1,677
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MANAGEMENT

Diversification, government support, and firm performance

, ORCID Icon &
Article: 2215072 | Received 18 Aug 2021, Accepted 02 May 2023, Published online: 19 May 2023

References

  • Abdullah, H., & Tursoy, T. (2021). Capital structure and firm performance: Evidence of Germany under IFRS adoption. Review of Managerial Science, 15(2), 379–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00344-5
  • Adesina, K. S. (2021). How diversification affects bank performance: The role of human capital. Economic Modelling, 94, 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.10.016
  • Alouane, N., Kahloul, I., & Grira, J. (2022). The trilogy of ownership, income diversification, and performance nexus: Empirical evidence from Tunisian Banks. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102180
  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
  • Amit, R., & Livnat, J. (1988). Diversification and the Risk-Return Trade-off. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/256502
  • Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113–124.
  • Berry, C. H. (2015). Corporate Growth and Diversification. In Corporate Growth and Diversification. Princeton University Press. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400872961/html
  • Bettis, R. A. (1981). Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250020406
  • Cano-Kollmann, M., Hamilton, R. D., III, & Mudambi, R. (2017). Public support for innovation and the openness of firms’ innovation activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw025
  • Capar, N., & Kotabe, M. (2003). The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400036
  • Chang, S. -C., & Wang, C. -F. (2007). The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.11.002
  • Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1991). The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120104
  • Chauvet, L., & Ferry, M. (2021). Taxation, infrastructure, and firm performance in developing countries. Public Choice, 187(3), 455–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00788-4
  • Chen, S. -S., & Ho, K. W. (2000). Corporate diversification, ownership structure, and firm value: The Singapore evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 9(3), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-5219(00)00032-6
  • Chen, C. -J., & Yu, C. -M.J. (2012). Managerial ownership, diversification, and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. International Business Review, 21(3), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.06.002
  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2
  • Delios, A., Zhou, N., & Xu, W. W. (2008). Ownership structure and the diversification and performance of publicly-listed companies in China. Business Horizons, 51(6), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.06.004
  • Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.002
  • Dinh Nguyen, D., To, T. H., Nguyen, D. V., Phuong Do, H., & McMillan, D. (2021). Managerial overconfidence and dividend policy in Vietnamese enterprises. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1885195. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1885195
  • Du, J., Bian, C., & Gan, C. (2017). Bank competition, government intervention, and SME debt financing. China Finance Review International, 7(4), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-02-2017-0007
  • George, R., & Kabir, R. (2012). Heterogeneity in business groups and the corporate diversification–firm performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.005
  • Geringer, J. M., Beamish, P. W., & Dacosta, R. C. (1989). Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for mne performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100202
  • Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S., & Olsen, D. M. (2000). Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<51::AID-SMJ77>3.0.CO;2-K
  • Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45(6), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.002
  • Guo, F., Zou, B., Zhang, X., Bo, Q., & Li, K. (2020). Financial slack and firm performance of SMMEs in China: Moderating effects of government subsidies and market-supporting institutions. International Journal of Production Economics, 223, 107530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107530
  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798. https://doi.org/10.2307/256948
  • Jugend, D., Fiorini, P. D. C., Armellini, F., & Ferrari, A. G. (2020). Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 156, 119985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119985
  • Jugend, D., Jabbour, C. J. C., Alves Scaliza, J. A., Rocha, R. S., Junior, J. A. G., Latan, H., & Salgado, M. H. (2018). Relationships among open innovation, innovative performance, government support and firm size: Comparing Brazilian firms embracing different levels of radicalism in innovation. Technovation, 74–75, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.004
  • Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1989). Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100105
  • Le, V., & Harvie, C. (2010). Firm performance in Vietnam: Evidence from manufacturing small and medium enterprises. Faculty of Business - Economics Working Papers. https://ro.uow.edu.au/commwkpapers/221
  • Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). International Diversification and Firm Performance: The S-curve Hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159604
  • Luo, X., Huang, F., Tang, X., & Li, J. (2021). Government subsidies and firm performance: Evidence from high-tech start-ups in China. Emerging Markets Review, 49, 100756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100756
  • Meyer, M., Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Organizational Prospects, Influence Costs, and Ownership Changes. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1992.00009.x
  • Myers, S. C. (1984). Capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/2327916
  • Nguyen, T. T., Ho, H. H., Nguyen, D. V., Pham, A. C., & Nguyen, T. T. (2021). The effects of business model on bank’s stability. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9030046
  • OECD. (2021) . SME and Entrepreneurship Policy in Viet Nam. OECD Research on SMEs and Startups.
  • Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1981). Economies of scope. The American Economic Review, 71(2), 268–272.
  • Park, K., & Jang, S. (2012). Effect of diversification on firm performance: Application of the entropy measure. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.03.011
  • Park, K., & Jang, S. (. (2013a). Capital structure, free cash flow, diversification and firm performance: A holistic analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.01.007
  • Park, K., & Jang, S. (. (2013b). Effects of within-industry diversification and related diversification strategies on firm performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.02.009
  • Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Pils, F. (2009). Diversification, Relatedness, and Performance. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Porter, M. E. (1989). From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. In D. Asch & C. Bowman (Eds.), Readings in Strategic Management (pp. 234–255). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_17
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1997). The Core Competence of the Corporation. In D. Hahn & B. Taylor (Eds.), Strategische Unternehmungsplanung/Strategische Unternehmungsführung: Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen (pp. 969–987). Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41482-8_46
  • Rajan, R., Servaes, H., & Zingales, L. (2000). The Cost of Diversity: The Diversification Discount and Inefficient Investment. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 35–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00200
  • Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 3(4), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030407
  • Sohl, T., McCann, B. T., & Vroom, G. (2022). Business model diversification: Demand relatedness, entry sequencing, and curvilinearity in the diversification-performance relationship. Long Range Planning, 55(6), 102215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102215
  • Tanriverdi, H., & Venkatraman, N. (2005). Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.435
  • Tapanainen, T., Dao, K. T., Thanh, H. N. T., Nguyen, H. T., Dang, N. B., & Nguyen, N. D. (2022). Impact of dynamic capabilities and firm characteristics on the firm performance of Vietnamese small and medium-sized retail enterprises. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 21(1), 28–61. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2022.120539
  • Teirlinck, P. (2017). Is there an industry-science mismatch in the Brussels agglomeration? Evidence from knowledge spillovers in innovation active SMEs in knowledge intensive business services (KIBS). Brussels Studies La Revue Scientifique Pour Les Recherches Sur Bruxelles/Het Wetenschappelijk Tijdschrift Voor Onderzoek over Brussel/The Journal of Research on Brussels. https://doi.org/10.4000/brussels.1467
  • Thi Viet Nguyen, N., Nguyen, C. T. K., Ho, P. T. M., Thi Nguyen, H., Van Nguyen, D., & McMillan, D. (2021). How does capital structure affect firm’s market competitiveness? Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 2002501. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2002501
  • Vu, T. -H., Nguyen, V. -D., Ho, M. -T., & Vuong, Q. -H. (2019). Determinants of Vietnamese Listed Firm Performance: Competition, Wage, CEO, Firm Size, Age, and International Trade. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12020062
  • Williamson, O. E. (1967). Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size. Journal of Political Economy, 75(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1086/259258
  • Winter, S. G. (2009). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In Teece (Ed.), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital (pp. 165–187). Routledge.
  • Wu, W., Wu, C., Zhou, C., & Wu, J. (2012). Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.005