Board governance mechanisms and sustainability reporting quality: A theoretical framework

References

• Aaijaz, N., & Ibrahim, M. (2012). CSR inflections: An overview of CSR global strategies adopted by companies in malaysia and other Asian Countries. The Journal of Southeast Asian Research, 12, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5171/2012.266824
   Google Scholar
• Abd-Mutalib, H., Jamil, C. Z. M., & Wan-Hussin, W. N. (2014). The availability, extent, and quality of sustainability reporting by Malaysian listed firms: Subsequent to mandatory disclosure. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v6i2.6108
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Wahab, E. A., Ariff, A. M., Madah Marzuki, M., & Mohd Sanusi, Z. (2017). Political connections, corporate governance, and tax aggressiveness in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(3), 424–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-05-2016-0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah, S. N., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2013). Gender, ethnic and age diversity of the boards of large Malaysian firms and performance. Jurnal Pengurusan, 38, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2013-38-03
   Google Scholar
• Abdulmalik, S., & Che-Ahmad, A. (2019). Regulatory changes and reporting quality: The moderating role of firm characteristics. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(2), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.03
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Manaf, K. B., Amran, N. A., & Che Ahmad, A. (2013). Financial reporting quality of malaysian family firms. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 3(1), 1–5. Retrieved from http://seajbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/KLB3115-MUHARRATUL-ROLES-OF-PERSONALITY-TOWARDS-ENTREPRENEURSHIP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. A., & Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 97-115.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. (2015). Myths and facts about female directors. International Finance Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agyei-Mensah, B. K. (2017). The relationship between corporate governance, corruption, and forward-looking information disclosure: A comparative study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(2), 284–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2015-0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, A. (2014). Estimating the value of political connection in Malaysia’s top richest tycoon companies. Proceedings of the Australian Academy of Business and Social Sciences Conference 2014. The Journal of Developing Areas. ISBN 978-0-9925622-0-5
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N. (2017). Board independence and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting in Malaysia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(2), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i2.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Haji, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility disclosures over time: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(7), 647–676. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2012-0729
   Google Scholar
• Ajibolade, S. O., & Uwuigbe, U. (2013). Effects of corporate governance on corporate social and environmental disclosure among listed firms in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(5), 76–92. ISSN 2235-767X. http://www.ejbss.com/recent.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2016). Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 12(3), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aman, Z., & Ismail, S. (2017). The determinants of corporate sustainability reporting: Malaysian evidencee [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Management and Muamalah 2017, 2017; ICoMM, Putrajaya Malaysia, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amran, N. A., & Che Ahmad, A. (2014). Effects of ownership structure on Malaysian companies performance. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 4(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.17576/ajag-2013-4-5774
   Google Scholar
• Amran, N. A., Ismail, K., Izah, K. N., Aripin, N., Hassan, N., Manaf, A., … Abdullah, S. N. (2014). Women directors involvement in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(5), 226–231.
   Google Scholar
• Anas, A., Abdul Rashid, H. M., & Annuar, H. A. (2015). The effect of award on CSR disclosures in annual reports of Malaysian PLCs. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 831–852. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2013-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and business performance: Evidence for the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, J. S., Ding, D. K., & Thong, T. Y. (2013). Political connection and firm value. Asian Development Review, 30(2), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1162/ADEV_a_00018
   Google Scholar
• Ansong, A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance among Ghanaian SMEs: The role of stakeholder engagement. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1), 1385165. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1385165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz, N. S. A., & Rosmiza, H. B. (2017). A Review of the indicators disclosed in sustainability reporting of public listed companies in Malaysia. Journal of Human Capital Development, 10(2), 1–14. http://journal.utem.edu.my/index.php/jhcd/article/view/3199
   Google Scholar
• Bakar, A. B. S. A., Ghazali, N. A. B. M., & Ahmad, M. B. (2019). Sustainability reporting and board diversity in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i2/5663
   Google Scholar
• Bank., W. (2014). Corporate governance of state-owned enterprises: A toolkit (WA:Group). World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal, S., Lopez-Perez, M., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2018). Board independence and corporate social responsibility disclosure: The mediating role of the presence of family ownership. Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8030033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betianu, L. (2010). Indicators of the global reporting initative regarding sustainable development. Annales Universitatis Apulensis : Series Oeconomica, 12(1), 15–24. Retrieved from https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/indicators-global-reporting-initiative-regarding-sustainable-development/
   Google Scholar
• Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiral, O., & Gendron, Y. (2011). Sustainable development and certification practices: Lessons learned and prospects. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(5), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiral, O., & Henri, J. F. (2017). Is sustainability performance comparable? A study of GRI reports of mining organizations. Business and Society, 56(2), 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiral, O., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2020). Sustainability reporting assurance: Creating stakeholder accountability through hyperreality? Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braam, G., & Peeters, R. (2018). Corporate sustainability performance and assurance on sustainability reports: Diffusion of accounting practices in the realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braam, G. J. M., Uit de Weerd, L., Hauck, M., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2016). Determinants of corporate environmental reporting: The importance of environmental performance and assurance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7–8), 1168–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, S. N., & Molander, E. A. (1977). Is ethics of business changing? Harvard Business Review, 55(1), 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursa Malaysia. (2006). Bursa Malaysia’s CSR frameworks for Malaysian PLCs. Kuala Lumpur: Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad. Retrieved from http://www.bursamalaysia.com/website/bm/about_us/the_organisation/csr/downloads/csr_framework_slides.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bursa Malaysia. (2017). Corporate governance: Moving from aspiration to actualisation. Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad. Retrieved from https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/corporate-governance-moving-aspiration-actualisation/
   Google Scholar
• Bursa Malaysia. (2018). Sustainability reporting guide. Bursa Malaysia Securites Berhad
   Google Scholar
• Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad. (2017). Practice note 9: Risk management and internal control, corporate governance and sustainability statement [Updated as at 31 December 2017]. Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F. P., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2011). The diversity of corporate board committees and firm financial performance. SSRN Electronic Journal, 20, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.972763
   Google Scholar
• Cecchetti, I., Allegrini, V., & Monteduro, F. (2018). The role of boards of directors in transparency and integrity in state-owned enterprises. In Hybridity in the Governance and Delivery of Public Services, 7, 53–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020180000007001
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1153–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandar, N., Chang, H., & Zheng, X. (2012). Does overlapping membership on audit and compensation committees improve a firm’s financial reporting quality? Review of Accounting and Finance, 11(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/14757701211228192
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1–2), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che-Ahmad, A. B., Olarinoye Abdulmalik, S., & Mohamad Yusof, N. Z. (2020). CEO career horizons and earnings quality in family firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 28(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-02-2019-0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. M., Green, W. J., & Ko, J. C. W. (2014). The impact of strategic relevance and assurance of sustainability indicators on investors’ decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C. H., Guidry, R. P., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2018). The frontstage and backstage of corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from the arctic national wildlife refuge bill. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 865–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3375-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, K. (2019). Pasir Gudang chemical pollution – What harm can these chemicals do to you? | SoyaCincau.com. In Soyacincau. Retrieved from https://www.soyacincau.com/2019/03/16/pasir-gudang-chemical-pollution/
   Google Scholar
• Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Kellermanns, F., & Wu, Z. (2011). Family involvement and new venture debt financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
   Google Scholar
• Coulson-Thomas, C. (2013). Integrity and the boardroom. Strategic Direction, 29(6), 32–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-05-2013-0026
   Google Scholar
• Cui, V., Ding, S., Liu, M., & Wu, Z. (2018). Revisiting the effect of family involvement on corporate social responsibility: A behavioral agency perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3309-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. (2000). Financial accounting theory. Mc Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. (2013). Financial accounting theory (4th ed.; N. S. . North Ryde, Ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Wang, H., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2016). Family control and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking and Finance, 73, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccio, M. (2007). The characteristics of politically connected firms. The Characteristics of Politically Connected Firms, 51, 1–34. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ciberwp%0AFaccio
   Google Scholar
• Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically-connected firms and non-connected firms: A cross country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01099.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccio, M., Masulis, R., & McConnell, J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01000.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J. P. H., & Wong, T. J. (2004). Politically-connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China’s partially privatized firms. SSRN Electronic Journal, 84(2), 330–357. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.642441
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Méndez, C., Arrondo García, R., & Pathan, S. (2017). Monitoring by busy and overlap directors: An examination of executive remuneration and financial reporting quality. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española De Financiación Y Contabilidad, 46(1), 28–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2016.1250345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2018). Financial auditor and sustainability reporting: Does it matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, M., & Patten, D. M. (2004). Evidence on the pernicious effect of financial report environmental disclosure. Accounting Forum, 28(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. M.A. Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173–178). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, S., Ott, C., Looks, E., & Guenther, T. W. (2017). The contents of assurance statements for sustainability reports and information asymmetry. Accounting and Business Research, 47(4), 369–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1263550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, S. Y. K., Gul, F. A., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2015). Corporate political connections and the 2008 Malaysian election. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 43, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajewski, J.-F., & Li, L. (2015). Can internet-based disclosure reduce information asymmetry? Advances in Accounting, 31(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2015.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-torea, N., Fernandez-feijoo, B., & De, M. (2016). Board of director’s effectiveness and the stakeholder perspective of corporate governance: Do effective boards promote the interests of shareholders and stakeholders? BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(4), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2017). Sustainability reporting in family firms: A panel data analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. C., & Simionescu, L. N. (2015). Does entrepreneurship and corporate social responsibility act as a catalyst towards firm performance and brand value? International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(4), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v7n4p23
   Google Scholar
• Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2015). GRI’s History. GRI News letter. https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/grihistory/Pages/GRI%27shistory.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Gnanaweera, K. A. K., Kunori, N., & Ntim, C. G. (2018). Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators. Cogent Business and Management, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1423872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., & Milner, M. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Who’s kidding whom? Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81(6), 66–70. http://researchgate.net/publication/333647199
   Google Scholar
• GRI. (2016). GRI sustainability reporting 2016 sustainability performance. CRODA GRI Report Achive. https://www.croda.com/en-gb/sustainability/gri-report/gri-report-archive
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, E., Hoppe, H., & Poser, C. (2006). Environmental corporate social responsibility of firms in the mining and oil and gas industries: Current status quo of reporting following GRI guidelines. Greener Management International, 2006(53), 6–25. https://doi.org/0.9774/gleaf.3062.2006.sp.00003
   Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A., Hutchinson, M., & Lai, K. M. (2013). Gender-diverse boards and properties of analyst earnings forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 27(3), 511–538. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & Abeysekera, I. (2006). Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: What is new? Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/14013380610703120
   Google Scholar
• Habib, A., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2014). Overlapping membership on audit and compensation committees, audit committee equity holdings, and financial reporting quality. SSRN Electronic Journal, 26(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2445936
   Google Scholar
• Habib, A., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2016). Overlapping membership on audit and compensation committees and financial reporting quality. Australian Accounting Review, 26(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handajani, L., Subroto, B., & Saraswati, E. (2014). Does board diversity matter on corporate social disclosure? An indonesian evidence. In Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(9), 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2343-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashmi, M. A., Brahmana, R. K., & Lau, E. (2018). Political connections, family firms, and earnings quality. Management Research Review, 41(4), 414–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2017-0136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herda, D. N., Taylor, M. E., & Winterbotham, G. (2012). The effect of board independence on the sustainability reporting practices of large U.S. Firms. Issues In Social And Environmental Accounting, 6(2), 178. https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v6i2.69
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, M. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Perlines, F., & Ibarra Cisneros, M. A. (2017). Analysis of the moderating effect of entrepreneurial orientation on the influence of social responsibility on the performance of Mexican family companies. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1), 1408209. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1408209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. (1999). Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the US government. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199901)20:1<67::AID-SMJ22>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh, -J. W.-J. (2018). Governance structure and the credibility gap: Experimental evidence on family businesses’ sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(2), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3409-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M., & Loh, L. (2018). Board governance and sustainability disclosure: A cross-sectional study of singapore-listed companies. Sustainability, 10(7), 2578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X. B., & Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberts, L. (2014). The integrity of governance: What it is, what we know, what is done and where to go. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H. (2011). Directors’ roles in corporate social responsibility: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0870-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAASB. (2011). ISAE 3000 (revised), assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information. International Federation of Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, A. H., & Hanefah, M. M. (2016). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility in Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(2), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-06-2015-0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, A. M. (2010). Director’s integrity: An assessment of corporate integrity. SSRN Electronic Journal. November (2010), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1717487
   Google Scholar
• Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 4029(408), 351–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y
   Google Scholar
• Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junior, R. M., Best, P. J., & Cotter, J. (2014). Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1637-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalelkar, R. (2017). Effect of audit and compensation committee membership overlap on audit fees. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(1), 34–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-12-2014-0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation (Kesner, Ed.). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, K., Robin, A., & Suh, S. (2016). Board structure and audit committee monitoring: Effects of audit committee monitoring incentives and board entrenchment on audit fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing’ and Finance, 31(2), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X15583412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katmon, N., Mohamad, Z. Z., Norwani, N. M., & Farooque, O. A. (2019). Comprehensive board diversity and quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 447–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3672-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2015). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2015 8th edition. KPMG. http://www.kpmg.com/au/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/pages/corporate-responsibility-reporting-survey-2013.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, G. V., & Parsons, L. M. (2008). Getting to the bottom line: An exploration of gender and earnings quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9314-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, N. H., & Butler, F. C. (2018). The influence of family firms and institutional owners on corporate social responsibility performance. Business and Society, 57(7), 1374–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316648443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrán-Jorge, M., & Martínez, D. M. M. (2013). What should a comprehensive sustainability report include? Universial Business Review, 39, 66–103. Retrieved from https://doaj.org/article/b1cc3b02d10646e78b701b18b713f3f2
   Google Scholar
• Lau, C., Lu, Y., & Liang, Q. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in China: A corporate governance approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2513-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laux, C., & Laux, V. (2009). Board committees, CEO compensation, and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 869–891. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, L., & Thomas, T. (2018). Sustainability reporting in ASEAN countries. National University of Singapore. https://www.asean-csr-network.org/c/images/Resources/Reports/2018_Sustainability_Reporting_in_ASEAN_Countries.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leipziger, D. (2015). The OECD principles of corporate governance. The corporate responsibility code book: Third edition (pp. 347–416). Greenleaf Publishing Limited: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.9781783530670_21
   Google Scholar
• Liao, C., & Hsu, A. W. H. (2013). Common membership and effective corporate governance: Evidence from audit and compensation committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2016). The credibility of CSR (corporate social responsibility) reports in Europe. Evidence from a quantitative content analysis in 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, L., Nguyen, T. P. T., Sim, I., Thomas, T., & Wang, Y. (2016). Sustainability reporting in Singapore: The state of practice among Singapore exchange (sgx) mainboard listed companies 2015. The ASEAN CSR Network, Centre for Governance, Insitutions and Organisations (CGIO), NUS Business School, National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, I., Palma, M., & Branco, M. C. (2019). Web based sustainability reporting in family versus non-family firms: The role of the richest European Families. SSRN Electronic Journal. SSRN 3385351, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3385351
   Google Scholar
• Loza Adaui, C. R. (2020). Sustainability reporting quality of peruvian listed companies and the impact of regulatory requirements of sustainability disclosures. Sustainability, 12(3), 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., & Tang, Q. (2014). Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2014.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Madi, H. K., Ishak, Z., & Manaf, N. A. A. (2015). The impact of audit committee characteristics on corporate voluntary disclosure. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164(August), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.106
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4–5), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malenko, N. (2013). Communication and decision-making in corporate boards. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(5), 1486–1532. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manetti, G., & Becatti, L. (2009). Assurance services for sustainability reports: Standards and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0551-008-9809-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manetti, G., & Toccafondi, S. (2012). The role of stakeholders in sustainability reporting assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1044-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, B., Braam, G., & Reimsbach, D. (2019). Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct-effects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, P., Presas, P., & Simon, A. (2014). The heterogeneity of family firms in CSR engagement: The role of values. Family Business Review, 27(3), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514539004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCCG. (2017). Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG) 2017. Securities Commission Malaysia. https://www.sc.com.my/wp-content/uploads/eng/html/cg/mccg2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mensah, H. K., Agyapong, A., & Nuertey, D. (2017). The effect of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment of employees of rural and community banks in Ghana. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1280895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroney, R., Windsor, C., & Aw, Y. T. (2012). Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: An empirical analysis. Accounting & Finance, 52(3), 903–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muttakin, M. B., Mihret, D. G., & Khan, A. (2018). Corporate political connection and corporate social responsibility disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(2), 725–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435898
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. (2007). Seeking stakeholder-centric sustainability assurance. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2007(25), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2007.sp.00009
   Google Scholar
• Odriozola, M. D., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2017). Is corporate reputation associated with quality of CSR reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). Corporate governance and business integrity in Kazakhstan. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264272880-13-en
   Google Scholar
• Ofoegbu, G. N., Odoemelam, N., Okafor, R. G., & Ntim, C. G. (2018). Corporate board characteristics and environmental disclosure quantity: Evidence from South Africa (integrated reporting) and Nigeria (traditional reporting). Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1551510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, S. H. (2016). Measuring the quality and identifying influencing factors of sustainability reporting: Evidence from the resources industry in Australia. Edith Cowan University. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1922
   Google Scholar
• Ong, T., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2017). Impact of corporate governance on sustainability reporting: Empirical study in the Australian resources industry. School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Australia. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?Abstract_id=2902495
   Google Scholar
• Osazuwa, N. P., Che-ahmad, A., & Che-adam, N. (2015). A theoretical framework on the relationship between political connection, board characteristics and environmental disclosure in Nigeria [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Accounting Studies(ICAS). Johor Bahru, Malaysia. August 2015, 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Osazuwa, N. P., Che-Ahmad, A., & Che-Adam, N. (2017). Political connection, board characteristics and environmental disclosure in Nigeria. Advanced Science Letters, 23(9), 9356–9361. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10480
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Y. (2018). CSR and the sustainability reporting landscape of Malaysia. Retrieved September 23, 2019, Legal Herald Advocates and Slicitors. https://www.lh-ag.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/6-CSR-and-the-Sustainability-Reporting-Landscape-of-Malaysia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (USA). (2014). Sustainability goes mainstream: Insights into investor views. Investor Survey, winter/spring series. Retrieved from http://www.pwc.com/us/en/pwc-investor-resource-institute/publications/assets/pwc-sustainability-goes-mainstream-investor-views.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Puroila, J. (2018). Is sustainability performance comparable? A study of GRI Reports of Mining Organizations. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(3), 230–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2018.1515157
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, I. M. A., Jamil, N. N., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2018). Does Political Connection Moderate Women Directors’ Effect on CSR Disclosure? Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 11, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17576/AJAG-2018-11-06
   Google Scholar
• Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimsbach, D., & Hahn, R. (2015). The effects of negative incidents in sustainability reporting on investors’ judgments: An experimental study of third‐party versus self‐disclosure in the realm of sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(4), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimsbach, D., Hahn, R., & Gürtürk, A. (2018). Integrated reporting and assurance of sustainability information: An experimental study on professional investors’ information processing. European Accounting Review, 27(3), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2016.1273787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadou, A., Alom, F., & Laluddin, H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosures in Malaysia: Evidence from large companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(1), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2016-0104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, C., Kit, F. S. Y., & Srinidhi, B. (2019). The value of boardroom communication: Ethnic directors’ out-of-board community affiliations with other board members and the quality of accruals [Paper presentation]. AFAANZ 2019 Conference, Brisbane, Autralia. 1–62. https://openconf.s3.amazonaws.com/AFAANZ2019/papers/161.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=1S4TZ7FHYC2HTER44JG2&Signature=z7mTeyju3Eil1pnrs9sLUUAwC5o%3D&Expires=1564301593
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, R., Stoffel, M., Behrmann, M., Ceschinski, W., & Doan, H. (2018). Effects of committee overlap on the monitoring effectiveness of boards of directors: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Risk Finance, 19(4), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-11-2017-0187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawani, Y., Mohamed Zain, M., & Darus, F. (2010). Preliminary insights on sustainability reporting and assurance practices in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111011083482
   Google Scholar
• Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2006.010098
   Google Scholar
• Seele, P., & Gatti, L. (2017). Greenwashing revisited: In search of a typology and accusation-based definition incorporating legitimacy strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şener, İ., Varoğlu, A., & Karapolatgil, A. A. (2016). Sustainability reports disclosures: Who are the most salient stakeholders? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(October), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.028
   Google Scholar
• Shahab, Y., & Ye, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: Empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 15(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-018-0038-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutar, G., McNeil, M. M., & Molster, C. (1994). The impact of the work environment on ethical decision making: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinidhi, B. (2019). Board diversity, director communication and reporting outcomes. JCAE Doctoral Consortium. University of Texas Arlington, College of Business.
   Google Scholar
• Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanyi, P. N., & Smith, D. B. (2015). Busyness, Expertise, and financial reporting quality of audit committee chairs and financial experts. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(2), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Star. (2019, December 2). Climate change a rising concern among Malaysians. Science of the Total Environment, 1, 8.
   Google Scholar
• The Star Online. (2019). Numbers rise: 2,775 people affected by Pasir gudang chemical pollution - nation | the star online. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/03/14/numbers-rise-2775-people-affected-by-pasir-gudang-chemical-pollution/
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Sustainability accounting, and accountability. Routledge., 2014, 248–272. Retrieved from https://www.bokus.com/bok/9780415695589/sustainability-accounting-and-accountability/
   Google Scholar
• Velte, P. (2017). Do overlapping audit and compensation committee memberships contribute to better financial reporting quality? Empirical evidence for the German two-tier system. International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 8(3/4), 196. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijea.2017.092272
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Zhang, H. M., Tsai, S. B., Wu, L. D., Xue, K. K., Fan, H. J., … Chen, Q. (2018). Does a board chairman’s political connection affect green investment?-From a sustainable perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, E. L. (2017). Malaysia ranks seventh in number of family-owned businesses, says credit suisse. The Edge Markets, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/malaysia-ranks-seventh-number-familyowned-businesses-says-credit-suisse
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. WCED, 383.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, H., Darus, F., & Rahman, S. A. A. (2015). Do corporate governance mechanisms influence environmental reporting practices? Evidence from an emerging country. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 10(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2015.068686
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, H., & Lehman, G. (2009). Corporate environmental reporting through the lens of semiotics. Asian Review of Accounting, 17(3), 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217340910991938
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, H., Lehman, G., & Mohd Nasir, N. (2006). Environmental engagements through the lens of disclosure practices. Asian Review of Accounting, 14(1/2), 122–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217340610729509
   Google Scholar
• Zahid, M., Ghazali, Z., & Ur Rahman, H. (2016). Corporate sustainability practices and reporting: A case of Malaysian real estate investment trusts and property listed companies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 688–693. http://www.econjournals.com
   Google Scholar
• Zahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Ali, W., Khan, M., Alharthi, M., Imran Qureshi, M., & Jan, A. (2020). Boardroom gender diversity: Implications for corporate sustainability disclosures in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainal, D. (2013). A longitudinal analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (CSRR) in Malaysia public listed firms : Pre- and post- mandatory CSRR requirement. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 245–262. Retrieved from http://garph.co.uk/IJARMSS/Jan2013/18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zainal, D. (2017). Quality of corporate social responsibility reporting (csrr): The influence of ownership structure and company characteristics. Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 10(1), 16–35.
   Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang, Y., Chang, X., & Lee, Y. (2018). Board composition and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from Chinese public firms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082752
   Google Scholar
• Zurairi, A. (2018). Climate-related natural disasters cost Malaysia RM8b in the last 20 years. Malaymail. Retrieved from https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2018/10/12/
   Google Scholar