Predicting task performance from psychological ownership and innovative work behaviour: A cross sectional study

References

• Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioural control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behaviour. In P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology, volume 1 (pp. 438–459). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Akçin, K., Erat, S., Alniaçik, U., & Çiftçioğlu, A. B. (2018). Effect of psychological ownership on employee silence and task performance: A study on academicians. International Business Research, 11(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v11n1p34
   Google Scholar
• Ali, J. A., & Al-Owaihan, A. (2008). Islamic work ethic: A critical review. Cross Cultural Management. An International Journal, 15(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600810848791
   Google Scholar
• Amarneh, B. H., Abu Al-Rub, R. F., & Abu Al-Rub, N. F. (2010). Co-workers’ support and job performance among nurses in Jordanian hospitals. Journal of Research in Nursing, 15(5), 391–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987109347134
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170
   Google Scholar
• Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behaviour, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.631648
   Google Scholar
• Asamani, J. A., Amertil, N. P., Ismaila, H., Francis, A. A., Chebere, M. M., & Nabyonga-Orem, J. (2019). Nurses and midwives demographic shift in Ghana: The policy implications of a looming crisis. Human Resources for Health, 17(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0377-1
   Google Scholar
• Asatryan, V. S., & Oh, H. (2008). Psychological ownership theory: An exploratory application in the restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 32(3), 363–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348008317391
   Google Scholar
• Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 30(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583
   Google Scholar
• Baba, A. I., & Abdullahi, A. (2019). Mediating role of affective commitment on the relationship between employee’s innovative behaviour and task performance: Lesson from Nigeria public sector. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 7(3), 2348–7186. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229688261.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Battistelli, A., Montani, F., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., & Picci, P. (2014). Employees’ concerns about change and commitment to change among Italian organizations: The moderating role of innovative work behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(7), 951–978. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.809012
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2000). Are we what we own? I shop therefore I am: Compulsive buying and the search for self (pp. 76–104). Jason Aronson
   Google Scholar
• Berisha, B., Ramadani, V., Gërguri-Rashiti, S., & Palalić, R. (2020). The impact of innovative working behaviour on employees’ working performance. In Leitão, J., Nunes A., Pereira, D., & Ramadani, V. (ed.) Intrapreneurship and Sustainable Human Capital (pp. 37–49). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49410-0_3
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Pierce, J. L., & Crossley, C. (2014). Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 35(3), 318–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1869
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High‐quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 30(6), 709–729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.565
   Google Scholar
• Chan, I. Y. S., Liu, A. M. M., & Fellows, R. (2014). Role of leadership in fostering an innovation climate in construction firms. Journal of Management Engineering, 30(60), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000271
   Google Scholar
• Chi, N. W., & Han, T. S. (2008). Exploring the linkages between formal ownership and psychological ownership for the organization: The mediating role of organizational justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 691–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/096317907X262314
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. H. (1988). Life events and psychosocial functioning. Theoretical and Methodological Issues. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00037-6
   Google Scholar
• Daneji, A. M., & Bambale, A. J. A. (2019). Mediating effect of intrapreneurship on psychological ownership and teachers’ in-role performance. The 1st International Conference on Business, Management and Information Systems. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3487395.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Martin, A. (2015). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 38(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2057
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, J. (2007). Individual innovation: The connection between leadership and employees’ innovative work behaviour. PhD University of Twente, EIM:.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, J. P. J., & Kemp, R. (2003). Determinants of co-worker’s innovative behaviour: An investigation into knowledge-intensive services. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000787
   Google Scholar
• De Spiegelaere, S., Van Guys, G., & Van Hootegem, G. (2012). Job design and innovative work behaviour: One size does not fit all types of employees. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 8(4), 5–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7341/2012841
   Google Scholar
• Dieleman, M., Toonen, J., & Toure. (2006). The match between motivation and performance management of health sector workers in Mali. Human Resources for Health, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-4-2
   Google Scholar
• Dittmar, H. (1992). The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To Have Is to Be. St Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Google Scholar
• Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
   Google Scholar
• Ghafoor, A., Qureshi, T. M., Khan, M. A., & Hijazi, S. T. (2011). Transformational leadership, employee engagement and performance: Mediating effect of psychological ownership. African Journal of Business Management, 5(17), 7391–7403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.126
   Google Scholar
• Gold, J. R., Burridge, C. P., & Turner, T. F. (2001). A modified stepping-stone model of population structure in red drum. Genetica, 111(1–3), 305–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013705230346
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person–organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 55(2), 254–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1682
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, D., & Holmberg, S. (1990). The intention- behaviour relationship among U.S. and Swedish Voters. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2786868
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11–2018-0203
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Han, T. S., Chiang, H. H., McConville, D., & Chiang, C. L. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of person–organization fit, person–job fit, and contextual performance: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Human Performance, 28(5), 425–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1021048
   Google Scholar
• Hayati, K., & Caniago, I. (2012). Islamic work ethic: The role of intrinsic motivation, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 65(3), 1102–1106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.148
   Google Scholar
• Hee, O. C., Kamaludin, N. H., & Ping, L. L. (2016). Motivation and Job performance among nurses in the health tourism hospital in Malaysia. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4), 668–672. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/2709
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Hubona, G. S., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
   Google Scholar
• J.f., H. J., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I–method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, D., Sambasivan, M., & Kumar, N. (2013). Effect of spiritual intelligence, emotional intelligence, psychological ownership and burnout on caring behaviour of nurses: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(21–22), 3192–3202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12386
   Google Scholar
• Khan, K., Abbas, M., Gul, A., & Raja, U. (2015). Organizational justice and job outcomes: Moderating role of Islamic work ethic. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1937-2
   Google Scholar
• Kurniati, A., Efendi, F., & Yeh, P. M. (2014). Human resource development for health in Indonesia: Challenges of achieving the millennium development goals. Jurnal Sumber Daya Manusia Kesehatan, 1(1), 1–17. https://www.hrhresourcecenter.org/node/5985.html
   Google Scholar
• Leong, C. T., & Rasli, A. (2014). The Relationship between innovative work behaviour on work role performance: An empirical study. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 129(2), 592–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.717
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Chow, I. H. S., Zhang, J. C., & Huang, M. (2019). Organizational innovation climate and individual innovative behaviour: Exploring the moderating effects of psychological ownership and psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 13(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0263-y
   Google Scholar
• Ma Prieto, I., & Pilar Pérez-Santana, M. (2014). Managing innovative work behaviour: The role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H. (1980). The Self in Thought and Memory. In D. M. Wegner & R. R. Vallacher (Eds.), The Self in Social Psychology (pp. 102–130). Oxford University Pres.
   Google Scholar
• Masood, M., & Afsar, B. (2017). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour among nursing staff. Nursing Inquiry, 24(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12188
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., & Gardner, J. (2007). A Study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(5), 477–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.5.477-500
   Google Scholar
• McSherry, R. O. B., & Douglas, M. (2011). Innovation in nursing practice: A means to tackling the global challenges facing nurses, midwives and nurse leaders and managers in the future. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(2), 165–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01241.x
   Google Scholar
• Md-Sidin, S., Sambasivan, M., & Muniandy, N. (2009). Impact of psychological ownership on the performance of business school lecturers. Journal of Education for Business, 85(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903217903
   Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2015). Reflection as a facilitator of teachers’ innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12052
   Google Scholar
• Michael, L. A. H., Hou, S. T., & Fan, H. L. (2011). Creative self-efficacy and innovative behaviour in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 45(4), 258–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.x
   Google Scholar
• Nasifoglu Elidemir, S., Ozturen, A., & Bayighomog, S. W. (2020). Innovative behaviours, employee creativity, and sustainable competitive advantage: A moderated mediation. Sustainability, 12(8), 3295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083295
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ozorhon, B., Oral, K., & Demirkesen, S. (2016). Investigating the components of innovation in construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(3), 04015052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000419
   Google Scholar
• Pendleton, A., Wilson, N., & Wright, M. (1998). The perception and effects of share ownership: Empirical evidence from employee buy-outs. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36(1), 99–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00082
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., Li, D., Jussila, I., & Wang, J. (2019). An empirical examination of the emergence of collective psychological ownership in work team contexts. Journal of Management and Organization, 26(5), 657–676. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.68
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Coghlan, A. M. (2004). Work environment structure and psychological ownership. The mediating effects of control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), 507–534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.5.507-534
   Google Scholar
• Renz, F., Posthuma, R., & Smith, E. (2020). A Climate for Psychological Ownership to Enhance Organizational Performance Across Latin America. Academy of Management Global Proceedings, 59. USA
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1981). The Self-Concept: Social Product and Social Force. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives (pp. 593–624). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schirle, L., McCabe, B. E., & Mitrani, V. (2019). The relationship between practice environment and psychological ownership in advanced practice nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945918754496
   Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/23042796
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, A., & Singh, S. (2015). Psychological ownership: Scale development and validation in the Indian context. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 10(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2015.068172
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validating choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36(2), 111–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
   Google Scholar
• Tong, L. (2018). Relationship between meaningful work and job performance in nurses. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 24(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12620
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press (pp. 15-40)
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25(4), 439–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249
   Google Scholar
• Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, L. E., Van Oort, A., Rispens, S., & Olckers, C. (2019). Work engagement and task performance within a global Dutch ICT-consulting firm: The mediating role of innovative work behaviours. In Current Psychology, 1–12 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00339-1
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Law, K. S., Zhang, M. J., Li, Y. N., & Liang, Y. (2019). It’s mine! Psychological ownership of one’s job explains positive and negative workplace outcomes of job engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(.2), 229–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000337
   Google Scholar
• Weng, R. H., Huang, C. Y., Chen, L. M., & Chang, L. Y. (2015). Exploring the impact of transformational leadership on nurse innovation behaviour: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 23(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12149
   Google Scholar
• Widmann, A., Mulder, R. H., & König, C. (2019). Team learning behaviours as predictors of innovative work behaviour – A longitudinal study. Innovation: Organization and Management, 21(2), 298–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1530567
   Google Scholar
• Woo, C. H., Park, J. Y., & Kim, H. W. (2019). Effects of psychological ownership, self-leadership, and social exchange relationships on innovative behaviour of military hospital personnel. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing, 28(3), 166–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2019.28.3.166
   Google Scholar
• Xerri, M. J., & Reid, S. R. (2018). Human resources and innovative behaviour: Improving nursing performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500196
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., Zhou, L., Wang, Z., Lin, C., & Luo, Z. (2019). Humble leadership and innovative behaviour among Chinese nurses: The mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(8), 1801–1808. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12879
   Google Scholar
• Yasir, M., & Majid, A. (2019). Boundary integration and innovative work behaviour among nursing staff. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0035
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, M. R., Yoo, J. A., & Kim, Y. M. (2012). Study for professionalism, organizational citizenship behaviour, psychological ownership of nurse officers. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 18(3), 290–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2012.18.3.290
   Google Scholar
• Yousef, D. A. (2000). Organizational commitment as a mediator of the relationship between Islamic work ethic and attitudes toward organizational change. Human Relations, 53(4), 513–537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700534003
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behaviour in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995
   Google Scholar
• Yuksel, M., Darmody, A., & Venkatraman, M. (2019). When consumers own their work: Psychological ownership and consumer citizenship on crowdsourcing platforms. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1747
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Liu, G., Zhang, L., Xu, S., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2020). Psychological ownership: A meta-analysis and comparison of multiple forms of attachment in the workplace. Journal of Management, 47(3), 745–770. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320917195
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., Wu, G., & Xie, H. (2017). Impacts of leadership on project-based organizational innovation performance: The mediator of knowledge sharing and moderator of social capital. Sustainability, 9(10), 1893. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101893
   Google Scholar