External auditors’ trust and perceived quality of interactions

References

• Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. (2010). Guidance to audit committees on evaluation of quality work performed by external auditors. Singapore Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• Al-matarneh, G. F. (2011). The commitment of Jordanian auditors to assess audit risks. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(11), 267–24. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n11p267
   Google Scholar
• Aller, M., Vargas, I., Garcia-Subirats, I., Coderch, J., Colomes, L., Llopart, J., Ramon, F., Sanchez-Perez, I., & Vazquez, M. L. (2013). A tool for assessing continuity of care across care levels: An extended psychometric validation of the CCAENA questionnaire. International Journal of Integrated Care, 13(4), .e050–e050. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aoki, N. (2020). An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65–122. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertucci, A., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Conte, S. (2016). Effect of task and goal interdependence on achievement, cooperation, and support among elementary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogt, H. J., & Tillema, S. (2016). Accounting for trust and control: Public sector partnerships in the arts. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 36, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, R., Sinkovics, R. R., & Kim, D. (2010). Drivers and performance outcomes of relationship learning for suppliers in cross-bsimple customer–supplier relationships: The role of communication culture. Journal of International Marketing, 18(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.18.1.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, K., Harrison, G., & Ross, P. (2013). Perception of audit service quality and auditor retention. International Journal of Auditing, 17(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2012.00457.x
   Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Ye, Z. (2011). Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: Insights, practice implications, and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, K. Y., & Adelopo, I. (2022). Audit committee financial expertise, accrual, and real earnings management. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance,1–17 . https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. R., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2004). The corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23 (1) , 87–152.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2010). Corporate governance in the post-sarbanes-oxley era: Auditors’ experiences. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 751–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01026.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, C. E., & Zweig, D. (2015). How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.931325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Crook, T. R., Combs, J. G., Ketchen, D. J., & Aguinis, H. (2018). Competence-based trust in inter-organizational relationships: What matters more? Journal of Management, 44(3), 919–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315596813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contessotto, C., & Moroney, R. (2014). The association between audit committee effectiveness and audit risk. Accounting and Finance, 54(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2002). Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.7389937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte (2015) Audit committee performance evaluation. [accessed on 19 Feb 2016]. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/center-for-corporate-governance/us-aers-audit-committee-performance-evaluation-032615.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon, G. (2001). Violation of safeguards by trusted personnel and understanding related information security concerns. Computers & Security, 20(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4048(01)00209-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2008). The Relationship Between Being Perceived as Trustworthy by Coworkers and Individual Performance. Journal of Management 35 (1) 136–157 https://doi.org/10.117/0149206308321545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Eshuis, J. (2012). The interplay between trust and control in governance processes: A conceptual and empirical investigation. Administration & Society, 44(6), 647–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711413876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fames, D., Janssens, M., Madhok, A., & Looy, B. V. (2008). Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: Connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract enforcement. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1053–1078. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.35732527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala, R., Rrokop, M., & Zivelova, I. (2013). The relationship between inter-organizational trust and performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60 (4) , 89–98. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201260040089
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2016). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1982). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A., & Fedorowicz, J. (2008). The role of trust in supply chain governance. Business Process Management Journal, 14(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810888019
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, L. A. V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2016). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Han, W., Huang, Y., Hughes, M., & Zhang, M. (2021). The trade-off between trust and distrust in supply chain collaboration. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin R. (1993). The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust. Politics & Society, 21(4), 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329293021004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• HKICPA. (2010). Audit committees and audit quality.
   Google Scholar
• HKICPA. (2017). Quality control for an audit of financial statements. Hong Kong Standard on Auditing 220.
   Google Scholar
• HKICPA. (2021a). Communication with those charged with governance (pp. 260). HKSA.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2009). Communication with those charged with governance. In International Standard On Auditing (ISA) 260. IFAC 1–25 .
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2014). A framework for audit quality: Key elements that create an environment for audit quality. IFAC.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007). A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaggi, B., Leung, S., & Gul, F. (2009). Family control, board Independence and earnings management: Evidence based on Hong Kong firms. Journal of Accounting Public Policy, 28(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., Li, M., Gao, S., Bao, Y., & Jiang, F. (2013). Managing knowledge leakage in strategic alliances: The effects of trust and formal contracts. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(6), 983–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W. (2003). Social interdependence: Interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 58(11), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.11.934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Roseth, C., & Shin, T. S. (2014). The relationship between motivation and achievement in interdependent situations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(9), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2015). Theoretical approaches to cooperative learning In R. Gillies (Ed.) Collaborative Learning: Developments in Research and Practice, 17–46. New York: Nova
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., & Kim, T. (2019). A research on the relationship between accrual-based earnings management and real earnings management in the retail industry. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(12), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.12.201912.5
   Google Scholar
• KPMG (2013a) Evaluation of the external auditor. https://home.kpmg.com/tr/en/home/insights/2017/01/evaluation-of-the-external-auditor.html [accessed on 26 Feb 2013a]
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2013b). Audit committee handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R., & Brewer, M. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 231–244 https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.5.1044.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B., & Hanna, B. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 357–389). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamoorthy, G., Wright, A, and Cohen, J. (2003). Audit Committee Effectiveness and Financial Reporting Quality: Implications for Auditor Independence. Australian Accounting Review, 13(29), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2003.tb00206.x
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R., McAllister, D., & Bies, R. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/259288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linting, M., Meulman, J. J., Groenen, P. J. F., & Van der Kooij, A. J. (2007). Nonlinear principal components analysis: Introduction and application. Psychological Methods, 12(3), 336–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.3.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linting, M., & Van der Kooij, A. J. (2012). Nonlinear principal components analysis with CATPCA: A tutorial. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Vrieling, L., Perlaviciute, G., Bouman, T., & Steg, L. (2022). The role of trust in public acceptability of energy projects: Integrity versus competence. Environmental Research Communications, 4(3), 035003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac5718
   Google Scholar
• Manodongwe, L., & Jaravaza, D. C. (2020). Women entrepreneurial intentions in subsistence marketplaces: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and demographic profiles in Zimbabwe. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1818365. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.743578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro, M., Moro, A., Aschauer, E., & Fink, M. (2019). Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks. Review of Managerial Science, 13(2), 267–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0247-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, U. (1999). Organizational strategy on different landscapes: A new science approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022499601393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, B., & Goo, S. H. (2015). Corporate governance and its reform in Hong Kong: A study in comparative corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 15(4), 444–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2013-0109
   Google Scholar
• Minnaar, R. A., Vosselman, E., van Veen-Dirks, P. M., & Zahir-ul-Hassan, M. K. (2017). A relational perspective on the contract-control-trust nexus in an interfirm relationship. Management Accounting Research, 34, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, N., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2020). Interpersonal trust and employee knowledge sharing behavior: Creative performance as the outcome. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 50(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2019-0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Morales, F. X., Martínez-Fernández, M. T., & Torlò, V. J. (2011). The dark side of trust: The benefits, costs and optimal levels of trust for innovation performance. Long Range Planning, 44(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, W. J., Ellegaard, C., & Esbjerg, L. (2019). The effects of goodwill and competence trust on strategic information sharing in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2017-0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oortmerssen, L. A., Woerkum, C. M. J., & Aarts, N. (2014). The visibility of trust: Exploring the connection between trust and interaction in a Dutch collaborative governance boardroom. Public Management Review, 16(5), 666–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.743578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, A., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1996). The effect of positive goal and resource interdependence on individual performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 136(2), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9713998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer, O., Subramanian, U., & Wang, Y. (2018). Information sharing, advice provision, or delegation: What leads to higher trust and trustworthiness? Management Science, 64(1), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parayitam, S., & Papenhausen, C. (2018). Strategic decision-making: The effects of cooperative conflict management, agreement-seeking behavior and competence-based trust on decision outcomes. Management Research Review, 40(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2016-0285
   Google Scholar
• Pasiouras, F., Bouri, E., Roubaud, D., & Galariotis, E. (2021). Culture and multiple firm–bank relationships: A matter of secrecy and trust? Journal of Business Ethics, 174(1), 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04571-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., & Ryu, S. (2008). Alternative origins to interorganizational trust: An interdependence perspective on the shadow of the past and the shadow of the future. Organization Science, 19(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. (2014). Managing contracts for fairness in buyer-supplier exchanges. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), 1508–1527. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzoli, M., & Paolone, F. (2018). Earnings management in developing countries. The case of Brazilian real estate industry. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2012). Communications with audit committees. Auditing Standard (AS) 1301.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2015). Concept release on audit quality indicators.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, M. J., Katsikeas, C. S., & Bello, D. C. (2008). Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: The role of organizational complexity. Organization Science, 19(4), 647–665. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, M., & Dugal, S. (1998). Developing trust: The importance of cognitive flexibility and co-operative contexts. Management Decision, 36(9), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810239441
   Google Scholar
• Sako, M. (1992). Prices, quality and trust: Interfirm relations in Britain and Japan. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sako, M., & Help, S. (1998). Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(3), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00082-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saukani, N., & Ismail, N. A. (2019). Identifying the components of social capital by categorical principal component analysis. 141 (2) , 631–655 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1842-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V. D., Sharma, D. S., & Ananthanarayanan, U. (2011). Client importance and earnings management: The moderating role of audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 125–156. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shazi, R., Gillespie, N., & Steen, J. (2015). Trust as a predictor of innovation network ties in project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, S. C. E., Bradley, F., & Sousa, C. M. P. (2012). Empirical test of the trust-performance link in international alliances context. International Business Review, 21(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics, Fourth Edition. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen‐Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005493
   Google Scholar
• Turley, S., & Zaman, M. (2007). Audit committee effectiveness: Informal processes and behavioural effects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(5), 765–788. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710779036
   Google Scholar
• Usoro, A., Sharratt, M. W., Tsui, E., & Shekhar, S. (2007). Trust as antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500143
   Google Scholar
• Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y. (2011). The dark side of buyer-supplier relationships: A social capital perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2017). Trust and knowledge creation: The moderating effects of legal inadequacy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(10), 2194–2209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2016-0482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, F., Lu, S., Shi, B., & Zheng, H. (2018). Trust, guaixi, and cooperation: Study on partner opportunism in Chinese joint-venture manufacturing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2016-0159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, K. Z., Zhang, Q., Sheng, S., Xie, E., & Bao, Y. (2014). Are relational ties always good for knowledge acquisition? Buyer–supplier exchanges in China. Journal of Operations Management, 32(3), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar