Work from home and collective creativity: Exploring the experiences of IT professionals

References

• Akkermans, J., Richardson, J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2020). The covid-19 crisis as a career shock: Implications for careers and vocational behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal Academy of Management, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amigoni, G. (2021). Physical, digital, and hybrid workspaces: From the process of creation to the process of use. In T. Bayón, M. Eisend, J. Koch, A. Söllner, M. Vodosek, & H.-T. Wagner (Eds.), Dynamic capabilities and relationships: Discourses, concepts, and reflections (pp. 127–143). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., & Kelliher, C. (2020). Enforced remote working and the work-life interface during lockdown. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(7/8), 677–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-07-2020-0224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235:AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babapour Chafi, M., Hultberg, A., & Bozic Yams, N. (2021). Post-pandemic office work: Perceived challenges and opportunities for a sustainable work environment. Sustainability, 14(1), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badke-Schaub, P., & Buerschaper, C. (2001). Creativity and complex problem solving in the social context. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9827-9_9
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Ainsworth, S. E., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Are groups more or less than the sum of their members? The moderating role of individual identification. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x15000618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, Z. H., Yousuf, U., & Saba, N. (2023). Revolutionizing work-life balance: Unleashing the power of telecommuting on work engagement and exhaustion levels. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2242160. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2242160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Bonnardel, N., Burkhardt, J.-M., Thornhill-Miller, B., Pahlavan, F., Buisine, S., Guegan, J., Pichot, N., & Lubart, T. (2022). Immersive virtual environments’ impact on individual and collective creativity a review of recent research. European Psychologist, 27(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, C. O. (2001). Phenomenology the method. In P. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (Vol. 3, pp. 93–122). NLN Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Breene, K. (2016). The 10 countries best prepared for the new digital economy. World Economic Forum Retrieved January 9 from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/07/countries-best-prepared-for-the-new-digital-economy/
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur, A., Gray, D., Islam, A., & Bhuiyan, S. (2021). A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(4), 1007–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brucks, M. S., & Levav, J. (2022). Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation. Nature, 605(7908), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04643-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., Horton, J., Ozimek, A., Rock, D., Sharma, G., & Hong, T. (2020). COVID-19 and remote Work: An early look at US data.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, W., Khapova, S., Bossink, B., Lysova, E., & Yuan, J. (2020). Optimizing employee creativity in the digital era: Uncovering the interactional effects of abilities, motivations, and opportunities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 1038. Article 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). Leadership, creative problem-solving capacity, and creative performance: The importance of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 52(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamakiotis, P., Dekoninck, E. A., & Panteli, N. (2013). Factors influencing creativity in virtual design teams: An interplay between technology, teams and individuals. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamakiotis, P., & Panteli, N. (2017). Leading the creative process: The case of virtual product design. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). Balancing governance capacity and legitimacy: How the Norwegian government handled the COVID ‐19 crisis as a high performer. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 774–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirella, S. (2016). Organizational variables for developing collective creativity in business: A case from an Italian fashion design company. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(3), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirella, S. (2021). Managing collective creativity: Organizational variables to support creative teamwork. European Management Review, 18(4), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(4), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4 ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L., Schruijer, S. G. L., & Fodor, O. C. (2022). Minority dissent, openness to change and group creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 34(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.2018833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marchis, G. P., & Shchebetenko, S. (2022). Creativity studies within the European Union: A bibliometric analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2067961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex problem solving: What it is and what it is not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Ovidio, M., & Gandini, A. (2019). The functions of social interaction in the knowledge-creative economy: Between co-presence and ICT-mediated social relations [social interactions; co-presence; ICT-mediated interactions; knowledge-creative workers; Milan]. Sociologica, 13(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/9388
   Google Scholar
• Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414845
   Google Scholar
• Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish University. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englander, M. (2012). The interview: Data collection in descriptive phenomenological human scientific research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916212X632943
   Google Scholar
• Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (1995). Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. Universitätsbibliothek der Universität Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Gaggioli, A., Mazzoni, E., Benvenuti, M., Galimberti, C., Bova, A., Brivio, E., Cipresso, P., Riva, G., & Chirico, A. (2020). Networked flow in creative collaboration: A mixed method study. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, A., & Garavaglia, E. (2023). ‘Another work routine is possible’: Everyday experiences of (unexpected) remote work in Italy. Culture and Organization, 29(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2023.2201003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., & Danziger, J. N. (2007). Which telework? Defining and testing a taxonomy of technology-mediated work at a distance. Social Science Computer Review, 25(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439306293819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. (2020). From ‘social distancing’ to ‘care in connecting’: An emerging Organizational research agenda for Turbulent times. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(2), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2020.0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. (1985). Phenomenology and psychological research. Duquesne university press.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, V.-P. (2011). How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers. Theory & Psychology, 21(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310372152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, T. D., & Raghuram, S. (2010). Teleworker knowledge sharing and the role of altered relational and technological interactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(8), 1061–1085. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalo, J. A., & Duguid, M. M. (2012). Follow the crowd in a new direction: When conformity pressure facilitates group creativity (and when it does not). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guegan, J., Segonds, F., Barré, J., Maranzana, N., Mantelet, F., & Buisine, S. (2017). Social identity cues to improve creativity and identification in face-to-face and virtual groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, T. T. (2005). Informing the design of computer-based environments to support creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgrewe, U. (2014). New new technologies: The future and the present of work in information and communication technology. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. (W. R. B. Gibson, Trans.). Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G. (2023). Developing creative potential: The power of process, people, and place. Journal of Advanced Academics, 0(0), 1932202X231156389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x231156389
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., & Gaulin, J. P. (2005). A reexamination of brainstorming research: Implications for research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, P., Williams, S., Scott, P., & Fontinha, R. (2021). Varieties of flexibilisation? The working lives of information and communications technology professionals in the United Kingdom and Germany. New Technology, Work and Employment, 36(3), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemsdal, L., & Clegg, S. (2022). Defining the work situation in organization theory: Bringing Goffman back in. Culture and Organization, 28(6), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2022.2090563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohonen-Aho, L., & Tiilikainen, S. (2017). Constructing shared context for temporary teams in virtual worlds with informal interaction. In 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lal, B., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Haag, M. (2021). Working from home during covid-19: Doing and managing technology-enabled social interaction with colleagues at a distance. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(4), 1333–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10182-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2018). The effects of knowledge sharing on individual creativity in higher education institutions: Socio-technical view. Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-P. (2007). To share or not to share: Modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9119-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lua, E., Liu, D., & Shalley, C. E. (2023). Multilevel outcomes of creativity in organizations: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2690
   Google Scholar
• Luo, C., Lan, Y., Luo, X., & Li, H. (2021). The effect of commitment on knowledge sharing: An empirical study of virtual communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manroop, L., & Petrovski, D. (2022). Exploring layers of context-related work-from-home demands during COVID-19. Personnel Review, 52(6), 1708–1727. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-06-2021-0459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, M., Bach, N., & Oertel, S. (2022). Forced to go virtual. Working-from-home arrangements and their effect on team communication during COVID-19 lockdown. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(3), 238–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022221083698
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, K. L. (2018). Flexible work and the effect of informal communication on idea generation and innovation. In Academy of Management Proceedings, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• McGloin, R., Coletti, A., Hamlin, E., & Denes, A. (2022). Required to work from home: Examining transitions to digital communication channels during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication Research Reports, 39(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2021.2012757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, M., Vinchon, F., Pichot, N., Bonetto, E., Bonnardel, N., Girandola, F., & Lubart, T. (2021). COVID-19: A boon or a bane for creativity? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messenger, J. C., & Gschwind, L. (2016). Three generations of telework: New ICT s and the (R) evolution from home office to virtual office. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michinov, E., & Michinov, N. (2021). Stay at home! When personality profiles influence psychological adjustment and creativity during the COVID-19 outbreak. Current Psychology, 42(7), 5650–5661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01885-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell, G. J., & Cody, W. K. (1993). The role of theory in qualitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 6(4), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/089431849300600405
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moerer-Urdahl, T., & Creswell, J. W. (2004). Using transcendental phenomenology to explore the “ripple effect” in a leadership mentoring program. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300202
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Mouchiroud, C., & Bernoussi, A. (2008). An empirical study of the construct validity of social creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naotunna, S., & Zhou, E. (2018). Autonomy and creativity of professional teleworkers: The mediating role of creative self efficacy. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 10(3), 300–307. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/autonomy-creativity-professional-teleworkers/docview/1982192992/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Nemiro, J. E. (2002). The creative process in virtual teams. Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1401_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., Briggs, R. O., Mittleman, D. D., Vogel, D. R., & Pierre, B. A. (1996). Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(3), 163–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518138
   Google Scholar
• Ocker, R. J. (2005). Influences on creativity in asynchronous virtual teams: A Qualitative analysis of experimental teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2004.843294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R., & Da Silva, N. (2015). The impact of digital technology on the generation and implementation of creative ideas in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, N. L., Dzindolet, M. T., & Paulus, P. B. (1996). The effects of facilitators on the performance of brainstorming groups. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 11(4), 633–646.
   Google Scholar
• Parjanen, S. (2012). Experiencing creativity in the organization: From individual creativity to collective creativity. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 7, 109–128. https://doi.org/10.28945/1580
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3 ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, B. L., & Hyland, M. A. M. (2002). Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Kramer, W., Allen, J. A., Murugavel, V. R., & Leone, S. A. (2021). Creativity in virtual teams: A Review and agenda for future research. Creativity Theories–Research-applications, 8(1), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-0011
   Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & Vreede, T. D. (2012). Chapter 13 - team creativity and innovation: The effect of group composition, social processes, and cognition. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 295–326). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rese, A., Kopplin, C. S., & Nielebock, C. (2020). Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and creative performance in coworking spaces. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2327–2354. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Essentials of organizational behavior. Pearson Education (US).
   Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2017). Creativity and the management of technology: Balancing creativity and standardization. Production and Operations Management, 26(4), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Hildrum, J., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., & Mendez, D. (2023). Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies. Journal of Systems and Software, 195, 111552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39(3), 684–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terason, S., Yang, J., & Kulwanich, A. (2022). Virtual meetings experience in sports management organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic: A phenomenological inquiry. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2088636. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2088636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termini, C. M., Rutaganira, F. U. N., Palavicino-Maggio, C. B., Spriggs, C. C., Evans, C. S., & McReynolds, M. R. (2021). Using virtual interviewing to create a more accessible hybrid academic job market. Cell, 184(26), 6217–6221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tønnessen, Ø., Dhir, A., & Flåten, B.-T. (2021). Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meulen, N., van Baalen, P., van Heck, E., & Mülder, S. (2019). No teleworker is an island: The impact of temporal and spatial separation along with media use on knowledge sharing networks. Journal of Information Technology, 34(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396218816531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2015). Social information processing theory (CMC). In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, S. R. Wilson, J. P. Dillard, J. P. Caughlin, & D. H. Solomon (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1–13). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic192
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2007). Reflections on the use of a phenomenological method. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880701473425
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, R., Sawyer, J., & Griffin, R. (1993). Toward a theory of Organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., Joyce, C., Shah, N., Sherman, K., Hecht, B., & Teevan, J. (2021). The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C.-L., Yamashita, N., Kuzuoka, H., Wang, H.-C., & Foong, E. (2022). Distance matters to weak ties. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(GROUP), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492863
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, J., Chen, W., Xiao, Y., & Wang, B. (2022). Exploration of digital creativity: Construction of the multiteam digital creativity influencing factor model in the action phase. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar