The propensity of risk-taking and financial efficiency: Exploring the role of management accounting system: Evidence from the manufacturing sector

References

• Abdusalomova, N. (2019). Principles of ties of internal control and management accounting systems at the enterprises of black metallurgy. Архив Научных Исследований, (2). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TA.
   Google Scholar
• Abernethy, M. A., Kuang, Y. F., & Qin, B. (2015). The influence of CEO power on compensation contract design. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1265–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50971
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, K. (2017). The implementation of management accounting practice and its relationship with performance in small and medium enterprises sector. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1), 342-353. https://econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/3394
   Google Scholar
• Akbar, S., Kharabsheh, B., Poletti-Hughes, J., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2017). Board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector. International Review of Financial Analysis, 50, 101–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Albashabsheh, A., Alhroob, M., Irbihat, B., & Javed, S. (2018). Impact of accounting information system in reducing costing in Jordanian banks. International Journal of Research Granthaalayah, 6(7), 210–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1336672
   Google Scholar
• Alhroob, M., Irbihat, B., Albashabsheh, A., & Javed, S. (2017). Does corporate governance create volatility in performance? International Journal of Informative & Futuristic Research, 4 (7), 6859–6866. http://www.ijifr.com/pdfsave/01-04-2017495IJIFR-V4-E7-075.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Andersén, J., & Samuelsson, J. (2016). Resource organization and firm performance: How entrepreneurial orientation and management accounting influence the profitability of growing and non-growing SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 22(4), 466–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0250
   Google Scholar
• Antoncic, J. A., Antoncic, B., Gantar, M., Hisrich, R. D., Marks, L. J., Bachkirov, A. A., Coelho, A., Polzin, P., Borges, J. L., Coelho, A., & Kakkonen, M.-L. (2018). Risk-taking propensity and entrepreneurship: The role of power distance. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495818500012
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M., & Yan, Z. (2017). Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25, 29–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Arena, C., Michelon, G., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Big egos can be green: A study of CEO hubris and environmental innovation. British Journal of Management, 29(2), 316–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12250
   Google Scholar
• Azudin, A., & Mansor, N. (2018). Management accounting practices of SMEs: The impact of organizational DNA, business potential and operational technology. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(3), 222–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.014
   Google Scholar
• Baixauli-Soler, J. S., Belda-Ruiz, M., & Sanchez-Marin, G. (2015). Executive stock options, gender diversity in the top management team, and firm risk taking. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 451–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. J., Chen, L., Clegg, L. J., & Voss, H. (2018). Risk propensity in the foreign direct investment location decision of emerging multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0126-4
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2015). The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its Integration into management control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Chiarini, A., & Vagnoni, E. (2015). World-class manufacturing by fiat. comparison with Toyota production system from a strategic management, management accounting, operations management and performance measurement dimension. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 590–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.958596
   Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A. (2015). Top management team characteristics and firm growth. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2013-0181
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Girardone, C., & Kuo, J.-M. (2017). Governance, efficiency and risk taking in Chinese banking. The British Accounting Review, 49(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Farrukh, M., Javed, S., Javed, S., & Lee, J. W. C. (2021). Twenty years of green innovation research: Trends and way forward. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print), ahead-of-print(ahead–of–print). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-06-2020-0068
   Google Scholar
• Gaganis, C., Hasan, I., Papadimitri, P., & Tasiou, M. (2019). National culture and risk-taking: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Business Research, 97, 104–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.037
   Google Scholar
• Gamache, D. L., & McNamara, G. (2019). Responding to bad press: How CEO temporal focus influences the sensitivity to negative media coverage of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 918–943. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0526
   Google Scholar
• Gan, H. (2019). Does CEO managerial ability matter? Evidence from corporate investment efficiency. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 52(4), 1085–1118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0737-2
   Google Scholar
• García-Granero, A., Llopis, Ó., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2015). Unraveling the link between managerial risk-taking and innovation: The mediating role of a risk-taking climate. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1094–1104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.012
   Google Scholar
• Ghasemi, R., Mohamad, N. A., Karami, M., Bajuri, N. H., & Asgharizade, E. (2016). The mediating effect of management accounting system on the relationship between competition and managerial performance. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 24(3), 272–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2015-0030
   Google Scholar
• Hanousek, J., Shamshur, A., & Tresl, J. (2019). Firm efficiency, foreign ownership and CEO gender in corrupt environments. Journal of Corporate Finance, 59, 344–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R. E., Chirico, F., Zyung, J., & Gambeta, E. (2017). Managerial risk taking: A multitheoretical review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 43(1), 137–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316671583
   Google Scholar
• Husain, U., & Javed, S. (2019). Impact of climate change on agriculture and Indian economy : A quantitative research perspective from 1980 to 2016. Industrial Engineering & Management, 8 (2), 2–5. https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/impact-of-climate-change-on-agriculture-and-indian-economy-a-quantitative-research-perspective-from-1980-to-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Indriani, M., & Nadirsyah, N. (2015). Interaction effect of budgetary participation and management accounting system on managerial performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Global Journal of Business Research, 9(1), 1–13. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2654399
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, K., Isa, C. R., & Mia, L. (2018). Market competition, lean manufacturing practices and the role of management accounting systems (MAS) information. Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM Journal of Management), 52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2018-52-04
   Google Scholar
• Jamil, C. Z. M., Mohamed, R., Muhammad, F., & Ali, A. (2015). Environmental management accounting practices in small medium manufacturing firms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 619–626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.411
   Google Scholar
• Javed, S. (2017). Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Use Of Technology (UTAUT) model-mobile banking. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 22 (3), 1–20. https://www.icommercecentral.com/open-access/unified-theory-of-acceptance-and-use-of-technology-utaut-modelmobile-banking.php?aid=86597
   Google Scholar
• Javed, S., Atallah, B., Aldalaien, E., & Husain, U. (2019). Performance of venture capital firms in UK : Quantitative research approach of 20 UK venture capitals. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 27(5), 432–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2019.432.438
   Google Scholar
• Javed, S., & Husain, U. (2021). Corporate CSR practices and corporate performance: Managerial implications for sustainable development. DECISION, 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-021-00274-w
   Google Scholar
• Javed, S., Husain, U., & Ali, S. (2020). Relevancy of investment decisions and consumption with asset pricing : GMM and CCAPM model approach. International Journal of Management, 11(8), 10–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.8.2020.002
   Google Scholar
• Javed, S., & Khan, A. A. (2017). Analysing parsimonious model of OL and OE using SEM technique. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15 (22), 685–712. https://serialsjournals.com/abstract/53799_sarfarz_and_azeem.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Javed, S., Khan, M. S., & Farooqi, A. R. (2020). Impact of population, trade openess, education, life expectancy and gross capital formation on the economy of Indian sub-continent. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 8034–8044. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260811
   Google Scholar
• Javed, S., Malik, A., & Alharbi, M. M. H. (2020). The relevance of leadership styles and Islamic work ethics in managerial effectiveness. PSU Research Review, 4(3), 189–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-03-2019-0007
   Google Scholar
• Josef, A. K., Richter, D., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Wagner, G. G., Hertwig, R., & Mata, R. (2016). Stability and change in risk-taking propensity across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(3), 430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000090
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, S., & Li, Y. (2016). What is corporate sustainability and how do firms practice it? A management accounting research perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-10496
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Baseer, S., & Javed, S. (2017). Perception of students on usage of mobile data by K-mean clustering algorithm. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(2), 17–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A., & Javed, S. (2016). Determining factors responsible in shifting consumption of mobile data (2G to 3G). International Journal of Computer Applications, 155(14), 30–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016912452
   Google Scholar
• Krahel, J. P., & Titera, W. R. (2015). Consequences of big data and formalization on accounting and auditing standards. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 409–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51065
   Google Scholar
• Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk‐taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12203
   Google Scholar
• Krause, T. A., & Tse, Y. (2016). Risk management and firm value: Recent theory and evidence. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 24(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2015-0027
   Google Scholar
• Latan, H., Jabbour, C. J. C., De Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Wamba, S. F., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180(10), 297–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106
   Google Scholar
• Laufs, K., Bembom, M., & Schwens, C. (2016). CEO characteristics and SME foreign market entry mode choice. International Marketing Review, 33(2), 246–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-08-2014-0288
   Google Scholar
• Li, C.-R., Lin, C.-J., & Tien, Y.-H. (2015). CEO transformational leadership and top manager ambidexterity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(8), 927–954. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2014-0054
   Google Scholar
• Liem, V. T., Hien, N. N., & Ntim, C. G. (2020). Exploring the impact of dynamic environment and CEO’s psychology characteristics on using management accounting system. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1712768. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1712768
   Google Scholar
• Malik, A., Khan, N., Faisal, S., Javed, S., & Faridi, M. (2020). An Investigation On Leadership Styles For The Business Productivity And Sustainability Of Small Medium Enterprises (SME’S). International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24 (5), 1–10. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/an-investigation-on-leadership-styles-for-the-business-productivity-and-sustainability-of-small-medium-enterprises-smes-9845.html
   Google Scholar
• Mata, R., Josef, A. K., & Hertwig, R. (2016). Propensity for risk taking across the life span and around the globe. Psychological Science, 27(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615617811
   Google Scholar
• Naseem, M. A., Lin, J., Ur Rehman, R., Ahmad, M. I., & Ali, R. (2019). Does capital structure mediate the link between CEO characteristics and firm performance? Management Decision, 58(1), 164-181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2018-0594
   Google Scholar
• Ndofor, H. A., Wesley, C., & Priem, R. L. (2015). Providing CEOs with opportunities to cheat: The effects of complexity-based information asymmetries on financial reporting fraud. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1774–1797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471395
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T., Mia, L., Winata, L., & Chong, V. K. (2017). Effect of transformational-leadership style and management control system on managerial performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 202–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.018
   Google Scholar
• Odar, M., Kavčič, S., & Jerman, M. (2015). The role of a management accounting system in the decision-making process: Evidence from a post-transition economy. Engineering Economics, 26(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.1.4873
   Google Scholar
• Opper, S., Nee, V., & Holm, H. J. (2017). Risk aversion and guanxi activities: A behavioral analysis of CEOs in China. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1504–1530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0355
   Google Scholar
• Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Park, K., Min, H., & Min, S. (2016). Inter-relationship among risk taking propensity, supply chain security practices, and supply chain disruption occurrence. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2015.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Sekścińska, K., Rudzinska-Wojciechowska, J., & Maison, D. A. (2018). Future and present hedonistic time perspectives and the propensity to take investment risks: The interplay between induced and chronic time perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 920. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00920
   Google Scholar
• Shahzadi, S., Khan, R., Toor, M., & Ul Haq, A. (2018). Impact of external and internal factors on management accounting practices: A study of Pakistan. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-08-2018-0023
   Google Scholar
• Shields, J., & Shelleman, J. M. (2016). Management accounting systems in micro-SMEs. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 21(1), 19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3709.2016.ja.00004
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y., & Anchor, J. (2017). The impacts of risk-taking behaviour and competition on technical efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese banking industry. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 90–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.026
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. C., & Scapens, R. W. (2016). The role of identity and image in shaping management accounting change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 1075–1099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2014-1835
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, N., Nhan, N., Giang, P., & Ngoc, N. (2016). The effects of innovation on firm performance of supporting industries in Hanoi, Vietnam. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(2), 413–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1564
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. M., Xu, B. B., Zhang, S. J., & Chen, Y. Q. (2016). Influence of personality and risk propensity on risk perception of Chinese construction project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1294–1304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.07.004
   Google Scholar