Environmental tax and global income inequality: A method of moments quantile regression analysis

References

• Abdullah, S., & Morley, B. (2014). Environmental taxes and economic growth: Evidence from panel causality tests. Energy Economics, 42, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.013
   Google Scholar
• Adebola, S., Opeyemi, M., & Kumar, A. (2022). Heliyon The impact of technological innovation on renewable energy production: Accounting for the roles of economic and environmental factors using a method of moments quantile regression. Heliyon, 8(March), e09913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09913
   Google Scholar
• Adeleye, B. N., Id, R. O., Lawal, A. I., & Alwis, T. D. (2021). Energy use and the role of per capita income on carbon emissions in African countries. PLoS one, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259488
   Google Scholar
• Aiyar, S., & Ebeke, C. (2020). Inequality of opportunity, inequality of income and economic growth. World Development, 136, 105115.
   Google Scholar
• Alhassan, A., Usman, O., Ike, G. N., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2020). Impact assessment of trade on environmental performance: Accounting for the role of government integrity and economic development in 79 countries. Heliyon, 6(9), e05046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05046
   Google Scholar
• Althor, G., Watson, J. E. M., & Fuller, R. A. (2016). Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change. Nature Publishing Group, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20281
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez-verdejo, E., Moya-fernández, P. J., & Muñoz-rosas, J. F. (2021). Single Imputation Methods and Confidence Intervals for the Gini Index. Mathematics, 9(24), 3252.
   Google Scholar
• Anser, M. K., Adeleye, B. N., & Tabash, M. I. (2021). Current Issues in Tourism Services trade – ICT – Tourism nexus in selected Asian countries: New evidence from panel data techniques. Current Issues in Tourism, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1965554
   Google Scholar
• Antosiewicz, M., Fuentes, J. R., Lewandowski, P., & Witajewski-baltvilks, J. (2022). Distributional effects of emission pricing in a carbon-intensive economy. Energy Policy, 160(July2020), 112678.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir, M. F., MA, B., Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, U., & Vo, X. V. (2021). Unveiling the heterogeneous impacts of environmental taxes on energy consumption and energy intensity: Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy, 226, 120366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120366
   Google Scholar
• Bellemare, M. F., & Wichman, C. J. (2020). Elasticities and the Inverse Hyperbolic Sine Transformation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12325
   Google Scholar
• Bosquet, B. (2000). Environmental tax reform: Does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00173-7
   Google Scholar
• Bruckner, B., Hubacek, K., Shan, Y., Zhong, H., & Feng, K. (2022). Impacts of poverty alleviation on national and global carbon emissions. Nature Sustainability, 5(4), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00842-z
   Google Scholar
• Budolfson, M., Dennig, F., Errickson, F., Feindt, S., Ferranna, M., Fleurbaey, M., Klenert, D., Kornek, U., Kuruc, K., Méjean, A., Peng, W., Scovronick, N., Spears, D., Wagner, F., & Zuber, S. (2021). Protecting the poor with a carbon tax and equal per capita dividend. Nature Climate Change, 11(12), 1025–1026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01228-x
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, M., & Whitehead, M. (2020). Just transitions, poverty and energy consumption: Personal carbon accounts and households in poverty. Energies, 13(22), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225953
   Google Scholar
• Caillavet, F., Fadhuile, A., & Nichèle, V. (2019). Assessing the distributional effects of carbon taxes on food: Inequalities and nutritional insights in France. Ecological Economics, 163, 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Candeira, S., & Winter, F. (2021). Relationship between income inequality, socioeconomic development, vulnerability index, and maternal mortality in Brazil, 2017. BMC public health, 21(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, J., Dai, H., Li, S., Guo, C., Ho, M., Cai, W., He, J., Huang, H., Li, J., Liu, Y., Qian, H., Wang, C., Wu, L., & Zhang, X. (2021). The general equilibrium impacts of carbon tax policy in China: A multi-model comparison. Energy Economics, 99, 105284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105284
   Google Scholar
• Chancel, L. (2022). Global carbon inequality over 1990. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00955-z.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. (2022). The inequality impacts of the carbon tax in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01285-3
   Google Scholar
• Chepeliev, M., Osorio-rodarte, I., & Van Der, M. D. (2021). Distributional impacts of carbon pricing policies under the Paris Agreement: Inter and intra-regional perspectives. Energy Economics, 102(December2020), 105530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105530
   Google Scholar
• Cuomo, C. J. (2011). Climate change, Vulnerability, and responsibility. Hypatia, 26(4), 690–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01220.x
   Google Scholar
• Devi, S., & Gupta, N. (2019). Effects of inclusion of delay in the imposition of environmental tax on the emission of greenhouse gases. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals, 125, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Dissou, Y., & Siddiqui, M. S. (2014a). Can carbon taxes be progressive? ☆. Energy Economics, 42, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.010
   Google Scholar
• Dissou, Y., & Siddiqui, M. S. (2014b). Can carbon taxes be progressive? Energy Economics, 42, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.010
   Google Scholar
• Firpo, S., Galvao, A. F., Pinto, C., & Poirier, A. (2021). GMM quantile regression. Journal of Econometrics, Xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.11.014
   Google Scholar
• Freire-González, J. (2018). Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: A critical review. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(1), 194–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Fremstad, A., & Paul, M. (2020). The Impact of a Carbon Tax on Inequality. Ecological Economics, 163(July2018), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.016
   Google Scholar
• Gmbh, M. S. (2014). Environmental Taxation and Redistribution Concerns Author (s): Rafael Aigner Source: FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, June 2014, Vol. 70, No. 2 (June 2014), Published by: Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG Stable URL. 70(2), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522114X681379
   Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H. (1995). Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend. International Tax and Public Finance, 183(2), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877495
   Google Scholar
• Grottera, C., & Olimpio, A. (2017). Impacts of carbon pricing on income inequality in Brazil. Climate and Development, 9(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2015.1067183
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, K., & Cameron, G. (1994). Simulating the Distributional effects of a Canadian carbon tax. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 20(4), 385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Hardadi, G., Buchholz, A., & Pauliuk, S. (2021). Implications of the distribution of German household environmental footprints across income groups for integrating environmental and social policy design. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13045
   Google Scholar
• Hardardottir, H., & Erik, U. G. (2021). Parameterizing standard measures of income and health inequality using choice experiments. September, 2020, 2531–2546. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4395
   Google Scholar
• Hashem Pesaran, M., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Ike, G. N., Usman, O., & Asumadu, S. (2020). Science of the Total Environment Fiscal policy and CO 2 emissions from heterogeneous fuel sources in Thailand : Evidence from multiple structural breaks cointegration test. The Science of the Total Environment, 702, 134711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134711
   Google Scholar
• Immurana, M., Aziz, A., Micheal, I., & Boachie, K. (2020). Does taxation on harmful products influence population health ? Evidence from Africa using the dynamic panel system GMM approach. Quality & Quantity, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01043-0
   Google Scholar
• James, M. R., & Robson, S. (2012). Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 117(F3).
   Google Scholar
• Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1987). A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, 55(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403192
   Google Scholar
• Joumard, I., Pisu, M., & Bloch, D. (2012). Tackling income inequality The role of taxes and transfers.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkhof, A. C., Moll, H. C., Drissen, E., & Wilting, H. C. (2008). Taxation of multiple greenhouse gases and the effects on income distribution. A case study of the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 67(2), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.015
   Google Scholar
• Khoso, N., Rajput, S., Aziz, T., Hussain, A., & Jahanzeb, A. (2021). Trade Openness and Income Inequality: Fresh Evidence Based on Different Inequality Measures. Applied Economics Journal, 28(2), 63–81. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AEJ/article/view/245051
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, M., Sommer, M., Kratena, K., Kletzan-slamanig, D., & Kettner-marx, C. (2019). CO2 taxes, equity and the double dividend – Macroeconomic model simulations for Austria. Energy Policy, 126(April2018), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.030
   Google Scholar
• Klenert, D., Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O., & Mattauch, L. (2018). Environmental Taxation, Inequality and Engel’s Law: The Double Dividend of Redistribution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 71(3), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0070-y
   Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., & Bassett, G., Jr. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(1), 33–50. https://www.Jstor.org/stable/1913643
   Google Scholar
• Kou, P., Han, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). An evolutionary analysis of corruption in the process of collecting environmental tax in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(39), 54852–54862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13104-4
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, K. H. (2021a). The impact of environmental policy on wage inequality. International Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.12327
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, K. H. (2021b). The impact of environmental policy on wage inequality. International Journal of Economic Theory, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.12327
   Google Scholar
• Labeaga, J. M., Labandeira, X., & López-Otero, X. (2021). Energy taxation, subsidy removal and poverty in Mexico. Environment and Development Economics, 26(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X20000364
   Google Scholar
• Liya, A., Qin, Q., Kamran, H. W., Sawangchai, A., Wisetsri, W., & Raza, M. (2021). How macroeconomic indicators influence gold price management. Business Process Management Journal, 27(7), 2075–2087. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2020-0579
   Google Scholar
• Lütkepohl, H., & Xu, F. (2012). The role of the log transformation in forecasting economic variables. Empirical Economics, 42(3), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-010-0440-1
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Q. (2022). On the sustainable trade development: Do Financial inclusion and eco-innovation matter? Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Sustainable Development, 1960(January), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2298
   Google Scholar
• Machado, J. A. F., & Santos Silva, J. M. C. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Mamoon, D., & Murshed, S. M. (2013). Education bias of trade liberalization and wage inequality in developing countries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 8199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2011.589532
   Google Scholar
• Markkanen, S., & Anger-kraavi, A. (2019). Social impacts of climate change mitigation policies and their implications for inequality. Climate Policy, 3062. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1596873
   Google Scholar
• Maxim, M. R. (2020). Environmental fiscal reform and the possibility of triple dividend in European and non-European countries: Evidence from a meta-regression analysis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 22(4), 633–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00273-8
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, C., Elamer, A. A., Glen, T., AlHares, A., & Gaber, H. R. (2019). Accounting society’s acceptability of carbon taxes: Expectations and reality. Energy Policy, 131(December2018), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Mdaghri, A. A., & Oubdi, L. (2022). Bank-Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Liquidity Creation: Evidence from MENA Countries. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 76(6), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2022-0013
   Google Scholar
• Mor, S., & Ghimire, M. (2022). Transparency and Nationally Determined Contributions: A Review of the Paris Agreement. Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics and Business Law, 11(2), 106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. H., & song, W. (2021). Carbon Pricing and Income Inequality: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Economic Development, 46(2), 155–182.
   Google Scholar
• Oueslati, W., Zipperer, V., Rousselière, D., & Dimitropoulos, A. (2017). Energy taxes, reforms and income inequality: An empirical cross- country analysis. International Economics, 150(January), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2017.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Patriarca, F., & Vona, F. (2012). Environmental Taxes, Inequality and Technical Change Environmental Taxes, Inequality and Technical Change. Revue de l’OFCE, 11. https://doi.org/10.3917/reof.124.0389
   Google Scholar
• Patuelli, R., Nijkamp, P., & Pels, E. (2005). Environmental tax reform and the double dividend: A meta-analytical performance assessment. Ecological Economics, 55(4), 564–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.021
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. (1991). The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming Author (s): David Pearce Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Royal Economic Society Stable URL. The Economic Journal. 938–948. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2233865
   Google Scholar
• Peichl, A., & Wissenschaftskolleg, H. (2017). SHIFTING TAXES FROM LABOR TO CONSUMPTION: MORE EMPLOYMENT AND MORE INEQUALITY? by N ico P estel. Review of Income and Wealth, 63(3), 542–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12232
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. T., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., He, Y., Taketani, M., Shi, R., & Zhu, X. D. (2019). Economic and welfare influences of an energy excise tax in Jiangsu province of China: A computable general equilibrium approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1403–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.267
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2014). Information in the yield curve: A Macro‐Finance approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(August 2012), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels (pp. 4938). https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
   Google Scholar
• Poursoleyman, E., Mansourfar, G., Homayoun, S., & Rezaee, Z. (2022). Business sustainability performance and corporate financial performance: The mediating role of optimal investment. Managerial Finance, 48(2), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-01-2021-0040
   Google Scholar
• Qiao, K., & Dowell, G. (2022). Environmental concerns, income inequality, and purchase of environmentally-friendly products: A longitudinal study of U. S. counties. Research Policy, 51(4), 104443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104443
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. M., & Alam, K. (2021). Clean energy, population density, urbanization and environmental pollution nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh. Renewable Energy, 172, 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.103
   Google Scholar
• Raza Abbasi, K., Shahbaz, M., Jiao, Z., & Tufail, M. (2021). How energy consumption, industrial growth, urbanization, and CO 2 emissions affect economic growth in Pakistan? A novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Energy, 221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119793
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. T. (2010). Global Inequality and Climate Change. Society & Natural Resources, 1920(2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920118490
   Google Scholar
• Roosen, J., Staudigel, M., & Rahbauer, S. (2022). Demand elasticities for fresh meat and welfare effects of meat taxes in Germany. Food Policy, 106(December2021), 102194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102194
   Google Scholar
• Saelim, S. (2019). Carbon tax incidence on household demand: Effects on welfare, income inequality and poverty incidence in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.218
   Google Scholar
• Säll, S. (2018). Environmental food taxes and inequalities: Simulation of a meat tax in Sweden. Food Policy, 74(June2017), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.12.007
   Google Scholar
• Shan, M., Chao, C., Liu, X., & Yu, E. S. H. (2018). Environmental policy, firm dynamics and wage inequality in developing countries. International Review of Economics and Finance, 57(February), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.02.013
   Google Scholar
• Silva, S., Soares, I., & Afonso, O. (2021). Assessing the double dividend of a third-generation environmental tax reform with resource substitution. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(10), 15145–15156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01290-7
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y. (2022). Composite fiscal decentralisation and green innovation: Imperative strategy for institutional reforms and sustainable development in OECD countries. Sustainable Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2292
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Razzaq, A. (2022). Composite fiscal decentralisation and green innovation: Imperative strategy for institutional reforms and sustainable development in OECD countries. Sustainable Development, 2021, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2292
   Google Scholar
• Tirachini, A., & Proost, S. (2021). Economics of Transportation Transport taxes and subsidies in developing countries: The effect of income inequality aversion. Economics of Transportation, 25(June2020), 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100206
   Google Scholar
• Tomás, M., López, L. A., & Monsalve, F. (2020). Carbon footprint, municipality size and rurality in Spain: Inequality and carbon taxation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121798
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2018). Climate Action Now. Climate Action Now: Summary for Policymakers 2018.
   Google Scholar
• UnitedNtions Environmental Programme. (2021). Making Peace with Nature. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789280738377
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Lin, J., Feng, K., Liu, P., Du, M., Ni, R., Chen, L., Kong, H., Weng, H., Liu, M., Baiocchi, G., Zhao, Y., Mi, Z., Cao, J., & Hubacek, K. (2019). Environmental taxation and regional inequality in China. Science Bulletin, 64(22), 1691–1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.09.017
   Google Scholar
• Wan, G., Zhang, X., & Zhao, M. (2022). Urbanization can help reduce income inequality. Npj Urban Sustainability, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00040-y
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
   Google Scholar
• Wier, M., Birr-Pedersen, K., Jacobsen, H. K., & Klok, J. (2005). Are CO2 taxes regressive? Evidence from the Danish experience. Ecological Economics, 52(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Wolde-Rufael, Y., & Mulat-Weldemeskel, E. (2022a). The moderating role of environmental tax and renewable energy in CO2 emissions in Latin America and Caribbean countries: Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Environmental Challenges, 6, 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100412
   Google Scholar
• Wolde-Rufael, Y., & Mulat-Weldemeskel, E. (2022b). The moderating role of environmental tax and renewable energy in CO2 emissions in Latin America and Caribbean countries: Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Environmental Challenges, 6, 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100412
   Google Scholar
• Xie, P., & Jamaani, F. (2022). Does Green Innovation, Energy Productivity and Environmental Taxes Limit Carbon Emissions in Developed economies: Implications for Sustainable development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, September, 63, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Xin, N., & Xie, Z. (2022). Financial inclusion and trade adjusted carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of environment related taxes employing non-parametric panel methods. Sustainable Development, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2375
   Google Scholar
• Yan, J., & Yang, J. (2021). Carbon pricing and income inequality: A case study of Guangdong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 296, 126491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126491
   Google Scholar
• Zahid, M., Fareed, Z., Ferraz, D., & Ikram, M. (2022). Exploring the heterogenous impacts of environmental taxes on environmental footprints: An empirical assessment from developed economies. Energy, 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121753
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, C., & Cai, W. (2021). Recycling Carbon Pricing Revenue and the Effects on Income Inequality and Regional Disparity. A CGE-based Study of China, 20, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Fujimori, S., Hasegawa, T., Oshiro, K., & Sasaki, K. (2022). Poverty and inequality implications of carbon pricing under the long ‑ term climate target. Sustainability Science, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01206-y
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Wang, C., & Cai, W. (2022). Resources, Conservation & Recycling Carbon pricing policy, revenue recycling schemes, and income inequality: A multi-regional dynamic CGE assessment for China. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 181, 106246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106246
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., Zhang, W., Pan, X., Hu, J., & Pu, G. (2020). Environmental tax reform and the “double dividend” hypothesis in a small open economy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010217
   Google Scholar