Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability of normal and biofortified maize inbred lines in stress and non-stress environments

References

• Abakemal, D., Shimelis, H., & Derera, J. (2016). Genotype-by-environment interaction and yield stability of quality protein maize hybrids developed from tropical-highland adapted inbred lines. Euphytica, 209(3), 757–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1673-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abera, W., van Rensburg, J. B. J., Labuschagne, M. T., & Maartens, H. (2004). Genotype-environment interactions and yield stability analyses of maize in Ethiopia. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 21(4), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2004.10635058
   Google Scholar
• Badu-Apraku, B., Abamu, F. J., Menkir, A., Fakorede, M. A. B., & Obeng-Antwi, K. (2003). Genotype by environment interactions in the regional early variety trials in West and Central Africa. Maydica, 48, 93–104. https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000185935000002?SID=EUW1ED0E63mVpt2R6bnyqd2yHL1HJ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bänziger, M., Edmeades, G. O., Beck, D., & Bellon, M. (2000). Breeding for drought and nitrogen stress tolerance in maize: From theory to practice. CIMMYT.
   Google Scholar
• Bänziger, M., & Long, J. (2000). The potential for increasing the iron and zinc density of maize through plant-breeding. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 21(4), 397–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650002100410
   Google Scholar
• Bhandari, S., & Banjara, M. R. (2015). Micronutrients deficiency, a hidden hunger in Nepal: Prevalence, causes, consequences, and solutions. International Scholarly Research Notices, ID 276469, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/276469
   Google Scholar
• Bisawas, A., Sarker, U., Banik, B. R., Rohman, M. M., & Talukder, M. Z. A. (2014). Genotype x environment interaction for grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds under salinity stress. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 39(2), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v39i2.20431
   Google Scholar
• Bocianowski, J., Nowosad, K., & Tomkowiak, A. (2019b). Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield of maize hybrids and lines using the AMMI model. Maydica, 64, M13. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/237014896.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, W. B., Gregory, O. E., & Barker, T. C. (2002). Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53(366), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.366.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choukan, R. (2011). Genotype, environment and genotype × environment interaction effects on the performance of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Crop Breeding Journal, 1, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.22092/CBJ.2011.100349
   Google Scholar
• Eberhart, S. A., & Russell, W. A. (1966). Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties 1. Crop Science, 6(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertiro, B. T., Beyene, Y., Das, B., Mugo, S., Olsen, M., Oikeh, S., Juma, C., Labuschagne, M., Prasanna, B. M., & Lübberstedt, T. (2017). Combining ability and testcross performance of drought-tolerant maize inbred lines under stress and non-stress environments in Kenya. Plant Breeding, 136(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Farshadfar, E., Mahmodi, N., & Yaghotipoor, A. (2011). AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 1837–1844. https://www.cropj.com/farshadfar_5_13_2011_1837_1844.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Francis, T. R., & Kannenberg, L. W. (1978). Yield stability studies in short-season maize. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58(4), 1029–1034. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps78-157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasura, E., Setimela, P., & Souta, C. (2015). Evaluation of the performance of sorghum genotypes using GGE biplot. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 95(6), 1205–1214. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2015-119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauch, H. G. (1992). Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gauch, H. G. (2006). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science, 46(4), 1488–1500. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauch, H. G., & Zobel, R. W. (1996). AMMI analyses of yield trials. In M. S. Kang & H. G. Gauch (Eds.), Genotype by environment interaction (pp. 85–122). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gollob, H. F. (1968). A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika, 33(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haruna, A., Boakyewaa, A. G., Buah, S. S., Kanton, R. A., Kudzo, A. I., Seidu, A. M., Kwadwo, O. A., & Tejada Moral, M. (2017). Analysis of genotype by environment interaction for grain yield of intermediate maturing drought tolerant top‐cross maize hybrids under rain‐fed conditions. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 3(1), 1333243. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2017.1333243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwalla, N., Al Dhaheri, A. S., Radwan, H., Alfawaz, H. A., Fouda, M. A., Al-Daghri, N. M., Zaghloul, S., & Blumberg, J. B. (2017). The prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies and inadequacies in the Middle East and approaches to interventions. Nutrients, 9, 229–256. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9030229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, K. T., Radhika, K., Kumar, A. A., & Padma, V. (2014). Association studies of grain iron and zinc concentrations with yield and other agronomic traits using F2 populations of two crosses in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor l. Moench). The Journal of Research Angrau, 42, 77–80. https://oar.icrisat.org/9048/#:~:text=Links%3A-,Google%20Scholar,-View%20Statistics
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Coffey, L., Garfin, J., Miller, N. D., White, M. R., Spalding, E. P., de Leon, N., Kaeppler, S. M., Schnable, P. S., Springer, N. M., Hirsch, C. N., & Lukens, L. (2018). Genotype x environment interactions affecting heterosis in maize. PLoS One, 13(1), e0191321. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafouasson, H. N. A., Gracen, V., Yeboah, M. A., Ntsomboh-Ntsefong, G., Tandzi, N. L., & Mutengwa, C. (2018). Genotype-by-environment interaction and yield stability of maize single cross hybrids developed from tropical inbred lines. Agronomy, 8(5), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8050062
   Google Scholar
• Ma, G., Jin, Y., Li, Y., Zhai, F., Kok, F. J., Jacobsen, E., & Yang, X. (2008). Iron and zinc deficiencies in China: What is a feasible and cost-effective strategy? Public Health Nutrition, 11(6), 632–637. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980007001085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makumbi, D., Diallo, A., Kanampiu, F., Mugo, S., & Karaya, H. (2015). Agronomic performance and genotype x environment interaction of herbicide-resistant maize varieties in Eastern Africa. Crop Science, 55(2), 540–555. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.08.0593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maqbool, M. A., Aslam, M., Beshir, A., Khan, M. S., & Tuberosa, R. (2018). Breeding for provitamin A biofortification of maize (Zea mays L). Plant Breeding, 137(4), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mebratu, A., Wegary, D., Mohammed, W., Teklewold, A., & Tarekegne, A. (2019). Genotype × environment interaction of quality protein maize hybrids under contrasting management conditions in Eastern and Southern Africa. Crop Science, 59(4), 1576–1589. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.12.0722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, M., Sharifi, P., & Karimizadeh, R. (2014). Stability analysis of durum wheat genotypes by regression parameters in dryland conditions. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(5), 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201462051049
   Google Scholar
• Ndhlela, T., Herselman, L., Magorokosho, C., Setimela, P., Mutimaamba, C., & Labuschagne, M. (2014). Genotype x environment interaction of maize grain yield using AMMI biplots. Crop Science, 54(5), 1992–1999. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.07.0448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, A., Rodriguez, F., Alvarado, M., Lopez, M., Crossa, J., & Burgueno, J. (2015). GEA-R (genotype × environment analyses with R for Windows) version 4.0.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, R. M., Vencovsky, D. J. B., Vencovsky, R., Pinheiro, J. B., & Oliveira, A. B. (2005). Use of supplementary genotypes in AMMI analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 110(5), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1822-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, H. D., & Williams, E. R. (1976). A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika, 63(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/63.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinthus, M. J. (1973). Estimate of genotypic value: A proposed method. Euphytica, 22(1), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pixley, K. V., & Bjarnason, M. S. (2002). Stability of grain yield, endosperm modification, and protein quality of hybrid and open-pollinated quality protein maize (QPM) cultivars. Crop Science, 42(6), 1882–1890. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasanna, B. M., Palacios-Rojas, N., Hossain, F., Muthusamy, V., Menkir, A., Dhliwayo, T., Ndhlela, T., San Vicente, F., Nair, S. K., Vivek, B. S., Zhang, X., Olsen, M., & Fan, X. (2020). Molecular breeding for nutritionally enriched maize: Status and prospects. Frontiers in genetics, 10, 1392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setimela, P. S., Crossa, J., & Bänziger, M. (2010). Targeting of early to intermediate maize hybrids for yield performance and stability using SREG model. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 27(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2010.10639988
   Google Scholar
• Sibiya, J., Tongoona, P., Derera, J., & Rij, N. (2012). Genetic analysis and genotype × environment (G × E) for grey leaf spot disease resistance in elite African maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Euphytica, 185(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0466-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siwela, M., Pillay, K., Govender, L., Lottering, S., Mudau, F. N., Modi, A. T., & Mabhaudhi, T. (2020). Biofortified crops for combating hidden hunger in South Africa: Availability, acceptability, micronutrient retention and bioavailability. Foods, 9(6), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9060815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, N. J., Steyn, N. P., Fourie, J., & De Villiers, A. (2011). Price and availability of healthy food: A study in rural South Africa. Nutrition, 27(1), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2009.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tena, E., Goshu, F., Mohamad, H., Tesfa, M., Tesfaye, D., & Seife, A. (2019). Genotype × environment interaction by AMMI and GGE-biplot analysis for sugar yield in three crop cycles of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) clones in Ethiopia. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1651925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VSN International. (2017). Genstat Discovery Software V18.0 (18.0). http://www.genstat.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Worku, M., Makumbi, D., Beyene, Y., Das, B., Mugo, S., Pixley, K., Bänziger, M., Owino, F., Olsen, M., Asea, G., & Prasanna, B. M. (2016). Grain yield performance and flowering synchrony of CIMMYT’s tropical maize (Zea mays L.) parental inbred lines and single crosses. Euphytica, 211(3), 395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1758-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wricke, G. (1962). On a method of understanding the biological diversity in field research. Zeitschrift Für Pflanzenzüchtung, 47, 92–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., Hunt, L. A., Sheng, Q., & Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40(3), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., & Kang, M. S. (2003). GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, W., Kang, M. S., Ma, S., Woods, B., & Cornelius, P. L. (2007). GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science, 47(2), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., & Rajcan, I. (2002). Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., & Tinker, N. A. (2006). Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86(3), 623–645. https://doi.org/10.4141/P05-169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, P. H., Selvan, P. M., Sultana, R., Srivastava, A., Singh, A. K., Srinivasan, G., Singh, P. R., & Singh, P. P. (2007). Association between line per se and hybrid performance under excessive soil moisture stress in tropical maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crop Research, 101(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zewdu, Z., Abebe, T., Mitiku, T., Worede, F., Abebaw, D., Assaye, B., & Atnaf, M. (2020). Performance evaluation and yield stability of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in Ethiopia. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 6(1), 1842679. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1842679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar