Relationship between construction performance evaluation and contractor characteristics in Japan

References

• Alzahrani, J. I., & Emsley, M. W. (2013). The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 313–322. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, S. O., Wong, P. S., Fung, A. Y., & Coffey, W. (2008). Examining the use of bid information in predicting the contractor’s performance. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 13(2), 111–122. doi:10.1108/13664380810898122
   Google Scholar
• Egemen, M., & Mohamed, A. N. (2006). Clients’ needs, wants and expectations from contractors and approach to the concept of repetitive works in the Northern Cyprus construction market. Building and Environment, 41(5), 602–614. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, P. S., & Choi, S. K. (2000). Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process. Construction Management and Economics, 18(5), 547–557. doi:10.1080/014461900407356
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, S., & Miyakawa, A. (2016). Study on the tendering and contracting system for public works at public benefit: Comparison with western countries. Policy and Practice Studies, 2(1), 97–106. [In Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Furusaka, S. (2012). A comparative study on the mechanism of quality enhancement on building project in Japan China Korea and Taiwan: Using reinforcement work and steel work as an example. Souken Report, 7, 7–18. Construction Research Institute. [In Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D. M. (1996). Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan. Construction Management and Economics, 14(5), 437–450. doi:10.1080/014461996373304
   Google Scholar
• Hatush, Z., & Skitmore, M. (1997). Criteria for contractor selection. Construction Management and Economics, 15(1), 19–38. doi:10.1080/014461997373088
   Google Scholar
• Holt, G. D. (1998). Which contractor selection methodology? International Journal of Project Management, 16(3), 153–164. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00035-5
   Google Scholar
• Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., & Harris, F. C. (1994). Factors influencing U.K. construction clients’ choice of contractor. Building and Environment, 29(2), 241–248. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(94)90074-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosrowshahi, F. (1999). Neural network model for contractors’ prequalification for local authority projects. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 6(3), 315–328. doi:10.1108/eb021121
   Google Scholar
• Konno, Y. (2014). Japanese competitive bid entry qualifications: An examination of public works. Construction Management and Economics, 32(10), 957–967. doi:10.1080/01446193.2014.948465
   Google Scholar
• Kunishima, M. (2001). Improvement to the construction company: Advance to post ‘donburi’. Civil Engineering, 86, 1–2. [In Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Kunishima, M. (2006). Payment method for public works. Scope Net, 42, 3–7. [In Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2007). On the second interim report of the construction industry policy study group (Technical report). Tokyo: Author. [In Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2010). Supervision, inspection, guidance on performance results for quality assurance of public works: Reference books for practitioners. Tokyo: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. [In Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. (2011). The result of survey based on the bid contract optimization law. [In Japanese]. Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Ogunsemi, D. R., & Aje, I. O. (2006). A model for contractors’ selection in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 11(1), 33–44. doi:10.1108/13664380680001078
   Google Scholar
• Olaniran, O. J. (2015). The effects of cost-based contractor selection on construction project performance. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 20(3), 235–251. doi:10.1108/JFMPC-06-2014-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oono, T., & Harada, Y. (2005). Comparison of bidding and contract method of public works in Japan, the US and Europe. Government Auditing Review, 32, 149–168. [In Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Tam, C. M., & Harris, F. (1996). Model for assessing building contractors’ project performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 3(3), 187–203. doi:10.1108/eb021030
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, S., & Hayashi, S. (2006). Competitiveness of the auction system and the safety regulation in the process of the construction in the public procurement (Technical report). Tokyo: Japan Construction Information Center. [In Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Topcu, Y. (2004). A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey. Building and Environment, 39(4), 469–481. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, D., Kayis, B., & Willey, K. (2009). Identifying key factors in the evaluation of tenders for projects and services. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 250–260. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, C. H. (2004). Contractor performance prediction model for the United Kingdom construction contractor: Study of logistic regression approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(5), 691–698. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:5(691)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, H., & Proverbs, D. (2003). Factors influencing contractor performance: An international investigation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10(5), 322–332. doi:10.1108/09699980310502937
   Google Scholar