761
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ACCOUNTING, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & BUSINESS ETHICS

A holistic success model for sustainable e-learning based on the stakeholder approach: Case of Vietnamese students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Article: 2236298 | Received 17 Apr 2023, Accepted 02 Jul 2023, Published online: 18 Jul 2023

References

  • Ahmad, N., Quadri, N. N., Qureshi, M. R. N., & Alam, M. M. Relationship modeling of critical success factors for enhancing sustainability and performance in E-Learning. (2018). Sustainability, 10(12), 4776. Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124776
  • Al-Adwan, A. S., Albelbisi, N. A., Hujran, O., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alkhalifah, A. Developing a holistic success model for sustainable E-Learning: A structural equation modeling approach. (2021). Sustainability, 13(16), 9453. Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169453
  • Al-Adwan, A. S., Nofal, M., Akram, H., Albelbisi, N. A., & Al-Okaily, M. (2022). Towards a sustainable adoption of e-learning systems: The role of self-directed learning. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 21, 245–17. https://doi.org/10.28945/4980
  • Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
  • Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
  • Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Díaz-García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education, 100, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.002
  • Al Mulhem, A., & Wang, S. (2020). Investigating the effects of quality factors and organizational factors on university students’ satisfaction of e-learning system quality. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1787004. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1787004
  • Alzahrani, A. I., Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., Alfarraj, O., & Alalwan, N. (2019). Modelling digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success model. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617726123
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS (Version 7.0) Computer software and manual. SPSS.
  • Bauk, S., Šćepanović, S., & Kopp, M. (2014). Estimating students’ satisfaction with web based learning system in blended learning environment. Education Research International, 2014, e731720. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/731720
  • Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
  • Chakraborty, P., Mittal, P., Gupta, M. S., Yadav, S., & Arora, A. (2021). Opinion of students on online education during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 357–365.
  • Chen, M., Chen, C. C., & Sheldon, O. J. (2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1082. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000111
  • Cheng, Y.-M. (2014). Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses’ continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2013-0024
  • Cheok, M. L., & Wong, S. L. (2015). Predictors of E-Learning satisfaction in teaching and learning for school teachers: A literature review. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.816a
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
  • Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., Sun, S. Y., Lin, T. C., & Sun, P. C. (2005). Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions. Computers & Education, 45(4), 399–416.
  • Christian, D. D., McCarty, D. L., & Brown, C. L. (2021). Experiential education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A reflective process. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 34(3), 264–277.
  • Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., DiFelice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001
  • Dahms, M.-L., & Zakaria, H. L. (2015). Institutional capacities in e-learning and problem based learning at Universities and University Colleges in Tanzania and Ghana. In Institutional capacities in e-learning and problem based learning at Universities and University Colleges in Tanzania and Ghana [Report] (p. 46). Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University. 978-87-91404-76-4.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Dawadi, S., Giri, R. A., & Simkhada, P. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the education sector in Nepal: Challenges and coping strategies. In Online Submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED609894
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  • Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  • Farooq, S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic Markovic, M., & Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of Lecture Capture System (LCS) in Executive Business Studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology & Smart Education, 14(4), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2016-0015
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Sage Publications Sage CA.
  • Goh, C. F., Leong, C. M., Kasmin, K., Hii, P., & Tan, K. (2017). Students’ experiences, learning outcomes and satisfaction in e-learning. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1298
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis, 7th penyunt. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hằng, V. T., & Tuân, N. M. (2013). Tích hợp các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến hài lòng của người học vào hệ thống e-Learning: một tình huống tại Trường Đại học Kinh tế-Luật. Tạp chí Khoa học, 53, 24.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
  • Islam, A. K. M. N. (2013). Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the university context. Computers & Education, 69, 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.037
  • Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
  • Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
  • Lassoued, Z., Alhendawi, M., & Bashitialshaaer, R. An exploratory study of the obstacles for achieving quality in distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2020). Education Sciences, 10(9), 232. Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090232
  • Lee, J.-W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002
  • Lee, S. J., Lee, H., & Kim, T. T. A study on the instructor role in dealing with mixed contents: How it affects learner satisfaction and retention in e-learning. (2018). Sustainability, 10(3), 850. Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030850
  • Maqableh, M., Jaradat, M., & Azzam, A. (2021). Exploring the determinants of students’ academic performance at university level: The mediating role of internet usage continuance intention. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10453-y
  • Martins, J., Branco, F., Gonçalves, R., Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., Oliveira, T., Naranjo-Zolotov, M., & Cruz-Jesus, F. (2019). Assessing the success behind the use of education management information systems in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.001
  • Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and is success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044
  • Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
  • Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
  • Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2623–2656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1
  • Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696.
  • Sabeh, H. N., Husin, M. H., Kee, D. M. H., Baharudin, A. S., & Abdullah, R. (2021). A systematic review of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success in an E-learning context (2010–2020). IEEE Access, 9, 81210–81235. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3084815
  • Salam, M., & Farooq, M. S. (2020). Does sociability quality of web-based collaborative learning information system influence students’ satisfaction and system usage? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00189-z
  • Seta, H., Wati, T., Muliawati, A., & Hidayanto, A. (2018). E-Learning success model: An extention of DeLone & McLean IS’ success model. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.52549/ijeei.v6i3.505
  • Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: The group comparison between male and female. Quality & Quantity, 55(3), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
  • Tú, T. H. C., Anh, B. T., Huệ, T. T. P., & Tân, H. (2020). SỰ THAY ĐỔI CỦA VAI TRÒ GIẢNG VIÊN TRONG THỜI ĐẠI SỐ–MỘT NGHIÊN CỨU TẠI TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC NGUYỄN TẤT THÀNH. Tạp Chí Khoa Học, 17(11), 2099. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.17.11.2920(2020)
  • Turugare, M., & Rudhumbu, N. (2020). Integrating technology in teaching and learning in universities in Lesotho: Opportunities and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3593–3612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10093-3
  • Williams, G., & Smith, A. (2018). A longitudinal study of the well-being of students using the Student Wellbeing Process Questionnaire (Student WPQ). Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 24(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2018/40105
  • Wong, R. (2023). When no one can go to school: Does online learning meet students’ basic learning needs?. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 434–450.
  • Yakubu, N., & Dasuki, S. (2018). Assessing eLearning Systems Success in Nigeria: An Application of the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 17, 183–203. https://doi.org/10.28945/4077
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2015). Self-Regulated Learning: Theories, Measures, and Outcomes. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 541–546). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26060-1