The relationship between complexity behavior and enterprise growth: A case of savings and credit cooperatives in Uganda

References

• Achtenhagen, L., Naldi, L., & Melin, L. (2010). “Business growth”—Do. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 289–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adizes, I. (1979). Organizational passages—Diagnosing and treating lifecycle problems of organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 8(1), 3–25. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(79)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriana, V., & Trejo Cazares, M. C. (2016). Academic and research networks management: Challengesfor higher education institutions in Mexico. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 7. doi:10.1186/s41239-016-0013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akingunola, R. O. (2011). Small and medium scale enterprises and economic growth in Nigeria: An assessment of financing options. Pakistan Journal of Business and Economic Review, 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, M. E. (2005). Social science research: Conception, methodology and analysis. Kampala, Uganda: Makerere University.
   Google Scholar
• Anyadike-Danes, M., Bonner, K., Hart, M., & Mason, C. (2009). Measuring business growth: High-growth firms and their contribution to employment in the UK: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA), UK.
   Google Scholar
• Baltaci., A., & Ali., B. (2017). Complexity leadership: A theoretical perspectives. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 5(1), 30–58. doi:10.17583/ijelm.2017.2435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, C. B. (2011). Complexity leadership: An overview and key limitations (Learner Paper). Retrieved fromIntegralleadershipreview.com
   Google Scholar
• Bwana, K. M., & Mwakujonga, J. (2013). Issues in SACCO development in Kenya and Tanzania: The historical and development perspectives. The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education Journal, 3(5), 161–169
   Google Scholar
• Coveney, P. V. (2003). Self–Organization and complexity: A new age for theory, computation and experiment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 361(1807), 1057–1079. doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design, qualitatif, quantitative, and mixing approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P, Achentenhagen, L, & Naldi, L. (2010). Small firm growth. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 69–166. doi:10.1561/0300000029
   Google Scholar
• DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Ghalayini., Y. (2017). Complexity theory: A newway to look at new public management. Network and Complex Systems, 7(1), 6–10. ISSB 2224-610X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0603
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Logistic regression. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 264, 315.
   Google Scholar
• Gandolfo., D., & Vasja., R. (2016). Complexity theory for a new managerial paradigm: A research framework. Switerzeland: Springer International Publishing. Contribution to Management Science doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18185-1_14
   Google Scholar
• Geerlof, J., & van Beckhoven, A. (2016). 4/28–Complexity, self-organization and leadership: Enlivened experiences from The Netherlands. In Integral leadership review. Netherland: Thouris. Retrieved from integralleadershipreview.com/14633
   Google Scholar
• Gershenson, C., & Fernández, N. (2012). Complexity and information: Measuring emergence, self‐organization, and homeostasis at multiple scales. Complexity, 18(2), 29–44. doi:10.1002/cplx.v18.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1(1), 49–72. doi:10.1207/s15327000em0101_4
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., Hazy, J., & Lichtenstein, B. (2010). Complexity and the nexus of leadership: Leveraging nonlinear science to create ecologies of innovation. London: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Anand, P. (2015). Focused web crawlers and its approaches. Futuristic trends on computational analysis and knowledge management (ABLAZE). 2015 International Conference on IEEE, Noida, India.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. D., Guha, S., & Krishnaswami, S. S. (2013). Firm growth and its determinants. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 15. doi:10.1186/2192-5372-2-15
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education International, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J. K., & Martinez, K. (2006). Environmental sensor networks: A revolution in the earth system science? Earth-Science Reviews, 78(3–4), 177–191. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylighen, F. (2016). Stigmergy as a universal coordination mechanism I: Definition and components. Cognitive Systems Research, 38, 4–13. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, T., & Powell, R. (1998). An internally consistent thermodynamic data set for phases of petrological interest. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 16(3), 309–343. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1314.1998.00140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong., L., Lu., M., & Huang, P. (2015). When organizational complexity helps corporations improve its performance. Journal of Management Development, 34(3), 340–351. doi:10.1108/JMD-05-2013-0071
   Google Scholar
• Kasekende, L., & Opondo, H. (2003). Financing Small and Medium-scale Enterprises (SMEs). Uganda’s Experience By. Bank of Uganda, Kampala, Uganda
   Google Scholar
• Koech, C. (2011). A survey of the financial constraints hindering growth of SME’s in Kenya: The case of Kamukunji district in Nairobi county. Unpublished MBA project.
   Google Scholar
• Kyazze, L. M., Nkote, I. N., & Wakaisuka-Isingoma, J. (2017). Cooperative governance and social performance of cooperative societies. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1284391. doi:10.1080/23311975.2017.1284391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoureux, E. L., Pallant, J. F., Pesudovs, K., Hassell, J. B., & Keeffe, J. E. (2006). The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: An evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 47(11), 4732–4741. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Bayes and multiple imputation. Statistical analysis with missing data (pp. 200–220). US: Wiley series.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, H. P. V. (2016). Growth of small businesses: A literature review and perspectives of studies. Gestão & Produção, 23(2), 419–432. doi:10.1590/0104-530x1759-14
   Google Scholar
• Mafabi, S., Munene, J., & Ntayi, J. (2012). Knowledge management and organisational resilience: Organisational innovation as a mediator in Uganda parastatals. Journal of Strategy and Management, 5(1), 57–80. doi:10.1108/17554251211200455
   Google Scholar
• Mao, H. (2009). Review on enterprise growth theories. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(8), 20. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v4n8p20
   Google Scholar
• Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organization: Chaos and complexity theories of formal social organizations (pp. 389–418). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, R. (2008). Complexity theory for organizations and organizational leadership. Complexity Leadership, Part, 1, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 389–418. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00092-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvie, A., & Wiklund, J. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 261–288. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-6520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, E. (2008). Complexity, management and the dynamics of change: Challenges for practice. US: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Huberman, M. A., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Trade, Industry and Cooperatives (MTIC). (2016). Ministers statement on the status of cooperatives in Uganda. Kampala: Ministry of Industry Trade and Cooperatives.
   Google Scholar
• Muthaih, K., & Venkatesh, S. (2012). A study on the barriers affecting the growth of small & medium enterprises in india. International Journal of Research in Computer Application Management, 2(1), 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• National Planning Authority. (2015). National development plan 11 (2015/16-2019/20). Kampala, Uganda: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nuwagaba, A. (2012). Savings and credit cooperative societies (SACCOS) as a source of financing agriculture. Challenges and lessons learnt. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 2(11), 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Okello Candiya Bongomin, G., Ntayi, J. M., Munene, J. C., & Nabeta, I. N. (2016). Financial inclusion in rural Uganda: Testing interaction effect of financial literacy and networks. Journal of African Business, 17(1), 106–128. doi:10.1080/15228916.2016.1117382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (version 12). Australia: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of a firm. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons Inc.,
   Google Scholar
• Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarantakos, S. (2012). Social research. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ssekakubo., J., Ndiwalana., G., & Lwanga, F. (2014). Corporate governance and the financial performance of savings, credit and corporative societies. International Research Journal of Arts and Social Science, 3(3), 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, Y.-H., Hong, T.-P., & Sun, S.-I. (2004). An XML implementation process model for enterprise applications. Computers in Industry, 55(2), 181–196. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2004.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Uganda Cooperative Alliance. (2015). Annual performance. Kampala Uganda: Report.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9, 2. doi:10.5751/ES-00650-090205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8, 3. doi:10.33151/ajp.8.3.93
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, F. M. (2017). Organizational behaviour and gender. US: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Council of Credit Unions Statistcial Report. (2016). The global network of credit unions and financial cooperatives. Washington, USA: World Council. WWW.WOCCU.Org.
   Google Scholar
• Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., & Zhao, C. (2010). Enterprise growth theory and reviewed in this paper—Based on growth drivers point of view [J]. Soft Science, 7, 104–109.
   Google Scholar
• Yeasmin, S., & Rahman, K. (2012). Triangulation research method as the tool of social science research. BUP Journal, 1(1), 154–163.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (2010). Chinese and foreign enterprise growth theory paper. Shandong Economy, (10), 60–65.
   Google Scholar