Decision-making process towards real estate agents, landlords, and expatriate tenants’ criteria with perspective from principal-agent theory

References

• Appraisal Institute. (2020). The Appraisal of real estate (15th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Asare, E. K., Beldona, S., & Nketia, J. (2020). The principal, the agent, and the culture: Potential impacts of culture on financing contracts. The International Trade Journal, 34(1), 30–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2019.1693450
   Google Scholar
• Banks Pidduck, A., & Archer, N. P. (2006). Issues in supplier partner selection. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(3), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390610658450
   Google Scholar
• Benites-Gambirazio, E. (2020). Working as a real estate agent. Bringing the clients in line with the market. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1697954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolomope, M., Amidu, A. R., Filippova, O., & Levy, D. (2020). Property investment decision-making behaviour amidst market disruptions: An institutional perspective. Property Management, 39(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-06-2020-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnet, F., & Pollard, J. (2020). Tenant selection in the private rental sector of Paris and Geneva. Housing Studies, 36(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1769565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, L., & Connell, A. O. (2006). A brief history of decision making. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 32–41. https://hbr.org/2006/01/a-brief-history-ofdecision-making
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CB Richard Ellis. (2023). Bangkok Office Information. Retrieved October 30, 2023, from https://property.cbre.co.th/guides/bangkokofficerentlease.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, K. W., Choy, L. H., Chua, M. H., Lai, L. W., & Yung, E. H. (2023). Pro profits or non-profits? A principal-agent model for analyzing public sector planning decisions and empirical results from planning applications in Hong Kong. Cities, 137, 104291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104291
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. Y. K. (2014). Decision utility and anticipated discrete emotions: An investment decision model. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 15(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2014.908885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., Nakayama, M., & Ractham, P. (2018). The impact of social influence, information quality and online forum features on the credibility of doctors and hospitals for medical tourism services. International Journal of Health Information System, 10(4), 194. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJHISI.2015100102
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Wang, D., & Wang, B. (2021). Interface between context and theory: The application and development of agency theory in the Chinese context. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2019-0433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabholkar, P., & Overby, J. (2006). An investigation of real estate agent service to home sellers: Relevant factors and attributions. The Service Industries Journal, 26(5), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060600722882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, C., Li, Y., & Cui, Z. (2023). Understanding How heterogeneous agents affect principal’s returns: Perspectives from short-termism and bayesian learning. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 8(3), 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2022.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Falkenbach, H. (2009). Market Selection For International Real Estate Investments. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 13(4), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-715x.2009.13.299-308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (2004). Fairness and incentives in a multi-task principal-agent model. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.549241
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Workers Administration Office. (2020). Thailand’s expatriate statistics in May, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020, from https://www.doe.go.th/prd/assets/upload/files/alien_th/88ee4994ceb1195ef0a1468ae96796d3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, J., & Waller, W. (2005). Carrot or stick? Contract frame and use of decision-influencing information in a principal-agent setting. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(5), 709–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00187.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Property Guide. (2020). Global Rental Yields. Retrieved July 5, 2020, https://www.globalpropertyguide.com/rental-yields.
   Google Scholar
• Goetgeluk, R. W. (2011). The decision plan nets method. In S. Jansen, H. Coolen, & R. Goetgeluk (Eds.), The measurement and analysis of housing preference and choice (pp. 57–74). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grum, B., & Kobal Grum, D. (2015). A model of real estate and psychological factors in decision-making to buy real estate. Urbani Izziv, 26(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2015-26-01-002
   Google Scholar
• Hamman, J., Loewenstein, G., & Weber, R. (2010). Self-interest through delegation: An additional rationale for the principal-agent relationship. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1826–1846. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasu, E. (2018). Housing decision-making process explained by third agers, Finland: ‘we didn’t want this, but we chose it’. Housing Studies, 33(6), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1408785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, K., Ren, Z., & Yang, J. (2023). Principal-agent problem with multiple principals. Stochastics, 95(5), 878–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442508.2022.2125808
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. (2011). The multi-attribute utility method. In S. Jansen, H. Coolen, & R. Goetgeluk (Eds.), The measurement and analysis of housing preference and choice (pp. 101–126). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jariwala, H. V. (2015). Analysis of financial literacy level of retail individual investors of Gujarat state and its effect on investment decision. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 20(1–2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2015.977727
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. (2012). Designing for decision making. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60(2), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9230-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, K., Abrahams, A., & Ractham, P. (2016). E-Progression of nonprofit organisation websites: The US versus Thai charities. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56(3), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1153917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, K., Ractham, P., & Abrahams, A. (2016). Website development by nonprofit organisations in an emerging market: A case study of Thai websites. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 21(3), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., Devaraj, S., & Mahmood, M. (2004). Understanding determinants of online consumer satisfaction: A decision process perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D., Murphy, L., & Lee, C. (2008). Influences and emotions: Exploring family decision-making processes when buying a house. Housing Studies, 23(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030801893164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S., Gao, S., & Teo, L. (2008). Gap analysis of green features in condominiums between potential homeowners and real estate agents. Facilities, 34(11/12), 630–648. https://doi.org/10.1108/f-02-2014-0012
   Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2018). The principal–agent framework and independent regulatory agencies. Political Studies Review, 16(3), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916664359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matinheikki, J., Kauppi, K., Brandon–Jones, A., & van Raaij, E. M. (2022). Making agency theory work for supply chain relationships: A systematic Review across four disciplines. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(13), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2021-0757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirrlees, J., & Raimondo, R. (2013). Strategies in the principal-agent model. Economic Theory, 53(3), 605–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-012-0706-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munroe, M., & Versteeg, J. (2004). The decision‐making process in conspectus evaluation of collections: The quest for certainty. The Library Quarterly, 74(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1086/382846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (2004). Consumer decision making and image theory: Understanding value-laden decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online Exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prowse, P. (2012). Effective negotiation: From research to results - by Ray Fells. Industrial Relations Journal, 43(1), 85–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2011.00644.x
   Google Scholar
• Rauchhaus, R. (2009). Principal-agent problems in humanitarian intervention: Moral hazards, adverse selection, and the commitment dilemma. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannikov, Y. (2008). A continuous-time version of the principal–agent problem. Review of Economic Studies, 75(3), 957–984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00486.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. (2005). Agency theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sithipolvanichgul, J. (2021). Board of directors’ effectiveness and enterprise RiskManagement: Do effective boards improve risk oversight? ThammasatReview, 24(1), 133–167.
   Google Scholar
• Stamso, M. A. (2015). Selling a house and the decision to use a real estate broker in Norway. Property Management, 33(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-01-2014-0006
   Google Scholar
• Teeramungcalanon, M. (2020). An analysis of Consumer preference towards ThaiProducts on Chinese E-Commerce platform. Thammasat Review, 23(2), 1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tilton, J., Bilgili, H., Johnson, J., & Ellstrand, A. (2023). Toward an affect based view of principal–agent dynamics. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(3), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518221141258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tim, Y., Yang, L., Pan, S. L., Kaewkitipong, L., & Ractham, P. (2013). The emergence of social media as boundary objects in crisis response: A collective action perspective.
   Google Scholar
• Tuo, Y., Zhao, C., & Zhao, X. (2018). Multiple principal-agent relationships model based on fairness preference. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 21(4), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2018.1479166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanavičienė, V., Kaklauskas, A., & Zavadskas, E. (2009). The Conceptual Model of Construction and Real Estate Negotiation. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 13(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-715x.2009.13.53-70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar