The South African social enterprises’ strategies to guard against mission drift when faced with tensions from the funders

References

• Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between non-profits and businesses. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1_suppl), 69–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291S004
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between non-profits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 726–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012450777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. E., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor.
   Google Scholar
• Barinaga, E. (2017). Tinkering with space: The organizational practices of a nascent social venture. Organization Studies, 38(7), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616670434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barinaga, E. (2020). Co-opted! Mission drift in a social venture engaged in a cross-sectoral partnership. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organizations, 31(2), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0019-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2004). Social alliances: Company/non-profit collaboration. California Management Review, 47(1), 58–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. H., Hirschmann, M., & Fisch, C. (2021). Which criteria matter when impact investors screen social enterprises? Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowmaker-Falconer, A., & Herrington, M. (2020). Igniting start-ups for economic growth and social change: GEM SA 2019/2020. Global Entrepreneurship MonitorSouth Africa. https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/50671
   Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, M. (2007). “Balance”: The development of a social enterprise business performance analysis tool. Social Enterprise Journal, 3(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610780000721
   Google Scholar
• Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. (2015). How partnerships affect the social performance of Korean social enterprises. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.965723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., & Crane, A. (2018). Cross-sector partnerships for systemic change: Systematized literature review and agenda for further research. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3922-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and design research: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). A framework for design. In J.W. Cresswell (Ed.), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed., pp.3– 26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, I. A., & Doherty, B. (2019). Balancing a hybrid business model: The search for equilibrium at Cafédirect. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 1043–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3960-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113488126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin, A., Shaw, E., & Lewis, K. V. (2017). The collaborative dynamic in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(7–8), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1328902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Domenico, M., Tracey, P., & Haugh, H. (2009). The dialectic of social exchange: Theorizing corporate—social enterprise collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(8), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609334954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufays, F., & Huybrechts, B. (2016). Where do hybrids come from? Entrepreneurial team heterogeneity as an avenue for the emergence of hybrid organizations. International Small Business Journal, 34(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615585152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulk, L., Pandey, S., Pandey, S. K., & Scott Kennedy, K. (2020). Donors’ responses to profit incentives in the social sector: The entrepreneurial orientation reward and the profit penalty. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(1), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillett, A., Loader, K., Doherty, B., & Scott, J. M. (2019). An examination of tensions in a hybrid collaboration: A longitudinal study of an empty homes project. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3962-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granados, M. L., & Rosli, A. (2020). ‘Fitting In’ vs. ‘Standing Out’: How social enterprises engage with stakeholders to legitimize their hybrid position. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2019.1604405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, M. G., Williams, T. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2019). Anchors aweigh: The sources, variety, and challenges of mission drift. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 819–845. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R., Márquez, P., & Reficco, E. (2016). Configuration and development of alliance portfolios: A comparison of same-sector and cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2729-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harries, E., Hodgson, L., & Noble, J. (2014). Creating your theory of change. London: New Philanthropy Capital.
   Google Scholar
• Heracleous, L., & Fernandes, O. J. (2019). Challenges in coding qualitative data. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, B., & Nicholls, A. (2013). The role of legitimacy in social enterprise‐corporate collaboration. Social Enterprise Journal, 9(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-01-2013-0002
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, B., Nicholls, A., & Edinger, K. (2017). Sacred alliance or pact with the devil? How and why social enterprises collaborate with mainstream businesses in the fair trade sector. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(7–8), 586–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1328905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, L. L., & Pereira, B. A. D. (2016). The survival of interorganizational networks: A proposal based on resource dependence theory. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(4), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n4p153-175
   Google Scholar
• Kwong, C., Tasavori, M., & Wun-mei Cheung, C. (2017). Bricolage, collaboration and mission drift in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(7–8), 609–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1328904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlewood, D., & Holt, D. (2018). Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: Exploring the influence of environment. Business and Society, 57(3), 525–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315613293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2011). Creating a fortune with the base of the pyramid. Next-generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid. FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L., & Smith, M. L. (2000). Qualitative research for counseling psychology. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of Counseling Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 199–230). New York: John Wiley. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232605565
   Google Scholar
• Myres, K., Mamabolo, A., Mugudza, N., & Jankelowitz, L. (2018). Social Enterprises in South Africa Discovering a vibrant sector. Gordon Institute of Business Science.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., & Huybrechts, B. (2016). Sustaining inter-organizational relationships across institutional logics and power asymmetries: The case of fair trade. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(4), 699–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2495-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. M. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quelin, B., Kivleniece, I., & Lazzarini, S. (2017). Public-private collaboration, hybridity, and social value: Towards new theoretical perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 763–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). Stakeholders matter: How social enterprises address mission drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2353-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications Ltd (ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Sakarya, S., Bodur, M., Yildirim-Öktem, Ö., & Selekler-Göksen, N. (2012). Social alliances: Business and social enterprise collaboration for social transformation. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1710–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarese, C., Huybrechts, B., & Hudon, M. (2021). The influence of interorganizational collaboration on logic conciliation and tensions within hybrid organizations: Insights from social enterprise–corporate collaborations. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(4), 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04557-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2010). Platforms for cross-sector social partnerships: Prospective sensemaking devices for social benefit. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0776-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shai, L., Molefinyana, C., & Quinot, G. (2019). Public procurement in the context of broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) in South Africa—Lessons learned for sustainable public procurement. Sustainability, 11(24), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegner, M., Pinkse, J., & Panwar, R. (2018). Managing tensions in a social enterprise: The complex balancing act to deliver a multi-faceted but coherent social mission. Journal of cleaner production, 174, 1314–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217750826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. R., Cronley, M. L., & Barr, T. F. (2012). Funding implications of social enterprise: The role of mission consistency, entrepreneurial competence, and attitude toward social enterprise on donor behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.11.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407–442. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201323327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hille, I., de Bakker, F. G. A., Ferguson, J. E., & Groenewegen, P. (2019). Navigating tensions in a cross-sector social partnership: How a convener drives change for sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Sepulveda, L., & McMullin, C. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy, 46(10), 1755–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, C., Weidner, K., Kroeger, A., & Wallace, J. (2017). Social value creation in inter‐organizational collaborations in the not‐for‐profit sector–give and take from a dyadic perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 929–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidner, K., Weber, C., & Göbel, M. (2019). You scratch my back, and I scratch yours: Investigating inter-partner legitimacy in relationships between social enterprises and their key partners. Business and Society, 58(3), 493–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316675617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werhahn, D., Mauer, R., Flatten, T. C., & Brettel, M. (2015). Validating effectual orientation as strategic direction in the corporate context. European Management Journal, 33(5), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wry, T., Cobb, J. A., & Aldrich, H. E. (2013). More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 441–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.781862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wymer, W. W., Jr, & Samu, S. (2003). Dimensions of business and non-profit collaborative relationships. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v11n01_02
   Google Scholar