Exploring qualitative data as predictors for M&A: Empirical analysis of target firms’ letters to shareholders

References

• Abrahamson, E., & Amir, E. (1996). The information content of the president’s letter to shareholders. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23(8), 1157–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1996.tb01163.x
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., & Jaffe, J. F. (2016). Do takeover targets underperform ? Evidence from operating and stock returns author (s): Anup Agrawal and Jeffrey F. Jaffe Published By?: Cambridge University Press on Behalf of the University of Washington School of Business Administration Stable URL, 38(4), 721–746. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126741
   Google Scholar
• Ahammad, M. F., & Glaister, K. W. (2008). Recent trends in UK cross‐border mergers and acquisitions. Management Research News, 31(2), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170810846812
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkus, O., Cookson, J. A., & Hortacsu, A. (2016). The determinants of bank mergers: A revealed preference analysis. Management Science, 62(8), 2241–2258. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcalde, N., & Espitia, M. (2003). The characteristics of takeover targets: The Spanish experience 1991-1997. Journal of Management and Governance, 7(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022416521512
   Google Scholar
• Ali-Yrkkö, J., Hyytinen, A., & Pajarinen, M. (2005). Does patenting increase the probability of being acquired? Evidence from cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Applied Financial Economics, 15(14), 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100500186978
   Google Scholar
• Altman, E. I., Haldeman, R. G., & Narayanan, P. (1977). ZETATM analysis A new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(77)90017-6
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, B. W., & Megginson, W. L. (1992). The role of asset structure, ownership structure, and takeover defenses in determining acquisition likelihood. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(4), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amernic, J., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2010). Measuring and assessing tone at the top using annual report CEO letters. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Asquith, P., & Kim, E. H. A. N. (1982, December). American finance association the impact of merger bids on the participating firms ’ security holders author (s): Paul Asquith and E . Han Kim Source : The Journal of Finance, 37(5), 1209–1228. Published by : Wiley for th. Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1982.tb03613.x
   Google Scholar
• Baghai, M., Smit, S., & Viguerie, S. P. (2007). The granularity of growth. McKinsey Quarterly, 21, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119197409
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, S. M. (1990). Exclusive merger agreements and lock-ups in negotiated corporate acquisitions. Minnesota Law Review, 75, 239. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/2359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J., & Zelin, R. (2000). the effects of information ordering on investor perceptions: An experiment utilizing presidents’letters. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 13(3), 71–80. http://www.financialdecisionsonline.org/archive/pdffiles/v13n3/baird.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. (1990). the prediction of takeover targets in the U.K. by means of multiple discriminant analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1990.tb00550.x
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. (1999). Predicting UK takeover targets: Some methodological issues and an empirical study. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 12(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008378900054
   Google Scholar
• BELKAOUI, A. (1978). Financial ratios as predictors of Canadian takeovers. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 5(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1978.tb00177.x
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A. N., Demsetz, R. S., & Strahan, P. E. (1999). The consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and implications for the future. Journal of Banking and Finance, 23(2), 135–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00125-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinazzi, E. L., Miller, D., Amore, M. D., & Corbetta, G. (2020). Ownership similarity in mergers and acquisitions target selection. Strategic Organization, 18(2), 330–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018801294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1 S), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betton, S., Berk, J., Dann, L., Ferson, W., Hansen, R., Harris, R., Holderness, C., Hollifield, B., Jennings, R., Kahn, C., Malatesta, P., Perotti, E., Ritter, J., Smith, D., Spencer, B., Spiegel, M., Stulz, R., & Titman, S. (2000). Toeholds, bid jumps, and expected. Society, 13(4), 841–882. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/13.4.841
   Google Scholar
• Blonigen, B. A., & Taylor, C. T. (2000). R&D intensity and acquisitions in high-technology industries: Evidence from the US electronic and electrical equipment industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, A. L., & Harold Mulherin, J. (2008). Do auctions induce a winner’s curse? New evidence from the corporate takeover market. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, J. L. (2001). Not all M&As are alike: And that matters. Harvard Business Review. March 2001. https://hbr.org/2001/03/not-all-mas-are-alike-and-that-matters
   Google Scholar
• Brar, G., Giamouridis, D., & Liodakis, M. (2009). Predicting European takeover targets. European Financial Management, 15(2), 430–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00423.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, N. M., & Conroy, J. P. (2013). Executive hubris: The case of a bank CEO. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(2), 172–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571311303701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calomiris, C. W., & Hubbard, R. G. (1993). Internal finance and investment: Evidence from the undistributed profits tax of 1936-1937. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4288
   Google Scholar
• Campa, J. M., & Hernando, I. (2004). Shareholder value creation in European M&As. European Financial Management, 10(1), 47–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2004.00240.x
   Google Scholar
• Carley, K. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23(May), 75. https://doi.org/10.2307/271007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M. A., & Jones, M. J. (2006). Differential patterns of textual characteristics and company performance in the chairman’s statement. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610679100
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, S. (1999). The relationship between firm investment and financial status. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudd, M., & Duggal, R. (2000). Industry distributional characteristics of financial ratios: An acquisition theory application. Financial Review, 35(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2000.tb01409.x
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, A., & Fliers, P. T. (2020). Predicting takeover targets: Long-run evidence from the Netherlands. De Economist, 168(3), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-020-09364-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEl Monte, A., & Papagni, E. (2003). R&D and the growth of firms: Empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms. Research Policy, 32(6), 1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00107-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Q., Hine, M., Ji, S., & Sur, S. (2017). Building an environmental sustainability dictionary for the IT industry. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017), 950–959. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.112
   Google Scholar
• DePamphilis, D. (2019). Mergers, acquisitions, and other restructuring activities: An integrated approach to process, tools, cases, and solutions. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, J. K., & Sorensen, E. (1984). An application of logit analysis to prediction of merger targets. Journal of Business Research, 12(3), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(84)90020-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikova, D., Sahib, P. R., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2006, August). The effect of acquisition experience, institutional context and national culture on cross-border merger abandonment and completion. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2006(1), U1–U6. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.27168699
   Google Scholar
• Dikova, D., Sahib, P. R., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2010). Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion: The effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry, 1981-2001. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, T. T., Rao Sahib, P., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2018). Lessons from the flipside: How do acquirers learn from divestitures to complete acquisitions? Long Range Planning, 51(2), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, P., & Ruback, R. (1977). Tender offers and stockholder returns. An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90043-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doumpos, M., Kosmidou, K., & Pasiouras, F. (2004). Prediction of acquisition targets in the UK: A multicriteria approach. Operational Research, 4(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943609
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, A. I. (2012). The determinants of mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(4), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n4p72
   Google Scholar
• Espahbodi, H., & Esphabodi, P. (2003). Binary choice models and corporate takeover. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(4), 549–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00258-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geppert, J., & Lawrence, J. E. (2008). Predicting firm reputation through content analysis of shareholders’ letter. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(4), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2008.32
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Goergen, M., & Renneboog, L. (2004). Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids. European Financial Management, 10(1), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2004.00239.x
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, H., & Vernon, J. (1990). A new look at the returns and risks to pharmaceutical R&D. Management Science, 36(7), 804–821. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.7.804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeley, M. B., King, D. R., & Govin, J. G. (2006). Effects of firm R&D investment and environment on acquisition likelihood. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1513–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., Harrison, J. S., & Ireland, R. D. (2001). Mergers & acquisitions: A guide to creating value for stakeholders. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, F. D. (2001). Hyperlinking unaudited information to audited financial statements: Effects on investor judgments. Accounting Review, 76(4), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2001.76.4.675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holl, P., & Kyriaziz, D. (1996). The determinants of outcome in UK take–over bids. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 3(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/758528451
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203
   Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A. C., Sundaram, A. K., & Rockwood, K. (2000). Cross-border acquisitions of US technology assets. California Management Review, 42(3), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control. The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4), 5–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(83)90004-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (2005). Takeovers: Their causes and consequences. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.173455
   Google Scholar
• Kagel, J. H., & Levin, D. (2009). The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. Common Value Auctions and the Winner’s Curse, 76(5), 107–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830138.107
   Google Scholar
• Kallapur, S., & Trombley, M. A. (1999). The association between investment opportunity set proxies and realized growth. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 26(3–4), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00265
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169–213. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul, A., & Wu, B. (2016). A capabilities-based perspective on target selection in acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1220–1239. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W. G., & Arbel, A. (1998). Predicting merger targets of hospitality firms (a logit model). International Journal of Hospitality Management, 17(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4319(98)00023-1
   Google Scholar
• King, D. R., Covin, J. G., & Hegarty, W. H. (2003). Complementary resources and the exploitation of technological innovations. Journal of Management, 29(4), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasa, S., & Stegemoller, M. (2007). Takeover activity as a response to time-varying changes in investment opportunity sets: Evidence from takeover sequences. Financial Management, 36(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2007.tb00085.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohers, T., Huang, M. H., & Kohers, N. (2000). Market perception of efficiency in bank holding company mergers: The roles of the DEA and SFA models in capturing merger potential. Review of Financial Economics, 9(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-3300(00)00019-7
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). Trustworthiness and naturalistic evaluation. Program, 1986(30), 30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
   Google Scholar
• Meador, A. L., Pamela, C. H., & Gayle, R. L. (1996). Development of prediction models for horizontal and vertical mergers. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decision, 9(1), 11–23. http://www.financialdecisionsonline.org/archive/pdffiles/v09n1/meador.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meghouar, H., & Ibrahimi, M. (2020). Financial characteristics of takeover targets: A French empirical evidence. EuroMed Journal of Business, 16(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-06-2019-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORCK, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1990). Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions? The Journal of Finance, 45(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05079.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulier, K., Schoors, K., & Merlevede, B. (2016). Investment-cash flow sensitivity and financial constraints: Evidence from unquoted European SMEs. Journal of Banking and Finance, 73, 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Officer, M. S. (2003). Termination fees in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 431–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00119-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, K. J., Dworkis, K. K., & Mark Young, S. (2013). CEO narcissism and accounting: A picture of profits. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50638
   Google Scholar
• Ouzounis, G., Gaganis, C., & Zopounidis, C. (2009). Prediction of acquisitions and portfolio returns. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 1(4), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBAAF.2009.023151
   Google Scholar
• Palepu, K. G. (1986). Predicting takeover targets. A methodological and empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(86)90008-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasiouras, F., & Tanna, S. (2010). The prediction of bank acquisition targets with discriminant and logit analyses: Methodological issues and empirical evidence. Research in International Business and Finance, 24(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2009.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Patelli, L., & Pedrini, M. (2014). Is the optimism in CEO’s letters to shareholders sincere? Impression management versus communicative action during the economic crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1855-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polemis, D., & Gounopoulos, D. (2012). Prediction of distress and identification of potential M&As targets in UK. Managerial Finance, 38(11), 1085–1104. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351211266801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, R. (2016). Good times, bad times: A keyword analysis of letters to shareholders of two fortune 500 banking institutions. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, R. G. (1997). Modelling takeover likelihood. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 24(7–8), 1009–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00148
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. G. (2004). Takeover prediction models and portfolio strategies: A multinomial approach. Multinational Finance Journal, 8(1/2), 35–72. https://doi.org/10.17578/8-1/2-2
   Google Scholar
• Ranft, A. L., & Lord, M. D. (2000). Acquiring new knowledge: The role of retaining human capital in acquisitions of high-tech firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00034-1
   Google Scholar
• Ranft, A. L., & Lord, M. D. (2002). Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.420.2952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenscraft, D. J. (1987). The 1980s merger wave: An industrial organization perspective. The Merger Boom, 17, 37. https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedbcp/y1987p17-51n31.html
   Google Scholar
• Rodney, C. S., Monllor, J., & Shelton, L. (2009). Acquisition as a growth strategy for young IPO firms. In Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 11, pp. 77–101). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1074-7540(2009)0000011005
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz, S., & Weitzel, U. (2005). Bargaining in mergers : The role of outside options and termination provisions. October, October, 1–40. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/309922
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L., Santurkar, S., Tsipras, D., Talwar, K., & Madry, A. (2018). Adversarially robust generalization requires more data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10 .5555/3327345.3327409
   Google Scholar
• Słowiński, R., Zopounidis, C., & Dimitras, A. I. (1997). Prediction of company acquisition in Greece by means of the rough set approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 100(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00110-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Taffler, R. J. (2000). A content analysis of discretionary the chairman ’ s statement. Auditing, 13(5), 624–646. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10 .1108/09513570010353738
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, D. L. (1973). Financial characteristics of merged firms: A multivariate analysis. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taffler, R. J. (1983). The assessment of company solvency and performance using a statistical model. Accounting and Business Research, 13(52), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1983.9729767
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsagkanos, A., Georgopoulos, A., & Siriopoulos, C. (2007). Predicting Greek mergers and acquisitions: A new approach. International Journal of Financial Services Management, 2(4), 289. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFSM.2007.016286
   Google Scholar
• Tunyi, A. (2019). Firm size, market conditions and takeover likelihood. Review of Accounting and Finance, 18(3), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-07-2018-0145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, R. M. (1994). The usefulness of current cost information for identifying takeover targets and earning above-average stock returns. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 9(2), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X9400900214
   Google Scholar
• Weston, J. F., Chung, K. S., & Siu, J. A. (1998). Takeovers, restructuring, and corporate governance. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, A., & Cheung, K. Y. (2009). The effects of merger and acquisition announcements on the security prices of bidding firms and target firms in Asia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(2), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v1n2p274
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. S., Wei, C. P., & Chiang, Y. H. (2014). Exploiting technological indicators for effective technology merger and acquisition (M&A) predictions. Decision Sciences, 45(1), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanakis, S. H., & Zopounidis, C. (1997). Prediction of Greek company takeovers via multivariate analysis of financial ratios. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(7), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Zhou, C., & Ebbers, H. (2011). Completion of Chinese overseas acquisitions: Institutional perspectives and evidence. International Business Review, 20(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar