How does cross-functional cooperation influence organizational performance? The mediating role of management accounting systems

References

• Abdel-Kader, M., & Luther, R. (2008). The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: A Uk-Based empirical analysis. British Accounting Review, 40(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2007.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Abernethy, M. A., & Bouwens, J. (2005). Determinants of accounting innovation implementation. Abacus, 41(3), 217–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00180.x
   Google Scholar
• Agndal, H., & Nilsson, U. (2009). Interorganizational cost management in the exchange process. Management Accounting Research, 20(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
   Google Scholar
• Baines, A., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: A structural equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7–8), 675–698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00102-2
   Google Scholar
• Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2002). Market orientation, learning orientation and product innovation: Delving into the organization’s black box. Journal of Market-focused Management, 5(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012543911149
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator–Mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. S., & Speklé, R. F. (2018). Construct validity in Survey-Based management accounting and control research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(2), 23–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51995
   Google Scholar
• Bendig, D., Enke, S., Thieme, N., & Brettel, M. (2018). Performance implications of Cross-Functional coopetition in new product development: The mediating role of organizational learning. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 137–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.007
   Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.7566023
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
   Google Scholar
• Cadez, S., & Guilding, C. (2008). An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), 836–863. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Caglio, A., & Ditillo, A. (2012). Opening the black box of management accounting information exchanges in Buyer–Supplier relationships. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Calantone, R. J., Tamer Cavusgil, S., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515–524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Accounting Review, 61(1), 16–35.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, J.-M. (2004). The relationships among management accounting information, organizational learning and production performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2004.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, H. C., & Ad R Van, G. (2000). Supply chain management and management accounting: A case study of Activity-Based costing. International Journal of Logistics, 3(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560050006664
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Google Scholar
• Eng, T.-Y. (2006). An investigation into the mediating role of Cross-Functional coordination on the linkage between organizational norms and scm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 762–773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.014
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Carsten, R. (2010). Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: Implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 80–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.080
   Google Scholar
• Essa, S. A. G., Dekker, H. C., & Groot, T. L. C. M. (2018). Your gain my pain? The effects of accounting information in uncertain negotiations. Management Accounting Research, 41, 20–42. In Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2018.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
   Google Scholar
• Gemser, G., & Leenders, M. A. A. M. (2011). Managing Cross-Functional cooperation for new product development success. Long Range Planning, 44(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., & Malmi, T. (2002). Moderate impact of erps on management accounting: A lag or permanent outcome? Management Accounting Research, 13(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2002.0189
   Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A. (1991). The effects of management accounting systems and environmental uncertainty on small business managers’ performance. Accounting and Business Research, 22(85), 57–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1991.9729418
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7 ed. ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Tomas, G., Hult, M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2 ed). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., David, J., Jr, K., Hair, J. F., Tomas, G., Hult, M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
   Google Scholar
• Hulland, J. (1999). Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, N. A., & King, M. (2006). The alignment of accounting and information systems in SMEs in Malaysia. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 9(3), 24–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2006.10856425
   Google Scholar
• Jermias, J., & Gani, L. (2005). Ownership structure, Contingent-Fit, and Business-Unit performance: A research model and empirical evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 40(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2005.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in Cross-Sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
   Google Scholar
• Luo, X., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Pan, X. (2006). Cross-Functional “Coopetition”: The simultaneous role of cooperation and competition within firms. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.2.067
   Google Scholar
• Meira, J., Kartalis, N. D., Tsamenyi, M., & Cullen, J. (2010). Management controls and Inter‐Firm relationships: A review. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/18325911011025731
   Google Scholar
• Mia, L., & Chenhall, R. H. (1994). The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90010-8
   Google Scholar
• Mia, L., & Clarke, B. (1999). Market competition, management accounting systems and business unit performance. Management Accounting Research, 10(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1998.0097
   Google Scholar
• Miguel, M. R. (2004). Interaction between management accounting and supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 134–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410527033
   Google Scholar
• Min, H. (2003). Selection of management accounting systems in Just-in-Time and Theory of Constraints-Based Manufacturing Au - Lea, Bih-Ru. International Journal of Production Research, 41(13), 2879–2910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754031000109134
   Google Scholar
• Möller, K., Windolph, M., & Isbruch, F. (2011). The effect of relational factors on Open-Book accounting and Inter-Organizational cost management in Buyer–Supplier partnerships. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2011.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. P. (2018). Performance implication of market orientation and use of management accounting systems: The moderating role of accountants’ participation in strategic decision making. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 25(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-04-2018-0005
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. P., Ngo, L. V., Bucic, T., & Phong, N. D. (2018). Cross-Functional knowledge sharing, coordination and firm performance: The role of Cross-Functional competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 123–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.014
   Google Scholar
• Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Google Scholar
• Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Scott, B. M., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   Google Scholar
• PwC. (2018) “Doing business in Vietnam.”, accessed at https://www.pwc.com/vn/en/publications/vietnam-publications/dbg-2018.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, C. (2004). The effect of accounting report structure and team structure on performance in Cross-Functional teams. Accounting Review, 79(4), 1153–1180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.1153
   Google Scholar
• Ruggeri, D., & Rizza, C. (2017). Accounting information system innovation in interfirm relationships. Journal of Management Control, 28(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-017-0247-8
   Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1–2), 127–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90018-P
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. A., Vasudevan, S. P., & Tanniru, M. R. (1996). Organizational learning and resource-based theory: An integrative model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(6), 41–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819610150512
   Google Scholar
• song, X. M., Mitzi, M. M., & Schmidt, J. B. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of Cross‐Functional cooperation: A Comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1410035
   Google Scholar
• Sprinkle, G. B. (2003). Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 287–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00058-7
   Google Scholar
• Teoh, Say, Y., & Pan, S. L. (2008). Understanding the Influences of social integration in enterprise systems use. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(5), 493–511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390810904256
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/257085
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, J. S. L. (2001). The impact of culture on the relationship between budgetary participation, management accounting systems, and Managerial performance: An analysis of Chinese and Western managers. The International Journal of Accounting, 36(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7063(01)00101-7
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource‐Based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
   Google Scholar
• Widener, S. K. (2006). Associations between strategic resource importance and performance measure use: The impact on firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 17(4), 433–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2005.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Windolph, M., & Moeller, K. (2012). Open-Book accounting: Reason for failure of Inter-Firm cooperation? Management Accounting Research, 23(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2011.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, M., & Roijmans, D. (2011). Using prototypes to induce experimentation and knowledge integration in the development of enabling accounting information. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 708–736. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01055.x
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., John, G., Jr, L., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
   Google Scholar