884
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Perceptions about mercury and lead in fish consumed in Lake Albert fishing communities Uganda

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & | (Reviewing Editor) show all
Article: 1220344 | Received 14 Jul 2016, Accepted 01 Aug 2016, Published online: 17 Aug 2016

References

  • Anders, R., & Batchelder, W. (2013). Cultural consensus theory for the ordinal data case. Psychometrika, 1–31. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9382-9
  • Barges, Anne (2008). Culture, territories, and confidence in food: An anthropological view on health in the context of environmental pollution and socio-political tension. Appetite, 51, 30–33.doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.02.003
  • Barnett, J., McConnon, A., Kennedy, J., Raats, M., Shepherd, R., Verbeke, W., ... Wall, P. (2011). Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: Design and conceptual framework of the FoodRisC project. BMC Public Health, 11, 1–9. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-308
  • Béné, C., & Merten, S. (2008). Women and fish-for-Sex: Transactional sex, HIV/AIDS and gender in African fisheries. World Development, 36, 875–899. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.010
  • Bloomingdale, A., Guthrie, L. B., Price, S., Wright, R. O., Platek, D., Haines, J., & Oken, E. (2010). A qualitative study of fish consumption during pregnancy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92, 1234–1240. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.30070
  • Burger, J. (2000). Consumption advisories and compliance: The fishing public and the deamplification of risk. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43, 471–488.10.1080/713676577
  • Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M. (2008). Knowledge about fish consumption advisories: A risk communication failure within a university population. Science of The Total Environment, 390, 346–354. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.016
  • Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M. (2009). Perceptions of the risks and benefits of fish consumption: Individual choices to reduce risk and increase health benefits. Environmental Research, 109, 343–349. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.002
  • Campbell, Linda, Dixon, D. G., & Hecky, R. E. (2003). A review of mercury in Lake Victoria, East Africa: Implications for human and ecosystem health. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 6, 325–356.doi:10.1080/10937400306474
  • Carvalho, C. M. L., Matos, A. I. N. M., Mateus, M. L., Santos, A. P. M., & Batoréu, M. C. C. (2008). High-fish consumption and risk prevention: Assessment of exposure to methylmercury in Portugal. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part A, 71, 1279–1288.10.1080/15287390801989036
  • Cohen, J. T., Bellinger, D. C., Connor, W. E., Krisetherton, P. M., Lawrence, R. S., Savitz, D. A., ... Gray, G. M. (2005). A quantitative risk-benefit analysis of changes in population fish consumption. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29, 325–334. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.07.003
  • Costa-Font, J., & Mossialos, E. (2007). Are perceptions of “risks” and “benefits” of genetically modified food (in)dependent? Food Quality and Preference, 18, 173–182. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.09.013
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Michigan: Sage.
  • Dapi, L. N., Omoloko, C., Janlert, U., Dahlgren, L., & Håglin, L. (2007). “I eat to be happy, to be strong, and to live.” Perceptions of rural and urban adolescents in Cameroon, Africa. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 39, 320–326. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2007.03.001
  • Driscoll, D., Sorensen, A., & Deerhake, M. (2012). A multidisciplinary approach to promoting healthy subsistence fish consumption in culturally distinct communities. Health Promotion Practice, 13, 245–251.10.1177/1524839910380156
  • Engelberth, H., Teisl, M. F., Frohmberg, E., Butts, K., Bell, K. P., Stableford, S., & Smith, A. E. (2013). Can fish consumption advisories do better? Providing benefit and risk information to increase knowledge. Environmental Research, 126, 232–239.10.1016/j.envres.2013.08.012
  • Geheb, K., Kalloch, S., Medard, M., Nyapendi, A.-T., Lwenya, C., & Kyangwa, M. (2008). Nile perch and the hungry of Lake Victoria: Gender, status and food in an East African fishery. Food Policy, 33, 85–98. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.06.001
  • Grunert, K. G. (2005). Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32, 369–391. doi:10.1093/eurrag/jbi011
  • Hindrum, J. T. R. (2011). Enviromental monitoring programme for the Albertine Graben Uganda In NINA (Ed.), Results from an ecosystem indicator scoping workshop in Kasese, Uganda, April 2011 (Vol. 706, p. 118). Norsk: Author.
  • Johnston, J. J., & Snow, J. L. (2007). Population-based fish consumption survey and probabilistic methylmercury risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 13, 1214–1227.10.1080/10807030701655764
  • Kalogeropoulos, N., Karavoltsos, S., Sakellari, A., Avramidou, S., Dassenakis, M., & Scoullos, M. (2012). Heavy metals in raw, fried and grilled Mediterranean finfish and shellfish. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50, 3702–3708.10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.012
  • Karp, T., Scholz, C. A., McGlue, M. M. (2012). Structure andstratigraphy of the Lake Albert Rift, East Africa: Observations from seismic reflection and gravity data Lacustrine sandstone reservoirs and hydrocarbon systems (pp. 299–518). New York, NY: Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University.
  • Kuntz, S. W., Ricco, J. A., Hill, W. G., & Anderko, L. (2010). Communicating methylmercury risks and fish consumption benefits to vulnerable childbearing populations. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 39, 118–126. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01094.x
  • Loewe, M. (2012). Post 2015: How to reconcile the millennium development goals (MDGs) and the sustainable development goals (SDGs)? German Development Insitute. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/getWSDoc.php?id=70
  • Mansilla-Rivera, I., & Rodríguez-Sierra, C. J. (2011). Metal levels in fish captured in puerto rico and estimation of risk from fish consumption. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 60, 132–144.10.1007/s00244-010-9538-x
  • Mariën, K., & Patrick, G. M. (2001). Exposure analysis of five fish-consuming populations for overexposure to methylmercury. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 11, 193–206.10.1038/sj.jea.7500160
  • Mitterer-Daltoé, M. L., Latorres, J. M., Queiroz, M. I., Fiszman, S., & Varela, P. (2013). Reasons underlying low fish consumption where availability is not an issue. A case study in Brazil, one of the world’s largest fish producers. Journal of Sensory Studies, 28, 205–216. doi:10.1111/joss.12037
  • Moretti, F., van Vliet, L., Bensing, J., Deledda, G., Mazzi, M., Rimondini, M., ... Fletcher, I. (2011). A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries. Patient Education and Counseling, 82, 420–428. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.005
  • Mozaffarian, D., Lemaitre, R. N., Kuller, L. H., Burke, G. L., Tracy, R. P., & Siscovick, D. S. (2003). Cardiac benefits of fish consumption may depend on the type of fish meal consumed: The cardiovascular health study. Circulation, 107, 1372–1377. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000055315.79177.16
  • Oken, E., Choi, A. L., Karagas, M. R., Mariën, K., Rheinberger, C. M., Schoeny, R., ... Korrick, S. (2012). Which fish should i eat? Perspectives influencing fish consumption choices. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120, 790–798.10.1289/ehp.1104500
  • Olale, E., & Henson, S. (2013). The impact of income diversification among fishing communities in Western Kenya. Food Policy, 43, 90–99. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.08.008
  • Olmedo, P., Pla, A., Hernández, A. F., Barbier, F., Ayouni, L., & Gil, F. (2013). Determination of toxic elements (mercury, cadmium, lead, tin and arsenic) in fish and shellfish samples. Risk assessment for the consumers. Environment International, 59, 63–72.10.1016/j.envint.2013.05.005
  • Petre, S. J., Sackett, D. K., & Aday, D. D. (2012). Do national advisories serve local consumers: an assessment of mercury in economically important North Carolina fish. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14, 1410–1416.10.1039/c2em30024a
  • Pieniak, Z., Verbeke, W., & Scholderer, J. (2010). Health-related beliefs and consumer knowledge as determinants of fish consumption. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 23, 480–488. doi:10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01045.x
  • Pieniak, Z., Verbeke, W., Scholderer, J., Brunsø, K., & Ottar Olsen, S. O. (2008). Impact of consumers' health beliefs, health involvement and risk perception on fish consumption. British Food Journal, 110, 898–915. doi:10.1108/00070700810900602
  • Power, M., Klein, G. M., Guiguer, K. R. R. A., & Kwan, M. K. H. (2002). Mercury accumulation in the fish community of a sub-Arctic lake in relation to trophic position and carbon sources. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 819–830. doi:10.2307/827208
  • Ruxton, C. H. S. (2011). The benefits of fish consumption. Nutrition Bulletin, 36, 6–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-3010.2010.01869.x
  • Ssebisubi, M. (2013). The status fishing communities in Buikwe District Uganda (pp. 6–38). In ICEIDA (Ed.). Kampala: ICEIDA.
  • Ssetaala, A., Mpendo, J., Nanvubya, A., Sigirenda, S., Nielsen, L., & Kiwanuka, N. (2012). Are fishing communities another most-at-risk-population? Results of a community-based study along Lake Victoria, Uganda. Retrovirology, 9, 216 p.10.1186/1742-4690-9-S2-P216
  • Teisl, M. F., Fein, S. B., & Levy, A. S. (2009). Information effects on consumer attitudes toward three food technologies: Organic production, biotechnology, and irradiation. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 586–596. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.07.001
  • Teisl, M. F., Fromberg, E., Smith, A. E., Boyle, K. J., & Engelberth, H. M. (2011). Awake at the switch: Improving fish consumption advisories for at-risk women. Science of The Total Environment, 409, 3257–3266.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.006
  • Thrushfield, M. (1995). Veterinary epidemiology (2nd ed.). Paris: Black well science.
  • Tudoran, A., Olsen, S. O., & Dopico, D. C. (2009). The effect of health benefit information on consumers health value, attitudes and intentions. Appetite, 52, 568–579. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.01.009
  • Ueland, Ø., Gunnlaugsdottir, H., Holm, F., Kalogeras, N., Leino, O., Luteijn, J. M., ... Verhagen, H. (2012). State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Consumer perception. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50, 67–76. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.006
  • van Dijk, H., Fischer, A. R. H., Honkanen, P., & Frewer, L. J. (2011). Perceptions of health risks and benefits associated with fish consumption among Russian consumers. Appetite, 56, 227–234. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.008
  • van Kleef, E., Frewer, L. J., Chryssochoidis, G. M., Houghton, J. R., Korzen-Bohr, S., Krystallis, T., ... Rowe, G. (2006). Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study. Appetite, 47, 46–63. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.002
  • Verbeke, W., Vanhonacker, F., Frewer, L. J., Sioen, I., Henauw, S. d., & Camp, J. v. (2008). Communicating risks and benefits from fish consumption: impact on Belgian consumers’ perception and intention to eat fish. Risk Analysis, 28, 951–967.
  • Verbeke, W., Vanhonacker, F., Sioen, I., Van Camp, J., & De Henauw, S. (2007). Perceived importance of sustainability and ethics related to fish: A consumer behavior perspective. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36, 580–585. doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[580:PIOSAE]2.0.CO;2
  • Wheatley, B., & Wheatley, M. A. (2000). Methylmercury and the health of indigenous peoples: a risk management challenge for physical and social sciences and for public health policy. Science of The Total Environment, 259, 23–29.10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00546-5
  • Wohl, J. B. (1998). Consumers’ decision-making and risk perceptions regarding foods produced with biotechnology. Journal of Consumer Policy, 21, 387–404.10.1023/A:1006904622571
  • Yasnitsky, A., & Ferrari, M. (2008). From Vygotsky to Vygotskian psychology: Introduction to the history of the Kharkov School. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 44, 119–145. doi:10.1002/jhbs.20303