Tax amnesty from the perspective of tax official

References

• Alasuutari, P. (1996). Theorizing in qualitative research: a cultural studies perspective. Article in Qualitative Inquiry,371-12.
   Google Scholar
• Alm, J., & Beck, W. (1993, March). Tax amnesties and compliance in the long run: A time series analysis. National Tax Journal, 46(1), 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J. (1991). The desirability of a permanent tax amnesty.”. Journal of Public Economics, 45, 143–159. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(91)90037-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darussalam, D. (2014, Desember). Tax amnesty Dalam Rangka Rekonsiliasi Nasional. Inside Tax, Edisi 26.
   Google Scholar
• Dubin, J., Graetz, M. J., & Wilde, L. L. (1992, August). State income tax amnesties: Causes. The Quarterly Journal of Economic, 107, 1057–1070. doi:10.2307/2118374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitatif methods in business research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fatih, O., & Eren, (2011). Tax amnesty with effects and effecting aspects: Tax compliance, tax audits, and enforcements around; The Turkish case. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7): 95-103. [ Special Issue –April].
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. C., Godderris, J. H., & Young, J. C. (1989, March). Participation in tax amnesties: The individual income tax. National Tax Journal, 42(1), 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawan, A., & Sukartha, M. (2016, Desember). Pengaruh Persepsitax Amnesty, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Transformasi Kelembagaan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Pada Penerimaan Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 17(3), 2036–2060.
   Google Scholar
• Kusuma, H. 2015. “Tax Ratio RI Lebih Rendah dari Malaysia dan Singapura”. Okefinance. October. https://economy.okezone.com/read/2015/10/21/20/1235513/tax-ratio-ri-lebih-rendah-dari-malaysia-dan-singapura
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, H. B., & Zechauser, R. J. (1987). Amnesty, enforcement, and tax policy. Tax Policy and the Economy, 1, 55–85. doi:10.1086/tpe.1.20061763
   Google Scholar
• Llewelyn, S. (2003). “what counts as “theory” in qualitative management and accounting research? introducing five levels of theorizing”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 662–708.
   Google Scholar
• Luitel, H.S & Sobel, R.S. (2007). “The Revenue Impact of Repeated Tax Amnesties”. Public Budgeting & Finance / Fall, 2007 (pp. 19-38).
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, L. P. (1991). Federal tax amnesty: Crime and punishment revisited. Virginia Tax Review, 10, 535–585.
   Google Scholar
• Mattiello, G., 2005. “Multiple Tax Amnesties and Tax Compliance (Forgiving Seventy Times Seven)”, Università Ca’Foscari, Venezia Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Qualitative data analysis. Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi (penerjemah), Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moleong, L. J. (2000). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D. (2009). Qualitatif research in business dan management. Londong: SAGE Publication Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ngadiman, & Huslin, D. (2015). Pengaruh sunset policy, tax amnesty, Dan Sanksi Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak (Studi Empiris di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Jakarta Kembangan). Jurnal Akuntansi, XIX(02), 225–241.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018a). Revenue statistics 2018: Tax revenue trends in the OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/revenue-statistics-highlights-brochure.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018b). Revenue Statistics in Asian and Pacific Economies. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/revenue-statistics-asia-pacific-brochure.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parle, W.M.and, & Hirlinger, M.W. (1986). Evaluating the use of tax amnesty by state governments. Public Administration Review, 246–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragimun. tanpa tahun. Implementasi Tax Amnesty. Retrieved from www.kemenkeu.go.id.
   Google Scholar
• Rahayu, N. (2017). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Perpajakan, Ketegasan Sanksi Pajak, Dan Tax Amnesty Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Akuntansi Dewantara, 1(1), 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rechberger, S., Hartner, M., Kirchler, E., & Hämmerle, F. (2010). Tax amnesties, justice perceptions, and filing behavior: A simulation study. Law Policy, 32(2), 214–225. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2009.00316.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Bonnie. (1986). Federal tax amnesty: reflecting on the states experiences. Tax Lawyer 40, 145-184.
   Google Scholar
• Saraçoğlu, O. F., & Çaşkurlu, A. E. (2011). Tax amnesty with effects and effecting aspects: Tax compliance, tax audits, and enforcements around; The turkish case. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 95–103. [ Special Issue –April].
   Google Scholar
• Schaltegger, C. A., & Torgler, B., 2005. “Tax Amnesty and Political Participation”, Swiss Federal Tax Administration Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• Suyanto, & Putri, I. S. (2017). Pengaruh Persepsi Wajib Pajak Tentang Kebijakan Tax Amnesty (Pengampunan Pajak), Dan Motivasi Membayar Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Perpajakan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(1), 49–56. doi:10.24964/ja.v5i1.256
   Google Scholar
• Wardiyanto, B. (2008, Oktober–Desember). Kebijakan Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty): Perspektif Kerangka Kerja Implementasi Sunset Policy mendasarkan UU No. 28 tahun 2007. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, XXI(4), 328–335.
   Google Scholar