How leader member exchange affects effectiveness of performance appraisal system: A chain of reactions model

References

• Adam, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–21). Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60097-0
   Google Scholar
• Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoun, B., Eyoun, K., Chen, H., & Arasli, F. (2022). Mapping the relationships between hotel employees’ perceptions of performance appraisal fairness, satisfaction, and psychological contract. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality and Tourism, 21(4), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2022.2106618
   Google Scholar
• Babagana, S. A., Mat, N., & Ibrahim, H. (2019). Effectiveness of performance appraisal (EPA): Does distributive fairness and employee participation matter?: A conceptual framework. Sains Humanika, 11(2–2), 11(2–2. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v11n2-2.1654
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600219
   Google Scholar
• Chouhan, V., Chandra, B., Goswami, S., & Verma, P. (2016). Analyzing the performance appraisal system of a public sector organization in India: The case of Rajasthan State mines and minerals limited. IUP Journal of Management Research, 15(1), 48–74. https://www.iupindia.in/1601/Management%20Research/Analyzing_the_Performance.html
   Google Scholar
• Cogliser, C. C., Schriesheim, C. A., Scandura, T. A., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader–member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., & Zipay, K. P. (2015). Justice, fairness, and employee reactions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111457
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., & Crossman, A. (2004). Satisfaction with performance appraisal systems: A study of role perceptions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(5), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410543605
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, S., Henning, J., & Payne, S. (2013). Performance appraisal satisfaction: The role of feedback and goal orientation. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(4), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dansereau, F., Jr., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darehzereshki, M. (2013). Effects of performance appraisal quality on job satisfaction in multinational companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, 2(1), 1–18. http://www.ijecbs.com/January2013/5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dusterhoff, C., Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. N. (2014). The effects of performance rating, leader–member exchange, perceived utility, and organizational justice on performance appraisal satisfaction: Applying a moral judgment perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1634-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader–member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elicker, J. D., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006). The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process. Journal of Management, 32(4), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306286622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00070-0
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B., & Enders, J. (2007). Support from the top: Supervisors’ perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García‐Izquierdo, A. L., Moscoso, S., & Ramos‐Villagrasa, P. J. (2012). Reactions to the fairness of promotion methods: Procedural justice and job satisfaction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(4), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getnet, B., Jebena, T., & Tsegaye, A. (2014). The effect of employees’ fairness perception on their satisfaction towards the performance appraisal practices. International Journal of Management & Commerce Innovations, 2(1), 174–210. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15768.96004
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/257990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greller, M. M. (1978). The nature of subordinate participation in the appraisal interview. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4), 646–658. https://doi.org/10.2307/255705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7 ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz, B. C. (2015). From first impression to fairness perception: Investigating the impact of initial trustworthiness beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 499–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcout, Brace, and World.
   Google Scholar
• Ikramullah, M., Van Prooijen, J.-W., Iqbal, M. Z., & Ul-Hassan, F. S. (2016). Effectiveness of performance appraisal: Developing a conceptual framework using competing values approach. Personnel Review, 45(2), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2014-0164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal, M. Z. (2012). Expanded dimensions of the purposes and uses of performance appraisal. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 17(1), 23. http://web.usm.my/aamj/17.1.2012/AAMJ_17.1.3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jawahar, I. (2007). The influence of perceptions of fairness on performance appraisal reactions. Journal of Labor Research, 28(4), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-007-9014-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawahar, I. (2010). The mediating role of appraisal feedback reactions on the relationship between rater feedback-related behaviors and ratee performance. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 494–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110378294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Truxillo, D. M., Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., & Hammer, L. (2009). Perceptions of overall fairness: Are effects on job performance moderated by leader-member exchange? Human Performance, 22(5), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280903248427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A. (2021). Exploring the perceptions of educational supervisors and their impact on teachers’ performance appraisals (TPA) in khyber pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. The Dialogue, 16(2), 12–27. https://journals.qurtuba.edu.pk/ojs/index.php/thedialogue/article/view/109
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. Y., & Park, S. M. (2017). Antecedents and outcomes of acceptance of performance appraisal system in Korean non-profit organizations. Public Management Review, 19(4), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1195436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusumah, A., Irwan, H., Indrayanto, A., & Setiawan, I. (2021). A mediating and moderating role on employee performance appraisal. Management Research Review, 44(12), 1639–1659. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2020-0701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuvaas, B. (2011). The interactive role of performance appraisal reactions and regular feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941111102164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6), 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader‐member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(6), 723–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 952. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lira, M. (2014). Satisfaction with a performance appraisal system in the Portuguese public sector: The importance of perceptions of justice and accuracy. Tékhne, 12, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tekhne.2015.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Longenecker, C. O., Liverpool, P. R., & Wilson, K. Y. (1988). An assessment of manager subordinate perceptions of performance appraisal effectiveness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2(4), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013763
   Google Scholar
• Long, C. S., Kowang, T. O., Ismail, W. K. W., & Rasid, S. Z. A. (2013). A review on performance appraisal system: An ineffective and destructive practice. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(7), 887–891. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.7.2174
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, G., & Farooqi, R. (2013). Exploring employee satisfaction with performance management and the challenges faced in context of IT industry. Compensation & Benefits Review, 45(6), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368714525016
   Google Scholar
• Mok Kim Man, M., & Yie Yeen, L. (2021). Factors affecting the effectiveness of employees’ performance appraisal in private hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(1), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3174.2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nease, A. A., Mudgett, B. O., & Quiñones, M. A. (1999). Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 806. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
   Google Scholar
• Pettijohn, C. E., Pettijohn, L. S., & d’Amico, M. (2001). Characteristics of performance appraisals and their impact on sales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.4
   Google Scholar
• Pichler, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta ananalysis. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 709–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichler, S. (2019). Performance Appraisal Reactions: A Review and Research Agenda. In Steelman, Lisa A., & Williams, Jane R. (Eds.), Feedback at Work (pp. 75–96). Springer Nature. 3030309150, 9783030309152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30915-2_5
   Google Scholar
• Pichler, S., Varma, A., Michel, J. S., Levy, P. E., Budhwar, P. S., & Sharma, A. (2016). Leader member exchange, group and individual level procedural justice and reactions to performance appraisals. Human Resource Management, 55(5), 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, R., & Sharples, D. (2012). The impact of rater agreeableness and rating context on the evaluation of poor performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-8325.002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, E. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research Methods for Business Students (7 ed.). Pearson Education. https://worldcat.org/title/1001708543
   Google Scholar
• Scaduto, A., Hunt, B., & Schmerling, D. (2015). A performance management solution: Productivity measurement and enhancement system (ProMES). Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.4
   Google Scholar
• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sudin, S. (2011). Fairness of and satisfaction with performance appraisal process. Journal of Global Management, 2(1), 66–83. https://ideas.repec.org/a/grg/03mngt/v2y2011i1p66-83.html
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K., & Fisher, D. (2005). Action inquiry and performance appraisals: Tools for organizational learning and development. The Learning Organization, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470510574241
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Wang, X., & Song, D. (2019). The impact of leader-member exchange relationship on employee performance appraisal reaction: The mediating role of organizational justice. Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Conference of the Society for Management and Economics, Hangzhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. P. (2002). Perceptual dimensions of performance appraisal management systems in the eyes of different sample categories. International Journal of Management, 19(2), 184–193. https://www.proquest.com/docview/233231044?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true#
   Google Scholar
• Xervaser, A. U., Ahmad, R., Bandar, N. F. A., & Abdullah, S. M. (2016). Perceived fairness in performance appraisal system and its relationship with work performance. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 1(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.199.2016
   Google Scholar