for Power Electronics, Intelligent Motion, Renewable Energy and Energy Management Proceedings) (pp. 956–963). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03347175
   Google Scholar
• Rio, M., Blondin, F., & Zwolinski, P. (2019). Investigating product designer LCA preferred logics and visualisations. Procedia CIRP, 84, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.293
   Google Scholar
• Rio, M., Blondin, F., Coeurdevey, J., & Pochat, S. L. (2020). pLayRoOM-LcA Results chOice Maker: Représentation partagée d’Analyse du Cycle de Vie.
   Google Scholar
• Rio, M., Khannoussi, K., Crebier, J.-C., & Lembeye, Y. (2020). Addressing circularity to product designers: Application to a multi-cell power electronics converter. Procedia CIRP, 91, 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.158
   Google Scholar
• Romano, T. T., Alix, T., Lembeye, Y., Perry Lembeye, N., & Crebier Lembeye, J. C. (2023). Towards circular power electronics in the perspective of modularity. Procedia CIRP, 116, 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.099
   Google Scholar
• Sanfelix, J., Cordella, M., & Alfieri, F. (2019). Methods for the assessment of the reparability and upgradability of energy-related products—Publications Office of the EU. https://op.europa.eu/fr/publication-detail/-/publication/c0b344f5-216c-11ea-95ab-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
   Google Scholar
• Spreafico, C., Landi, D., & Russo, D. (2023). A new method of patent analysis to support prospective life cycle assessment of eco-design solutions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 38, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar