Director selection in agricultural cooperatives—The process and the roles in the Finnish context

References

• Agyemang-Mintah, P. (2015). The nomination committee and firm performance: An empirical investigation of UK financial institutions during the pre/post financial crisis. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 11(3), 176–26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311485166_The_nomination_committee_and_firm_performance_An_empirical_investigation_of_UK_financial_institutions_during_the_prepost_financial_crisis
   Google Scholar
• Baltaca, B., & Mavrenko, T. (2009). Financial cooperation as a low-cost tool or effective microfinancing. Journal of Business Management. ISSN 1691-5348, pp. 56-64. https://www.riseba.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/jbm-2009_0.pdf#page=56
   Google Scholar
• Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal Management Reviews, 13(2), 113–237. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraud-Didier, V., Henninger, M., & Akremi, A. (2012). The relationship between members’ trust and participation in the governance of cooperatives: The role of organizational commitment. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15(1), 1–24. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00695926/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M., & Schoorman, F. (1983). A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 206–217. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amr.1983.4284723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijman, J., Hanisch, M., & van der Sangen, G. (2014). Shifting control? The changes of internal governance in agricultural co-operatives in the EU. Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 85(4), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12055
   Google Scholar
• Bijman, J., Hendrikse, G., & van Oijen, A. (2013). Accommodating two worlds in one organisation: Changing board models in agricultural cooperatives. Managerial and Decision Economics, 34(3–5), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2584
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. (1997). Women on corporate boards of directors: A needed resource. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(9), 909–915. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017987220508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cechin, A., Bijman, J., Pascucci, S., Zylbersztajn, D., & Omta, O. (2013). Drivers of pro-active member participation in agricultural cooperatives: Evidence from Brazil. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 4(4), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12023
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, W. (1985). Structuring, staffing, and maintaining the board. In E. Mattar & M. Ball (Eds.), Handbook for corporate directors (pp. 24.01–24.06). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Clune, R., Hermanson, D., Tompkins, J., & Zhongxia, Y. (2014). The nominating committee process: A qualitative examination of board independence and formalization. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 748–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, M., & Burress, M. (2013). The impact of CEO tenure on cooperative governance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 34(3–5), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2585
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C. (2002). Making sense of co-operative governance: Competing models and tensions. Review of International Co-operation, 95(1), 51–57. http://oro.open.ac.uk/15400/
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C. (2004). The GOVERNANCE of co-operatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 75(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x
   Google Scholar
• Daily, C., Dalton, D., & Cannella, A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, W., & Hendrikse, G. (2015). Managerial vision bias and cooperative governance. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 42(5), 797–828. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Foncea, M., & Marcuello, C. (2013). Entrepreneurs and the context of co-operative organizations: A definition of co-operative entrepreneur. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 30(4), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal  2007, Vol. 50, No. 1, 25–32 doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D., Corley, K., & Hamilton, A. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D., & Thomas, J. (1996, September). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), ABI/INFORM Collection p. 370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, P., & McGhee, P. (2017). Personal moral values of directors and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2016-0046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui, B. (1991). The economic rationale for the “Third Sector” – Nonprofit and other noncapitalist organizations. Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 62(4), 551–572. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8292.1991.tb01367.x
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. (1996). The ownership of enterprise. ISBN 9780674001718.
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. (1999). Co-operative firms in theory and practice. Liiketaloudellinen Aikakausikirja, 48(4), 387–403. http://lta.lib.aalto.fi/1999/4/lta_1999_04_a2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Henrÿ, H. (2012). Guidelines for Co-operative Legislation third revised edition (3rd ed.). ILO.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A., Cannella, A., & Paetzold, R. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R., Castleton, M., & Withers, M. (2009). Complementarity in monitoring and bonding: More intense monitoring leads to higher executive compensation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhtala, K., & Tuominen, P. (2016, September 15–16). Election of board members in cooperatives: A review on cooperative governance vis-à-vis corporate governance. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, H. (1998). A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boards. Corporate Governance, 6(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00089
   Google Scholar
• Huse, M. (2005). Corporate governance: Understanding important contingencies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 2(4), Summer 2005. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv2i4p3
   Google Scholar
• ICA Coop. (2018). International Cooperative Alliance. https://monitor.coop/sites/default/files/publication-files/wcm2018-web-803416144.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B., & Huse, M. (2000). Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: An ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(4), 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620050177958
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Ellstrand, A., & Daily, C. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2012). Antecedents of board composition: the role of nomination committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 474–489. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00913.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karhu, S. (1999). Osuuskunnat taas ovat suorastaan afääriyrityksiä. In M. Kuisma, A. Henttinen, S. Karhu, & M. Pohls ( Toim.), Kansantalous. Pellervo ja yhteisen yrittämisen idea 1899–1999 (pp. 243–426). Pellervo-Seura ry.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana, R., & Pick, K. (2004). The social nature of boards. Brooklyn Law Review, 70, pp. 1259–1285. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/brklr70&div=44&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Cannella, A. (2008). Toward a social capital theory of director selection. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 282–293. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00693.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komulainen, A. (2018). Valloittavat osuuskaupat - päivittäistavarakaupan keskittyminen Suomessa 1879–1938 [Academic thesis]. Akateeminen väitöskirja.
   Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M., Keskisarja, T., & Siltala, S. (2014). Paperin painajainen: Metsäliitto, metsät ja miljardit Suomen kohtaloissa 1984–2014. Siltala.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and “problematizing” in organizational studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1023–1062. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/256926
   Google Scholar
• Maharaj, R. (2009). Corporate governance decision-making model: How to nominate skilled board members, by addressing the formal and informal systems. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6(2), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2008.27
   Google Scholar
• Menozzi, A., Urtiaga, M., & Vannoni, D. (2012). Board composition, political connections, and performance in state-owned enterprises. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(3), 671–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud, V. (2013). Mediating the paradoxes of organizational governance through numbers. Organizational Studies, 35(1), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monks, R., & Minow, N. (2004). Corporate governance (3rd ed.). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., & McIntyre, M. (2007). Board of director performance: A group dynamics perspective. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710739831
   Google Scholar
• Muth, M., & Donaldson, L. (1998). Stewardship theory and board structure: A contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(1), 5–28. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8683.00076
   Google Scholar
• O’Neal, D., & Thomas, H. (1995). Director networks/director selection: The board’s strategic role. European Management Journal, 13(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(94)00060-K
   Google Scholar
• Österberg, P., & Nilsson, J. (2009). Members‘ perception of their participation in the governance of cooperatives: The key to trust and commitment in agricultural cooperatives. Agribusiness, 25(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J., & Zahra, S. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellervo Coop Center (2019). Website source. https://pellervo.fi/english/cooperation-finland/
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Ramli, R., & Zakaria, H. (2010). A new perspective on board composition and firm performance in an emerging market. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(5), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011085607
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, B. (2004). Nominating, electing and compensating co-op directors. USDA/Rural Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., Tacheva, S., Greve, P., & Hu, Y. (2006). The determinants and effects of board nomination committees. Journal of Management and Governance, 10(2), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-006-0001-3
   Google Scholar
• Schmeiser, S. (2012). Corporate board dynamics: Directors voting for directors. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82(2–3), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siltala, S. (2013). Puu-Valion nousu ja uho [Academic Thesis]. Helsingin yliopisto, Humanistinen tiedekunta. Akateeminen väitöskirja.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Staatz, J. (1987). The structural characteristics of farmer co-operatives and their behavioral consequences. Co-operative Theory: New Approaches, Citeseer, 18, pp. 33–60. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.667.862&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trechter, D., King, R., Cobia, D., & Hartell, J. (1997). Case Studies of Executive Compensation in Agricultural Co-operatives. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 19(2), 492–503. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2307/1349756
   Google Scholar
• Tricker, B. (2015). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ees, H., & Postma, T. (2004). Dutch boards and governance: A comparative institutional analysis of board roles and member (S)election procedures. International Studies of Management and Organization Issue, 34(2), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2004.11043702
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, J., & Stern, I. (2006). The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2), 169–204. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.2.169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J., & Stern, I. (2007). Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male Caucasian): How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at U.S. companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers, M., Hillman, A., & Cannella, A. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311428671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar