6,479
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research article

Factors influencing audit opinion of the Indonesian municipal governments’ financial statements

, & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1540256 | Received 12 Sep 2018, Accepted 22 Oct 2018, Published online: 03 Nov 2018

References

  • Agusti, A. F. (2014). Determinants factors of accountability and transparency of ministries/institutions [Faktor Determinan Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Kementerian/Lembaga] ( Thesis). Economic Faculty, University of Indonesia.
  • Ånerud, K. (2007, October). Harmonization of financial auditing standards in the public and private sectors – what are the differences? Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection, 34(4), 17.
  • Arens, A. A., Randal, J. E., & Beasley, M. S. (2008). Auditing and assurance services (12th ed.). New Jerssey, NJ: Pearson International Edition.
  • Arifin, I., & Fitriasari, D. (2014). Disclosure of ministry/institution financial statements, organizational characteristics and results of BPK’s audit. Proceeding SNA 17, Mataram, 24–27 September.
  • Atmajaya, R. M. S. A., & Probohudono, A. N. (2015). Analisis Audit BPK RI Terkait Kelemahan SPI, Temuan Ketidakpatuhan dan Kerugian Negara [Audit analysis of BPK RI regarding weaknesses of ICS, findings of non-compliance and state losses]. Jurnal Integritas, 2(11), 81-110.
  • Blume, L., & Voigt, S. (2011). Does organizational design of supreme audit institutions matter? A cross-country assessment. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(2), 215–229. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.07.001
  • Brook, D. A. (2001). Business-style financial statements under the CFO Act: An examination of audit opinions ( Dissertation). Graduate Faculty of George Mason University.
  • Budiawan, D. A., & Budi, S. P. (2014). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal Dan Kekuatan Koersif Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah [The influence of internal control systems and coercive strengths on the quality of local government financial reports]. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, University of Education Indonesia, 2(1), 276-288.
  • Carslaw, C., Mason, R., & Mills, J. R. (2007). Audit timeliness of school district audits. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 19(3), 290–316.
  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control-integrated framework. New York, NY: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
  • D’Aquila, J. M. (1998). Is the control environment related to financial reporting decisions? Managerial Auditing Journal, 13(8), 472–478. doi:10.1108/02686909810236334
  • Dye, K. M. (2007, November/December). Corruption and fraud detection by public sector auditors. The EDP Audit, Control and Security, 36(5–6), 6. Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection.
  • Fatimah, D., Ria, N. S., & Rasuli, M. (2014). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern, Kepatuhan Terhadap Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya dan Umur Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian pada Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Di Seluruh Indonesia [Effect of internal control systems, compliance with legislation, previous year audit opinions, and lifespan of local governments against unqualified opinion acceptance on local government financial reports throughout Indonesia]. Jurnal Akuntansi, 3(1), 1–15.
  • Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2005). The disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control after the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Accounting Horizons, 19(3), 137–158. doi:10.2308/acch.2005.19.3.137
  • Gendron, Y., Cooper, D. J., & Townley, B. (2001). In the name of accountability: State auditing, independence and new public management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 14(3): 278. Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005518
  • Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 19 [Multivariate analysis application with IBM SPSS 19 program]. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  • Gonzalez, B., Lopez, A., & Garcia, R. (2011). How do supreme audit institutions measures the impact of their work? Public Sector Accounting, 3, 503–517. Sage Library in Accounting and Finance. Corn wall.
  • Government of Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Keuangan Negara Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 [The State Finance Act No. 17/2003]. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
  • Government of Indonesia. (2004a). Undang-Undang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 [The audit of the management and responsibility of the State Finance Act No. 15/2004]. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
  • Government of Indonesia. (2004b). Undang-Undang Perbendaharaan Negara Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 [The State Treasury Act No. 1/2004]. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
  • Government of Indonesia. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan - Berbasis Kas Nomor 24 Tahun 2015 [The government regulation of governmental accounting standard – cash-based no. 24/2005]. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
  • Government of Indonesia. (2006). Undang-Undang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Nomor 15 Tahun 2016 [The Supreme Audit Board Act No. 15/2006]. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
  • Government of Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan Berbasis Akrual [The government regulation of governmental accounting standard – accrual-based no. 71/2010]. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
  • Griggs, L. L. (2004, Apr). Audits of internal control over financial reporting: What do they mean? Insights, The Corporate & Securities Law Advisor, 18(4). 2. Research Library.
  • Habib, A. (2013). A meta-analysis of the determinants of modified audit opinion decisions. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(3), 184–216. doi:10.1108/02686901311304349
  • Hay, D., & Cordery, C. (2018). The value of public sector audit: Literature and history. Journal of Accounting Literature, 40, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.acclit.2017.11.001
  • Liu, J., & Lin, B. (2012). Government auditing and corruption control: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5, 163–186. doi:10.1016/j.cjar.2012.01.002
  • Maabuat, J. S., Morasa, J., & Saerang, D. P. E. (2016). Pengaruh Kelemahan Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Ketidakpatuhan pada Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Penyelesaian Kerugian Negara terhadap Opini BPK RI atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia [The influence of weaknesses in the internal control system, non-compliance with legislation and settlement of state losses against BPK’s opinion on local government financial statements in Indonesia]. e-Journal Accountability. Sam Ratulangi University, 5(2), 52–62.
  • Mahaputra, I. P. U. R., & Putra, I. W. (2014). Analisis Faktor- Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Kualitas Informasi Pelaporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah [The analysis of factors affecting quality of information on local government financial reporting]. e-Journal Accountancy Udayana University, 8(2), 230–244.
  • McCandless, H. E. (1993, April). Auditing to serve public accountability. International Journal of Government Auditing, 20(2), 14. Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection.
  • Ministry of Home Affair of the Republic of Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 4 Tahun 2008 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Reviu atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah [Ministry of home affair regulation no 4 of 2008 regarding guidance of implementation review on local government financial statement]. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
  • Munawar, N., & Abdullah, S. (2016). Pengaruh Jumlah Temuan Audit Atas SPI Dan Jumlah Temuan Audit Atas Kepatuhan Terhadap Opini Atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota Di Aceh [The influence of number of audit findings on ICS and number of compliance audit findings on the opinion of financial statements of district/municipal governments in Aceh]. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala, 5(2), 57-67.
  • Nugraheni, P., & Subaweh, I. (2008, April). Pengaruh Penerapan Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan [The implemention effect of government accounting standards on the quality of financial statements]. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, 13(1), 48-58.
  • Pearson, D. (2014). Significant reforms in public sector audit – Staying relevant in times of change and challenge. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 10(1), 150–161. doi:10.1108/JAOC-06-2013-0054
  • Prasetyaningsih, E., Yuhalifiyah, G., & Susanto, H. (2014). Internal control system weakness and non-compliance to the provision of legislation in practicing audit of local government in Indonesia. Open Journal of Political Science, 4(4), 257–264. doi:10.4236/ojps.2014.44028
  • Safitri, N. L. K. S. A., & Darsono. (2015). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal dan Temuan Kepatuhan Terhadap Opini Audit pada Pemerintah Daerah [The influence of the internal control system and findings of compliance on audit opinions local governments]. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 5(1), 1–12.
  • Sari, A. P., Martani, D., & Setyaningrum, D. (2015). Pengaruh temuan audit, tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan dan kualitas sumber daya manusia terhadap opini audit melalui tingkat pengungkapan laporan keuangan kementerian/lembaga [Effect of audit findings, follow-up of audit results and quality of human resources on audit opinions through the level of disclosure of ministry/agency financial statements]. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVIII, Medan.
  • Sari, S. P., & Witono, B. (2014). Keterandalan dan ketepatwaktuan pelaporan keuangan daerah ditinjau dari sumber daya manusia, pengendalian internal dan pemanfaatan Teknologi informasi [Reliability and timeliness of regional financial reporting viewed from human resources, internal control and information technology utilization]. In Seminar Nasional dan Call for Paper (Sancall 2014). Research Methods and Organizational Studies, 418-425.
  • Schelker, M., & Eichenberger, R. (2010). Auditors and fiscal policy: Empirical evidence on a little big institution. Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(4), 357–380. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2010.09.002
  • Setiawan, R. A. (2017). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern dan Kepatuhan Pada Peraturan Perundangundangan Terhadap Opini Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah [The influence of internal control systems and compliance with laws and regulations on opinions of local government financial reports]. Essay. The University of Hasanuddin.
  • Setyaningrum, D. (2015). Kualitas Auditor, Pengawasan Legislatif dan Pemanfaatan Hasil Audit dalam Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah [Auditor quality, legislative supervision and utilization of audit results in regional financial management accountability] ( Dissertation). Economic Faculty, University of Indonesia.
  • Siegel, J. G., & Akel, A. (1989, January). Identifying responsibility for the audit report. The National Public Accountant, 34(1), 38.
  • Sinason, D. H. 2000. A study of the effects of accountability and engagement risk on auditor materiality decisions in public sector audits. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12,1. Accounting, Spring, 12, 1. Tax & Banking Collection. doi:10.1108/JPBAFM-12-01-2000-B001
  • Sipahutar, H., & Dan Khairani, S. (2013). Analisis Perubahan Opini LHP BPK RI Atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Empat Lawang [Analysis of development in BPK’s opinion reports to the financial statements of the regional government of Empat Lawang district]. Journal STIE MDP, 1(1), 1-9.
  • Skaerbaek, P. (2009). Public sector auditor identities in making efficiency auditable: The national audit office of denmark as independent auditor and modernizer. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 971-987.
  • Suparwan, D. K. T., Sujana, E., & Yuniarta, G. A. (2018). Pengaruh Kewajaran Penyajian Laporan Keuangan terhadap Kualitas Akuntabilitas Keuangan pada Dinas-Dinas Kabupaten Bangli [The effect of financial statement fairness presentation on the quality of financial accountability at Bangli district offices]. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi (JIMAT), Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 8(2), 1-12.
  • Supreme Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia [Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia]. (2014). Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan Keuangan BPK RI Nomor 4/K/I-XIII.2/7/2014 [Auditing guideline nomor 4/K/I-XIII.2/7/2014]. Jakarta: Republic of Indonesia.
  • Supreme Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia [Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia]. (2017a). Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara [State audit standard]. Jakarta: Republic of Indonesia.
  • Supreme Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia [Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia]. (2017b). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2016 dan 2017 [Summary of audit result semester I year 2016 and 2017]. Jakarta: Republic of Indonesia.
  • Tahinakis, P., & Samarinas, M. (2016). The incremental information content of audit opinion. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(2), 139–169. doi:10.1108/JAAR-01-2013-0011
  • Taufikurrahman. (2014). Analisis faktor – faktor yang mempengaruhi pemberian opini audit oleh BPK RI atas LKPD Provinsi, kabupaten dan kota di Sumatera Utara [Analysis of factors influencing the provision of audit opinion by the BPK for provincial, district and municipal financial statements in North Sumatra] ( Unpublished essay). University of North Sumatera.
  • Trisnani, E. D., Dimyati, M., & Paramu, H. (2018). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Keandalan Laporan Keuangan dengan Mediasi Penatausahaan Aset Tetap [The influence of the internal control system on the reliability of financial statements with fixed asset administration intermediation]. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, 11(3), 271–282.
  • Winanti, B. A. (2014). Analisis Pengaruh Temuan dan Tindak Lanjut Pemeriksaan BPK, Legitimasi Kepala Daerah serta Pengawasan Pemerintahan terhadap Opini Audit LKPD 2010–2011 [Analysis of the influence of BPK findings and follow-up of audit results, legitimacy of regional leaders and government oversight of local governments’ financial statements audit opinions 2010–2011]. Accountancy Essay. Economic Faculty, University of Indonesia.
  • Wisdom, O., & Oyebisi, O. M. (2017, December). Impact of public sector auditing in promoting accountability and transparency in Nigeria. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 22(3), 22.