Do mental model and creativity help employees to improve their job performance from their participation in the budgeting?

References

• Alzghoul, A., Elrehail, H., Emeagwali Okechukwu, L., & AlShboul Mohammad, K. (2018). Knowledge management, workplace climate, creativity and performance: The role of authentic leadership. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(8), 592–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-12-2017-0111
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   Google Scholar
• Burney, L. L., Henle, C. A., & Widener, S. K. (2009). A path model examining the relations among strategic performance measurement system characteristics. Organizational Justice, and Extra- and in-role Performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Camisón, C., & López, A. V. (2010). An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(8), 853–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571011068199
   Google Scholar
• Capelo, C., & Dias, J. F. (2009). A system dynamics‐based simulation experiment for testing mental model and performance effects of using the balanced scorecard. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 25(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.413
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H. (2005). Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(5), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Rhee, M., & Kim, Y.-C. (2019). Performance feedback and problemistic search: The moderating effects of managerial and board outsiderness. Journal of Business Research, 102, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.039
   Google Scholar
• Chong, V. K., Eggleton, I. R., & Leong, M. K. (2005). The effects of value attainment and cognitive roles of budgetary participation on job performance. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1488(04)08009-3
   Google Scholar
• Chong, V. K., Eggleton, I. R., & Leong, M. K. (2006). The multiple roles of participative budgeting on job performance. Advances in Accounting, 22, 67–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6110(06)22004-2
   Google Scholar
• Chong, K. M., & Mahama, H. (2014). The impact of interactive and diagnostic uses of budgets on team effectiveness. Management Accounting Research, 25(3), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.10.008
   Google Scholar
• Covaleski, M. A., Evans, J. H., Luft, J. L., & Shields, M. D. (2003). Budgeting research: Three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 15(1), 3–49. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2003.15.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
   Google Scholar
• Derfuss, K. (2016). Reconsidering the participative budgeting-performance relation: A meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001301
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M. (1997). Disciplines of organizational learning: contributions and critiques. Human Relations, 50(9), 1085–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679705000903
   Google Scholar
• Faizan, A., Mostafa, R. S., Marko, S., Kisang, R., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2016-0568
   Google Scholar
• Groen, B. A., Wouters, M. J., & Wilderom, C. P. (2017). Employee participation, performance metrics, and job performance: A survey study based on self-determination theory. Management Accounting Research, 36, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L., Decoster, S., Babalola, M. T., Schutter, L. D., Garba, O. A., & Riisla, K. (2018). Authoritarian leadership and employee creativity: The moderating role of psychological capital and the mediating role of fear and defensive silence. Journal of Business Research, 92, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.034
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academic Marketing. Sciece, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. (2011). Do comprehensive performance measurement systems help or hinder managers’ mental model development? Management Accounting Research, 22(2), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Henri, J.-F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in Intenational Marketing, 20, 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
   Google Scholar
• Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
   Google Scholar
• Hult, G., Ketchen, J., & David, J. (2001). Does Market orientation matter?: A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(9), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.197
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, E. P. (2015). Participation, accounting and learning how to implement a new vision. Management Accounting Research, 29, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Kihn, L. A. (2010). Performance outcomes in empirical management accounting research: Recent developments and implications for future research. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(5), 468–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401011052896
   Google Scholar
• Kren, L. (1992). Budgetary participation and managerial performance: The impact of information and environmental volatility. The Accounting Review, 67(3), 511–526.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, C. M., & Buckland, C. (2001). Budgeting-the role of trust and participation: A research note. Abacus, 37(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00092
   Google Scholar
• Lau, C. M., & Lim, E. W. (2002). The effects of procedural justice and evaluative styles on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance. Advances in Accounting, 19, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6110(02)19008-0
   Google Scholar
• Lau, C. M., Scully, G., & Lee, A. (2018). The effects of organizational politics on employee motivations to participate in target setting and employee budgetary participation. Journal of Business Research, 90, 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Lau, C. M., & Tan, S. L. (2003). The effects of participation and job-relevant information on the relationship between evaluative style and job satisfaction. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 21(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024803621137
   Google Scholar
• Lau, C. M., & Tan, S. L. C. (2006). The effects of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust on job tension in budgeting. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2005.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Lau, C. M., & Tan, S. L. (2012). Budget targets as performance measures: The mediating role of participation and procedural fairness. Advances in Management Accounting, 151–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7871(2012)0000020013
   Google Scholar
• Lim, B.-C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.387
   Google Scholar
• Milani, K. (1975). The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: A field study. The Accounting Review, 50(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12059
   Google Scholar
• Moulang, C. (2013). Performance measurement system use in generating psychological empowerment and individual creativity. Accounting & Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., & Cheah, J.-H. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: A software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7(3), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-019-00058-3
   Google Scholar
• Selvina, M., & Yuliansyah, Y. (2016). Relationships between budgetary participation and organizational commitment: Mediated by reinforcement contingency evidence from the service sector industries. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 8(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.8.2.69-80
   Google Scholar
• Shahzad, K., Bajwa, S. U., Siddiqi, A. F. I., Ahmid, F., & Sultani, A. R. (2016). Integrating knowledge management (KM) strategies and processes to enhance organizational creativity and performance. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(1), 154–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-07-2014-0061
   Google Scholar
• Shields, M. D. (1997). Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 3–61.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, J. F., & Shields, M. D. (1998). Antecedents of participative budgeting. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 23(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00014-7
   Google Scholar
• Sitepu, E. M. P., Appuhami, R., & Su, S. (2020). How does interactive use of budgets affect creativity? Pacific Accounting Review, 32(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-05-2019-0054
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2004). Structural equation modeling in management accounting research: Critical analysis and opportunity. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 49–89.
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
   Google Scholar
• Sue‐Chan, C., & Hempel, P. S. (2016). The creativity‐performance relationship: How rewarding creativity moderates the expression of creativity. Human Resource Management, 55(4), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21682
   Google Scholar
• Uyar, A., & Kuzey, C. (2016). Contingent factors, extent of budget use and performance: A structural equation approach. Australian Accounting Review, 26(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12090
   Google Scholar
• Van der Stede, W. A., Young, S. M., & Chen, C. X. (2005). Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 30(7–8), 655–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2004). Salesperson creative performance: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00483-6
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
   Google Scholar
• Winata, L., & Mia, L. (2005). Information technology and the performance effect of managers’ participation in budgeting: Evidence from the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 24(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2004.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Wong-On-Wing, B., Lan, G., & Lui, G. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and participation in budgeting: Antecedents and consequences. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2010.22.2.133
   Google Scholar
• Yuliansyah, A. (2016). Meningkatkan response rate dalam penelitian survey: Suatu study literature. Smart Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Yuliansyah, Y., Hariri, H., & Razimi, M. S. (2018a). Comprehensive strategy to conduct a mail survey: Techniques to improve response rates. International Journal of Management and Business Research, 8(4), 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Yuliansyah, Y., Inapty, B. I., Dahlan, M., & Agtia, I. O. (2018b). Budgetary participation and its impact on individual performance. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 24(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.24.2.10
   Google Scholar
• Yuliansyah, Y., & Jermias, J. (2018). Strategic performance measurement system, organizational learning and service strategic alignment: Impact on performance. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(4), 564–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-07-2018-0102
   Google Scholar
• Yuliansyah, Y., & Khan, A. (2015). Interactive use of performance measurement systems and the organization’s customers-focused strategy: The mediating role of organizational learning. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 13(2), 219–229.
   Google Scholar
• Yuliansyah, Y., & Khan, A. (2017). A re-visit of the participative budgeting and employees’ self-efficacy interrelationship –Empirical evidence from Indonesia’s public sector. International Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2017.1325584
   Google Scholar
• Yuliansyah, Y., Triwacananingrum, W., Mohd-Sanusi, Z., & Said, J. (2019). Enhancing task performance of bank employees: The relevance of trust, self-efficacy and budget participation. International Journal of Business Excellence, 17(4), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2019.099122
   Google Scholar
• Zawawi, N. H. M., & Hoque, Z. (2010). Research in management accounting innovations: An overview of its recent development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(4), 505–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091011094554
   Google Scholar