Orchestration to improve the performance and sustainability of family companies

References

• Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367
   Google Scholar
• Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331
   Google Scholar
• Agoes, S., & Ardana, I. C. (2009). Etika Bisnis dan Profesi. Tantangan Membangun Manusia Seutuhnya. Salemba Empat.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, K. (2015). Conflict management and resolution in family-owned businesses. Journal of Family Business Management, 5(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-08-2015-0030
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, A. D., Kok, S., & O’Shea, M. (2019). The family business, adversity and change: A dynamic capabilities and knowledge-based approach. Journal of General Management, 44(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307018810585
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2001). How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.4251563
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. F. (1991). Resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
   Google Scholar
• Bilgiardi, B., & Dormio, A. I. (2009). Successful generational change in family business. Measuring Business Excellence, 13(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040910961207
   Google Scholar
• Bjuggren, P. O., & Sund, L. G. (2001). Strategic decision making in intergenerational successions of small-and medium-size family-owned businesses. Family Business Review, 14(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00011.x
   Google Scholar
• Burin, A. R. G., Perez-Arostegui, M. N., & Llorens-Montes, J. (2020). Ambidexterity and IT competence can improve supply chain flexibility? A resource orchestration approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(2), 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100610
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera-Suárez, K., De Saá-Pérez, P., & García-Almeida, D. (2001). The succession process from a resource-and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x
   Google Scholar
• Caputo, A., Marzi, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Rialti, R. (2018). Conflict management in family businesses: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Management in Family Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-02-2018-0027
   Google Scholar
• Cater, J. J., III, & Kidwell, R. E. (2014). Function, governance, and trust in successor leadership groups in family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. N., Tzeng, L. C., Ou, W. M., & Chang, K. T. (2007). The relationship among social capital, entrepreneurial orientation organizational resources and entrepreneurial performance for new ventures. Contemporary Management Research, 3(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.90
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/000812560304500301
   Google Scholar
• Chirico, F. (2008). Knowledge accumulation in family firms: Evidence from four case studies. International Small Business Journal, 26(4), 433–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242608091173
   Google Scholar
• Chirico, F., & Nordqvist, M. (2010). Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. International Small Business Journal, 28(5), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610370402
   Google Scholar
• Chirico, F., & Salvato, C. (2016). Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: When relational and affective factors matter. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12114
   Google Scholar
• Chirico, F., Sirmon, D. G., Sciascia, S., & Mazzola, P. (2011). Resource orchestration in family firms: Investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(4), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.121
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, L., Genin, E., & Peerally, J. (1998). Family, business and power: Illustrating three extreme cases. Journal of Family Business Management, 2(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/20436231211216411
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, T. (2004). Theories of corporate governance: The philosophical foundation of corporate governance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Claßen, C. A. E., & Schulte, R. (2017). How do conflict impact change in family businesses? The family system and familiness as a catalytic converter of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(7), 1198–1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2016-0071
   Google Scholar
• Coff, R. W. (1997). Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/259327
   Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00110.x
   Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approach (3rd) ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. A. (2006a). Fundamentals of family business system governance. Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. A. (2006b). Governance of the family business owners. Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007
   Google Scholar
• De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Campopiano, G., & Cassia, L. (2015). The impact of family involvement on SMEs’ performance: Theory and evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 924–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12093
   Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<677::AID-SMJ905>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Google Scholar
• Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., & Sarathy, R. (2008). resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning & technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00717.x
   Google Scholar
• Eddleston, K. A., Otondo, R. F., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2008). Conflict, participative decision‐making, and generational ownership dispersion: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 456–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00252.x
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Google Scholar
• Elia, G., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Urbinati, A. (2020). Implementing open innovation through virtual brand communities: A case study analysis in the semiconductor industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119994
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, F., & Başer, G. G. (2010). Family and business values of regional family firms; a qualitative research. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391011033861
   Google Scholar
• Filser, M., Kraus, S., & Märk, S. (2013). Psychological aspects of succession in family business management. Management Research Review, 36(3), 256–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171311306409
   Google Scholar
• Gersick, K., Davis, J., Hampton, M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
   Google Scholar
• Graebner, M. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2004). The seller’s side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(3), 366–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131440
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., Cosier, R. A., & Novicevic, M. M. (1998). Conflict in family business: Make it work to your advantage. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 61–80. https://www.proquest.com/docview/214229886
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., & Evans, R. E. (1994). Family business and multiple levels of conflict. Family Business Review, 7(4), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00331.x
   Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, I. R., Ravishankar, M. N., & Aitken-Fischer, M. (2014). A resource-advantage perspective on the orchestration of ambidexterity. The Service Industries Journal, 34(15), 1234–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2014.942655
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, T. R., Holmes Jr, J. R. M., & Connelly, B. L. (2009). Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.747
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., & Paul, D. L. (2017). Institutional holdings, investment opportunities and dividend policy. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 64, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, A. B., Soufani, K., & Lam, J. (2001). A study of succession in a family firm. Family Business Review, 14(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00245.x
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, D. T. (2005). Strategic planning for the family in business. Journal of Financial Planning, 18(3), 50–56. https://www.academia.edu/842511/Strategic_planning_for_the_family_in_business
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393737
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25005-X
   Google Scholar
• Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00040.x
   Google Scholar
• Kets De Vries, M. F. R. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(93)90071-8
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell, R. E., Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2012). Harmony, justice, confusion, and conflict in family firms: Implications for ethical climate and the “fredo effect”. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1014-7
   Google Scholar
• Klein, S. B., & Astrachan, J. H. (2005). Smyrnios, K. X. The F-PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construct Validation, and Further Implication for Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00086.x
   Google Scholar
• Koentjoro, S., & Gunawan, S. (2020). Managing knowledge, dynamic capabilities, innovative performance, and creating sustainable competitive advantage in family companies: A case study of a family company in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030090
   Google Scholar
• Kor, Y. Y., & Mesko, A. (2013). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firm’s dominant logic. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2000
   Google Scholar
• Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family–centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1263–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12065
   Google Scholar
• Lansberg, I. (1999). Succeeding generations: Realizing the dream of families in business. Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Breton–Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out–compete? Governance, long–term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00147.x
   Google Scholar
• Le Breton–Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x
   Google Scholar
• Leppäaho, T., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Dimitratos, P. (2015). The case study in family business: An analysis of current research practices and recommendations. Family Business Review, 29, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515614157
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability‐based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00854.x
   Google Scholar
• Ling, Y., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2010). The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: The moderating role of information exchange frequency. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 322–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00893.x
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., & Hua, Z. (2013). The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.016
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3
   Google Scholar
• Madanoglu, M., Altinay, L., & Wang, X. L. (2016). Disentangling the effect of family involvement on innovativeness and risk taking: The role of decentralization. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1796–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.058
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ferrero, J., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Bermejo-Sánchez, M. (2016). Is family ownership of a firm associated with the control of managerial discretion and corporate decisions? Journal of Family Business Management, 6(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-06-2015-0022
   Google Scholar
• Martin, K. D., Johnson, J. L., & Cullen, J. B. (2009). Organizational change, normative control deinstitutionalization, and corruption. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20091915
   Google Scholar
• Mazzola, P., Marchisio, G., & Astrachan, J. (2008). Strategic planning in family business: A powerful developmental tool for the next generation. Family Business Review, 21(3), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210030106
   Google Scholar
• Meier, O., & Schier, G. (2016). The early succession stage of a family firm: Exploring the role of agency rationales and stewardship attitudes. Family Business Review, 29(3), 256–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516646260
   Google Scholar
• Miao, C., Coombs, J. E., Qian, S., & Sirmon, D. G. (2017). The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation: A meta-analysis of resource orchestration and cultural contingencies. Journal of Business Research, 77, 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.016
   Google Scholar
• Michael-Tsabari, N., & Weiss, D. (2015). Communication traps: Applying game theory to succession in family firms. Family Business Review, 28(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513497506
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 757–868. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
   Google Scholar
• Mina, A., Bascaviesoglu – Moreau, E., & Hughes, A. (2014). Open services innovation and the firm’s search for external knowledge. Research Policy, 43(5), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of” direct” research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392364
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. L., Jr, Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Holcomb, T. R. (2007). Creating value in the face of declining performance: Firm strategies and organizational recovery. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.579
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano, M. R., Marino, V., & Ojala, J. (2015). In search of an integrated framework of business longevity. Business History, 57(7), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2014.993613
   Google Scholar
• Ndofor, H. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Xiaoming, H. (2011). Firm resources, competitive actions, and performance: investigating a mediated model with evidence from the in-vitro diagnostics industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.901
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge - creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104. https://hbr.org/1991/11/the-knowledge-creating-company-2
   Google Scholar
• Pieper, T. M., Smith, A. D., Kudlats, J., & Astrachan, J. H. (2015). Article commentary: The persistence of multifamily firms: Founder imprinting, simple rules, and monitoring processes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12179
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Advantage, C. (1985). Creating and sustaining superior performance Competitive advantage. Free Press. 167–206.
   Google Scholar
• Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/259392
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, H., & Freel, M. (2019). Managing family-related conflicts in family businesses: A review and research agenda. Family Business Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519893223
   Google Scholar
• Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2019). Open Innovation in SMEs: Exploring Inter-organizational Relationships in an Ecosystem. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, K., & Lansky, D. (2013). Managing conflict in the family business: Understanding challenges at the intersection of family and business. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzotti, D., Frisenna, C., & Mazzone, R. (2017). The impact of family owners’ monitoring on CEO turnover decisions and the role of trust. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(3), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9367-z
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2007). Organizational Behaviour (12th) ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, M. E., & Sundaram, D. (2011). Knowledge orchestration for sustained competitive advantage. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 11, 1530–1605. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.274
   Google Scholar
• Salvato, C., Chirico, F., & Sharma, P. (2010). A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(3–4), 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985621003726192
   Google Scholar
• Saunila, M., Ukko, J., & Rantanen, H. (2012). Innovation capability and its measurement in Finnish SMEs. In Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications (pp. 417–435). ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_21
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, A., & Sena, V. (2020). Impact of open innovation on industries and firms – A dynamic complex systems view. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 159, 120199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120199
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, D., & Haynie, J. M. (2009). Family business, identity conflict, and an expedited entrepreneurial process: A process of resolving identity conflict. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00344.x
   Google Scholar
• Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
   Google Scholar
• Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695
   Google Scholar
• song, J. H., Kolb, J. A., Hee Lee, U., & Kyoung Kim, H. (2012). Role of transformational leadership in effective organizational knowledge creation practices: Mediating effects of employees’ work engagement. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23(1), 65–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21120
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00199.x
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
   Google Scholar
• Trevinyo‐Rodríguez, R. N., & Bontis, N. (2010). Family ties and emotions: A missing piece in the knowledge transfer puzzle. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001011068716
   Google Scholar
• Uhlaner, L. M. (2005). The use of the Guttman scale in development of a family orientation index for small-to-medium-sized firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00029.x
   Google Scholar
• Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Vallejo, M. C. (2009). The effects of commitment of non-family employees of family firms from the perspective of stewardship theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9926-6
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. (2011). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Woodfield, P., & Husted, K. (2017). Intergenerational knowledge sharing in family firms: Case-based evidence from The New Zealand wine industry. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994). Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199400000020
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M., Ni, Y., & Huang, P. (2020). Dividend payouts and family-controlled firms—The effect of culture on business. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 75, 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research. Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5th) ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yli‐Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.183
   Google Scholar
• Zachary, R. K. (2011). The importance of the family system in family business. Journal of Family Business Management, 1(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/20436231111122263
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & Larraneta, B. (2007). Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1070–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.014
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, J., & Khan, Z. (2019). Value creation through big data in emerging economies: The role of Resource Orchestration and Entrepreneurial Orientation. Management Decision, 57(8), 1818–1838. Emerald Insight. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2018-0572
   Google Scholar