Absorptive Capacity, Business Venturing and Performance: Corporate Governance Mediating Roles

References

• Abernathy, W. J. (1978). The productivity dilemma. Johns Hokings University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abolarinwa, S. I., Asogwa, C. I., Ezenwakwelu, C. A., Court, T. O., & Adedoyin, S. (2020). Corporate growth strategies and financial performance of quoted manufacturing firms in Nigeria: The mediating role of global economic crises. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1750259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ade, G., & Habib, A. (2016). Mediation role of absorption capacity on the relationship between relational network and the entrepreneurial orientation of tunisian contractors. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management, 5(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-026X.1000179
   Google Scholar
• Afolabi, A., & Laiseinde, O. T. (2019). Manufacturing sector performance and economic growth in Nigeria. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1378(2019), 032067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/3/032067
   Google Scholar
• Aktan, B., & Bulut, C. (2008). Financial performance impacts of corporate entrepreneurship in emerging markets: A case of Turkey. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 12, 69–40. http://www.eurojournalsn.com
   Google Scholar
• Al Maqtari, F. A., Farhan, N. H., Al-hattami, H. M., & Khalid, A. S. D. (2020). Impact of country-level corporate governance on entrepreneurial conditions. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1797261. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1797261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albu, N., & Mateescu, A. R. (2015). The relationship between entrepreneurship and corporate governance the case of Romanian listed companies. Amfiteatru Economic, 17(38), 44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altuntas, G., & Donmez, D. (2010). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and organizational performance: Evidence from the hotel industry in Canakkale region. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 39(1), 50–74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235946491
   Google Scholar
• Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambad, S. N. A., & Wahab, K. A. (2016). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian large companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(2), 259-280. http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/images/repository/pdf/Vol17-no2-paper6.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, H. M., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2010). An examination of the relationship between absorptive capacity and organizational learning, and a proposed integration. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, D. (2001). Privatization, corporate entrepreneurship and performance: Testing normative model. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 197–218. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291005597
   Google Scholar
• Asensio-López, D., Cabeza-García, L., & González-Álvarez, N. (2019). Corporate governance and innovation: A theoretical review. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 28(3), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-05-2018-0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asnsio-Lopez, D., Cabeza-Garcia., L., & Gonzalez-Alvarez, N. (2019). Corporate governance and innovation: A theoretical review. European Journal of Management and Business, 28(3), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-05-2018–0056
   Google Scholar
• Asogwa, C. I., Ofoegbu, G. N., Nnam, J. I., Chukwunwike, O. D., & Ntim, C. G. (2019). Effect of corporate governance board leadership models and attributes on earnings quality of quoted Nigerian companies. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1683124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1683124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Balsmeier, B., Buchwald, A. & Stiebale, J. (2014). Outside directors on the board and innovative firm performance. Research Policy, 43 (10), 1800–1815. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v43y2014i10p1800-1815.html
   Google Scholar
• Barringer, B. R., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199905)20:5<421::AID-SMJ30>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J. (2003). The Paradox of corporate entrepreneurship: Post-Enron principles for encouraging creativity without crossing the line. Tech & Innovation. Spring, 2003(30). https://www.strategy-business.com/article/8276?gko=eb280.
   Google Scholar
• Bojica, A. M., & Fuentes, M. M. (2011). Knowledge acquisition and corporate entrepreneurship: Insights from Spanish SMEs in the ICT sector. Journal of World Business, 47(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borlea, S. N., & Achim, M. (2013). Theories of corporate governance. Economics Series, 23(1), 117127.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1981). Theories of Learning. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1999). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bruderl, J., & Peisendorfer, P. (2000). Fast-growing business. International Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 45–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20628597
   Google Scholar
• Brunninge, O., Nordqvist, M., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Corporate governance and strategic change in SMEs: The effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small Business Economics, 29(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9021-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1955). The informant in quantitative research. American Journal of Sociology, 60(1), 339–342. doi:10.1086/221565
   Google Scholar
• Chandrashekar, D., & Mungila Hillemane, B. S. (2018). Absorptive capacity, cluster linkages, and innovation: An evidence from Bengaluru high-tech manufacturing cluster. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(1), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2017-0087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. L. & Hsu, W. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347–362.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, H-T.. & He, L-J.. (2010). Board supervision capability and information transparency. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(1), 18–31. doi:10.1111/corg.2010.18.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiva, R., & Alegre, J. (2005). Organizational learning and organizational knowledge: Towards the integration of two approaches. Management Learning, 36(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507605049906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B., Poon, S. K., & Davis, J. G. (2008). Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: A complementarity theory-based approach. Omega, 36(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirjevskis, A. (2019). The role of dynamic capabilities as drivers of business model innovation in mergers and acquisitions of technology-advanced firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 5(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5010012
   Google Scholar
• Clydesdale, G. (2007). Economic decline and the failure of Chinese entrepreneurs. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 10(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-007-9011-5
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300304
   Google Scholar
• Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. The Journal of Marketing, 5894(4), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800404
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande, A. (2018). Relationships between advanced manufacturing technologies, absorptive capacity, mass customization, time to market and financial and market performance: An empirical investigation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 10(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-03-2017-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchek, S. (2013). Capturing absorptive capacity: A critical review and future prospects. Schmalenbach Business Review, 65(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396860
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. SAGE Publications Sage CA.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, V. H., Bruton, G. D., & Hisrich, R. D. (1998). Strategy and the board of directors in venture capital-backed firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(6), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00062-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board Independence and Firm Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30152-6
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, J., & Winlund, H. (2000). Boards of directors in small and medium-sized industrial firms: Examining the effects of the board’s working style on board task performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620050177930
   Google Scholar
• Glass, A. J., & Sagi, K. (1988). International technology transfer and the technology gap. Journal of Development Economics, 55(2), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00041-8
   Google Scholar
• Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., & Lu, L. (2012). Backgrounds of independent directors and corporate performance: An empirical study on Chinese listed financial services companies. In H. Tan (Ed..), technology for education and learning. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27711-5_39.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, A., Emmanuel, T., & Alshare, K. (2005). Major determinants of entrepreneurship in mid-size companies: Empirical investigation. In: Southwest Decision Sciences Institute, 2005 Conference Proceedings, Dallas, USA, 3-4 March, 2005, 468–478.
   Google Scholar
• Hajawiyah, A., Wahyudin, A., Sakinah, K., Pahala, S., & Pahala, I. (2020). The effect of good corporate governance mechanisms on accounting conservatism with leverage as a moderating variable. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1779479. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1779479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A., & Bagchi-Sen, S. A. (2002). A study of R & D, innovation and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation, 22(4), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00016-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmel, G. (2000). Lending the Revolution. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D. T., & Rutherford, M. W. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical look at the innovativeness dimension and its antecedents. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(3), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810710740227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, A. (2019). Agglomeration, absorptive capacity and knowledge governance: Implications for public-private firm innovation in China. Regional Studies, 45(8), 1069-1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1659505
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmelinna Laukkanen, P. (2012). Constituents and outcomes of absorptive capacity – Appropriability regime changing the game. Management Decision, 50(7), 1178–1199. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211246950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imoniana, J. O., DeFeitas, E. C., & Perera, L. C. J. (2016). Assessment of internal control systems to curb corporate fraud - evidence from Brazil. African J. Of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1504/AJAAF.2016.077592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed, A., Iqabal, R., & Hasan, L. (2006). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Karachi Stock Exchange. The Pakistan Development Review, 45(4), 947–964. https://doi.org/10.30541/v45i4llpp.947-964
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm; managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 306–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Barrionuevo, M. M., Garcia-Morales, V. J., & Molina, L. M. (2011). Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity. Technovation, 31(5–6), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Barrionuevo, M. M., Molina, L. M., & Garcia-Morales, V. J. (2019). Combined influence of absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship on performance. Sustainability, 11(11), 3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiraporn, P., Lee, S. M., Park, K. J., & Song, H. (2018). How do independent directors influence innovation productivity? A quasi-natural experiment. Applied Economics Letters, 25(7), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1329927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karacaogulu, K., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & San, F. B. (2013). The impact of corporate entrepreneurship on firms’ financial performance: Evidence from Instabul stock market exchange firms. International Business Research, 6(1), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v6n1p163
   Google Scholar
• Kedia, B. L., & Bhagat, R. S. (1988). Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258375
   Google Scholar
• Kelm, K. M., Narayanan, V. K., & Pinches, G. E. (1995). Shareholders value creation during R & D innovation and commercialization stages. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 770–786. https://doi.org/10.2307/256745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandwalla, P. N. (1987). Generators of pioneering-innovative management: Some Indian evidence. Organization Studies, 8(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068700800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, K. (2019). Do not change horses: Specialist CEOs enhance innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(8), 875–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1566525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, K., & Kim, W. Y. (2019). Do lucky CEOs avoid innovation? Applied Economics Letters, 26(10), 795–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1497842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosnik, R. D. (1987). Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2010). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuratko, D. F., & Morris, M. H. (2018). Corporate entrepreneurship: A critical challenge for educators and researchers. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737291
   Google Scholar
• Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.3.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, S. F., & Braun, M. (2009). Managerial risk, innovation, and organizational decline. Journal of Management, 35(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Tse, E. C., & Zhao, J. (2009). An empirical study of corporate entrepreneurship in hospitality companies. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 10(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15256480903088196
   Google Scholar
• Lis, A., & Sudolska, A. (2020). Absorptive capacity and its role for the company growth and competitive advantage: The case of Freudenthal automotive Torun company. Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation, 16(1). https://jemi.edu.pl/11-article-abstract/41
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Shen, M., Ding, W., & Zhao, X. (2017). Tie strength, absorptive capacity and innovation performance in Chinese manufacturing industries. Nankai Business Review International, 8(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-01-2017-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Zhao, X., & Zhao, H. (2018). Absorptive capacity and business performance: The mediating effects of innovation and mass customization. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(6), 1787–1803. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0416
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man, C. K., & Wong, B. (2013). Corporate governance and earnings management; A survey of literature. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(2), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i2.7646
   Google Scholar
• Maqtari, A. F., Farhan, N. H., Al-hattami, H. M., & Khalid, A. S. D. (2020). Impact of country-level corporate governance on entrepreneurial conditions. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1797261. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1797261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martila, N., Notter, I., Schweiger, S. A., Stettler, T. R., & Baldauf, A. (2017). Illuminating the relationship between absorptive capacity and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management, 1. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10687a
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Caro, E., Cepeda-Carrión, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Garcia-Perez, A. (2020). The effect of information technology assimilation on firm performance in B2B scenarios. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2019-0554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashayekhi, B., & Bazaz, M. S. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance in Iran. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 4(2), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1815-5669(10)70033-3
   Google Scholar
• Medase, K., & Barasa, L. (2019). Absorptive capacity, marketing capabilities, and Innovation commercialisation in Nigeria. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(5), 790–820. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2018-0194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. H., & Kuratko, D. F. (2002). Corporate entrepreneurship. Harcourt College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, Z., & Moridipour, H. (2013). Corporate governance quality: A literature review. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(10), 3093–3098.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C. (1983). The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing 1900-1940. Explorations in Economic History, 20(4), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(83)90024-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, W. F. (1962). The origins of the basic inventions underlying Dupont’s major product and process innovations, 1920-1950. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 323–358). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. Y., & Kotebe, M. (1999). Sourcing strategies of U.S. service companies: A modified transaction-cost analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 20(9), 791–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199909)20:9<791::AID-SMJ49>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghosal, S. (1998). Social capita, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndemezo, E., & Kayitana, C. (2018). Corporate governance, corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: Evidence from the Rwandese manufacturing industry. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686218806715
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of growth of the firm. John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A., & Berger, D. G. (1971). Entrepreneurship in organizations: Evidence from the popular music industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petti, C., & Zhang, S. (2013). Technological entrepreneurship and absorptive capacity in Guangdong technology firms. Measuring Business Excellence, 17(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041311329447
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, P., & Tylecote, A. (2004). Hybrid corporate governance and its effects on innovation: A case study of AstraZeneca. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000175535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramzi. (2009). Does the presence of independent directors influence accruals management? The Journal of Applied Business Research, 25(6), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v25i6.997
   Google Scholar
• Randi, S. A. (2013). Investigating absorptive capacity in boards, corporate governance and the value creating board. Ethos e-Thesis Online Service. https://ethos.bl.uk/orderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.576693
   Google Scholar
• Rani, P., Shauki, E. R., Darminto, D., & Prijadi, R. (2020). Motives, governance, and long-term performance mergers and acquisitions in Asia. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1791445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberge, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90002-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings Management through Real Activities Manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruigrok, W., Peck, S. I., & Keller, H. (2006). Board Characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1201–1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhdari, K. (2016). Corporate entrepreneurship: A review and future research agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8), 5–18. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/NEJE-04-2019-0024/full/html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. (1998). Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.533226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D., Tang, Y., Wang, M., & Zhang, W. (2015). The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 13(4), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2015.1090267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D., & Leih, S. (2016). Uncertainty, innovation, and dynamic capabilities. An Introduction. California Management Review, 58(4), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribo, J. A., Berrone, P., & Surroca, J. (2007). Do the type and number of blockholders Influence R&D investments? New evidence from Spain. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 828–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00622.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao, S. M., Lin, C. H., & Chen, V. Y. (2015). Family ownership as a moderator between R&D investments and CEO compensation. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C., Chang Pai, D., Hung, C., & Martín‐de Castro, G. (2011). Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in KIBS. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tylecote, A., & Visintin, F. (2007). Corporate governance, finance and the technological advantage of nations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–138.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, W. J., Parida, V., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Wang, Y., & Horng, R. (2010). Learning and innovation in small and medium enterprises. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011020296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1986). Positive accounting theory (pp. 388). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 7–24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., & Örtqvist, D. (2010). Does network board capital matter? A study of innovative performance in strategic SME networks. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylinen, M., & Gullkvist, B. (2014). The effects of organic and mechanistic control in exploratory and exploitative innovations. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, T., & Sung, T. (2015). How outside directors facilitate corporate R&D investment? evidence from large Korean firms. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, W. F. W., & Idris, A. A. (2012). Insight of Corporate Governance Theory. Journal of Business & Management, 1(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.12735/jbm.v1i1p52
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A. (1995). Corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: The case of management leveraged buyouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00024-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Filatotchev, I., & Wright, M. (2009). How do threshold firms sustain corporate entrepreneurship? The role of boards and absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & Huse, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship in medium size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management, 26(5), 947–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00064-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Chen, L., & Feng, T. (2014). Mediation or moderation? The role of R&D investment in the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from the Chinese IT industry. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(6), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, T., Ertug, G., & George, G. (2017). The capacity to innovate: A meta analysis of absorptive capacity and its performance implications. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceeding, 1, 12806. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.12806abstract
   Google Scholar