Towards the Co-evolution of Food Experience Search Spaces Based on the Design Weltanschauung Model in Food Marketing

References

• Alexander, C. (Ed.) (1963). The determination of components for an Indian village. Conference on Design Methods. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, B. (1979). Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 1(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90023-1
   Google Scholar
• Archer, B. (1981). A view of the nature of design research. Design: Science: Method, 1, 30–47.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L. B. (1965). Systematic method for designers [publisher not identified].
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, R., & Stein, P. R. (1954). Design for a Brain. PhT, 7(4), 24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3061597
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. Part Two: Variety. Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, W. R. (1991). Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems. In G. J. Klir (Ed.), Facets of Systems Science (pp. 405–417). Springer US. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_28
   Google Scholar
• Batat, W., Manna, V., Ulusoy, E., Peter, P. C., Ulusoy, E., Vicdan, H., & Hong, S. (2016). New paths in researching “alternative” consumption and well-being in marketing: alternative food consumption/Alternative food consumption: What is “alternative”?/Rethinking “literacy” in the adoption of AFC/Social class dynamics in AFC. Marketing Theory, 16(4), 561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593116649793
   Google Scholar
• Batat, W., Peter, P. C., Moscato, E. M., Castro, I. A., Chan, S., Chugani, S., & Muldrow, A. (2019). The experiential pleasure of food: A savoring journey to food well-being. Journal of Business Research, 100, 392–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.024
   Google Scholar
• Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research. Design Issues, 20(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/074793604772933739
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1959a). Cybernetics and management. Management science series. English University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1959b). What Has Cybernetics to Do with Operational Research? OR, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3007308
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1966). Decision and control: The meaning of operational research and management apbernetics. John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1971). The liberty machine. Futures, 3(4), 338–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(71)90053-X
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the firm (1st ed.). Allen Lane the Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1973). Cybernetics and management (2nd ed.). Management science series.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1975). Platform for change. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1979). The heart of enterprise. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the firm: The managerial cybernetics of organization: companion volume to the Heart of enterprise (2nd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the system: For organizations. The Managerial cybernetics of organization.. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (1993). Designing freedom. The CBC Massey lecture series. House of Anansi Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10498155
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (2002). What is cybernetics? Kybernetes, 31(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920210417283
   Google Scholar
• Block, L. G., Grier, S. A., Childers, T. L., Davis, B., Ebert, J. E. J., Kumanyika, S., Laczniak, R. N., Machin, J. E., Motley, C. M., & Peracchio, L. (2011). From nutrients to nurturance: A conceptual introduction to food well-being. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Blumrich, M. S. (1970). Computing Nonstandard Section Properties. MACHINE DESIGN, 42(6), 147.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard business review video series. Harvard Business Review Video.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. F. (2010). The design of design: Essays from a computer scientist. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Cherbuin, N., & Walsh, E. I. (2019). Sugar in mind: Untangling a sweet and sour relationship beyond type 2 diabetes. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 54, 100769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.100769
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. The management of innovation and change series. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Hall, T., Dillon, K., & Duncan, D. S. (2016). Know your customers’: “jobs to be done”. Harvard Business Review: HBR, 94(9), 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2016). Was ist disruptive Innovation? Harvard-Business-Manager: das Wissen der Besten, 38(1), 64–75.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, R. C., & Ashby, W. R. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science, 1(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207727008920220
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1999). Design Research: A Disciplined Conversation. Design Issues, 15(2), 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1511837
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2001). Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer-Verlag London Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2007). From a Design Science to a Design Discipline: Understanding Designerly Ways of Knowing and Thinking. In R. Michel (Ed.), Design Research Now (pp. 41–54). Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_3
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (Ed.). (2011). Design Thinking. Berg Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293884
   Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard, P. (2014). Pragmatism and Design Thinking. International Journal of Design, 8, 1. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/abstract?site=ehost&scope=site&jrnl=19913761&AN=96053226&h=TcrywSmE4cKewjAFCxgrzjciO1RIfp3FHZgB1svGT%2bwqXA0oF2nplu9tCD12tAelsPKtgfns3OM%2bV77fmOmuzQ%3d%3d&crl=c&resultLocal=ErrCrlNoResults&resultNs=Ehost&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d19913761%26AN%3d96053226
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dority, B. L., McGarvey, M. G., & Kennedy, P. F. (2010). Marketing foods and beverages in schools: the effect of school food policy on students’ overweight measures. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.29.2.204
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.23473212
   Google Scholar
• Foerster, H. (1995). von Ethics and second order cybernetics/H. v. Foerster. In Stanford Humanities Review (pp. 2). Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Foerster, H. (2007). Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Foerster, H. V. (1981). On cybernetics of cybernetics and social theory. In Self-Organizing Systems, an Interdisciplinary Approach (pp. 102–105).
   Google Scholar
• Frankl, V. E. (1985). Man’s search for meaning. Rev. and update. Pocket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, M., Cian, L., & Boichuk, J. (2018). Food Marketing.
   Google Scholar
• Glanville, R. (2007). Kybernetes: Volume 36, Number 9/10: Cybernetics and design. Kybernetes: 36, no. 9/10. Emerald Insight. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/academiccompletetitles/home.action
   Google Scholar
• Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning/Ernst von Glasersfeld. Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. In MIS Quarterly (pp. 75–105). Ron Weber.
   Google Scholar
• Heylighen, F., & Joslyn, C. (2001). Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. Encyclopedia of Physical Science & Technology, 28(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
   Google Scholar
• Johansson‐Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023
   Google Scholar
• Kamran, Q. 2018. Da-Sein Thinking: A Phenomenological Epistemology for Design Thinking. SSRN: Available at 3273883.
   Google Scholar
• Kamran, Q., Van Dijk, J., Topp, S., & Henseler, J. (2020). The Evolving New Typology of Marketing from a Design Weltanschauung. 2020 AMA Summer Academic Conference: Bridging Gaps: Marketing in the Age of Disruption, 997–1012.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, P. J. (1995). A framework for classifying and evaluating the theoretical contributions of case research in management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7, 66.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpinen, E. (2009). The habitual conception of action and social theory. Semiotica, (2009(173), 99–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.004
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1996). A second-order cybernetics of otherness. Systems Research, 13(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1735(199609)13:3<311::AID-SRES106>3.0.CO;2-O
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: a new foundation for design. In Chapter Two: Basic Concepts of Human-Centered Design (pp. 39–75). Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2009a). The content analysis reader. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2009b). Information of interactions in complex systems.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lukka, K., & Vinnari, E. (2014). Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(8), 1308–1338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1265
   Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & Malter, A. J. (2006). Marketing as Service-Exchange. Organizational Dynamics, 35(3), 264–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2006.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1906). Pragmatism (Editor [3]. CP.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J., & Berry, D. (2011). Designing Intelligence: Why Brains Aren’t Enough. GRIN Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (2001). Understanding intelligence. (1st MIT Press pbk. ed.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1950b). The psychology of intelligence. International library of psychology, philosophy and scientific method. Routledge & Kegan.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. ((1937)). La Construction du réel chez l’enfant. (Collection d’actualités pédagogiques). Delachaux & Niestlé.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1979). The Structure within Industries and Companies’ Performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1924589
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press; Collier Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Kunz, W. (1972). Der Ansatz der Informationswissenschaften. In Horst WJ Rittel (1992), Planen, Entwerfen, Design: Ausgewählte Schriften Zu Theo Rie Und Methodik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag (pp. 151–160).
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, M. (2009). Model-based management (MBM): A research agenda. Institute of Management discussion paper: Nr. 57. Institut für Betriebswirtschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the artificial. The Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C., & Carroll, J. M. (1979). The psychological study of design. Design Studies, 1(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90020-6
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Morgan, F. W. (2005). Services in society and academic thought: an historical analysis. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146705275294
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. The technology press.. Wiley.
   Google Scholar