Board gender diversity and innovation activities: Evidence from R&D investments in the UK

References

• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhababsah, S., & Alhaj-Ismail, A. (2021). Does shared tenure between audit committee chair and engagement partner affect audit outcomes? Evidence from the UK. The British Accounting Review, 101067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101067
   Google Scholar
• AlHares, A. (2020). Corporate governance mechanisms and R&D intensity in OECD courtiers. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(5), 863–885. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2019-0349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almor, T., Bazel-Shoham, O., & Lee, S. M. (2019). The dual effect of board gender diversity on R&D investments. Long Range Planning, 101884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzam, A., & Alhababsah, S. (2022a). Does state ownership affect R&D investments? Evidence from China. Cogent Business & Management 9: 1 2095888. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2095888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzam, A., & Alhababsah, S. (2022b). Do tenure and age of board chair matter for R&D investment? Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkin, D. B., Markman, G. D., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2000). Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1118–1129. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, V. L., III, & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.6.782.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Amar, W., Francoeur, C., Hafsi, T., & Labelle, R. (2013). What makes better boards? A closer look at diversity and ownership. British Management Journal, 24(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00789.x
   Google Scholar
• Brahma, S., Nwafor, C., & Boateng, A. (2021). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(4), 5704–5719. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo, F., & Reguera‐Alvarado, N. (2017). The effect of board of directors on R&D intensity: Board tenure and multiple directorships. R&D Management 47: 5 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. (2004). R&D expenditures and CEO compensation. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Leung, W. S., & Evans, K. P. (2018). Female board representation, corporate innovation and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 48, 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Ni, X., & Tong, J. Y. (2016). Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: A case of R&D investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 599–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta‐analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3%3C269::AID-SMJ950%3E3.0.CO;2-K<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalziel, T., Gentry, R. J., & Bowerman, M. (2011). An integrated agency–resource dependence view of the influence of directors’ human and relational capital on firms’ R&D spending. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1217–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damak, S. (2018). Gender diverse board and earnings management: Evidence from French listed companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9(3), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2017-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, C., João, M., & Guedes, C. (2012). Research and development, cash flow, agency and governance: UK large companies. Research Policy, 41(9), 1565–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, C. P., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebersberger, B., & Herstad, S. J. (2011). Product and the complementarities of external interfaces. European Management Review, 8(3), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2011). The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(1), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faleye, O., Kovacs, T., & Venkateswaran, A. (2014). Do better-connected CEOs innovate more? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(5–6), 1201–1225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109014000714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Y., Boateng, A., King, T., & MacRae, C. (2019). Board-CEO friendship ties and firm value: Evidence from US firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 65, 101373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.101373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative science quarterly, 484–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galia, F., & Zenou, E. (2012). Board composition and forms of innovation: Does diversity make a difference? European Journal of International Management, 6(6), 630–650. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2012.050425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, S. (2013). Venture boards: Distinctive monitoring and implications for firm performance. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaleb, B. A. A., Qaderi, S. A., Almashaqbeh, A., Qasem, A., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, board gender diversity and real earnings management: The case of Jordan. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1883222. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1883222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales-Bustos, J. P., Hernández-Lara, A. B., & Li, X. (2020). Board effects on innovation in family and non-family business. Heliyon, 6(9), e04980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, D., Li, K., & Xu, T. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate innovation: International evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(1), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002210901900098X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2004). From R&D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 353–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th) ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guldiken, O., & Darendeli, I. S. (2016). Too much of a good thing: Board monitoring and R&D investments. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2931–2938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanein, A., Marzouk, M., & Azzam, M. E. A. Y. (2021). How does ownership by corporate managers affect R&D in the UK? The moderating impact of institutional investors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(8), 3636–3645. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Lara, A. B., & Gonzales-Bustos, J. P. (2020). The influence of family businesses and women directors on innovation. Applied Economics, 52(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1638496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Li, A. Y., Tam, K., & Zhang, F. (2015). CEO gender, ethical leadership, and accounting conservatism. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2044-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honoré, F., Munari, F., & de La Potterie, B. V. P. (2015). Corporate governance practices and companies’ R&D intensity: Evidence from European countries. Research Policy, 44(2), 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., Shi, W., & Zheng, X. (2020). Board chairs and R&D investment: Evidence from Chinese family-controlled firms. Journal of Business Research, 112, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. R., Van de Schoot, R., Delmar, F., & Crano, W. D. (2015). Social influence interpretation of interpersonal processes and team performance over time using Bayesian model selection. Journal of Management, 41(2), 574–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920631453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konno, Y., Itoh, Y., & Wu, H.-C. (2018). Empirical analysis of R&D in the Japanese construction industry based on the structure conduct performance model. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1429347. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1429347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, Y. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., & Rusticus, T. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/259377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livnat, J., Smith, G., Suslava, K., & Tarlie, M. (2021). Board tenure and firm performance. Global Finance Journal, 47, 100535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2016). Gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(15), 1777–1790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1079229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, W. Y., & Barker, V. L., III. (2018). Not all ties are equal: CEO outside directorships and strategic imitation in R&D investment. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1312–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315614371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(3), 349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organiza- tions: A resource dependence approach. Harper and Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organiza- tions: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revilla, A. J., & Fernández, Z. (2012). The relation between firm size and R&D productivity in different technological regimes. Technovation, 32(11), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, R., Samagaio, A., & Felício, T. (2020). Corporate governance and R&D investment by European listed companies. Journal of Business Research, 115, 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, W. G., & Carpenter, M. A. (2003). Strategic satisficing? A behavioral-agency theory perspective on stock repurchase program announcements. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 160–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political psychology: Key readings J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius Eds. Psychology Press 276–293. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10 .4324/9780203505984-16
   Google Scholar
• Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman, M., Khan, M., Khan, M., Khan, M., & Khan, M. K. (2019). Female directors and the cost of debt: Does gender diversity in the boardroom matter to lenders? Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(4), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2018-1863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J., & McNaughton, M. (2007). Gender differences in risk aversion and expected retirement benefits. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(4), 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, T., & Sung, T. (2015). How outside directors facilitate corporate R&D investment? Evidence from large Korean firms. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalata, A. M., Ntim, C., Aboud, A., & Gyapong, E. (2018). Female CEOs and core earnings quality: New evidence on the ethics versus risk-aversion puzzle. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3918-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar