Engagement and flexibility: An empirical discussion about consultative leadership intent for productivity from Pakistan

References

• Abbas, A., Ekowati, D., & Anwar, A. (2023). Authentic Leadership Journey: An empirical Discussion from Pakistani higher education employing the Lay theory of Psychology. International Journal of Public Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-04-2022-0020
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, A., Ekowati, D., Shuairidi, F., Fenitra, R. M., & Fahlevi, M. (2022). Integrating Cycle of Prochaska and DiClemente with Ethically Responsible behavior theory for Social Change Management: Post Covid-19 Social Cognitive Perspective for Change. In A. Pego (Ed.), Challenges and Emerging Strategies for Global Networking Post COVID-19 (pp. 130–15). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, A., Ekowati, D., Suhairidi, F., & Hamid, A. R. (2022). Negative Vs Positive Psychology: A Review of Science of Well-being. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09708-1
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, A., Ekowati, D., & Suhariadi, F. (2021a). Individual psychological distance: A leadership task to assess and cope with invisible change. Journal of Management Development, 40(3), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-09-2020-0304
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, A., Ekowati, D., & Suhariadi, F. (2021b). Managing Individuals, Organizations Through Leadership: Diversity Consciousness Roadmap. In B. Christiansen & H. Chandan (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Applied Social Psychology in Multiculturalism (Vol. 1, pp. 47–71). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, A., Eliyana, A., Ekowati, D., Saud, M., Raza, A., & Wardani, R. (2020). Data set on coping strategies in the digital age: The role of psychological well-being and social capital among university students in Java Timor, Surabaya, Indonesia. Data in Brief, 30, 10558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105583
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, A., Saud, M., Ekowati, D., & Suhariadi, F. (2021). Social Psychology and Fabrication: A Synthesis of Individuals, Society, and Organization. In B. Christiansen & H. Chandan (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Applied Social Psychology in Multiculturalism (Vol. 1, pp. 89–109). Pennsylvania IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, A., Saud, M., Suhariadi, F., Usman, I., & Ekowati, D. (2022). Positive leadership psychology: Authentic and servant leadership in higher education in Pakistan. Current Psychology, 41(10), 5859–5871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01051-1
   Google Scholar
• Adil, A., & Kamal, A. (2019). Authentic leadership and psychological capital in job demands-resources model among Pakistani university teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(6), 734–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1580772
   Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (2008). Enhancing the relevance of organizational behavior by embracing performance management research. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 29(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.493
   Google Scholar
• Alotaibi, S. M., Amin, M., & Winterton, J. (2020). Does emotional intelligence and empowering leadership affect psychological empowerment and work engagement? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(8), 971–991. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2020-0313
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., & Kelliher, C. (2009). Flexible working and engagement: The importance of choice. Strategic HR Review, 8(2), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/14754390910937530
   Google Scholar
• Asrar-Ul-Haq, M., Ali, H. Y., Anwar, S., Iqbal, A., Iqbal, M. B., Suleman, N. S., Sadiq, Haris-Ul-Mahasbi, M., Iqbal, I., & Sadiq, I. (2019). Impact of organizational politics on employee work outcomes in higher education institutions of Pakistan: Moderating role of social capital. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 8(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-07-2018-0086
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Ishizaka, A., Gupta, M., & Shankar, A. (2022). Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1378–1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.023
   Google Scholar
• Beltrán-Martín, I., Roca-Puig, V., Escrig Tena, A., & Bou-Llusar, J. C. (2008). Human resource flexibility as a mediating variable between high performance work systems and performance. Journal of Management, 34(5), 1009–1044. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318616
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2016). Invisible influence: The hidden forces that shape behavior. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, M., Gibson, D. E., & Doty, D. H. (2005). The effects of flexibility in employee skills, employee behaviors, and human resource practices on firm performance. Journal of Management, 31(4), 622–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272347
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt, C. (2015). Business coaching and consulting–the systemic constellation approach in business. In M. Schabacker, K. Gericke, N. Szélig, & S. Vajna (Eds.), Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes (pp. 101–112). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Butt, K., Jabeen, M., & Zareef, M. (2023). What leadership qualities are necessary for productive librarianship? Explore coaxial traits of academic librarians in the twin cities of Pakistan. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(3), 102677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102677
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. I., Dainty, A. R., & Moore, D. R. (2005). Towards a multidimensional competency‐based managerial performance framework. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(5), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510602941
   Google Scholar
• Chong, M. P., Shang, Y., Richards, M., & Zhu, X. (2018). Two sides of the same coin? Leadership and organizational culture. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(8), 975–994. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0122
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dane, E. (2011). Paying attention to mindfulness and its effects on task performance in the workplace. Journal of Management, 37(4), 997–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310367948
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J. -L., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 809–837. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069417
   Google Scholar
• Dervitsiotis, K. N. (2005). Creating conditions to nourish sustainable organizational excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(8–9), 925–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500163078
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, C. (2012). The leadership productivity model. Journal of Applied Leadership and Management, 1, 20–38.
   Google Scholar
• De Smet, A., Dowling, B., Mysore, M., & Reich, A. (2021). It’s time for leaders to get real about hybrid. In The McKinsey Quarterly (pp. 1–10). United States. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/its-time-for-leadersto-get-real-about-hybrid
   Google Scholar
• Dyck, B., & Caza, A. (2021). Teaching multiple approaches to management to facilitate prosocial and environmental well-being. Management Learning, 53(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076211045498
   Google Scholar
• Eichenauer, C. J., Ryan, A. M., & Alanis, J. M. (2022). Leadership during crisis: An examination of supervisory leadership behavior and gender during COVID-19. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211010761
   Google Scholar
• Elkaleh, E. S. (2023). What Makes a Balanced Leader?: An Islamic Perspective. In Ahmed Amin & Jonathan A. J. Wilson, & N. El-Bassiouny (Eds.), Management, Spirituality and Religion: Volume 3 of Management, Spirituality and Religion (Vol. 3, pp. 45–62). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Elwyn, G., Durand, M. A., Song, J., Aarts, J., Barr, P. J., Berger, Z., Cochran, N., Frosch, D., Galasiński, D., & Gulbrandsen, P. (2017). A three-talk model for shared decision making: Multistage consultation process. bmj, 359. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4891
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K. T., & Murphy, M. C. (2015). A company I can trust? Organizational lay theories moderate stereotype threat for women. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214564969
   Google Scholar
• Fenitra, R. M., Abbas, A., Ekowati, D., & Suhairidi, F. (2022). Strategic Intent and Strategic Leadership: A Review Perspective for Post-covid Tourism and Hospitality Industry Recovery. In P. Mohanty, Sharma, A., Kennell, J., & Hassan, A. (Eds.), The Emerald Handbook of Destination Recovery in Tourism and Hospitality (pp. 23–44). Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Google Scholar
• Fraussen, B., Albareda, A., & Braun, C. (2020). Conceptualizing consultation approaches: Identifying combinations of consultation tools and analyzing their implications for stakeholder diversity. Policy Sciences, 53(3), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09382-3
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo, R. M. (2019). Role of leadership and participation: Social innovation in health in selected provinces in the Philippines. International Journal of Public Leadership, 15(4), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-05-2019-0020
   Google Scholar
• Gallessich, J. (1985). Toward a meta-theory of consultation. The Counseling Psychologist, 13(3), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000085133002
   Google Scholar
• Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(350), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865
   Google Scholar
• Giampaoli, D., Ciambotti, M., & Bontis, N. (2017). Knowledge management, problem solving and performance in top Italian firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2016-0113
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, N. A., & Mann, L. (2004). Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(9), 588–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410551507
   Google Scholar
• Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
   Google Scholar
• Guix, M., Bonilla-Priego, M. J., & Font, X. (2018). The process of sustainability reporting in international hotel groups: An analysis of stakeholder inclusiveness, materiality and responsiveness. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7), 1063–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1410164
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. J. (2018). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives (3rd ed.) ed.). Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., & Lees-Marshment, J. (2019). Political leaders and public engagement: The hidden world of informal elite–citizen interaction. Political Studies, 67(3), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718791370
   Google Scholar
• Himawan, K. K., Helmi, J., & Fanggidae, J. P. (2022). The sociocultural barriers of work‐from‐home arrangement due to COVID‐19 pandemic in Asia: Implications and future implementation. Knowledge and Process Management, 29(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1708
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P. B. (2015). Being awkward: Creating conscious culture change. The Journal of Business Strategy, 36(1), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-11-2014-0131
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (2004). Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999-2002 values surveys. Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Regnér, P., Angwin, D., & Scholes, K. (2020). Exploring strategy (7th ed.) ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kampkötter, P., Harbring, C., & Sliwka, D. (2018). Job rotation and employee performance–evidence from a longitudinal study in the financial services industry. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(10), 1709–1735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1209227
   Google Scholar
• Keller, T. (2003). Parental images as a guide to leadership sensemaking: An attachment perspective on implicit leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00007-9
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Z. A., Bhat, S. J., & Hussanie, I. (2017). Understanding leadership theories-A review for researchers. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(5), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7315.2017.00313.6
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N., Mayfield, M., Mayfield, J., Sexton, S., & De La Garza, L. M. (2019). Empathetic leadership: How leader emotional support and understanding influences follower performance. Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies, 26(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818806290
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. -W. (2020). Motivational effect of performance management: Does leadership matter? Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 16(59), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.59E.4
   Google Scholar
• Ma, S., & Seidl, D. (2018). New CEOs and their collaborators: Divergence and convergence between the strategic leadership constellation and the top management team. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 606–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2721
   Google Scholar
• Maskey, R., Fei, J., & Nguyen, H. -O. (2018). Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(2), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006
   Google Scholar
• Mubarak, N., Khan, J., Yasmin, R., & Osmadi, A. (2021). The impact of a proactive personality on innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(7), 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2020-0518
   Google Scholar
• Muradli, N., Ahmadov, F., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2019). Managing contradiction and sustaining sustainability in inter organizational networks through leadership: A case study. Entrepreneurship Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 1255–1269. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(14)
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. C., & Reeves, S. L. (2019). Personal and organizational mindsets at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 39, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2020.100121
   Google Scholar
• Mwai, G., Namada, J., & Katuse, P. (2018). Does Leadership Style Influence Organizational Effectiveness in Non-Governmental Organizations. International Journal of Business and Management, 13(8), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v13n8p52
   Google Scholar
• Nantavisit, N., & Wongsa, S. (2022). Guidelines for Effectively Studying the Behavior of Leaders in the Tourism Sector Using Interactionism Model from a Strategic Management Perspective. Asia Social Issues, 15(2), 251502. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2022.251502
   Google Scholar
• Neffinger, J., & Kohut, M. (2014). Compelling people: The hidden qualities that make us influential. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Oshagbemi, T. (2004). Age influences on the leadership styles and behaviour of managers. Employee Relations, 26(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450410506878
   Google Scholar
• Oshagbemi, T. (2008). The impact of personal and organisational variables on the leadership styles of managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1896–1910. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802324130
   Google Scholar
• Oshagbemi, T., & Ocholi, S. A. (2006). Leadership styles and behaviour profiles of managers. Journal of Management Development, 25(8), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610684231
   Google Scholar
• Perpék, É., Győri, Á., & Lengyel, G. (2021). Preferred leadership style, managerial and entrepreneurial inclination among Hungarian students. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00174-4
   Google Scholar
• Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Matz-Costa, C. (2008). The multi-generational workforce: Workplace flexibility and engagement. Community, Work & Family, 11(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802021906
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. -Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., De Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner‐ries, D., Huber, T., Neumann, R. K., Oughton, E. A., & Sidoli Del Ceno, J. (2018). A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?. Restoration Ecology, 26, S7–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541
   Google Scholar
• Reif, J. A., Kugler, K. G., Stockkamp, M. T., Richter, S. S., Benning, V. M., Muschaweck, L. A., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2022). An employee-centered perspective on business processes: Measuring “healthy business processes” and their relationships with people and performance outcomes. Business Process Management Journal, 28(2), 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2021-0375
   Google Scholar
• Richman, A. L., Civian, J. T., Shannon, L. L., Jeffrey Hill, E., & Brennan, R. T. (2008). The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work–life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee engagement and expected retention. Community, Work & Family, 11(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802050350
   Google Scholar
• Ruben, B. D., & Gigliotti, R. A. (2021). Explaining incongruities between leadership theory and practice: Integrating theories of resonance, communication and systems. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(6), 942–957. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2021-0072
   Google Scholar
• Savić, D. (2020). COVID-19 and work from home: Digital transformation of the workforce. Grey Journal, 16(2), 101–104.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
   Google Scholar
• Schriesheim, C. A., & Neider, L. L. (1989). Leadership Theory and Development: The Coming ″new Phase ″. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 10(6), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001145
   Google Scholar
• Sekhar, C., Patwardhan, M., & Vyas, V. (2018). Linking work engagement to job performance through flexible human resource management. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422317743250
   Google Scholar
• Sims, C., Carter, A., & Moore De Peralta, A. (2021). Do servant, transformational, transactional, and passive avoidant leadership styles influence mentoring competencies for faculty? A study of a gender equity leadership development program. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21408
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. Y., & Stacey, R. (1997). Governance and cooperative networks: An adaptive systems perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00100-X
   Google Scholar
• Sokolic, D. (2022). Remote work and hybrid work organizations. Paper presented at the 78th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development, Aveiro, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. (2003). Complex responsive processes in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stansfeld, S., & Candy, B. (2006). Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 443–462. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40967597
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, E. J., Betley, E., Sigouin, A., Gomez, A., Toomey, A., Cullman, G., Malone, C., Pekor, A., Arengo, F., & Blair, M. (2017). Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological conservation, 209, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Suhariadi, F., Sugiartib, R., Hardaningtyasc, D., Mulyatid, R., Kurniasarie, E., Saadahf, N. Yumnif, H., & Abbas, A. (2023). Work from home: A behavioral model of Indonesian education workers’ productivity during Covid-19. Heliyon, 9(3), e14082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14082
   Google Scholar
• Surma, M. J., Nunes, R. J., Rook, C., & Loder, A. (2021). Assessing employee engagement in a Post-COVID-19 workplace ecosystem. Sustainability, 13(20), 11443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011443
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, L. B., le Roux, T., & Fourie, L. M. (2023). Who Should Be Identified as Internal Stakeholders? An Internal Communication Practitioner and Consultant Perspective in the South African Corporate Context. Communicatio, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2022.2163268
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, D., Kark, R., Matta, F., & Johnson, R. E. (2021). Collective aspirations: Collective regulatory focus as a mediator between transformational and transactional leadership and team creativity: Corrections. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(4), 735–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09699-z
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. M., Rodell, J. B., & Agolli, A. (2021). Daily engagement and productivity: The importance of the speed of engagement. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(9), 1579–1599. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000958
   Google Scholar
• Vollero, A., Siano, A., Palazzo, M., & Amabile, S. (2020). Hoftsede’s cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility in online communication: Are they independent constructs? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1773
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, I. (Ed.) (2009). Role Theory of Leadership. In Contemporary Leadership Theories: Enhancing the Understanding of the Complexity, Subjectivity and Dynamic of Leadership (pp. 75–83). Physica-Verlag HD.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, E., Kim, Y., & Hong, S. (2021). Does working from home work? Experience of working from home and the value of hybrid workplace post-COVID-19. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 25(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-04-2021-0015
   Google Scholar
• Yawson, R. (2020). Strategic flexibility analysis of HRD research and practice post COVID-19 pandemic. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1779169
   Google Scholar
• Yousef, D. A. (1998). Correlates of perceived leadership style in a culturally mixed environment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 19(5), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739810234341
   Google Scholar
• Yu, F., Deuble, R., & Morgan, H. (2017). Designing research data management services based on the research lifecycle–a consultative leadership approach. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 66(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2017.1364835
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. A. (2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.) ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. A. (2019). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., He, H., Treviño, L. K., Chao, M. M., & Wang, W. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower voice and performance: The role of follower identifications and entity morality beliefs. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 702–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.01.004
   Google Scholar