Persuasive Strategies utilized in the Political Speeches of King Abdullah II: A Critical Discourse Analysis

References

• Ahmad, A. A.-S., Hammo, B., & Yagi, S. (2017). English-Arabic political parallel corpus: Construction, analysis and a case study in translation strategies. Jordanian Journal of Computers and Information Technology, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.5455/jjcit.71-1497962566
   Google Scholar
• Akan, M. F., Karim, M. R., & Chowdhury, A. M. K. (2019). An analysis of Arabic-English translation: Problems and prospects. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(1), 58–15.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Khalafat, L., & Haider, A. S. (2022). A Corpus-Assisted Translation Study of Strategies Used in Rendering Culture-Bound Expressions in the Speeches of King Abdullah II. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(1), 130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Suod, Y., & Al-Matari, A. (2017). The translatability of emotiveness in political speeches of King Abdullah II of Jordan: A critical discourse analysis. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 5(8), 73–84. https://www.eajournals.org/journals/european-journal-of-english-language-and-literature-studies-ejells/vol-5-issue-8-september-2017/translatability-emotiveness-political-speeches-king-abdullah-ii-jordan-critical-discourse-analysis/
   Google Scholar
• Ayasrah, M. T. (2017). Problems encountered by MA students in translating metaphors in political speeches of King Abdullah II and their adopted strategies. Middle East University. https://meu.edu.jo/libraryTheses/58fefb6df0281_1.pdfREFERENCES
   Google Scholar
• Carreon, J. R., & Svetanant, C. (2017). What lies underneath a political speech?: Critical discourse analysis of Thai PM’s political speeches aired on the TV programme returning happiness to the people. Open Linguistics, 3(1), 638–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (1994). An encyclopedic dictionary of language and languages. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, L. A. (2021). Function words in Edgar Alan Poe’s a dream within a dream: A psychological analysis. Qalaai Zanist Journal, 6(1), 1002–1012. https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.6.1.37
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004
   Google Scholar
• Haider, A. S. (2016). A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of the representation of Qaddafi in media: Evidence from Asharq Al-Awsat and Al-Khaleej newspapers. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 4(2), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijlc.v4n2a2
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2000). Civil political discourse in a democracy: The contribution of psychology. Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology, 6(4), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327949PAC0604_01
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, B. (2017). Discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kempf, W. (2003). Constructive conflict coverage-A social-psychological research and development program. Conflict & Communication Online, 2(2). https://regener-online.de/journalcco/2003_2/pdf_2003_2/kempf_engl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khawaldeh, S. K., & Abu Hatab, W. (2018). King Abdullah II Anti-Terrorism Ideology: A Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective.
   Google Scholar
• Khawaldeh, S. K., & Abu Hatab, W. (2018). King Abdullah II anti-terrorism ideology: A critical discourse analysis perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 10(6), 97. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v10i6.13202
   Google Scholar
• Kitaeva, E., & Ozerova, O. (2019). Intertextuality in political discourse. In Language, power, and ideology in political writing: Emerging research and opportunities (pp. 143–170). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Meriam-Webester. (2022). Intertextuality.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, A. (2019). The linguistic functions in King Abdullah II of Jordan speeches. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(1), 1–9. http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJALEL/article/view/5239
   Google Scholar
• Obeng, S. G. (1997). Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse. 8(1), 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008001004
   Google Scholar
• Rabab’ah, G., & Rumman, R. A. (2015). Hedging in political discourse: Evidence from the speeches of King Abdullah II of Jordan. Prague Journal of English Studies, 4(1), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjes-2015-0009
   Google Scholar
• Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
   Google Scholar
• Tenorio, E. (2011). Critical discourse analysis, an overview. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 183–210. https://njes-journal.com/articles/abstract/10.35360/njes.247/
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• WordSmith. (2022). Word Smith Tools
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, S., Kim, D., & May, S. (2017). Discourse and education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wróbel, S. (2015). Logos, Ethos, Pathos. Classical Rhetoric Revisited, 191(3), 401–421. https://polish-sociological-review.eu/Logos-Ethos-Pathos-Classical-Rhetoric-Revisited,119915,0,2.html
   Google Scholar