Integrated reporting quality in Malaysia: Do chairman attributes matter?

References

• Åberg, C., & Shen, W. (2020). Can board leadership contribute to board dynamic managerial capabilities? An empirical exploration among Norwegian firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(1), 169–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09460-6
   Google Scholar
• Abu Qa’dan, M. B., & Suwaidan, M. S. (2019). Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: The case of Jordan. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0225
   Google Scholar
• Adel, C., Hussain, M. M., Mohamed, E. K., & Basuony, M. A. (2019). Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 27(2), 301–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-10-2017-0118
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N. B. J., Rashid, A., & Gow, J. (2018). Corporate board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility reporting in Malaysia. Gender, Technology and Development, 22(2), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2018.1496671
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed Haji, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility disclosures over time: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(7), 647–676. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2012-0729
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed Haji, A., & Anifowose, M. (2016a). Audit committee and integrated reporting practice: Does internal assurance matter? Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(8/9), 915–948. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2015-1293
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed Haji, A., & Anifowose, M. (2016b). The trend of integrated reporting practice in South Africa: Ceremonial or substantive? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), 190–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2015-0106
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed Haji, A., & Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2013). A longitudinal examination of intellectual capital disclosures and corporate governance attributes in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 21(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341311316931
   Google Scholar
• Al-Absy, M. S. M. (2020). The board chairman’s characteristics and financial stability of Malaysian-listed firms. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1823586. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1823586
   Google Scholar
• Alfiero, S., Cane, M., Doronzo, R., & Esposito, A. (2017). Board configuration and IR adoption: Empirical evidence from European companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p13
   Google Scholar
• Alfiero, S., Cane, M., Doronzo, R., & Esposito, A. (2018). Determining characteristics of boards adopting integrated reporting. Financial Reporting, 2(2), 37–71. https://doi.org/10.3280/FR2018-002003
   Google Scholar
• Al Lawati, H., Hussainey, K., & Sagitova, R. (2021). Disclosure quality vis-à-vis disclosure quantity: Does audit committee matter in Omani financial institutions? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 57(2), 557–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-020-00955-0
   Google Scholar
• Al-Matari, Y. A. (2022). Do the characteristics of the board chairman have an effect on corporate performance? Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Heliyon, 8(4), e09286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09286
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadasi, A. A., Abidin, S., & Al-Jaifi, H. A. (2019). The puzzle of internal audit function budget toward specialist auditor choice and audit fees: Does family ownership matter? Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(2), 208–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2017-1655
   Google Scholar
• Alshorman, S., Qaderi, S., Alhmoud, T., & Meqbel, R. (2022). The role of slack resources in explaining the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and firm market value: A case from an emerging market. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2119833
   Google Scholar
• Altarawneh, M., Shafie, R., Ishak, R., & Ghaleb, B. A. A. (2022). Chief executive officer characteristics and discretionary accruals in an emerging economy. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2024117. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.2024117
   Google Scholar
• Amran, N. A., Yusof, M., Ishak, R., & Aripin, N. (2014). Do characteristics of CEO and chairman influence government-linked companies performance? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 799–803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.546
   Google Scholar
• Antonucci, G., & Venditti, M. (2021). Does CEO power influence corporate risk and performance? Evidence from Greece and Hungary. Corporate Ownership & Control, 18(4), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i4art6
   Google Scholar
• Badru, B. O., & Qasem, A. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and dividend payments in the Malaysian capital market: The interacting effect of family-controlled companies. Journal of Sustainable Finance Investment, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1979926
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., Nordqvist, M., & Hellerstedt, K. (2020). The role of the board chair—A literature review and suggestions for future research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(6), 372–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12350
   Google Scholar
• Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, J., Cooperman, E. S., & Wolfe, G. A. (2010). Director tenure and the compensation of bank CEOs. Managerial Finance, 36(2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351011014523
   Google Scholar
• Chandren, S., Qaderi, S. A., & Ghaleb, B. A. A. (2021). The influence of the chairman and CEO effectiveness on operating performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1935189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1935189
   Google Scholar
• Cooray, T., Gunarathne, A., & Senaratne, S. (2020). Does corporate governance affect the quality of integrated reporting? Sustainability, 12(10), 4262. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104262
   Google Scholar
• Cortesi, A., & Vena, L. (2019). Disclosure quality under integrated reporting: A value relevance approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 745–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.155
   Google Scholar
• Dey, P. K. (2020). Value relevance of integrated reporting: A study of the Bangladesh banking sector. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 17(4), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00084-z
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, D., & Velte, P. (2016). “The impact of supervisory board composition on CSR reporting. Evidence from the German two-tier System”, Sustainability, 8(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010063
   Google Scholar
• Dilling, P. F., & Caykoylu, S. (2019). Determinants of companies that disclose high-quality integrated reports. Sustainability, 11(13), 3744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133744
   Google Scholar
• Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250
   Google Scholar
• Erin, O., & Adegboye, A. (2022). Do corporate attributes impact integrated reporting quality? An empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20(3/4), 416–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2020-0117
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
   Google Scholar
• Frias‐Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez‐Ariza, L., & Garcia‐Sánchez, I. M. (2014). Explanatory factors of integrated sustainability and financial reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1765
   Google Scholar
• Ganesan, Y., Poongan, V., & Haron, H. (2019). Is a risk management committee essential in moderating the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability disclosure? International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, 7(1–2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2019.099039
   Google Scholar
• García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2020). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1775
   Google Scholar
• Ghafran, C., & Yasmin, S. (2018). Audit committee chair and financial reporting timeliness: A focus on financial, experiential and monitoring expertise. International Journal of Auditing, 22(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12101
   Google Scholar
• Ghaleb, B. A. A., Al-Duais, A., S, D., & Hashed, A. A. (2021a). Audit committee chair’s legal expertise and real activities manipulation: Empirical evidence from Malaysian energy and utilities sectors. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10258
   Google Scholar
• Ghaleb, B. A. A., Kamardin, H., & Hashed, A. A. (2022). Investment in outside governance monitoring and real earnings management: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(1), 52–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2020-0203
   Google Scholar
• Ghaleb, B. A. A., Qaderi, S. A., Almashaqbeh, A., & Qasem, A. (2021b). Corporate social responsibility, board gender diversity and real earnings management: The case of Jordan. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1883222. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1883222
   Google Scholar
• Girella, L., Rossi, P., & Zambon, S. (2019). Exploring the firm and country determinants of the voluntary adoption of integrated reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1323–1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2318
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics (5th) ed.). Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th) ed.). Pearson International Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K., & Miles, S. (2004). Assessing quality assessment of corporate social reporting: UK perspectives. Accounting Forum, 28(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Handajani, L., Subroto, B., Sutrisno, T., & Saraswati, E. (2014). Does board diversity matter on corporate social disclosure? An Indonesian evidence. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(9), 8–16. http://eprints.unram.ac.id/id/eprint/17307
   Google Scholar
• Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Harjoto, M. A., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2343-0
   Google Scholar
• Harjoto, M. A., Laksmana, I., & Yang, Y. W. (2019). Board nationality and educational background diversity and corporate social performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(2), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2018-0138
   Google Scholar
• Iredele, O. O. (2019). Examining the association between quality of integrated reports and corporate characteristics. Heliyon, 5(7), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01932
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4), 5–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.244158
   Google Scholar
• Katmon, N., Mohamad, Z. Z., Norwani, N. M., & Al Farooque, O. (2019). Comprehensive board diversity and quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 447–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3672-6
   Google Scholar
• Khan, I., Khan, I., & Saeed, B. B. (2019a). Does board diversity affect quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 1371–1381. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1753
   Google Scholar
• Khan, I., Khan, I., & Senturk, I. (2019b). Board diversity and quality of CSR disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(6), 1187–1203. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2018-0371
   Google Scholar
• Krause, R., Withers, M. C., & Semadeni, M. (2017). Compromise on the board: Investigating the antecedents and consequences of lead independent director appointment. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2239–2265. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0852
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., Lin, A., & Zhang, L. (2019). Relationship between chief executive officer characteristics and corporate environmental information disclosure in Thailand. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 6(4), 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0067-7
   Google Scholar
• Machold, S., Huse, M., Minichilli, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2011). Board leadership and strategy involvement in small firms: A team production approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00852.x
   Google Scholar
• Masduki, S. B., & Zaid, M. H. M. (2019). Corporate governance and compliance of integrated reporting: Evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Jurnal Intelek, 14(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.24191/ji.v14i2.232
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. C., Nguyen, P. M. H., Tran, B. H., Nguyen, T. T. N., Hoang, L. T. T., & Do, T. T. H. (2022). Integrated reporting disclosure alignment levels in annual reports by listed firms in Vietnam and influencing factors. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6), 1543–1570. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2020-0710
   Google Scholar
• Ntim, C. G., Lindop, S., Thomas, D. A., Abdou, H., & Opong, K. K. (2019). Executive pay and performance: The moderating effect of CEO power and governance structure. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(6), 921–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1282532
   Google Scholar
• Obeng, V. A., Ahmed, K., & Miglani, S. (2020). Integrated reporting and earnings quality: The moderating effect of agency costs. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 60(April), 101285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101285
   Google Scholar
• Pavlopoulos, A., Magnis, C., & Iatridis, G. E. (2019). Integrated reporting: An accounting disclosure tool for high quality financial reporting. Research in International Business and Finance, 49, 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.02.007
   Google Scholar
• Pistoni, A., Songini, L., & Bavagnoli, F. (2018). Integrated reporting quality: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1474
   Google Scholar
• Qaderi, S. A., Chandren, S., & Abdullah, Z. (2021). Integrated reporting disclosure in Malaysia: Regulations and practice. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-06-2021-0158
   Google Scholar
• Qaderi, S. A., Ghaleb, B. A. A., Hashed, A. A., Chandren, S., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). Board characteristics and integrated reporting strategy: Does sustainability committee matter? Sustainability, 14(10), 6092. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106092
   Google Scholar
• Qasem, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Ghaleb, B. A. A., & Bamahros, H. M. (2022). Institutional investors, political connections and stock recommendations from sell-side analysts: The case of Malaysia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-05-2021-0177
   Google Scholar
• Raimo, N., Nicolò, G., Tartaglia Polcini, P., & Vitolla, F. (2022). Corporate governance and risk disclosure: Evidence from integrated reporting adopters. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(7), 1462–1490. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2021-0260
   Google Scholar
• Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2020a). Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality? An agency theory viewpoint. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2635
   Google Scholar
• Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2020b). The role of ownership structure in integrated reporting policies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2238–2250. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2498
   Google Scholar
• Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board diversity and CSR reporting: An Australian study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2015-0052
   Google Scholar
• Sadou, A., Alom, F., & Laluddin, H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosures in Malaysia: Evidence from large companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(1), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2016-0104
   Google Scholar
• Securities Commission Malaysia [SCM]. (2017), Malaysian code on corporate governance. https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/corporate-governance
   Google Scholar
• Securities Commission Malaysia [SCM]. (2020), Corporate governance monitor 2020. https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/corporate-governance
   Google Scholar
• Songini, L., Pistoni, A., Tettamanzi, P., Fratini, F., & Minutiello, V. (2022). Integrated reporting quality and BoD characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(2), 579–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09568-8
   Google Scholar
• Suttipun, M., & Bomlai, A. (2019). The relationship between corporate governance and integrated reporting: Thai evidence. International Journal of Business & Society, 20(1), 348–364. http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/images/repository/pdf/Vol20-no1-paper22.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vafeas, N. (2003). Length of board tenure and outside director Independence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30(7‐8), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.05525
   Google Scholar
• Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., & Rubino, M. (2020a). Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: An agency theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1879
   Google Scholar
• Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., & Garzoni, A. (2019a). How pressure from stakeholders affects integrated reporting quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1591–1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1850
   Google Scholar
• Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., & Garzoni, A. (2019b). “The impact of national culture on integrated reporting quality. A Stakeholder Theory Approach”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1558–1571. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2332
   Google Scholar
• Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., & Garzoni, A. (2020b). The determinants of integrated reporting quality in financial institutions. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2019-0202
   Google Scholar
• Vitolla, F., Salvi, A., Raimo, N., Petruzzella, F., & Rubino, M. (2020c). The impact on the cost of equity capital in the effects of integrated reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2384
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Zhou, S., & Wang, T. (2020). Corporate governance, integrated reporting and the use of credibility-enhancing mechanisms on integrated reports. European Accounting Review, 29(4), 631–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1668281
   Google Scholar
• Wan-Hussin, W. N., Qasem, A., Aripin, N., & Ariffin, M. S. M. (2021). Corporate responsibility disclosure, information environment and analysts’ recommendations: Evidence from Malaysia. Sustainability, 13(6), 3568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063568
   Google Scholar
• Withers, M. C., & Fitza, M. A. (2017). Do board chairs matter? The influence of board chairs on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), 1343–1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2587
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2011). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd) ed.). MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Zhou, S. (2022). Do firms practicing integrated reporting engage in less myopic behavior? International evidence on opportunistic earnings management. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(3), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12401
   Google Scholar
• Zaid, M. A., Wang, M., & Abuhijleh, S. T. (2019). The effect of corporate governance practices on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Journal of Global Responsibility, 10(2), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-10-2018-0053
   Google Scholar
• Zouari, G., & Dhifi, K. (2022). The impact of ownership structure on integrated reporting in European firms. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(3), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2021-0057
   Google Scholar