A pragmatic and discourse study of common deixis used by Yemeni-Arab preachers in friday Islamic sermons at Yemeni mosques

References

• Abbad, A Al, Georgios, Y., & Al Mansur, N. (2019). Persuasive Strategies in Academic Female Saudi Application Letter Writing. In Rhetoric. and Communications E-Journal 49 (IKEEART-2020-467).
   Google Scholar
• Abdulameer, T. A. S. A., & Suhair, T. A. (2019). A pragmatic analysis of deixis in a religious text. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 292–18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, M. (2017). Persuasion in religious discourse: enhancing credibility in sermon titles and openings. Discourse and Interaction, 10(2), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2017-2-5
   Google Scholar
• Adegoju, A. (2014). Person Deixis as Discursive Practice in Nigeria’s ‘June 12’ Conflict Rhetoric. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v3i1.2
   Google Scholar
• Akhimien, P. E., & Farotimi, Y. (2018). A study of the conversational features and discourse strategies in select sermons of pastor EA Adeboye. American Journal of Linguistics, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342016000300004
   Google Scholar
• Al-Azzawi, Q., & Obayes, (2021). Discourse Analysis of Deixises in Selected Narrative Discourse. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(13), 2679–2688. http://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/8980
   Google Scholar
• Alenezi, A. 2019. “A Systemic Functional Linguistics Analysis of the Discourse of English Friday Sermons.” The University of New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Khalidy, H., & Odeh, (2019). A Pragmatic Analysis of Spatial Deixis in the Discussions of the General Budget by the Jordanian MPs for the Financial Year 2017. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(1), 134–138.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhawaldeh, A. A. (2022). Deixis in English Islamic Friday Sermons: A Pragma-Discourse Analysis. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.21415
   Google Scholar
• Alsaawi, A. 2017. “Imams’ Language in Mosque Sermons.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Newcastle University.
   Google Scholar
• Alsaif, F., & Ahmed, H. (2011). Deixis in English and Arabic: A Semantic-Pragmatic Study and Its Pedagogical Implications. University of Pune.
   Google Scholar
• Alwan, Z. H., Mukheef, R. N., & Sabah Abbas, A.-S. (2014). Persuasive devices in English and Arabic sermons: A contrastive study. Journal Dawat, 1 (1). http://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/490535dce37e8906
   Google Scholar
• Ariel, M. (2014). Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents (Rle Linguistics b: Grammar). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arminen, I. (2017). Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aubali, F., & Ahmad, A. (2015). Deixis in Arabic and English: A contrastive approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(4), 118–124. http://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.118
   Google Scholar
• Azijah, D. P., & Ingatan, G. (2020). Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in Jacinda Ardern Speech at Christchurch Memorial. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.33365/llj.v1i2.594
   Google Scholar
• Bara, B. G. 2011. Cognitive Pragmatics: The Mental Processes of Communication. Walter de Gruter GmbH & Co.KG, Berlin/Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, A., Yueguo, G., & Steen, G. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics. Routledge London.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News Discourse (Vol. 46). A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Birner, B. J. (2012). Introduction to Pragmatics. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanowska-Jakubowska, E. (2021). The Discursive Representation of Places Significant for an Individual: An Analysis of Polish Academic Year Inauguration Speeches and American Commencement Addresses. In Various Dimensions of Place in Language Studies (pp. 118). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Slaskiego
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, N. R. 2001. “Pronouns of Politics: The Use of Pronouns in the Construction of’self’and’other’in Political Interviews.” The Australian National University, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. 4. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085.
   Google Scholar
• Chovanec, J. (2014). Pragmatics of Tense and Time in News: From Canonical Headlines to Online News Texts (Vol. 253). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, A. A. (2012). Deixis and Personalization in Ad Slogans. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 64(1), 526–530.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, J. (2010). ‘Do We Really Want to Be like Them?’: Indexing Europeanness through Pronominal Use. Discourse & Society, 21(6), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510381217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (2011). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (Vol. 30). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dahnilsyah, D. (2017). The Implied Power through the Use of Personal Pronouns in Obama’s Speeches: Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 1(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v1n2.p59-71
   Google Scholar
• Downes, W. (2010). Language and Religion: A Journey into the Human Mind. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eragbe, C., & Yakubu, S. (2015). The Use of Deixis and Deictic Expressions in Boko Haram Insurgency Reports: A Study of Selected Boko Haram Insurgency Reports by the Media. Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 3(3), 94–101.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. J. 1997. Lectures on Deixis. CSLI publications.
   Google Scholar
• Galib, S. A., Tsuraya, A. S., Abubakar, M., Nur, N. A., Nawir, M. S., & Nawir, M. S. (2022). The Different Uses of the Pronoun ‘We’by EFL Teachers in Classroom Interaction. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.21458
   Google Scholar
• Garner, M. (2007). Preaching as a Communicative Event: A Discourse Analysis of Sermons by Robert Rollock (1555-1599). Reformation & Renaissance Review, 9(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1558/rrr.v9i1.45
   Google Scholar
• Garzone, G., & Sarangi, S. (2008). Discourse, Ideology and Specialized Communication (Vol. 33). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Green, K. 1992. “A Study of Deixis in Relation to Lyric Poetry.” University of Sheffield. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1855/1/DX195813.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Green, K. (2020). Deixis and the Poetic Persona. In The Language and Literature Reader (pp. 127–136). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grenoble, L. A. (1998). “Deixis and Information Packaging in Russian Discourse.” Deixis and Information Packaging in Russian Discourse
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, W. F. (2011). 11. Deixis and Indexicality. Foundations of Pragmatics, 1, 315. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214260
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, N. (2005). ‘we do not seem to have a theory … the theory i present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverkate, H. (1992). Deictic Categories as Mitigating Devices. Pragmatics, 2(4), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.4.03hav
   Google Scholar
• Helmbrecht, J. (2002). Grammar and Function of We. In B.V. John Benjamins (Ed.), PRAGMATICS AND BEYOND NEW SERIES (pp. 31–50).
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L., & Ward, G. (2008). The Handbook of Pragmatics. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hutagalung, D. P. 2017. “An Analysis of Deixis in Donald Trump’s Speech to the Major Cities Chiefs Police Association in USA.” http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/5892
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inčiuraitė-Noreikienė, L. (2012). The Use of Deictic Elements in Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies. Verbum, 3, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.15388/Verb.2012.3.4969
   Google Scholar
• Irgens, B. M. 2017. “Person Deixis in Japanese and English-a Contrastive Functional Analysis.“ AIT Bjerch AS/ Universitetet i Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, S. (2021). Distribution of Discourse Markers Elements or Discourse Particle as an Entity Relationship in Discourse. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(3), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.656
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, A. (2016). Deixis and Its Role in Defining Rhetorical Space. Revista Signos, 49(92), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342016000300004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamil, A. K., & MAHMOOD Tala’a, S. U. F. Y. A. N. 2015. “A Linguistis Study of Persuasive Stratrgies in English Religiou Sermons.” Department of English. College of Educatio of Human Sciences, University of ….
   Google Scholar
• Kaewrungruang, K., & Yaoharee, O. (2018). The Use of Personal Pronoun in Political Discourse: A Case Study of the Final 2016 United States Presidential Election Debate. Reflections, 25(1), 85–96. http://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/136268
   Google Scholar
• Kermer, F. (2016). A Cognitive Grammar Approach to Teaching Tense and Aspect in the L2 Context. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa, R. (2018). A Deictic Analysis of the Political Discourse of Some of Donald Trump’s Presidential Speeches Based on the Discourse Space Theory. Sahifatul-Alsun, 34, 40–71.
   Google Scholar
• Khalili, E. (2017). Deixis Analysis in A Tale of Two Cities Written by Charles Dickens. International Academic Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Khaliq, A. F., & María Isabel Maldonado, G. (2019). A Deictic Analysis of Pakistan’s National Identity Representation in the Indigenous English Newspapers. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• la Cruz Díaz-Valdés, & Daniel de, 2017. “A Study of Political Manipulation in Discourse: Comparing Hitler and Trump’s Speeches.”
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, R. H., & Ward Gregory, L. (2006). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuwen, T. V. (1995). The Grammar of Legitimation. In London:. School of Printing, School of Media.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, K., & Guo, F. (2016). A Review on Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(5), 1076. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0605.23
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics: Volume 2 (Vol. 2). Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, I. I., & Kasim, Z. M. (2019). Interpersonal Metadiscursive Features in Contemporary Islamic Friday Sermon. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2501-06
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, I. I., & Kasim, Z. M. (2021). Metadiscourse Resources across Themes of Islamic Friday Sermon. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21, 1. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmaridou, S. S. A. (2000). Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition (Vol. 72). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maziad, M. E. (2019). The Language of Collapsing Power: A Cognitive-Lingusitic Critical Discourse Analysis of the Arab Spring Speeches of Mubarak. University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Menshawy, M. 2020. “The Legitimating Power of Discourse.” https://doi.org/10.1163/18739865-20202000
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, Anne, B. C., & Svenja, A. (2011). Introducing Pragmatics in Use. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Packard, G., Moore, S. G., & Brent, M. (2018). (i’m) happy to help (you): the impact of personal pronoun use in customer–firm interactions. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(4), 541–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradita, I. 2021. “The influence of introducing semantic knowledge to improve students’ paraphrasing skills.”
   Google Scholar
• Reichelt, S. (2017) K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, A. (2011). Voice in Political Discourse: Castro, Chávez, Bush and Their Strategic Use of Language. A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Rühlemann, C. (2018). Corpus Linguistics for Pragmatics: A Guide for Research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rumman, R. N. (2019). Persuasive strategies in Arabic Religious discourse: Evidence from the friday sermons of dr. mohammad rateb al-nabulsi. International Journal of Linguistics, 11(6), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v11i6.15799
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, A. (2017). Deixis in Modern Linguistics. Essex Student Journal, 9, 1. https://doi.org/10.5526/esj23
   Google Scholar
• Sušinskienė, S. (2013). The Usage of Deixis in Advertising Slogans Related to Fragrance. In Acta Humanitarica Universitatis Saulensis (pp. 17). Siauliai: Siauliu universiteto Leidykla.
   Google Scholar
• Vanda, K. H., & Péter, F. B. (2011). Gender Differences in the Use of the Discourse Markers You Know and I Mean. Argumentum, 7, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in Discourse and Communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, K. (1996). Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., WANG, & Zhu, (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis of Chinese Advertisement. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, A. E. (2014). Clusivity: A New Approach to Association and Dissociation in Political Discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. A. 1990. “Personal Project Dimensions and Perceived Life Satisfaction: A Quantitative Synthesis.” Carleton University.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. (2004). Spatial Demonstratives in English and Chinese: Text and Cognition (Vol. 126). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Xinin, C., & Xiaolan, L. 2021. “Critical Discourse Analysis of Inaugural Speeches by Trump and Biden Based on the Systemic Functional Grammar.”
   Google Scholar
• Yadin-Israel, A. (2015). Some Uses of Deixis in Rabbinic Hebrew. Journal of Semitic Studies, 60(2), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgv003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2011). A Cognitive Interpretation of Discourse Deixis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(2), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.2.128-135
   Google Scholar
• Yule, G. (2020). The Study of Language. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Zupnik, Y.-J. (1994). A Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of Person Deixis in Political Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(4), 339–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90010-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar