Textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in political discourse: A case study

References

• Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69–16. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.218
   Google Scholar
• Albalat-Mascarell, A., & Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghazo, S., Al Salem, M. N., & Alrashdan, I. (2021a). Stance and engagement in English and Arabic research article abstracts. System, 103, 102681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghazo, S., Al Salem, M. N., Alrashdan, I., & Rabab’ah, G. (2021b). Grammatical devices of stance in written academic English. Heliyon, 7(11), e08463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C. (Eds.). (2002). Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1989). Mr. Darwin and his readers: Exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of ethos. Rhetoric Review, 8(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198909388880
   Google Scholar
• Crismore, A., Markannen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing. A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duruk, E. (2017). Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, V. (2016). Discourse of persuasion: A preliminary study of the use of metadiscourse in policy documents. Text & Talk, 36(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1998a). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1998b). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring writing in interaction (1st ed.). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse: Exploring writing in interaction (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, H. L. (2012). Discourse markers in political speeches: Forms and functions. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 23(4), 1260–1278.
   Google Scholar
• Kashiha, H. (2022). Academic lectures versus political speeches: Metadiscourse functions affected by the role of the audience. Journal of Pragmatics, 190, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, B. (1994). The role of metadiscourse in persuasion. Technical Communication, 41(2), 348–352.
   Google Scholar
• Mai, H. (2016). An intercultural analysis of meta-discourse markers as persuasive power in Chinese and American political speeches. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(6), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20160406.13
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, E., & Alghazo, S. M. (2021). Hedging in political discourse: The case of Trump’s speeches. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 13(3), 375–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mur-Dueñas, P. (2011). An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 3068–3079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
   Google Scholar