Impact investing: a bibliometric analysis of scientific literature

References

• Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling (2nd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Börner, K., Klavans, R., Patek, M., Zoss, A. M., Biberstine, J. R., Light, R. P., Larivière, V., & Boyack, K. W. (2012). Design and update of a classification system: The UCSD map of science. PloS One, 7(7), 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantin-Marius, A. (2020). Sustainable finance: A bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature. International Journal of Management and Applied Sciences, 6(6), 21–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Amicis, L., Binenti, S., Maciel Cardoso, F., Gracia-Lázaro, C., Sánchez, Á., & Moreno, Y. (2020). Understanding drivers when investing for impact: An experimental study. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 86. 2020 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0447-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GIIN. (2016). Impact investing trends evidence of a growing industry. https://thegiin.org/research/publication/impact-investing-trends.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. L., Booth, A., Cargo, M., Hanne, s K., Harden, A., Flemming, K., Garside, R., Pantoja, T., Thomas, J., & Noyes, J. (2018). Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series paper 2: Methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 97, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höchstädter, A. K., & Scheck, B. (2015). What’s in a name: An analysis of impact investing understandings by academics and practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2327-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, S. M. (2021). Impact investing in social sector organisations: A systematic review and research agenda. Accounting & Finance, 62(1), 709–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliavacca, M., Patel, R., Paltrinieri, A., & Goodell, J. W. (2022). Mapping impact investing: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 81, 101679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, R., & Siddiqui, A. (2023). Banking service quality literature: A bibliometric review and future research agenda. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 15(5), 732–756. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-01-2022-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, R., Migliavacca, M., & Oriani, M. E. (2022). Blockchain in banking and finance: A bibliometric review. Research in International Business and Finance, 62(C), 101718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101718
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R., Goodell, J. W., Oriani, M. E., Paltrinieri, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2022). A bibliometric review of financial market integration literature. International Review of Financial Analysis, 80(C), 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102035
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25, 348–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsevier. (2022). About Scopus. https://www.elsevier.com/en-in/solutions/scopus.
   Google Scholar
• Skupin, A., Biberstine, J. R., & Börner, K. (2013). Visualizing the topical structure of the medical sciences: A self-organizing map approach. PloS One, 8(3), e58779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Global Impact Investing Network. (2020). Annual impact investor survey. https://thegiin.org/research/publication/impinv-survey-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). Springer.
   Google Scholar