9,253
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The mediating role of innovation between corporate governance and organizational performance: Moderating role of innovative culture in Pakistan textile sector

, , , , & | (Reviewing editor) show all
Article: 1631018 | Received 29 Jan 2019, Accepted 04 Jun 2019, Published online: 28 Jun 2019

References

  • Abrams, F. W. (1951). Management’s responsibilities in a complex world. Harvard Business Review, 29(3), 29–23.
  • Ahmad, A., Hussain, A., Ahmad, Q. W., & Islam, B. U. (2017). Causes of workplace stress in the textile industry of developing countries: A case study from Pakistan. In Advances in social & occupational ergonomics (pp. 283–294). Springer.
  • Ali, M. (2018). Impact of corporate governance on firm’s financial performance (A comparative study of developed and non developed markets). Economic Research, 2(1), 15–30.
  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
  • Ameer, B. (2013). Corporate governance-issues and challenges in Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(4), 79.
  • Anand, S. (2007). Essentials of corporate governance (Vol. 36). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Arena, C., Cirillo, A., Mussolino, D., Pulcinelli, I., Saggese, S., & Sarto, F. (2015). Women on board: Evidence from a masculine industry. Corporate Governance, 15(3), 339–356. doi:10.1108/CG-02-2014-0015
  • Arora, A., & Sharma, C. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: Evidence from India. Corporate Governance, 16(2), 420–436. doi:10.1108/CG-01-2016-0018
  • Asensio López, D., Cabeza García, L., & González Álvarez, N. (2018). Corporate governance and innovation: A theoretical review. European Journal of Management and Business Economics. doi:10.1108/EJMBE-05-2018-0056
  • Ataullah, M, Sajid, A, & Khan, M. (2014). Quality related issues and their effects on returns of Pakistan textile industry. Journal of Quality and Technology Managment, 10(I), 69-91.
  • Balsmeier, B., Fleming, L., & Manso, G. (2017). Independent boards and innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 536–557. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.12.005
  • Barnhart, S. W., Marr, M. W., & Rosenstein, S. (1994). Firm performance and board composition: Some new evidence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(4), 329–340. doi:10.1002/mde.v15:4
  • Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1(1), 101–124.
  • Berkman, H., Zou, L., & Geng, S. (2009). Corporate governance, profit manipulation and stock return. Journal of International Business and Economics, 9(2), 132–145.
  • Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006
  • Bhatt, P. R., & Bhatt, R. R. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, 17(5), 896–912. doi:10.1108/CG-03-2016-0054
  • Bhatti, A. (2018). Factors effecting consumer purchase intention with the mediating role of corporate social responsibility in Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Management Science Research (IJAMSR), 2(8), 30-37.
  • Brick, I. E., & Chidambaran, N. (2010). Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(4), 533–553. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.06.003
  • Bryant, P., & Davis, C. (2012). Regulated change effects on boards of directors: A look at agency theory and resource dependency theory. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 1.
  • Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x
  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53. doi:10.1111/fire.2003.38.issue-1
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1).
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd: Hillsdale, NJ: erlbaum.
  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance1. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0
  • Craig, J, & Dibrell, C. (2006). The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 19(4), 275-288.
  • Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1993). Board of directors leadership and structure: Control and performance implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(3), 65–81. doi:10.1177/104225879301700305
  • Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta‐analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
  • Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101–115.
  • Darroch, J., & Jardine, A. (2002). Combining firm-based and consumer-based perspectives to develop a new measure for innovation. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University Press.
  • Davis, J. H, Schoorman, F. D, & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
  • Fagan, C., Menéndez, M. G., & Ansón, S. G. (2012). Women on corporate boards and in top management: European trends and policy (M. G. Menèndez & S. G. Ansón, Eds. illustrated ed.). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fama, E. F, & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal Of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Galia, F., & Zenou, E. (2018). Board composition and forms of innovation, does diversity make a difference? European Journal of International Management Decision, 6(6), 630–650.
  • García-Ramos, R., & García-Olalla, M. (2011). Board characteristics and firm performance in public founder-and nonfounder-led family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(4), 220–231. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.09.001
  • Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–156. doi:10.1162/00335530360535162
  • Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404. doi:10.1080/13518470802466121
  • Hair, J. F., Jr, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hair, J. F., Jr, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Hair, J. F., Jr, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd edition ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7‐8), 1034–1062.
  • Hayduk, L. A., & Littvay, L. (2012). Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 159. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-159
  • Henri, J.-F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529–558. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001
  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 101–112. doi:10.2307/3665716
  • Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London: Stationery Office.
  • Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
  • Hofmann, C. (2001). Balancing financial and non-financial performance measures (pp. 30167). Koenigsworther Platz, 1: University of Hannover.
  • Honghui, L. (2017). The effect of corporate governance on performance of firms listed on the Nairobi securities exchange. Nairobi: School of business, University of Nairobi.
  • Huse, M. (1994). Board-management relations in small firms: The paradox of simultaneous independence and interdependence. Small Business Economics, 6(1), 55–72. doi:10.1007/BF01066112
  • Hussain, G, Hanif, M. I, & Hamid, A. B. A. (2018). The effect of organizational innovation and organizational culture on the market performance of SMES in Pakistan. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 2(5).
  • Javid, A. Y, & Iqbal, R. (2008). Ownership concentration, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 47(4–II), 643-659.
  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  • Judge, W. Q., Naoumova, I., & Koutzevol, N. (2003). Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: An empirical study. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 385–396. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2003.08.023
  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74 (January–February), 75–85.
  • Kariyawasam, A. (2014). Impact of management control systems on the return on sales of manufacturing companies in Sri Lanka. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 8(2), 110-118.
  • Kaur, M., & Vu, M. (2017). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from banking industry in India. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 8, 39–53. doi:10.17576/AJAG-2017-08-04
  • Khan, A. W., & Abdul Subhan, Q. (2019). Impact of board diversity and audit on firm performance. Cogent Business & Management.
  • Khan, S. N., & Ali, E. I. E. (2017). The moderating role of intellectual capital between enterprise risk management and firm performance: A conceptual review. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 9–15.
  • Kiel, G. C., & Blennerhasett, P. (1984). The board of directors in large Australian companies. Management Decision, 22(1), 40–44. doi:10.1108/eb001338
  • Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189–205.
  • Kim, I., Pantzalis, C., & Park, J. C. (2013). Corporate boards’ political ideology diversity and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 21, 223–240.
  • Klein, P., Shapiro, D., & Young, J. (2005). Corporate governance, family ownership and firm value: The Canadian evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 769–784.
  • Lam, T.-Y., & Lee, S.-K. (2012). Family ownership, board committees and firm performance: Evidence from Hong Kong. Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, 12(3), 353–366. doi:10.1108/14720701211234609
  • Letza, S., Sun, X., & Kirkbride, J. (2004). Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 242–262.
  • Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77.
  • Madison, K, Holt, D. T, Kellermanns, F. W, & Ranft, A. L. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 29(1), 65-93.
  • Makhlouf, M. H., Ali, N. H. L. M. Y., & Ramli, B. N. A. (2017). Board of directors’ effectiveness and firm performance: Evidence from Jordan. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(18), 23–34.
  • Mansur, H., & Tangl, A. (2018). The effect of corporate governance on the financial performance of listed companies in Amman stock exchange (Jordan). Journal of Advanced Management Science Vol, 6(2), 97–102.
  • Mardnly, Z., Mouselli, S., & Abdulraouf, R. (2018). Corporate governance and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Syria. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. doi:10.1108/IMEFM-05-2017-0107
  • McMullen, D. A. (1996). Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences associated with audit committees. Auditing, 15(1), 87.
  • Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 63–73.
  • Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–Firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786. doi:10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-5
  • Mudashiru, A., Bakare, A., Ishmael, Y., & Babatunbe, Y. (2014). Good corporate governance and organisational performance: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(7), 1.
  • Muth, M., & Donaldson, L. (1998). Stewardship theory and board structure: A contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(1), 5–28. doi:10.1111/corg.1998.6.issue-1
  • Naala, M., Nordin, N., & Omar, W. (2017). Innovation capability and firm performance relationship: A study of pls-structural equation modeling (Pls-Sem). International Journal of Organization & Business Excellence, 2(1), 39–50.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • O’connell, V., & Cramer, N. (2010). The relationship between firm performance and board characteristics in Ireland. European Management Journal, 28(5), 387–399. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2009.11.002
  • Ozcan, I., & Ince, A. R. (2016). Board size, board composition and performance: An investigation on Turkish banks. International Business Research, 9(2), 74. doi:10.5539/ibr.v9n2p74
  • Pass, C. (2004). Corporate governance and the role of non-executive directors in large UK companies: An empirical study. Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, 4(2), 52–63. doi:10.1108/14720700410534976
  • Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 218–228. doi:10.2307/2393956
  • Puni, A. (2015). Do board committees affect corporate financial performance? Evidence from listed companies in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(5), 14–25.
  • Quy, V. T. (2017). organizational culture and firm performance–A comparative study between local and foreign companies located in Ho Chi Minh City. Paper presented at the Proceedings of NIDA International Business Conference 2017–Innovative Management: Bridging, Thailand.
  • Rankin, M., Ferlauto, K., McGowan, S. C., & Stanton, P. A. (2012). Contemporary issues in accounting. Australia: Wiley Milton.
  • Rehman, S.-U., Mohamed, R., & Ayoup, H. (2018a). Cybernetic controls, and rewards and compensation controls influence on organizational performance. Mediating role of organizational capabilities in Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Management Science Research (IJAMSR), 2(8), 1–10.
  • Rehman, S.-U., Mohamed, R., & Ayoup, H. (2018b). Management Control System (MCS) as a package elements influence on organizational performance in the Pakistani context. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(3), 280–295.
  • Rehman, S.-U., Mohamed, R., & Ayoup, H. (2019). The mediating role of organizational capabilities between organizational performance and its determinants. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 30. doi:10.1186/s40497-019-0155-5
  • Sachdev, S. B., & Verma, H. V. (2004). Relative importance of service quality dimensions: A multisectoral study. Journal of Services Research, 4, 1.
  • Shahwan, T. M. (2015). The effects of corporate governance on financial performance and financial distress: Evidence from Egypt. Corporate Governance, 15(5), 641-662.
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
  • Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Jr, O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 412–438. doi:10.2307/2393297
  • Taljaard, C. C., Ward, M. J., & Muller, C. J. (2015). Board diversity and financial performance: A graphical time-series approach. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 18(3), 425–447. doi:10.4102/sajems.v18i3.926
  • Teeratansirikool, L., Siengthai, S., Badir, Y., & Charoenngam, C. (2013). Competitive strategies and firm performance: The mediating role of performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(2), 168–184.
  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administration. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Tierney, P, Farmer, S. M, & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591-620.
  • Tsai, K.-H., & Yang, S.-Y. (2014). The contingent value of firm innovativeness for business performance under environmental turbulence. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 343–366. doi:10.1007/s11365-012-0225-4
  • Turulja, L., & Bajgoric, N. (2018). Innovation, firms’ performance and environmental turbulence: Is there a moderator or mediator?. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 213-232.
  • Uzkurt, C., Kumar, R., Semih Kimzan, H., & Eminoğlu, G. (2013). Role of innovation in the relationship between organizational culture and firm performance: A study of the banking sector in Turkey. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(1), 92–117.
  • Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5
  • Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
  • Wallach, E. J. (1983). Individuals and organizations: The cultural match. Training & Development Journal, 37(2), 28-36.
  • Zaefarian, G., Forkmann, S., Mitręga, M., & Henneberg, S. C. (2017). A capability perspective on relationship ending and its impact on product innovation success and firm performance. Long Range Planning, 50(2), 184–199. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.023
  • Zhou, T. (2013). Understanding continuance usage of mobile sites. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(9), 1286–1299.