A mathematical framework for managing interactive communication distortions in exascale organizations

References

• Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2012). Z Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategische Managementtheorie, 14, 325.
   Google Scholar
• Aswani, S. (2012). The way forward with ecosystem-based management in tropical contexts: Reconciling with existing management systems.”. Marine Policy, 36.1, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2011.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. E. “21st Century Regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st century trade and 20th century trade rules.” Available at SSRN 1869845 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C. J. (1995). Developing the environment: Problems & management. Longman scientific & technical.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28.3, 381–383. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullmore, E. D., & Sporns, O. (2012). The economy of brain network organization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13.5, 336–349. doi:10.1038/nrn3214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, W. W. (2013). Organization change: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones, A., & Straub, D. W., Jr. (2006). Conceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research, 17.3, 228–246. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, W. F. (2006). 10 Global performance management systems. Handbook of research in international human resource management, 176.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2014). Technopoles of the world: The making of twenty-first century industrial complexes. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, C. (2014). Globalisation and Insecurity in the twenty-first century: NATO and the Management of Risk. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R.L., Murphy, J., & Willmott, H. (2010). Organization theory and design. Cengage learning EMEA.
   Google Scholar
• Drack, M., & Apfalter, W. (2007). Is Paul A. Weiss’ and Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s system thinking still valid today? Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24.5, 537–546. doi:10.1002/sres.855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22.1, 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22.5, 1240–1253. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller, W. (2008). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, R. L. (2010). The relationship of ‘systems thinking’to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23.4, 269–284. doi:10.1007/s11213-010-9169-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. A. (1998). The processes of organization and management. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Gharajedaghi, J. (2011). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity: A platform for designing business architecture. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality management for organizational excellence. United Kingdom: pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, A. J. (2013). A problem structuring method for ecosystem-based management: The DPSIR modelling process. European Journal of Operational Research, 227.3, 558–569. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 571–586. doi:10.1002/smj.1975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeckel, S. H. (1999). Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations. Harvard business press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, T. (2011). Self-organized governance networks for ecosystem management: Who is accountable? Ecology & Society, 16.2, 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, R., Rohm, A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2011). We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54.3, 265–273. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2012). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z.-X., & Han, Y. (2012). Team empowerment and the organizational context decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization.”. Journal of Management, 38, 475–501. doi:10.1177/0149206309342891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, T., Mukkamala, R. R., & Slaats, T. (2011). Designing a cross-organizational case management system using dynamic condition response graphs. Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), 2011 15th IEEE International, Helsinki, Finland: IEEE..
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, P. (2012). Innovative supply risk management In Supply Management Research (pp. 79–104). Gabler Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., & Collins, J. (2012). Global positioning system: Theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. B. “System and method for multi-dimensional organization, management, and manipulation of remote data.” U.S. Patent No. 8,434,027. 2013 Apr 30.
   Google Scholar
• Kermisch, C. (2012). Risk and responsibility: A complex and evolving relationship. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18.1, 91–102. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9246-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaneghah, E. M., & Sharifi, M. (2014). AMRC: An algebraic model for reconfiguration of high performance cluster computing systems at runtime. The Journal of Supercomputing, 67.1, 1–30. doi:10.1007/s11227-013-0982-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuja, S. A., Solovjev, I. V., & Tsvetkov, V. Y. (2013). System elements heterogeneity. European Researcher, 60.10-1, 2366–2373.
   Google Scholar
• Lehar, A. (2005). Measuring systemic risk: a risk management approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(10), 2577-2603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveson, N. G. (2011). Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events. Safety Science, 49.1, 55–64. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepinette, E., & Tahar, I. (2013). Vector-valued risk measure processes.
   Google Scholar
• Merabti, M., Kennedy, M., & Hurst, W. “Critical infrastructure protection: A 21 st century challenge.” Communications and Information Technology (ICCIT), 2011 International Conference on. IEEE, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mirtaheri, S. L., Khaneghah, E. M., Sharifi, M., Minaei-Bidgoli, B., Raahemi, B., Arab, M. N., & Ardestani, A. S. (2013). Four-dimensional model for describing the status of peers in peer-to-peer distributed systems. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 21.6, 1646–1664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molchanov, I., & Ralchenko, K. (2015). A generalisation of the fractional Brownian field based on non-Euclidean norms. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.04.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N., Hai, & Mohamed, S. (2011). Leadership behaviors, organizational culture and knowledge management practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Development, 30.2, 206–221. doi:10.1108/02621711111105786
   Google Scholar
• O’leary, M. B., Mortensen, M., & Woolley, A. W. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36.3, 461–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okeson, J. P. (2014). Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M.(2007). The natural advantage of nations: Business opportunities, innovation, and governance in the 21st century.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Petter, S., DeLone, W., & Ephraim, M. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17.3, 236–263. doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflug, G. C., & Römisch, W. (2007). Modeling, measuring and managing risk (Vol. 20). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Pinedo, M. L. (2012). Scheduling: Theory, algorithms, and systems. Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, C. L., & Pmp, P. R. (2014). Risk management: Concepts and guidance.  Auerbach Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Puranam, P., Raveendran, M., & Knudsen, T. (2012). Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37.3, 419–440. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribes, D., Steven Jackson Stuart Geiger, Matthew Burton, Thomas Finholt (2013). Artifacts that organize: Delegation in the distributed organization. Information and Organization, 23.1, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, A. L. (2013). The enterprise and its environment: A system theory of management organization (Vol. 10). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riempp, G. (2012). Wide area workflow management: Creating partnerships for the twenty-first century. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2011). Contemporary human behavior theory: A critical perspective for social work. UK: Pearson Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1985). Analytical planning: The Organization of System (Vol. 7). RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sadgrove, M. (2015). Kit. The complete guide to business risk management. Abingdon: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, M. L., Witmer, J. A., & Schaffner, A. (2012). Statistics for the life sciences. London: Pearson education.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, A.-W. (2012). Business process engineering: Reference models for industrial enterprises. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. (2013). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50.2, 259–284. doi:10.1111/joms.12014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlicht, E. (2011). Consistency in Organization (updated). IZA Discussion Papers 5644, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2013). Anonymous agencies, backstreet businesses, and covert collectives: Rethinking organizations in the 21st century. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh, A. (2011). The first great depression of the twenty-first century. Socialist Register, 47.47, 44–63.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifi, M., Mirtaheri, S. L., & Khaneghah, E. M. (2010). A dynamic framework for integrated management of all types of resources in P2P systems. The Journal of Supercomputing, 52.2, 149–170. doi:10.1007/s11227-009-0281-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogdalen, J. E., & Jan, E. V. (2011). Quantitative risk analysis offshore—Human and organizational factors. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96.4, 468–479. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36.2, 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatelatos, M.,Dezfuli, H., Apostolakis, G., Everline, C., Guarro, S., Mathias, D., … & Vesely, W. (2011). Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners, Washington, DC: NASA.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, J. (2011). Product lifecycle management. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. Cognition beyond the Brain, (pp. 195–221). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Slavakis, K., & Lerman, G. “{Multi-Manifold Modeling in Non-Euclidean spaces}.” Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics San Diego, CA, USA. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Z., Zheng, S., Spangler, S. A., Yu, C., Hoogenraad, C. C., & Zhang, M. (2011). Liprin-mediated large signaling complex organization revealed by the liprin-α/CASK and liprin-α/liprin-β complex structures. Molecular Cell, 43.4, 586–598. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2012). Making sense of the organization: Volume 2: The impermanent organization (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P. C., & Tippins, S. C. (2000). Managing business risk: An organization-wide approach to risk management. Amacom.
   Google Scholar
• Zsidisin, G. A., Panelli, A., & Upton, R. (2000). Purchasing organization involvement in risk assessments, contingency plans, and risk management: An exploratory study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5.4, 187–198. doi:10.1108/13598540010347307
   Google Scholar