Factors influencing audit findings of the Indonesian district governments’ financial statements

References

• Adha, A. F., Afiah, N. N., & Pratama, A. (2019). Pengaruh Ukuran Entitas dan Kompleksitas Terhadap Kelemahan Pengendalian Intern pada Kementerian PUPR [Effect of entity size and complexity on weaknesses in internal control at the ministry of public works and housing]. SIKAP, 3(2), 122–18.
   Google Scholar
• Afiah, N. N., & Azwari, P. C. (2015). The effect of the implementation of Government Internal Control System (GICS) on the quality of financial reporting of the local government and its impact on the principles of good governance. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 811–818. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.172
   Google Scholar
• Ånerud, K. (2007). Harmonization of financial auditing standards in the public and private sectors – What are the differences? Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection, 34(4), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Arens, A. A., Randal, J. E., & Beasley, M. S. (2008). Auditing and assurance services (12th ed.). New Jerssey, NJ: Pearson International Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Astriani, D. (2014). Pengaruh Penyelesaian Temuan Audit Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Survei pada Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Barat) [The effect of completion of audit findings on the quality of regional government financial statements (survey of the west java provincial representative of the financial and development supervisory agency (BPKP))]. Retrieved from https://repository.widyatama.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/3069?show=full
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, M. A. A., Rahman, H. A., Alam, M. M., & Said, J. (2015). Enhancement of the accountability of public sectors through integrity system, internal control system and leadership practices: A review study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 163–169. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01096-5
   Google Scholar
• Badara, M. S., & Saidin, S. Z. (2013). Impact of the effective internal control system on the internal audit effectiveness at local government level. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 4(1), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Baltaci, M., & Yilmaz, S. (2006). Keeping an eye on subnational governments: Internal control and audit at local levels. Stock No. 37257. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. (2010). Improving performance and fostering accountability in the public sector through system dynamics modelling: From an “external” to an “internal” perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27, 361–384. doi:10.1002/sres.v27:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control-integrated framework. New York, NY: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• D’Aquila, J. M. (1998). Is the control environment related to financial reporting decisions? Managerial Auditing Journal, 13(8), 472–478. doi:10.1108/02686909810236334
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, C. B., & Dan Filho, J. R. F. (2017). Agency problems in the public sector: The role of mediators between central administration of city hall and executive bodies. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 51(4), 596–615.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. (2002). Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretative review. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 696–727. doi: 10.2307/3069614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J., Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2007). Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44, 193–223. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, K. M. (2007, November–December). Corruption and fraud detection by public sector auditors. The EDP Audit, Control and Security. 36(5–6). 6. Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamayuni, R. R. (2016). The effect of local government characteristics and the examination result of Indonesian supreme audit institution on economic growth, with financial performance as intervening variable in district and city government of lampung province. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(18), 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2005). The disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control after the Sarbanes–Oxley act. Accounting Horizons, 19(3), 137–158. doi:10.2308/acch.2005.19.3.137
   Google Scholar
• Ghozali, I. (2005). Model Persamaan Struktural - konsep dan aplikasi dengan program AMOS Ver 16.0. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Keuangan Negara Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 [The state finance act no. 17/2003]. Jakarta: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs, L. L. (2004, April). Audits of internal control over financial reporting: What do they mean? Insights, The Corporate & Securities Law Advisor, 18(4), 2. Research Library.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D., & Cordery, C. (2018). The value of public sector audit: Literature and history. Journal of Accounting Literature, 40, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.acclit.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huefner, R. (2011). The state of internal controls in local government: Evidence from town and village audits. The CPA Journal, LXXXI, 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Icerman, R. C., & Hillison, W. A. (1990). Distributions of audit-detecfted errors partitioned by internal control. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 5, 527–543. doi:10.1177/0148558X9000500405
   Google Scholar
• Intosai. (2013a). ISSAI 100 - Fundamental principles of public-sector auditing. Retrieved from http://www.issai.org/issai-framework/3-fundamental-auditing-priciples.htm
   Google Scholar
• Intosai. (2013b). ISSAI 400 - Fundamental principles of compliance auditing. Retrieved from http://www.issai.org/issai-framework/3-fundamental-auditing-priciples.htm
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, M., Tanjung, A. R., & Supriono, S. (2017). Pengaruh Tingkat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah, Belanja Modal, dan Jumlah Penduduk terhadap Kelemahan Pengendalian Intern pada Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Empiris pada Kabupaten dan Kota Provinsi Riau dan Sumatera Barat [The influence of economic growth rate, local own revenue, size of local government, capital expenditures, and number of population on weaknesses of internal control in local government (Empirical study in the regencies and cities of Riau and West Sumatra provinces]. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 4(1), 881–895.
   Google Scholar
• Jahera, J. J., & Colbert, J. (1988). The role of the audit and agency theory. Journal of Applied Business Research, 4(2): 17–65. doi:10.19030/jabr.v4i2.6427
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G., & Beattie, C. (2015). Local government internal audit compliance. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 9(3), 59–71. doi:10.14453/aabfj
   Google Scholar
• Kristanto, S. B. (2009, Januari). Pengaruh Ukuran Pemerintahan, Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD), Dan Belanja Modal Sebagai Prediktor Kelemahan Pengendalian Internal [Effects of government size, local own revenue (PAD), and capital expenditures as predictors of weaknesses in internal control]. Jurnal Akuntansi UKRIDA, 9(1), 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B., & Oosterman, A. (2011). Sub-national government capital spending in indonesia: Level, structure, and financing. Public Administration and Development, 31(3), 149–158. doi:10.1002/pad.v31.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahaputra, I. P. U. R., & Putra, I. W. (2014). Analisis Faktor- Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Kualitas Informasi Pelaporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah [The analysis of factors affecting quality of information on local government financial reporting]. e-Journal Accountancy Udayana University, 8(2), 230–244.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud, Hartono, R, & Utaminingsih, N. S. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kelemahan pengendalian intern pemerintah daerah [factors influencing the weaknesses of internal control of local governments]. Call of Paper in Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 17, Mataram.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, H. E. (1993, April). Auditing to serve public accountability. International Journal of Government Auditing, 20(2), 14. Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection.
   Google Scholar
• Nuraeni. (2014). The impact of local governments characteristics to audit quality Indonesia perspectives. Finance and Banking Journal, 16(1), 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Pamungkas, B. (2008). Akuntabilitas Instansi Pemerintah, Survei Pada Pemerintah Dati II DI Yogyakarta [Accountability of government agencies, survey on government region II of Yogyakarta]. Bogor: Kesatuan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pamungkas, B. (2018a). Accrual-based accounting implementation in Indonesian’s local governments compared to other countries’ experiences. Man in India, 98(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pamungkas, B. (2018b, Januari). Determinan penerapan basis akrual secara penuh pada pemerintah daerah [Determinants of the full implementation of accrual basis to local governments. Accounting journal]. Jurnal Akuntansi, XXII(01), 68–85.
   Google Scholar
• Pamungkas, B., Ibtida, R., Avrian, C., & Ntim, C. G. (2018). Factors influencing audit opinion of the Indonesian municipal governments’ financial statements. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1540256. doi:10.1080/23311975.2018.1540256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathak, J. (2005). Risk management, internal controls and organizational vulnerabilities. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(6), 569–577. doi:10.1108/02686900510606065
   Google Scholar
• Petrovits, C, Shakespeare, C, & Shih, A. (2010, January). The causes and consequences of internal control problems in nonprofit organizations. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 325–357. doi: 10.2308/accr.00000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratiwi, R., & Aryani, Y. A. (2016). Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah, Kepala Daerah, Tindak Lanjut Temuan Audit Terhadap Opini [Effect of regional governments characteristics, regional heads, follow-up audit findings on opinion]. Jurnal Akuntansi, 20(2), 167–189. doi:10.24912/ja.v20i2.52
   Google Scholar
• Purniasari, C. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kelemahan Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Kasus pada Kabupaten dan Kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2013–2014) [Analysis of Factors Affecting the Weaknesses of Local Government Internal Control (Case Studies in Regencies and Cities in Central Java Province 2013–2014)] (Doctoral dissertation). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
   Google Scholar
• Putri, N. K., & Makhmud, A. (2015). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Pad, Ukuran Dan Kompleksitas Terhadap Kelemahan Pengendalian Intern Pemda [Effects of economic growth, pad, size and complexity on weaknesses of local government internal control]. Accounting Analysis Journal, 4, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, K. T., & Zhang, J. X. (2014, December). Does audit committee monitoring matter in the government sector? Evidence from municipal internal control quality. Journal of Governmental & Nonprofit Accounting, 3(1), 58–80. doi:10.2308/ogna-50832
   Google Scholar
• Sargiacomo, M., & Gomes, D. (2010). Accounting and accountability in local government: Contributions from accounting history research. The sixth accounting history international conference “accounting and the state”, Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia [Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia]. (2014). Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan Keuangan BPK RI Nomor 4/K/I-XIII.2/7/2014 [Auditing guideline nomor 4/K/I-XIII.2/7/2014]. Jakarta: Republic of Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia [Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia]. (2016). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2016 [Summary of audit result semester I year 2016]. Jakarta: Republic of Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia [Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia]. (2017a). Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara [State audit standard]. Jakarta: Republic of Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia [Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia]. (2017b). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2017 [Summary of audit result semester I year 2017]. Jakarta: Republic of Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia [Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia]. (2018). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2018 [Summary of audit result semester I year 2018]. Jakarta: Republic of Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Waluyo, M. (2016). Mudah cepat tepat penggunaan tools amos dalam aplikasi (sem). Surabaya: UPN Veteran Jawa Timur.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, A. (2003). Do private sector financial statements provide a suitable model for public sector accounts?. Paper for a Conference on Public Law and the Modernizing State in Oeiras, Portugal, 3–6 Sept. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, S., Beris, Y., & Serrano-Berthet, R. (2010). Linking local government discretion and accountability in decentralisation. Development Policy Review, 28(3), 259–293. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00484.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar