Linking internal stakeholders’ pressure and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices: The moderating role of organizational culture

References

• Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adomako, S., & Tran, M. D. (2022). Stakeholder management, CSR commitment, corporate social performance: The moderating role of uncertainty in CSR regulation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1414–1423. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/256973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the s back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1057–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Amin-Chaudhry, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility-from a mere concept to an expected business practice. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(1), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2015-0033
   Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulou, A., & Selsky, J. W. (2015). The social context of corporate social responsibility: Enriching research with multiple perspectives and multiple levels. Business and Society, 54(3), 322–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312449260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Haim, A., & Karassin, O. (2018). A multilevel model of responsibility towards employees as a dimension of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 8(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v8n3p1
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator variable distinction in social psychological research conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105278021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, T. E., Atinc, G., Breaugh, J. A., Carlson, K. D., Edwards, J. R., & Spector, P. E. (2016). Statistical control in correlational studies: 10 essential recommendations for organizational researchers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. A., Ferron, J. M., & Kromrey, J. D. (2008). Cluster size in multilevel models: The impact of sparse data structures on point and interval estimates in two-level models. Section on Survey Research Methods – JSM proceedings (pp. 1122–1129).
   Google Scholar
• Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2016). Examining the association between stakeholder culture, stakeholder salience, and stakeholder engagement activities: An empirical study. Management Decision, 54(4), 815–831. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2015-0245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. University of Iowa Press, Iowa city, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (1997). Business and society: What’s in a name. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 5(2), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028867
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., & Ettington, D. R. (1988). The conceptual foundation of organizational culture. Working Paper #544. Divsion of Research, School of Business Administration, University of Michigan foundation of organizational culture. (544)
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. based on the competing values framework. (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Campanelli, P. (2008). Testing Survey questions. In E. de Leeuw, J. Hox, & D. Dillman (Eds.), Internatonal Handbook of Survey Methodology (pp. 176–200). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. D., & Wu, J. (2012). The illusion of statistical control: control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111428817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-68139190005-G
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (2000). A commentary and an overview of key questions on corporate social performance measurement. Business & Society, 39(4), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900406
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, Z., Wang, L., & Lai, F. (2018). Customer pressure and green innovations at third party logistics providers in China: The moderation effect of organizational culture. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2017-0294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/258888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. second). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). Interaction, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity: Implications for multiple regression. Journal of Management, 19(4), 915–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639301900411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 767–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culler, C. (2010). Good works: Assessing the relationship between organizational culture, corporate social responsibility programs, and weberian theory. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 3(13), 357–374.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, J., Chan, H. K., & Yee, R. W. Y. (2018). Examining moderating effect of organizational culture on the relationship between market pressure and corporate environmental strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 74, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amato, A., & Falivena, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Do firm size and age matter? Empirical evidence from European listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Aprile, G., Mannarini, T., & Robinson, S. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: A psychosocial multidimensional construct. Journal of Global Responsibility, 3(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561211219283
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society, 44(3), 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278086
   Google Scholar
• Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, S., Burritt, R., & Qian, W. (2014). Salient stakeholders in corporate social responsibility reporting by Chinese mining and minerals companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.012
   Google Scholar
• El Akremi, A., Gond, J. P., Swaen, V., De Roeck, K., & Igalens, J. (2018). How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of Management, 44(2), 619–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315569311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2003). Using the expectation maximization algorithm to estimate coefficient alpha for scales with item-level missing data. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshetu, O. M. (2019). The role of corporate social responsibility on employees organizational commitment ; with a mediating affect of organizational justice: A case of Gondar City, bank sector, Ethiopia. Research Journal of Commerce & Behavioural Science, 8(6), 8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Eyasu, A. M., Endale, M., & Ntim, C. G. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in agro-processing and garment industry: Evidence from Ethiopia. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1720945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faller, C. M., & Zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2016). Does equity ownership matter for corporate social responsibility? A literature review of theories and recent empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 15–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3122-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9677-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fentaw, T. (2016). Environmental social responsible practices of hospitality industry: The case of first level hotels and lodges in Gondar city, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 9(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v9i2.11
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. F., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, W. C. (1960). Business responsibility. Califonia Management Review, 2(4), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, E. R. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for Stakeholders. Survival, Reputation, and Success. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(3), 258–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbreath, J. (2010). Drivers of corporate social responsibility: The role of formal strategic planning and firm culture. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00633.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemechu, S., Fiseha, S., & Yirga, M. (2020). Assessment of corporate social responsibility: The case of manufacturing companies in gurage zone, Ethiopia. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 39(16), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i1630780
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9080-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Rodríguez, M. R., Martín-Samper, R. C., Köseoglu, M. A., & Okumus, F. (2019). Hotels’ corporate social responsibility practices, organizational culture, firm reputation, and performance. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(3), 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1585441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailu, F. K., & Rao, K. R. M. (2016). Perception of local community on corporate social responsibility of brewery firms in Ethiopia. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(3), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.21275/v5i3.nov161816
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Andersen, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Helmig, B., Spraul, K., & Ingenhoff, D. (2016). Under positive pressure: how stakeholder pressure affects corporate social responsibility implementation. Business and Society, 55(2), 151–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313477841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Arzaba, J. C., Nazir, S., Leyva-Hernández, S. N., & Muhyaddin, S. (2022). Stakeholder Pressure engaged with circular economy principles and economic and environmental performance. Sustainability, 14(23), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D. A. (2002). Issues in multilevel research: Theory development, measurement, and analysis. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 247–274). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., Maas, C. J. M., & Brinkhuis, M. J. S. (2010). The effect of estimation method and sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling. Statistica Neerlandica, 64(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? the role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834–864. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaakson, K., Reino, A., & Mõtsmees, P. (2012). Is there a coherence between organizational culture and changes in corporate social responsibility in an economic downturn? Baltic Journal of Management, 7(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261211219813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, A., & Aggrawal, V. S. (2020). Institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility implementation: A study of Indian executives. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(4), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2018-0311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23463924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose, P. E. (2013). Doing statistical mediation & moderation. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karassin, O., & Bar-Haim, A. (2016). Explaining corporate social performance through multilevel analysis. In L. Rayman-Bacchus & P. R. Walsh (Eds.), Corporate responsibility and sustainable development: Exploring the nexus of private and public interests (pp. 119–148). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karassin, O., & Bar-Haim, A. (2019). How regulation effects corporate social responsibility: Corporate environmental performance under different regulatory scenarios. World Political Science, 15(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/wps-2019-0005
   Google Scholar
• Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10693-000
   Google Scholar
• Klonoski, R. J. (1991). Foundational considerations in the corporate social responsibility debate. Business Horizons, 34(4), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-68139190002-D
   Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk, R. (2019). Relationships between stakeholder pressure, culture, and CSR practices in the context of project management in the construction industry in Poland. Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, Granada, Spain (pp. 5663–5671).
   Google Scholar
• Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Kim, H. (2017). Exploring the organizational culture’s moderating role of effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm performance: Focused on corporate contributions in Korea. Sustainability, 9(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational stages and cultural phases: A critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00278.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly, J. E. (2017). Corporate social performance: A review of empirical research examining the corporation–society relationship using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini social ratings data. Business and Society, 56(6), 796–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315585761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, M. J., Gangloff, A. K., & Shook, C. L. (2015). Examining multi-level effects on corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility Matthew. Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 10(3), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2015-0013
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 571–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0441-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulugeta, A., & Muhammednur, H. (2020). Determinants of corporate social responsibility practice of manufacturing firms in dire Dawa administration. Developing Country Studies, 10(6), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.7176/dcs/10-6-04
   Google Scholar
• Mzembe, A. N., & Meaton, J. (2014). Driving corporate social responsibility in the Malawian mining industry: A stakeholder perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(4), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogola, F. O., & Mària, J. F. (2020). Mechanisms for development in corporate citizenship: A multi-level review. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-020-00051-5
   Google Scholar
• Oh, W. Y., Cha, J., & Chang, Y. K. (2017). Does ownership structure matter? The effects of insider and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2914-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.2307/256404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlitzky, M., Louche, C., Gond, J. P., & Chapple, W. (2017). Unpacking the drivers of corporate social performance: A multilevel, multistakeholder, and multimethod analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2822-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocelli, J. V. (2003). Hierarchical multiple regression in counseling research: Common problems and possible remedies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2003.12069076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornel, J. B., Balinas, V. T., & Saldaña, G. A. (2011). Nearest-integer response from normally-distributed opinion model for likert scale. The Philippine Statistician, 60(1), 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Pornel, J. B., & Saldaña, G. A. (2013). Four common misuses of the likert scale. Philippine Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18(2), 12–19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309240449
   Google Scholar
• Potluri, R. M., & Temesgen, Z. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: An attitude of Ethiopian corporates. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(4), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110810909867
   Google Scholar
• Preston, L. E. (1975). Corporation and society: The search for a paradigm. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(2), 434–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravasi, D., & Schulz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2008). Integrating and unifying competing and complementary frameworks: The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business and Society, 47(2), 148–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650306297942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexty, R. W. (2017). Canadian business and society ethics, responsibilities, and sustainability (4th ed.). McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Shanak, H. S. H., Said, R. M., Abdullah, A., Daud, Z. M., & Abu-Alhaija, A. S. (2020). Corporate Organizational Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility Activities: An Empirical Evidence from Jordan and Palestine. International Journal of Business and Economy, 2(2), 90–103.
   Google Scholar
• Sirsly, C. A. T. (2009). 75 years of lessons learned: Chief executive officer values and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management History, 15(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511340910921808
   Google Scholar
• Siyal, S., Ahmad, R., Riaz, S., Xin, C., & Fangcheng, T. (2022). The impact of corporate culture on corporate social responsibility: Role of Reputation and corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 14(16), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavova, I. (2015). Social responsible business practices in Bulgaria: Change in organizational culture. Trakia Journal of Science, 13(Suppl. 1), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2015.s.01.036
   Google Scholar
• Smid, S. C., & Rosseel, Y. (2020). SEM with small samples: Two-step modeling and factor score regression versus Bayesian estimation with informative priors. In R. van de Schoot & M. Miocevic (Eds.), Small sample solutions (pp. 239–254). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or How? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis. An Introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, D. L. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 506–521. https://doi.org/10.2307/259139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Q., Liu, Y., & Fan, J. (2015). The effects of external stakeholder pressure and ethical leadership on corporate social responsibility in China. Journal of Management and Organization, 21(4), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, H., & Tian, J. (2021). The mediating role of responsible innovation in the relationship between stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance in times of crisis: Evidence from selected regions in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, J. B., & Tews, M. J. (2005). Construct validity of a general training climate scale. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsegaw, S., & Yohannes, W. (2019). Factors affecting the practices of corporate social responsibility in the health sector: Empirical evidence from local hospitals in Ethiopia. International Research Journal of Management and Commerce, 6(1), 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Uvaneswaran, S. M., Zemen, T., & Ahmed, S. M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices of business organizations in South Wollo Region - Ethiopia. Studies and Scientific Researches Economics Edition, 30(30), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.29358/sceco.v0i30.427
   Google Scholar
• Valiente, A. J. M., Ayerbe, C. G., & Figueras, M. S. (2012). Social responsibility practices and evaluation of corporate social performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen, D., & Egberts, M. (2020). The importance of collaboration in bayesian analyses with small samples. In R. van de Schoot & M. Miocevic (Eds.), Small sample size solutions. A guide for applied researchers and practitioners (pp. 50–69). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, P., Chen, X., & Ke, Y. (2020). Does corporate integrity culture matter to corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2015). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 55(8), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling applications using mplus. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118356258
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718. https://doi.org/10.2307/258977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D. J., & Cochran, P. L. (1992). Business and society in transition. Business & Society, 31(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039203100101
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028831
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. J., Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Bryan, L. M. (2018). Stakeholder identification and salience after twenty years: progress, problems, and prospects. Business and Society, 60(1), 196–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318816522
   Google Scholar
• Ying, M., Shan, H., & Tikuye, G. A. (2022). How do stakeholder pressures affect corporate social responsibility adoption? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 14(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., & Choi, Y. (2016). Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: The mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. Social Science Journal, 53(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar