12,331
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure and board characteristics on corporate performance

ORCID Icon, & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1647917 | Received 25 Apr 2019, Accepted 19 Jul 2019, Published online: 13 Aug 2019

References

  • Acer, A. Z., & Acer, P. (2014). Organizational culture types and their effects on organizational performance in Turkish hospitals. Emerging Markets Journal, 3(3), 18–18. doi:10.5195/emaj.2014.47
  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
  • Ahamed, W. S. W., Almsafir, M. K., & Al-Smadi, A. W. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility lead to improve in firm financial performance? Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(3), 126–138.
  • Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197. doi:10.1093/qje/qjr049
  • Arun, T. G., Almahrog, Y. E., & Ali-Aribi, Z. (2015). Female directors and earnings management: Evidence from UK companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 39, 137–146. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2015.03.002
  • Barnett, M. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275520
  • Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324. doi:10.1007/BF00381722
  • Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2011). Women on boards in Italy (CONSOB Working paper no. 70), 7–44. Rome: Commissione Nazionale Per Le Societa E La Borsa.
  • Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there an expectations gap? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 577–593. doi:10.1111/corg.2006.14.issue-6
  • Capezio, A., Shields, J., & O’Donnell, M. (2011). Too good to be true: Board structural independence as a moderator of CEO pay-for-firm performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 487–513.
  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.
  • Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firms financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.
  • Cavaco, S., & Crifo, P. (2014). CSR and financial performance: Complementarity between environmental, social and business behaviours. Applied Economics, 46(27), 3323–3338. doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.927572
  • Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006
  • Choi, T. H., & Pae, J. (2001). Business ethics and financial reporting quality: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 403–427. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0871-4
  • Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122–144. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013
  • Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329–356.
  • Crittenden, V. L., Crittenden, W. F., Ferrell, L., & Pinney, O. C. (2011). Market-oriented sustainability: A conceptual framework and propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 71–85. doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0217-2
  • Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Canella, A. A., Jr. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196703
  • Daily, C. M., McDougall, P. P., Covin, J. G., & Dalton, D. R. (2002). Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management, 28(3), 387–412. doi:10.1177/014920630202800307
  • Daunfeldt, S. O., & Rudholm, N. (2012). Does gender diversity in the boardroom improve firm performance? (HUI working papers no. 60). HUI Research.
  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
  • de Bussy, N. M., & Suprawan, L. (2012). Most valuable stakeholders: The impact of employee orientation on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 280–287. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.006
  • Faisal, D., & Azlinda, M. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate failure in the context of agency theory. Journal of American Academy of Business, 17(1), 125–132.
  • Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.
  • Fan, P. S. (2012). Is board diversity important for firm performance and board independence? An exploratory study of Singapore listed companies (MAS Staff Paper no. 52). Singapore: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).
  • Fauzi, H., & Idris, M. (2009). The relationship of CSR and financial performance: New evidence from Indonesian companies. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 3(1), 66–87. doi:10.22164/isea.v3i1.38
  • Fiori, G., Dinato, F., & Izzo, M. F. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance. An Analysis on Italian listed companies. 1–4. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com abstract =1032851
  • Franks, J. R., & Mayer, C. (2001). Ownership and control of german corporations. Review of Financial Studies, 14(4), 943–977. doi:10.1093/rfs/14.4.943
  • Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
  • Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 17–38. doi:10.1017/S1833367200001693
  • Gallo, P. J., & Christensen, L. J. (2011). Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviours. Business & Society, 50(2), 315–349. doi:10.1177/0007650311398784
  • Gatimbu, K. K., & Wabwire, J. M. (2016). Effect of corporate environmental disclosure on financial performance of firms listed at Nairobi Securities. International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies, 2(1), 1–6.
  • Ghelli, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical evidence (Master's thesis). Denmark: Copenhagen Business School CBS, University of Copenhagen (UCPH).
  • Ho, L.-C. J., & Taylor, M. (2007). An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 18(2), 123–150.
  • Hubbard, G. (2008). Beyond accounting–Assessing the impact of sustainability reporting on tomorrow’s business. (Discussion paper. Tomorrow’s company). The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
  • Ibrahim, H., & Samad, F. A. (2011). Corporate governance mechanisms and performance of public-listed family-ownership in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 105–116.
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) Can the corporation survive? (Center for Research in Government Policy and Business Working Paper no. PPS 76-4). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
  • Johl, S. K., Kaur, S., & Cooper, B. J. (2015). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed firms. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(2), 239–243. doi:10.7763/JOEBM.2015.V3.187
  • Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189–205. doi:10.1111/corg.2003.11.issue-3
  • King. (2002). King committee on corporate governance. Parklands, South Africa: Institute of Directors in South Africa.
  • KPMG. (2008). Sustainability reporting: A guide. Retrieved from www.kpmg.com
  • Kreder, R. (2016). Board diversity and earnings quality: The association between female board presence and the magnitude of discretionary revenue activities, evidence from US listed firms. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  • Lioui, A., & Sharma, Z. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100–111. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.004
  • Marimuthu, M., & Kolandaisamy, I. (2009). Can demographic diversity top management team contribute for greater financial performance? An empirical discussion. The Journal of International Social Research, 2(8), 273–286.
  • Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2010). Gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms (Tjalling C. Koopmans Institute Discussion Paper Series), 10, 1–28.
  • Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., & Gray, R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(2), 228–255. doi:10.1108/09513570610656105
  • Neely, A. D., Mills, J., Platts, K., Gregory, M., & Richards, H. (1994). Realizing strategy through measurement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(3), 140–152. doi:10.1108/01443579410058603
  • Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C. (2007). Can directors impact performance? A case-based test of three theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 585–608. doi:10.1111/corg.2007.15.issue-4
  • Nikolaeva, R., & Bicho, M. (2011). The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 136–157. doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0214-5
  • Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468–494. doi:10.1111/corg.2013.21.issue-5
  • Oeyono, J., Samy, M., & Bampton, R. (2011). An examination of corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A study of the top 50 Indonesian listed corporations. Journal of Global Responsibility, 2(1), 100–112. doi:10.1108/20412561111128555
  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910
  • Pimentel, L., & Major, M. J. (2014). Quality management and a balanced scorecard as supporting frameworks for a new management model and organisational change. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(7–8), 763–775. doi:10.1080/14783363.2014.904568
  • Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), 5–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00444.x
  • Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K
  • Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Gallego-Alvarez, I., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2009). Corporate governance and codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 187–202.
  • Rolland, J. B., & Dirigé, M. (2013). Evolution of earnings management during the financial crisis: Evidence from U.S. banks working paper.
  • Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, A. S. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81–90. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x
  • Saad, N. M. (2010). Corporate governance and the effects to capital structure in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(1), 105–114. doi:10.5539/ijef.v2n1p105
  • Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N., & Muhamad, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(6), 591–613. doi:10.1108/02686901011054881
  • Sanda, A. U., Garba, T., & Mikailu, A. S. (2008). Board independence and financial performance: Evidence from Nigeria (paper presented at the Centre for the Study of African Economics at St. Catherine’s College, 16–18 March). Oxford: University of Oxford.
  • Schwizer, P., Soana, M., & Cucinelli, D. (2012). The relationship between board diversity and firm performance: The Italian evidence (working paper). Department of Banking and Insurance, Faculty of Economics, University of Parma.
  • Scott, K. E. (1983). Corporation law and the american law corporate governance project. Stanford Law Review, 35(5), 927–947. doi:10.2307/1228708
  • Silva Monteiro, S. M., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2010). Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 185–204. doi:10.1002/csr.v17:4
  • Singh, H., & Harianto, F. (1989). Management-board relationships, takeover risk, and the adoption of golden parachutes. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 7–24.
  • Singh, V., & Vinnicombe, S. (2004). Why so few women directors in top UK boardrooms? Evidence and theoretical explanations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 479–488. doi:10.1111/corg.2004.12.issue-4
  • Sitepu, S. S. (2009). The influence of disclosure of corporate social responsibility to company performance (Thesis). Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta.
  • Sun, N., Salama, A., Hussainey, K., & Habbash, M. (2010). Corporate environmental disclosure, corporate governance and earnings management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(7), 679–700.
  • Taghizadeh, M., & Saremi, S. Y. (2013). Board of directors and firms performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed firm. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 59(37), 178–182.
  • Tilt, C. A. (2007). External stakeholders’ perspectives on sustainability reporting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 104–126). New York: Routledge.
  • Ujunwa, A. (2012). Board characteristics and the financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms. Corporate Governance, 12(5), 656–674. doi:10.1108/14720701211275587
  • Welford, R. (2007). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Issues for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(1), 42–51. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966