1,300
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CULTURE, MEDIA & FILM

Hollywood Dubliners become personal: Joyce’s Gabriel morphs to John Huston in The Dead

& | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1848754 | Received 19 Apr 2019, Accepted 06 Nov 2020, Published online: 18 Nov 2020

References

  • Aragay, M. (Ed.). (2005). Books in motion: Adaptation, intertextuality, authorship (Vol. 2). Rodopi.
  • Backus, M. (2001). Sexual figures and historical repression in “The Dead”. In M. P. Gillespie (Ed.), James Joyce and the fabrication of an Irish identity (pp. 111–12). Rodopi. Print.
  • Brill, L. (1997a). Introduction. In W. Rothman & D. Andrew (Eds.), John Huston’s filmmaking (pp. i–xvi). Cambridge University Press.
  • Brill, L. (1997b). The Dead (1987). In W. Rothman & D. Andrew (Eds.), John Huston’s filmmaking (pp. 207–226). Cambridge University Press.
  • Bruzzi, S. (2013). Men’s cinema: Masculinity and mise-en-scène in Hollywood. Edinburgh University Press. Print.
  • Cartmell, D., & Whelehan, I. (Eds.). (2013). Adaptations: From text to screen, screen to text. Routledge.
  • Collins, J., Radner, H., & Collins, A. P. (1993). Introduction. In J. Collins, H. Radner, & A. P. Collins (Eds.), Film theory goes to the movies: Cultural analysis of contemporary film (pp. 1–7). Routledge.
  • Corcoran, M. (2011). Identity crisis in James Joyce’s Dubliners. Journal of Franco-Irish Studies, 2(1), 4. 56–72.
  • Corseuil, A. R. (2001). John Huston’s adaptation of James Joyce’s “The Dead”: The interrelationship between description and focalization. Cadernos de Tradução, 1(7), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.5007/%25x
  • Grønstad, A. (2002). The gaze of Tiresias: Joyce, Rossellini and the iconology of “The Dead”. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.115
  • Huston, J. (Director). (1987). The Dead [Film]. Dublin.
  • Huston, J. (2001). An encounter with John Huston, and Talking with John Huston. In R. E. Long (Ed.), John Huston: Interviews (pp. 19–49). Univ. Press of Mississippi.
  • Hutcheon, L. (2006). A theory of adaptation. Routledge.
  • Hutcheon, L., & O’Flynn, S. (2013). A theory of adaptation. Routledge.
  • Joyce, J. (2000). The dead. In Dubliners (pp. 216–278). Oxford UP.
  • Leitch, T. M. (2003). Twelve fallacies in contemporary adaptation theory. Criticism, 45(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2004.0001
  • Leitch, T. M. (2007). Film adaptation and its discontents: From Gone with the Wind to The Passion of the Christ. JHU Press.
  • Long, R. E. (2001). Introduction. In R. E. Long (Ed.), John Huston: Interviews (pp. i–xx). Univ. Press of Mississippi.
  • McFarland, D., & King, W. (2017). “Proceed with the Execution”: Casting, Convention, and the Diminishment of Rose in The African Queen. In D. McFarland & W. King (Eds.), John Huston as adaptor (pp. 107–124). Suny Press.
  • Meyers, J. (2011). Writing film biography: John Huston. The Antioch Review, 69(1), 86–100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41152202
  • Monterrey, T. (2011). Framed images as counterpoints in James Joyce’s “The Dead” [Imágenes enmarcadas como contrapuntos en’Los Muertos’, de James Joyce]. Atlantis, 33(2), 61–74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41473828
  • Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and appropriation. Routledge.
  • Tracy, T., & Flynn, R. (2010). Introduction. In T. Tracy & R. Flynn (Eds.), John Huston: Essays on a restless director (pp. 1–8). McFarland.
  • Tracy, T. (2010). Let’s just see if it matters. In T. Tracy & R. Flynn (Eds.), John Huston: Essays on a restless director (pp. 9–21). McFarland.