A meta-analysis of risk taking and corporate performance

References

• Anh, N. T. (2020). Tác Động Của Nghiên Cứu Và Phát Triển Đến Kết Quả Kinh Doanh Của Doanh Nghiệp: Nghiên Cứu Thực Nghiệm Tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Quản lý và Kinh tế Quốc tế, 1321, 1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Anh, T. T., & Thuỷ, Đ. T. (2017). Tác Động Của Đòn Bẩy Tài Chính Đến Hiệu Quả Hoạt Động Của Doanh Nghiệp Việt Nam: Tiếp Cận Bằng Hồi Quy Phân Vị. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 12(3), 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Arrfelt, M., Mannor, M. J., Nahrgang, J. D., & Christensen, A. (2012). All risk-taking is not the same: a meta-analysis of risk-taking, firm risk, and firm performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Asimakopoulos, I., Samitas, A., Papadogonas, T., & Artikis, G. P. (2009). Firm-specific and economy wide determinants of firm profitability: Greek evidence using panel data. Managerial Finance, 35(11), 930–939. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350910993818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asthana, S. C., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Effect of R&D investments on persistence of abnormal earnings. Review of Accounting and Finance, 5(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/14757700610668967
   Google Scholar
• Ayaydin, H., & Karaaslan, İ. (2014). THE EFFECT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT ON FIRMS’FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM MANUFACTURING FIRMS IN TURKEY. Bilgi ekonomisi ve yönetimi dergisi, 9(1), 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Busenitz, L. W. (1999). Entrepreneurial risk and strategic decision making: It’sa matter of perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886399353005
   Google Scholar
• Busru, S. A., & Shanmugasundaram, G. (2017). Effects of innovation investment on profitability and moderating role of corporate governance: Empirical study of Indian listed firms. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217730938
   Google Scholar
• Cazavan-Jeny, A., & Jeanjean, T. (2006). The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approach. European Accounting Review, 15(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180500510384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1993). The handbook of research synthesis: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
   Google Scholar
• Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment philosophies: Successful strategies and the investors who made them work (Vol. 665). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickinson, G. (2001). Enterprise risk management: Its origins and conceptual foundation. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance. Issues and Practice, 26(3), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0440.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
   Google Scholar
• González, V. M. (2013). Leverage and corporate performance: International evidence. International Review of Economics & Finance, 25, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, G. E., Lumpkin, G. T., & Singh, R. P. (1997). Opportunity recognition: Perceptions and behaviors of entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 17(4), 168–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 334. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure En. Journal of Finance Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W. S., Park, K., Lee, S. H., & Kim, H. (2018). R&D Investments and Firm Value: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(11), 4133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiraci, M., Celikay, F., & Celikay, D. (2016). The effects of firms’ R & D expenditures on profitability: An analysis with panel error correction model for Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(5), 233–240.
   Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R. (2002). The role of the independent accountant in effective risk management. Review of Business and Economic Literature, 47(1), 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. H. (2018). An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 33(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., Ge, C., & Goh, K.-Y. (2011). R&D investment and firm performance in it companies: an empirical investigation across IT industry sectors. Paper presented at the PACIS 2011: Quality Research in Pacific Asia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 7-11 July 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Loo, P., & Lau, W. (2019). Key components of working capital management: Investment performance in Malaysia. Management Science Letters, 9(12), 1955–1964. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.010
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. W., Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2000). Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. Journal of Management, 26(5), 1055–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaritis, D., & Psillaki, M. (2010). Capital structure, equity ownership and firm performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(3), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngọc, N. M. (2016). Tác Động Của Nghiên Cứu Và Phát Triển, Tiếp Nhận Công Nghệ Đến Kết Quả Kinh Doanh Ở Các Doanh Nghiệp Chế Tạo - Chế Biến. Kinh tế & Phát triển, 225 (11), 73–81. 3
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, P. J. M., Serrasqueiro, Z. M., & Sequeira, T. N. (2009). Profitability in Portuguese service industries: A panel data approach. The Service Industries Journal, 29(5), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060902720188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phong, N. A., & Thanh, N. P. (2017). Tác Động Của Quy Mô Và Sở Hữu Nước Ngoài Đến Hiệu Quả Hoạt Động Doanh Nghiệp. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Huế: Kinh tế và Phát triển, 126(5C), 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, J., Yu, Y., & Cao, Y. (2013). The effect that R&D has on company performance: Comparative analysis based on listed companies of technique intensive industry in China and Japan. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(4), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ravšelj, D., & Aristovnik, A. (2020). The impact of R&D expenditures on corporate performance: evidence from slovenian and world R&D companies. Sustainability, 12(5), 1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sơn, N. T., & Hạnh, N. T. (2011). Evaluating the effects of R&D on business results by the dea model. Tạp chí Khoa Học và Công Nghệ, Đại học Đà Nẵng, 1(42), 166–173.
   Google Scholar
• Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman, M., Shaique, M., Khan, S., Shaikh, R., & Baig, N. (2017). Impact of R&D investment on firm performance and firm value: Evidence from developed nations (G-7). Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, 7(2), 302–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vithessonthi, C., & Racela, O. C. (2016). Short-and long-run effects of internationalization and R&D intensity on firm performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 34 C , 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2015.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Vithessonthi, C., & Tongurai, J. (2015a). The effect of firm size on the leverage–performance relationship during the financial crisis of 2007–2009. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 29, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vithessonthi, C., & Tongurai, J. (2015b). The effect of leverage on performance: Domestically-oriented versus internationally-oriented firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 34, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk-taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/259103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Jin, Z. (2016). Research on the impact of R&D investment on firm performance in China’s internet of things industry. Journal Of Advanced Management Science, 4(2), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.4.2.112-116
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar