Analysis of Tweet Form’s effect on users’ engagement on Twitter

References

• Antoine, H. A. (2016). Hashtagging: What you need to know about hashtags as trademarks, hashtag litigation, the FTC, viral campaigns, and more. Computer & Internet Lawyer, 33(11), 6–10. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy1.library.jhu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=119547933&site=ehost-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Arrabal-Sánchez, G., & De-Aguilera-Moyano, M. (2016). Communicating in 140 characters. How Journalists in Spain use Twitter. Comunicar, 24(46), 9–15. doi:10.3916/C46-2016-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, P., Hua-Wei, S., Huang, J., & Chen, H. (2013, March). Mention effect in information diffusion on a micro-blogging network. San Francisco: Public Library of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R. (2015, July 6). Images and videos - media for communication. London: MENA Report.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, S., & Soboleva, A. (2011). Interactive or reactive? Marketing with Twitter. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28, 491–499. doi:10.1108/07363761111181473
   Google Scholar
• Byrum, K. L. (2014). A comparison of the source, media format, and sentiment in generating source credibility, information credibility, corporate brand reputation, purchase intention, and social media engagement in a corporate social responsibility campaign presented via soci. Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, C. (2012, December). Domains/SocialFlow. PRweek, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Software, A. (2017, December 6). Text Mining Package “tm”. Retrieved from R-Project: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tm/tm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ghiassi, M., Skinner, J., & Zimbra, D. (2013). Twitter brand sentiment analysis: A hybrid system using n-gram analysis and dynamic artificial neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(16), 6266–6282. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, M. (2012, April). The power of pictures in marketing. LIMRA’s Marke Facts Quarter;u, p. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Johanna, G., Veronica, L., Emil, W., & Minna, P. (2012). Customer engagement in a facebook brand community. Management Research Review, 35(9),857-877. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy1.library.jhu.edu/10.1108/01409171211256578
   Google Scholar
• Kalro, A. D., Sivakumaran, B., & Marathe, R. R. (2017). The ad format-strategy effect on comparative advertising effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing, 51, 99–122. doi:10.1108/EJM-11-2015-0764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, S. (2013, May 20). To hashtag or not to hashtag?: That is the question - how to use them correctly without going overboard. Chicago Tribune; Chicago, Ill, pp. 2–5. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.057
   Google Scholar
• Linda, H., Glynn, M., & Roderick, B. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2),149-165. ISBN 1094-9968. Retrieved from doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Momany, M., & Alshboul, A. (2016). Social media marketing: Utilizing social media to advance brand awareness and increase online sales. International Journal of Business, Marketing, & Decision Science,9(1), 33-54.
   Google Scholar
• Montague, I., Gazal, K. A., Wiedenbeck, J., & Shepherd, J.-G. (2016). Forest products industry in a digital age: A look at E-Commerce and social media. Forest Products Journal, 66, 49–57. doi:10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Expósito, M., Oviedo-García, M., & Castellanos-Verdugo, M. (2017). How to measure engagement in Twitter: Advancing a metric. Internet Research, 27, 1122–1148. doi:10.1108/IntR-06-2016-0170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, A., & Paroubek, P. (2010). Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Paris: European Languages Resources Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sevin, E. (2013). Places going viral: Twitter usage patterns in destination marketing and place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6, 227–239. doi:10.1108/JPMD-10-2012-0037
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, E. (2017, December). A genius way to get more attention for tweets also makes life easier. Retrieved from https://www.inc.com/erik-sherman/a-genius-way-to-get-more-attention-for-tweets-also-makes-life-easier.html
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, E. (2018, July 16). A genius way to get more attention for tweets also makes life easier. Inc.: A genius way to get more attention for tweets also makes life easier.
   Google Scholar
• Syrdal, H. A., & Briggs, E. (2018, January 1). Engagement with social media content: A qualitative exploration. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 26, 4–22. doi:10.1080/10696679.2017.1389243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, L., Ni, Z., Xiong, H., & Zhu, H. (2015, July). Locating targets through mention in Twitter. World Wide Web, 18, 1019–1049. doi:10.1007/s11280-014-0299-8
   Google Scholar
• Tutaj, K., & Van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Effects of online advertising format and persuasion knowledge on audience reactions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18, 5. doi:10.1080/13527266.2011.620765
   Google Scholar
• Twitter. (2018). Number of monthly active Twitter users in the United States from 1st quarter 2010 to 4th quarter 2017 (in millions). United States: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Twitter Developer. (n.d.). Twitter API reference. Retrieved from https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/api-reference-index
   Google Scholar
• Unknown. (n.d.). Sentiment140. Retrieved from http://help.sentiment140.com/home
   Google Scholar